Report from the ACM DRM Workshop
Anonymous Coward writes "There's open skepticism from researchers about the ability of DRM to solve Hollywood's copy protection problems. Read Edward Felten's review here... Papers from the workshop are available online as well."
It worked for this post...
Bar, Qrpelcg QEZ cebgrpgrq zrqvn
Gjb, Dhrfgvba Znex, Dhrfgvba Znex, Dhrfgvba Znex
Guerr, Cebsvg Rkpynzngvba Znex, Rkpynzngvba Znex, Rkpynzngvba Znex
they should watermark paper. That way noone could copy it!
Oh wait...
no one wins, but the rich get richer.
I think one could just use that reply for every article ever posted on Slashdot.
Think of all of the big bit $$$ from your job as a DRM architect.
Shhhhhh....don't spoil the IT industry economic recovery.
Ah, yes, that's the problem alright, no one ever taught the people using Kazaa that stealing is wrong. It's all so clear now. Of course moral virtue is acquired by a good education!
...
--
And interesting sig. So a religion is a small, unpopular, large, popular, small
--
Researcher allowed to talk bad about DRM?
And the DCMA allowed this? What loophole?