Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft vs. Modded Xboxes

hikeran writes "The Register has an article about how Xbox live service is now apparently banning Xboxes that have been mod chipped. Basically it seems this is one of the many uses of those unique id's used in Microsoft's software. Next up bannings for using foul language on Xbox live service?? Be careful what you say.. you may be playing with an Xbox Live admin..."

26 of 699 comments (clear)

  1. Um...so?? by davmoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right or wrong, good move or bad, being as how its their service, Microsft can ban who ever the hell they want.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Um...so?? by mentin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I agree - but they should at least refund people's money or properly warn them in the first place.

      I think people who installed mod chips pretty well know what they were doing. Also, XBox 'box' probably contains lots of labels warning users that opening the case breaks any warranty.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    2. Re:Um...so?? by domninus.DDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even though you purchase an xbox, that doesnt bring them any profit. They lose at least 100 dollars on each xbox they sell, but make it up in licencing on games (this is how almost every game console works.) So even though you bought an xbox, if you play burned games you cost them money.

    3. Re:Um...so?? by Ponty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm down with what you're saying in principle, but it's just silly to think that the consumer should abide by certain perceived or actual rules that are a result from the pricing and marketing decisions of the vendor. They're in such separate domains that it's daffy to think that they should have any bearing on each other in the world or the mind of the consumer.

    4. Re:Um...so?? by grmoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know why the heck the above comment was modde3d insightful.. It is missing the obvious point.

      If someone sold you a secondhand car that worked -despite- having the seats replaced by the previous owner, would you be angry that the car dealer no longer allowes you to drive the car?

      Just because an X-Box was modded has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on whether or not it -works-.

      I wouldn't blame Microsoft for not warranting the modified Xboxes. Fine.

      What is bothersome is when an otherwise perfectly working (modified or not, makes no difference) Xbox no longer works because Microsoft has DECLARED that it won't.

  2. Their rules by ruszka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't really see this as such a bad thing... My ISP does not support home networking, so they will not give help until the network is taken down and proven to not be causing the problem.. Microsoft's support team was not trained to deal with modded xboxes, so I can see why there would be a rule to not giving support to those with the mods done.

    1. Re:Their rules by mentin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Did you read the article? It essentially states that people are being permanently (FOREVER!!!) banned from XBox live (which they paid for), using the Xbox, which they paid for, if it had a mod chip installed.

      You are wrong: people were not "permanently (FOREVER!!!) banned from Xbox live". Only their modded Xbox'es were.

      They are not "using the Xbox, which they paid for", they are using modded Xbox. Makes the difference, does not it?

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
  3. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You'd think Microsoft didn't have the right to refuse service to anybody they wanted to, especially people they thought could potentially ruin the service.


    Slashdot uses the same rationale to justify its IP banning and $rtbl'ing. But hey, it's "M$", so it must be wrong!

  4. Level playing field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't this just help maintain the integrity of the game play? Can't modded X-Boxen be altered to give unfair advantages by changing the software like players did in Unreal?

  5. Modding should be banned! by eMilkshake · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As an xbox live subscriber, I take comfort that the 13-year old blowing me to bits (and bits and bits) hasn't downloaded hack o' the week to beat me. There are so many ways to subvert online gaming it really is getting tiresome. So, preventing modded boxes is an effective way of prevention.

    Btw, users can nark on anyone for foul language -- it doesn't have to be caught by an admin. (Again, foul language seems to mainly come from 13-year olds who think it makes them sound older.)

    1. Re:Modding should be banned! by tc · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I would think differently about this if it was a FREE service, but it's not. I am paying to play these games online, I expect to do as I please.

      Why should you expect to do as you please? If you're disrupting the service for others, they have every right to ban you - pay or no pay. If I buy a ticket to a movie, that doesn't give the right to act as a please in the theater - the management could quite reasonably throw me out if I distrupted the experience of other paying customers.

      Indeed, one of the things you are paying for when you subscribe to Xbox Live is precisely that it is a controlled service. You are paying for a reasonable expectation that people are not going to cheat, or be consistently abusive. You know that when you sign up.

