Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Star Trek Nemesis Preview Online

Posted by michael on from the to-boldly-view-what-no-man-has-viewed-before dept.

T-Kir writes "Originally from a news link at Trekweb, iFilm has a preview of Star Trek Nemesis in WMP, Real and Quicktime formats, it is also recommended you view with a broadband connection. [ed. snip] All in all a nice piece of eye candy until the films release on December 13th." This is a long trailer with lots of spoilers - you've been warned.

14 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. Advertising by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm surprised that I haven't seen more (any really) previews on television for Nemesis. Maybe I just haven't caught them but I usually catch at least one television preview for any given big-budget movie during it's marketing time. The only advertisements for Nemesis that I've seen have been posters in theaters when I'm out seeing some other movie. Am I the only one who thinks that this film may suffer from a poor marketing campaign? Heck, I didn't even know when this film was slated to come out until this ./ story!

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
    1. Re:Advertising by TeeWee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The lack of PR is strange, even more when you consider it's stuck between a couple of heavy hitters like James Bond, LotR and Harry Potter.

      Sure, ST will get its traditional crowd to the theaters, but to get the mainstream to watch, it needs to contend with the aforementioned which are well hyped up. If people decide to go to one movie this Christmas period, it would probably be a toss up between LotR (great movie last time round) and Harry Potter (for both kids and adults). It looks like ST will lose out big time...

  2. *looks* fantastic! by girl_geek_antinomy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this trailer in the cinema last night, as it happens, and boy, do the effects look good on a big screen...

    But isn't it about time the Next Gen crew went off into quiet retirement and someone else got a shot at a Trek movie? At least this one looks darker and more interesting than some of the recent output...

  3. AICN reviews aside, this movie sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm not personally hopeful for this installment of the ST movie series. There are some excessively stupid plot elements involved, such as the whole "save us at the last second" thing that has been beat to death, the cliché of cloning and the Data transferrance thing. I don't want to be more specific so as to give away the movie, but if it's anything even remotely like the script summaries I've read linked from AICN, then this movie will be a huge flaming turd on arrival. Yeah, Harry Knowles is a Hutt with a slime trail behind him, but this time I think he's got the right idea. Sad way to end this branch of the movie series with this crew.

  4. No thanks by lazyl · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I find trailers that give away too much of the movie to be very annoying. Thanks for the warning! I'm going to stay away this time.

    --
    Aw crap, ninjas!
  5. Star Trek 11 will rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Star Trek XI: The Search for Data will be the best movie since Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.

  6. Re:Spoilers?? by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll field the first question, but really, I get the feeling you're just being trite.

    So:

    > How does the preview of a movie rate a /. story? Hey, I'm gonna post the Apple quicktime area as a "story."

    It answers this in the header: "News for nerds." Last I heard, the jocks were still leaving most of the seats in any given theatre showing a Star Trek movie empty, thoughtfully leaving them for the nerds.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  7. True.. by ABetterMan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Only the biggest trekkies will be at this release.
    Wil Wheaton was cut. I read that Patrick Stewart almost walked because the studio was trying to lowball him on pay. I'm not as excited about this movie as I could be.
    Planning on releasing the movie right inbetween the newest bond and the two towers (that preorder tickets go on sale tomorrow, btw).
    How's a ST movie supposed to compete with Halle Berry? :P
    It just seems like they shoulda tried to release it before "Die Another Day" to get higher opening day ticket sales, instead of battling the other two movies for income.
    True, but I dont think Patrick Stewart cares - his X-Men 2 movie is coming out soon.. so he should be swimming in (very much deserved) money either way.
    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.
  8. Criticizing the plot.. by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Criticizing the plot of a Star Trek movie is like going out and buying a "Fat Chicks with Huge Jugs" magazine and complaining about the lack of literary value.

    It's a Star Trek movie. Of course it's going to be mindless action and sci-fi. Duh. Doesn't mean it's not worth seeing (though it may well not be :).

  9. *Spoilers* by OneFix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those that don't already know... this movie is rumored to be the starting point for a new series ("Fall of the Federation") to star Riker, Troi, etc (no Picard or Data)... Read about it here...which would explain the comment Picard makes in one of trailers...

    1. Re:*Spoilers* by vaguelyamused · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A "Fall of the Federation" series could be interesting if done correctly. Maybe have the Federation imploding into civil war with all the other factions (Romulans, klingons,etc) taking and changing sides. It helps that FX technology has improved dramatically. I like TNG but a lot of the lame episodes (holodeck episodes for example) seemed to come at the end of a season when the FX budget was running dry. I also liked the idea of Enterprise but detest Bakula as the captain.

      --
      STOP ROCK VIDEO
  10. Re:What I want to see in a Star Trek movie... by Zorikin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Between TOS and TNG, the warp scale was changed to an exponential one. Warp factor 1 - speed of light - is consistent between serieses, but as warp factor approaches 10, effective speed approaches infinity. TNG ships regularly move at or beyond what, in TOS, could have been called warp factor 11.

  11. direct large QuickTime link by EjectButton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://anon.ifilm.speedera.net/anon.ifilm/qt/porta l/2457975_200.mov

    they might change it but it's working now

  12. Re:Too much info in trailers by agrounds · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think the real problem is that most movies are so rehashed, uninspired, and predictable these days that we can easily tell what the entire thing will be like regardless of the trailer.


    Agreed. When I came back to the US, after living in South Korea with no American radio or television, I went with my friends to a movie they wanted to see. The only thing I knew was it was called "Ghost and the Darkness". I bought my ticket and watched the flick with the rest of them. When the realization of what was happening and why was revealed, I was just engrossed. 'Wow!' 'How wild is that?' 'Imagine!'
    My friends were very ho hum, and when we walked out at the end, said they didn't care for the movie, and that was it. To me, walking in totally blind to everything but the movie name, it was a great flick. They already knew what was going to happen because of the previews.

    Even better was when I happened upon "Horror Planet" one day while surfing the UHF. I watched it from beginning to end, and when it did end (no spoilers here) I just sat there in my chair totally dumbfounded. 'That's not how movies end' 'WTF?' Then about an hour later, it hit me. How incredibly cool was that? Not only was it not predictable, but it completely threw cinematic convention out the window. Terrible movie, but hey, you should watch it just to see it all the way through. Don't read any spoilers though, it'll take away from the experience.