    2. Re:Modding should be banned! by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The way it should be:
      Microsoft implements a disk checksuming feature which ensures the copy of the game you are playing on your modded X-Box is authentic according to their database. Also included is a detection feature such as the one currently employed to detect the mod chips. If the checksuming hardware has been modified, deny the user. If the mod doesnt' affect checksumming and the validity of the games can be confirmed, allow the user to play. Everyone is happy.
      The way it really is:
      MS doesn't want to piss of content providers by allowing region coding to be broken. Nor is it willing to show that it will tollerate bending the rules of the DMCA, for any reason, valid or otherwise. Nor is MS smart enough to come up with a good plan the first time and by the time anyone realizes, it's way too late.
      The way it should be:
      Microsoft should work with those interested in using their device to do other things than play video games. For once there is actual geek intrest in a Microsoft product (a hardware one at that), and especially interesting is there is intrest from the Linux community. This is their chance to make some bucks of the people they fear are going to run them into the ground. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Microsoft should also make changes to accomodate those who wish to import content from other areas of the world for their own use, and usually pay top dollar to do so. Seriously, what exactly IS the big deal with me playing some awsome video game which was only released in Japan?
      The way it really is:
      I'll be buying a PlayStation 2 and a GameCube.
      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  6. Good! by Chester+K · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It'll help keep cheaters off XBox Live. A cheat-free online game experience is something most people I know would give their first-born for.

    And as fair as the implication that Microsoft banning people who've modded their XBox, as soon as you modded your XBox, stop whining and just take some responsibility for your actions. It's not like you didn't know full well what you were getting yourself into when you cracked open the case and started messing around with a soldering iron.

    --

    NO CARRIER
  7. It's MS's Service. by A+Commentor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't like MS's terms, just don't use it... Vote with your money... don't buy the XBOX, don't buy XBoxLive...

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

  8. The summary isn't really fair. by kaosrain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm all for modchips in Xboxes, it's one of the large reasons I use them (I helped work on them before the protection scheme got cracked.) However, I believe it is fair for Microsoft to ban the use of modchips on their Xbox Live service. We all know that Microsoft loses money on their Xboxes, and the regain it with the games. If a player is costing them money, I don't believe they have a right to complain when they can't utilize another (in my opinion) underpriced service. Further, this won't stop everyone, as dual-BIOS setups (one with the regular BIOS and one with the modified chip) for the Xbox have been around for ages.

  9. I can't believe I'm torn... by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as I hate to admit it, I'm torn between my hatred for the heavy-handed M$ action, and the proported resoning that it will help prevent cheating in their online games.

    Nothing destroys a game community faster than the proliferation of cheaters. And, the Xbox stands to profit nicely if it can develop those communities (it's certainly not profiting without them). If I pay my hard-earned money every month to play an online game, the last think I want is to have no chance to fairly compete.

    On the other hand...is that what's happening, or is this just another excuse to enable the control freaks at M$ to continue their reign?

    --
    Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
  10. if this weeds out cheaters then so be it. by revoemag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a game producer that has worked on online games, I will say that this is a very good thing. You don't know the trouble that we go through to make sure that people do not cheat in an online game and you know what, they figure out a way around it anyway. This is the first time that we have hardware level control over the game .exe's integrity. With MS's code sign system the game .exe is not hackable and this is a good thing for all of us. Hacking RUINS online games and if this is what they have to do to stop it then ok.

  11. Good for them. by Keebler71 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How many times have your heard a "Leet" Linux nazi shout RTFM? Well, in this case RTFE. (EULA). It is their service. The box is your hardware Now, I'll side with you that you have the right to modify said hardware anyway you choose. IMHO, you paid for it, you can use it how you want... however connecting to their network is completely another matter.

    Why would they want to be responsible for some hacker bringing down their server because they hacked their box to do [fill in the blank] and screwed with some important protocol or something that causes their server to crash?

    As for using foul language... what is your problem with that? Again, their server, they make the rules. You are not entilted to anything. If you have problems with their rules, than I suggest you don't buy one. Oh, and anti-language rules are relatively common in MMRPGs so it's not like that would be so shocking either. I actually prefer to play games with others who do not continuously spam my screen sexually immature comments.

    Where is all the outrage about all those stickers on your components that say "warranty void if removed"? Or do you only rant about Microsoft (that was rhetorical).

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  12. Good for microsoft! by grahamsz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft aren't doing anything illegal here, put simply - to use xbox live you require an original microsoft xbox.

    People should be free to mod their hardware as they see fit (since it's theirs).

    This is a bit like me fitting rocket boosters to the back of my car and driving it around at 200 mph. Sure i can do it and that's probaly legal. Driving it on public roads is of course not.

    Anyway i thought everyone that bought xbox mod chips wanted them to make them into linuXBoxes - what the hell will they be doing with xbox live, what they realy need access to is apt-get live :)

  13. Think first, then post by kaosrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I will admit that not everyone uses modchips for legal purposes, but there are many uses for them other than pirating games. With a modchip, you can write and run your own code, and run Linux, things you cannot do on an unmodified box.

  14. Talk about DoS... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I buy an Xbox, have it connect through a sniffing proxy (a linux box with a modem and a serial nullmodem connection). Then I mod it, do the same. At this point, I should be able to start spoofing Xboxen, with fake or even strategically chosen GUIDs. That asshole that beat me at Q3 3 times last sunday? He better hope his GUID isn't available to me through my proxy. The admin who chewed me about about saying "cunt" in the #kindergarden area of Xbox Live? He better hope I can't find his GUID.

    Hell, you might even just start carpet-bombing things. I can imagine even writing a little worm, that goes out hitting cable modem users, who still have a dialup. Late at night, it dials out to the service, and spoofs a modded Xbox. Hundreds of them, thousands of them. This could be fun...

    I mean, there are cryptographic methods that could prevvent something like this, but after all, we are talking about M$.

  15. Re:Censorship by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, it's worth noting that the article says nothing about banning for using foul language. It's what I like to call a "story troll" like the headline about GM corn yesterday.

  16. Its a great thing too... by pcx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No modchips to let you cheat :-)

    It's not unprecedented either. Drop in a modchip on your cable converter to get HBO for free and see how fast your cable company splices YOUR wire when they find out.

    Hack YOUR copy of quake or unreal and see how many anti-cheat servers will let you log on if they discover you're not running the default client.

    It's very, very simple. If you don't like the rules, don't join the service.

  17. Re:What do the users have to say? by TCaM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have the Live service and where I do tend to disagree with a great many things that MS has done and continues to do, I do agree with this. Any device that modifies the XBox, such as a modchip could also likely be used to load modified code that would and will most assuredly be used by pinhead assholes to cheat. Having seen this type of cheating on the PS2 with certain online games, and also with just about every online PC game I have no sympathy for the people who do this and get banned.

  18. Modchips are not illegal... by Fulg0re- · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This modchip issue has been quite the 'problem' lately in the Xbox 'scene'. I, like many others, have a modchip in my Xbox, and also have Xbox Live! Now, how is this possible?

    It's actually a matter of simply installing a switch. When I'm using Xbox Live!, I simply use the switch to disable my Enigmah modchip (use a DPDT switch for wires 15 and 21). That turns off the modchip, and there's no conceivable way that Microsoft can detect the presence of the chip because the voltage going to the chip is simply shut-off.

    If a person wants to use their modded Xbox, do not go on Xbox Live! What this means is that one should disconnect the network cable going to their Xbox when the chip is enabled, and presto.

    So that's how to by-pass Microsoft's pseudo-detection. The overarching issue, however, is if Microsoft has a right to 'ban' modchip users from the Xbox Live! service. Arguably, they do because their is always the possibility of users downloading 'hacks' and 'cheats' for Xbox Live! enabled games. This would obviously be 'unfair' to other legitimate users, as well as Microsoft. And obviously, they have a right to protect their service.

    Perhaps someone may argue that the modchip detection deters piracy. Maybe, but the amount of people who have the technical skills to install a modchip are arguably a negligible amount. In my case, soldering ~ 30 wires for my chip was a huge hassle. I doubt any of my friends and collegues could have done so. Nor would they even bother. How many people really want to run Linux on their Xbox just because it can be done?

    In the end, if a person has the 'smarts' to install a modchip (even if it is the no-solder Matrix/Xodus chip), they should also have the intelligence to forsee that using such a chip has obvious consequences.

  19. Speaking as one who works at EB... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I can tell you that the average consumer isn't going to have any problems with this. Most of these folks don't even know what a mod chip is, and wouldn't install one if they did. Most folks are basically honest, and they just get even more honest if you inform them that they won't be able to play online if they install a mod chip. Furthermore, I would be willing to bet that the "average consumer" will actually be in support of it. I'm constantly hearing people complain about the rampant cheating in various game communities. If Microsoft takes an active role in banning those who abuse their services & hardware it'll be seen as a step towards eliminating cheaters.

    The folks who do care about mod chips usually fall into two categories - collectors and pirates. The pirates want mod chips so they can play all their games without having to pay for them...and honestly, I can't think they'd be terribly surprised by getting banned. The collectors usually want mod chips so they can import games that aren't available here in the US...but that really isn't a problem (yet) with the Xbox. Sure, there are also some other folks who mod their Xboxes...tinkers and developers and such...but again, I don't think they'd be very surprised to get banned.

    yrs,
    Ephemeriis

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde