Slashdot Mirror


Genesi Introduces Dedicated MorphOS PCs

Velcro_SP writes "When was the last time a company had the nerve to attempt a worldwide introduction of an all-new desktop computer with dedicated OS? Genesi has been demonstrating prototypes all around Europe, most recently in Poland, in the USA, and is even making noise about Moscow. Throwing all caution to the wind they are moving past beta stage, announcing the consumer release scheduled to occur at an Aachen, Germany convention on December 7th and 8th. The Pegasos is a PPC processor-based computer designed and manufactured in Europe. It runs MorphOS, a PPC OS based on the Quark microkernel."

45 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. amiga? by JamesCronus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this looks aweful similar to the thing that amiga, are doing, seems like they are settgin themselves up for comepetition. i hope this wont go the same way the BeBox went

    --
    dybia felly dwi a hampster (i think therefore i am a hampster)
    1. Re:amiga? by ColdGrits · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is compatible with all existing Amiga software.

      which isn't surprising as a fe years back when Gateway owned Amiga and wanted nothing to do with a new OS, the MorphOS crew started writing an Amiga-compatible next generation PPC-based OS.

      Later, then Gateway sold Amiga to AmigaInc, and enough users pestered them, they decided to do a new AmigaOS. there was a possibility of them adopting MorphOS, but sadly internal politics (AmigaInc were friendly with Hyperion who hate the MorphOS crew, so AInc listened to Hyperion and gave them the contract instead) screwed it up.

      Meanwhile, MorphOS has gone from strength to strength and advanced way beond a mere next-generation AmigaOS.

      Shoudl be good!

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    2. Re:amiga? by Captain+Zion · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It is compatible with all existing Amiga software.

      Note that certain applications such as demos or games actually execute on UAE. According to the MorphOS overview page, they "believe that UAE is good enough to provide the functionality for applications that demand very true custom chip hardware emulation. Demos and Games are programs that are outdated very fast and they don't play such an important role to set the direction of future OS development", so no Protracker and Technological Death running in native mode. I wonder what happens with games/demos that require AGA?

    3. Re:amiga? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but is it also Amiga HARDWARE compatible? I read something quite a while ago that stated that it is physically impossible for normal FDDs to read Amiga(D)OS formatted disks... Would I be able to stick my old Amiga games into the bloody machine and play them? (This time while being able to read and understand english)

    4. Re:amiga? by Captain+Zion · · Score: 4, Funny
      This look awful similar to a microwave, that's it.

      Indeed. It will probably look great with a chicken cooking screensaver.

    5. Re:amiga? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      IIRC uae supports aga.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:amiga? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      another try:

      iirc uae emu's aga (&ecs)gfx arch.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:amiga? by anarkhos · · Score: 2

      What the hell is an FDD?
      -a mac user

      --
      >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
      >life
    8. Re:amiga? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2
      What the hell is an FDD?

      One of the reasons why I like normal x86 PCs better then Macs. (Not bashing Mac here people, just explaining why I like PCs better.)

  2. Next week on Slashdot by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gnutella Introduces Dedicated MorpheUS PCs! Let the swapping begin!

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  3. Yeah, actually... by evil_one · · Score: 4, Informative

    When was the last time a company had the nerve to attempt a worldwide introduction of an all-new desktop computer with dedicated OS?

    Ever heard of Be, Inc. or the Be Box?

    --
    Desperation is a stinky cologne
    1. Re:Yeah, actually... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The BeBox was not an all-new computer; it was an existing reference board with an added IO board for all the ports. The BeOS was not a dedicated OS; It ran on various PPC macs from the beginning and ported to x86 shortly thereafter. The only thing all-new about the BeBox was the case, which I admit was pretty damned cool. I hope I can pick up another BeBox someday (I used to have a 66MHz) so I can put a PC in it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Yeah, actually... by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, BeOS did not ran on Macs from the beginning -- that was years after the introduction of the BeBox. I remember this because I subscribed to the Be Newsletter and watched the development from early on.

  4. Winamp? by RomikQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can clearly see winamp or xmms in this picture. Does that mean their kernel supports windows/elf binaries?

    --
    Join the elite! Post at score:2! Ghostwheel is online.
    1. Re:Winamp? by Gropo · · Score: 3, Informative

      My guess is that it's AmigaAMP (or a dirivative thereof), rather than some sort of kludgy Win32 emulation...

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  5. More details on the OS..... by mickwd · · Score: 5, Informative
  6. What is this thing. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    So I click on the first link and get a screenshot of an OS running on a microwave. Hmmmm.

    I click the second link, and after some digging, figure out that this is a legacy free port of the old Amiga OS.

    My question is, what is this? An OS for microwaves? Graphics/Multimedia a la BeOS? Something to hack with? Or is it all about Amiga nostalgia?

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:What is this thing. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      The microwave has to have an OS. How else will you admin it?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  7. Last Dedicated OS/Computer Combo by MacGod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "When was the last time a company had the nerve to attempt a worldwide introduction of an all-new desktop computer with dedicated OS?"

    Umm, the BeBox/BeOS and NeXTCube with NextStep come to mind.

    So, how long till *these* guys get a buyout off from Apple?

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Last Dedicated OS/Computer Combo by Gropo · · Score: 4, Funny
      So, how long till *these* guys get a buyout off from Apple?
      Probably right after Razor Scooters gets a buyout from Segway...
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  8. What the? by ToadSprocket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When was the last time a company had the nerve to attempt a worldwide introduction of an all-new desktop computer with dedicated OS?
    Well, SGI had a neat little thing going there for a couple of years. Look where they are now. "But their machines are still used for rendering blah blah blah" Yeah and Hasselhoff is big in Germany, your point?
    It runs MorphOS, a PPC OS based on the Quark microkernel.
    Don't know too mych about Morph, isn't it designed to play ROMS for amiga games or something fairly niche like that?
    I don't really think this is big news. What is the target market for this thing? How far could it even go? Linux can't even make a dent in the windows marketplace, and look at all the muscle they have behind them. (take it easy now folks, Linux is great and I pray to the penguin every night, just demonstrating how far this thing will or will not go) Down boy!

    --


    If this article confuses you, don't worry. It was posted yesterday in a much clearer fashion.
    1. Re:What the? by jacquesm · · Score: 2

      SGI went under (and for those disputing that fact check their market share) because of management failure upon failure.

      The 02 was a pos when it came out, more warranty failures than you can count (I know, I own one), then they drop their own pretty good line and start making PC's running NT, not the best market to get your users to switch to if you have been bashing that same platform for years and care about your bottom line.

      Add to that the little cherry of buying out an ailing supercomputer manufacturer (cray) and the picture is complete.

      Too bad, I have owned a couple of indy's and IRIX is still one of the best os's I have ever worked with (QNX excepted)

    2. Re:What the? by the+gnat · · Score: 3, Informative

      SGI wasn't ever a "desktop" company anyway, contrary to what the parent poster said. They were always a workstation company, and Indys and O2s were intended for power users (though I've heard of them being used as office machines). They filled the same niche as the Sparcstations- the Indy and the Sparcstation 4 were introduced at about the same time.

      I haven't had much trouble with the O2, but I've never been very impressed either. SGI's customer base was people who needed something twice as powerful as the best PC and were willing to pay through the nose for it. The Indigo2 cost as much as a luxury car but was worth every pennny. Now with PCs (and Linux) not sucking quite so much, and with NVidia et al. churning out cheap, fast graphics chipsets, SGI has to focus on a higher-end (and lower-volume) market. They still make great "superworkstations" and visualization systems, but they'll never be able to make another Indy.

      The Cray-style systems are the one area where SGI is still going strong. We just bought an Origin 300, and even though the processors are slower for most tasks the overall architecture is far superior to anything in the PC world, and will probably remain so for years.

      What continues to impress me about their machines is how well they age; I still use an Indigo2 and I'd never call it "fast" but it runs "smoother" than any other computer/OS I've ever used. And that's with a recent Irix revision- not bad for a 9-year-old computer.

  9. MorphOS Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the MorphOS site. Posted Anon because I know it is whoring.

    This document was written to describe MorphOS, how it came about, its workings, its current status and future plans. Special thanks go to bplan and the MorphOS developers for the great deal of assistance given.

    Introduction

    MorphOS is a new Operating System for PowerPC RISC microprocessors which runs on the Pegasos computer and PowerUP (CyberstormPPC, BlizzardPPC) expansion cards for the Amiga. It has also been tested on the Mai Logic Teron CX and Teron PX evaluation boards. In the future MorphOS will also run on other Open Firmware based PowerPC machines and possibly some PowerPC based Apple Macintosh computers as well.

    It currently runs on 603e, 604e, 750 and 7400 (Original G4) PowerPC processors.

    MorphOS is a well named combination of the old and the new. It originally started in 1995 with a plan to migrate Amiga to PowerPC but eventually 'morphed' into an entire Operating System in it's own right which includes compatibility with Amiga applications. In the future it will change again becoming a truly modern, highly advanced operating system yet retaining compatibility with existing applications through it's system of OS boxes.

    In the Beginning - The History of MorphOS

    To add some perspective and for completeness, before going into detail, this section describes how the MorphOS project started and it's subsequent history.

    The Amiga started on its long arduous path to the PowerPC processor in 1995. While there have been and still are other projects to do this, with MorphOS 1.0 the original project is finally being completed.

    In September 1995 there was an agreement between Amiga Technologies and the German company phase5 to develop a migration path for the Amiga to move to the PowerPC from the Motorola 680x0 (68K) series processors which were coming to the end of their life, this was the genesis of the MorphOS project.

    Unfortunately this agreement was short-lived as Amiga Technologies' parent company Escom went bankrupt. However the project did not die as phase5 decided to go ahead and continue with the migration process. This lead to phase5 launching in 1997 a series of PowerUP add-on cards for the Amiga providing RISC based acceleration for the first time. Programs ran on both the 68K and some functions were accelerated through the use of the PowerPC processor and a PPC native library.

    There were many plans made and agreements between phase5 and other companies but as the numerous twists and turns in the Amiga story occurred companies went out of business and none of these plans came to fruition, eventually with the decline in the Amiga market phase5 themselves went bankrupt. Later a new company, bplan was formed and the project was picked up again but this time it was to be completed as an Operating System in it's own right without any components from the original. In 2000 as it moved towards completion, MorphOS was released as a public beta for PowerUP card owners.

    The 2002 public MorphOS 1.0 release on the PowerPC based Pegasos represents the final chapter in the 7 year long transition to PowerPC from the original 68K based propriety hardware. MorphOS does not require the original hardware or include any of the original system software but it does very much include the same spirit and feeling - a computer which is fast and fun to use!

    The Structure of MorphOS

    The MorphOS System is based around the minimalist Quark microkernel. On top of the kernel are currently two "Boxes" the first, currently in the final stages of development is the A-Box, the second box currently in development is the significantly more advanced Q-Box.

    At the time of writing (November 2002) most development has focused on the A-Box but considerable design work has been done on the Q-Box.

    The A-Box can run Amiga RTG (Re-Targetable Graphics) applications as it includes a complete PowerPC native clean-room reimplementation of version 3.1 of the Amigas' Operating System (herein AOS) and a JIT (Just In Time compiler) based 68K emulator.

    The Q-Box on the other hand shall be new and will require it's own applications, but by including compatibility with Amiga applications through the A-Box, MorphOS is able to start with an existing, mature application base while the Q-Box is in development.

    It is also possible that in the future other boxes may be added allowing compatibility with applications from other operating systems. Possibilities here are to add Unix / Linux and BeOS application compatibility. It should however be noted that these are only possibilities at this point and various issues have to be considered before adding compatibility for these systems.

    The A-Box

    The original purpose of MorphOS was to keep the Amiga alive by providing an upgrade path to modern hardware.

    Users can already use emulators to run original applications on other platforms but these work by emulating the 68K processor and the custom chips. While this emulation is complete and accurate, a great deal of potential performance is lost in doing all the emulation.

    While MorphOS has moved on from what it was originally built for it still retains compatibility with AOS 3.1. However it uses a different technique which allows software to take full advantage of modern hardware. The A-Box includes a clean-room implementation of the AOS 3.1 API created using publicly available documentation. This has been written and compiled on the PowerPC so it is nearly 100% native. There is also a 68K emulator for existing applications, the performance of which is boosted significantly by a JIT (Just In Time compiler) which converts 68K code into native PowerPC code then caches it largely removing the overhead emulation usually incurs. In addition to being native, the A-Box is faster than the original at running applications due to different techniques and being used withinthe system. This provides a further boost in system performance.

    For maximum performance however it is a simple process to compile code natively to the PPC. This allows Amiga applications to take full advantage of the PowerPC CPUs' performance.

    One important point to make however is that there is no emulation of the Amiga custom chips. Consequently MorphOS cannot itself run applications which require them. This is not as much of a problem as one might imagine since applications from AOS 2.0 onwards have been able to use API calls which are not hardware dependant. If a user wants to run applications which require the custom chips (e.g. many games), they can use UAE (Ubiquitous Amiga Emulator), this provides emulation of the full Amiga hardware and runs on various platforms including MorphOS.

    AOS originally ran on what are now obsolete systems with only a fraction of the computing power available in today's modern microprocessors. Amiga speeds were quoted in MIPS (millions of instructions per second), the MIPS rating for a 1Ghz IBM G3 is over 2,000 times higher than the original 68000 based Amiga. Despite this the original Amigas responsiveness was - and still is - very high. Consequently, given that the A-Box provides a more efficient PPC native implementation, it's responsiveness will appear surprisingly fast to any PC owner especially given the relatively low clock speed (600MHz) of the initial systems.

    File Systems Support
    MorphOS supports a number of File Systems and others can be supported via plug-ins:
    OFS (Original File System)
    FFS (Fast File System)
    FFS 2 (Fast File System 2)
    PFS 3 (Professional File System 3)
    SFS (Smart File System)

    Chill Out - The Ambient Desktop The MorphOS desktop replacement for Workbench is called Ambient and being part of the A-Box feels like the environment it emulates. It is able however to take advantage of the changes and advancements in the graphics system so unlike the Amigas' Workbench it supports 24bit displays and blending. Displaying the contents of a window while it's moving is another feature provided by the graphics system used by Ambient. MUI (Magic User Interface) is also incorporated making Ambient highly customizable.

    Other Graphical Enhancements
    Unlike the original, the graphics system is now fully abstracted away from the hardware, it has also been significantly enhanced with many new features such as transparency and overlays. Accelerated 3D graphics are implemented using the Rave3D API and a wrapper for the Warp3D API is in development, OpenGL compatibility is also in the pipeline.

    The Audio system has also been improved with the addition of AHI, this is a retarget table API for Audio so Applications can take advantage of systems with audio hardware better than the original (these days, all of them).

    When launched AOS was a highly advanced operating system, it included pre-emptive multitasking in 1985 - a feature not added to other desktop Operating Systems (i.e. to Windows or MacOS) until much later. Compared to modern Operating Systems however, the Amiga has it's fair share of limitations, i.e. there is no memory protection or virtual memory present as standard.

    Because it includes a faithful re-implementation of the AOS 3.1 API specification the A-Box design was largely fixed and could not be made radically different. Consequently the A-Box has many of the same basic limitations present in the original. Some of these have been worked around with extensions but in some cases the limitations are either too difficult or impossible to remove without completely breaking compatibility with applications. These however are limitations of the A-Box, not MorphOS as a whole, the Q-Box shall not have these problems.

    Q - The Future of MorphOS

    The Q-Box
    Up to now the development has been concentrated on the A-Box. In the future this focus shall switch to Q.

    Q shall consist of an enhanced Quark kernel, a set of servers to provide functionality and the Q-Box in which applications run. The Quark Kernel itself is very small providing a hardware abstraction layer, drivers, memory management and message passing. Most of the real work will be done in the servers, i.e. Networking, File System, GUI, Media, Security, 2D/3D Graphics etc.

    Applications shall run in the Q-Box and make API calls via a message passing system. The API shall not be locked to any single programming language so application developers will not be required to learn a new language. The message passing is also extremely fast, instead of transferring the data in the message, the memory location of the message is remapped to the application where the message is due. Small messages are directly copied as this method is faster for very small amounts of data.

    Scalability and Other Bits
    The message passing system used within MorphOS means the system can be highly scalable. The components sending and receiving messages can be running on different processors or even physically different computers and the messages will still get there. A windowing system over a network (a-la The X Windowing System) could be implemented in this manner but the result is likely to be a great deal more responsive. An X Windows compatible wrapper is planned so X Windows applications can be ported but the resulting speed on the desktop will be very different from those using current X Windows implementations.

    The distributed capability of Q messaging means clustering will be possible without having to rewrite the entire OS. Applications requiring massive numbers of processors will be relatively simple to write under Q. One requirement of large scale applications is a large memory footprint, workstations and large servers have been 64 bit for many years now but this is yet to reach consumer level Operating Systems. Q was designed with 64 bit capability in mind from the start, it shall not be a bolt-on to an existing 32 bit OS. Applications will, from the start have access to address ranges much, much larger than existing desktop Operating Systems.

    Microkernel Vs Macro Kernel
    A common problem encountered in the development of microkernel Operating Systems is speed. This is due to the CPU having to context switch back and forth between the kernel and user processes, context switching is expensive in terms of computing power. The consequence of this has been that many Operating Systems have switched from their original microkernel roots and become closer to a macrokernel by moving functionality into the kernel, i.e. Microsoft moved graphics into the Windows NT kernel, Be moved networking inside, Linux began as a macrokernel so includes everything. This technique provides a speed boost but at the cost of stability and security since different kernel tasks can potentially overwrite one another's memory.

    Given the above, one might wonder why Q can be based on a microkernel (strictly speaking it's only "microkernel like") and still expected to perform well. The answer to this lies in the fact that MorphOS runs on PowerPC and not x86 CPUs. It is a problem with the x86 architecture that causes context switches to be computationally expensive. Context switching on the PowerPC is in the region of 10 times faster, similar in speed to a subroutine call. This means PowerPC Operating Systems can use a microkernel architecture with all it's advantages yet without the cost of slow context switches. There are no plans for an x86 version of MorphOS, if this changes there will no doubt be internal changes to accommodate the different processor architecture.

    Transition
    At time of writing the Quark kernel exists but is incomplete. The rest of Q is still only at the planning stage, the large details have been worked out but the fine details have yet to be filled in. Drivers are for instance included in the A-Box where they can get to the hardware directly. In the future the drivers shall be moved into the Quark kernel where they will be independent of the A-Box and indeed of any other boxes, this has the advantage of making them usable by all the boxes. This move has been pre-planned so drivers were written with it in mind and the move shall be a relatively trivial operation.

    Vapour Where?
    Almost all the information here about the Q-Box is in the future and this could lead to accusations of us generating vapourware. We are only setting out our goals here and how we plan to achieve them. However as is normal in the world of computing things change so this is all subject to change. Development of complex systems always takes a great deal of time, we are looking at ways of getting the system into the market as soon as possible but the final product will of course take time.

    The future will expand on the work already done and provide MorphOS users with a truly modern Operating System designed and built by now long experienced developers who know the benefits and advantages of the past but also have the knowledge and experience of what not to do and the paths not to follow.

    Further Information

    For details of MorphOS news and links see: www.morphos-news.de

    For more details of the Pegasos main board see: www.pegasosppc.com

    v1.1 Copyright Thendic-France SARL November 2002

    All terms and names used in this white paper are trademarks and property of their respective owners.

  10. Slightly off-topic: Amiga PDA. by jfisherwa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I never understood why nobody ever went the route of making an Amiga-based PDA. 68k. Originally built for "low-resolution" (320x240). Lightweight OS with a small footprint. Plentiful applications already available.. and an interface that is extremely gratifying in its responsiveness.

    *shrug*

    1. Re:Slightly off-topic: Amiga PDA. by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Yes, and that's the same sort of resolution as most keyboarded PDAs - which are much the best, after all

      I have to say I agree with this idea, but you don't use the custom chips. You use the existing RTG standards and then put in whatever cheap GFX and sound controllers you can get. It worked for the Draco after all...

      Yes, it won't run most AOS stuff out of the box but they're not really designed for a PDA anyway. The point is, it would be relatively cheap hardware with a clean, simple, easily extensible OS that's already well understood by developers. I strongly suspect it would have happened years ago if it wasn't for Amiga's various financial and ownership questions.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  11. What is MorphOS ? read on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    The target of the Quark microkernel is to provide modern functionality for a new OS layer and to run as many RTG friendly applications we loved from our old Commodore(TM) A1000, A500, A2000, A1200, A3000(T) and A4000(T) systems as efficiently as possible.

    Therefore we are doing an API compatible PPC reimplementation of the OS using our own and AROS' technology, which we call A-Box. The goal is to extend the A-Box with new functionalities which it painfully needs and also work on a new OS layer using Quark functionality called Q-Box.

    Older software, which accesses the custom chip hardware, will directly play no role in our OS plans. This is because it would only hurt the project's goal to be as fast as possible as custom chip emulation requires too much cpu performance.

    We believe that UAE is good enough to provide the functionality for applications that demand very true custom chip hardware emulation. Demos & Games are programs that are outdated very fast and they don't play such an important role to set the direction of future OS development. A version of UAE for MorphOS is available here.

    Because we believe that the original OS design has strong limits for newer technology through its design structure, we also plan a completly fresh and clean OS layer on top of the Quark kernel (called Q-Box now).

    The A-Box API was nice in its time, but today it has serious limitations because it doesn't hide OS structures and has no concept of memory ownership. This doesn't even cover all kinds of problems in many of the other system modules like layers, graphics, intuition or DOS which we at least try to resolve as far as possible with our A-Box extensions. As a consequence, we will not replicate the A-Box API in the Q-Box but we will try to do a new API without any compromises to the past but based on past experience.

    There is a general MorphOS FAQ on the Support Page. This answers many general question you may have.

    The people behind MorphOS have worked on most of the key products for this market since Commodore(TM) died. A few products we developed were:

    Fastlane - First Zorro3 DMA SCSI controller
    CyberStorm - First 68060 CPU card
    CyberGraphX - The first 24Bit OS RTG
    Several innovative Graphics Cards like
    CyberVision64
    CyberVision64/3D
    CyberVisionPPC
    CyberStormPPC & BlizzardPPC - The only PowerPC CPU cards & Wide SCSI system for this market
    New Hardware developments
    G-Rex - DMA capable PCI extension for the PowerUP cards
    Pegasos - A PowerPC 2xAGP MicroATX CHRP system
    Both will be supported by MorphOS

    Anon cos i dont need the karma

  12. More Pegasos/MorphOS screenshots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    For more powerful Screenshots showing the Pegasos (Motherboard) and MorphOS (Operating System) in action please go here. A lot of Galleries!

  13. What is it with the Germans? by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    Genesi has been demonstrating prototypes all around Europe, most recently in Poland, in the USA, and is even making noise about Moscow.

    Everytime they invent a new technology the first thing they try to do with it is invade Poland and Russia! :-)

  14. Re:amiga?-Launch by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

    AmigaOS4 screenshots

    Jeebus. Those screen shots are even uglier than the ones on Red Hat's site.

    --

    I write in my journal
  15. Excuse My Ignorance, But... by occamboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What does this system do that:
    • Can't be done as well or better already, AND
    • That a large number of people want, or could be induced to want?
    i.e., what is the selling proposition here?
  16. Problem: Motorola by bstadil · · Score: 4, Informative
    Motorola is an awful company to do business with unless you are a volume user. They haven't a clue that its important to seed smaller designs with good pricing to win mindshare and have innovative designs flurish.

    TI understand this and look who won the DSP battle. (other reasons granted)

    Moto will charge you twice the price for half the performance vs x86 and still wonder why they are not able to make inroads. By the way Coldfire next gen. 68k has done ok but they are fumbling / killing this as we speak, ARM / Xscale will be the winner.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  17. cool by zogger · · Score: 2

    cool, the machine itself looks like the quicktime player to me, like a screen cap got changed into a piece of hardware.

    here's list of apps if anyone is interested and hasn't clicked over.

    new software
    program: version:
    CVS 1.11.2
    Frogger 2.05
    Frogger Codecs 1.4
    xquiz 1.2
    nettoe 1.1
    mp3ai release 0
    deutex 4.4.0
    tictactoe 1.2.1
    surfboard 1.1.5
    othello 0.03
    ID3ren 1.1
    wget 1.8.2
    Mencoder CVS 06.10.2002
    SDL 1.2.5
    Poseidon 1.31
    ahi.device 5.29
    ScummVM CVS 23.09.2002
    guigfxlib 19.2
    Freeciv 1.13.1
    ScummVM BE 0.2.0

    frogger, heh, still got that one some of my coal burning macs, heh, if it's that same frogger that is!

  18. Really want these things to move... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...then make the base nice and small. And give me a flat screen. Maybe wide-screen format! Yeah! And add a nice gui, and some good usable apps for chat, DVD burning, mail, some web services, music... uh... wait... nevermind.

  19. There's something wrong in the article by AMiGR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, they actually don't present prototypes, these boards are the production version of the Pegasos MB. What is still in beta (and will still be for some time, probably till 8/Dec) is MorphOS.

  20. Catweasel MK3 PCI/Flipper board by Mike+Bouma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Another interesting product which will be sold at the Aachen fair is the new Catweasel MK3 PCI/Flipper board. This PCI board can be used with AmigaOne boards, Pegasos boards, Classic Amigas and even ordinary PCs to read just about any disk format using ordinary mainstream diskdrives (including 880kb/1,76 MB Amiga disks), connect digital c64/Amiga/Atari joysticks, connect Amiga keyboards or even add a real c64 SID soundchip'.

    Here's a picture:
    http://home.t-online.de/home/indcomp/bin/cwmk3.jpg

    For more infor turn here.

    Previous slashdot coverage.

    Also interesting for Retro fans is that an ATX form factor c64 clone will be launched at the upcoming fair as well. (No kidding!)

  21. When? by mbogosian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When was the last time a company had the nerve to attempt a worldwide introduction of an all-new desktop computer with dedicated OS?

    1997: Be, Inc.

  22. Quark Microkernel joke.. by [cx] · · Score: 2, Funny

    It must take a really DENSE person to program one of those hahaha

    ahhh.. i kill myself with those ones!

    [cx]

  23. Solution: Port AmigaDOS (or similar) to Palm by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    There's a zillion motorola-based devices out there in the form of coldfire which should have no trouble running legacy 68000 code, so if you brought AmigaDOS (or AROS) to PalmOS you could probably run existing binaries. The best part is that all you would have to do is add a couple new drivers (which run in userspace) to the kernel ROM image and it should work okay. Well, and convince palm to port graffiti to AmigaDOS, or write your own HW recognition system.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. Re:Yes, you can read Amiga disks by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
    The only differences were in the software.

    No, no, no. If the only differences were in the software, PCs would be able to read amiga floppies with just some software, and they cannot. The floppy controller used in most PCs is not capable of reading/writing 880k and ~1700k amiga floppies (I forget how big the high density ones are.)

    Macs used a multi-speed drive to get 800k; I think it's got three different speeds. The drives were provided by sony. This is, BTW, the original "Superdrive" and the primary reason I'm annoyed with apple today - You don't bring out a product at one time which reads PC and Mac floppy disks, which is called a SuperDrive, and then later bring out a DVD-RW and also call it a superdrive. Call it a SuperMegaDrive, or stick it up your ass and whistle, but don't call it a SuperDrive.

    (End of rant)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. Re:drive component names by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 2

    You don't bring out a product at one time which reads PC and Mac floppy disks, which is called a SuperDrive, and then later bring out a DVD-RW and also call it a superdrive. Call it a SuperMegaDrive, or stick it up your ass and whistle, but don't call it a SuperDrive.
    I agree; that annoyed me like the dickens myself. But you gotta give 'em credit for having called the drive chip for the *original* high density floppy drive the "Super Woz Interface Module" i.e. SWIM. In all those years of the wintel folks giving chips names like TI-78 Foo Interface Driver System , it was always comforting to read specs from Apple.
    Of course, now the rest of the world has chips with names like Dragonball Z and Apple just makes iWhatever.
    *sigh*.
    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  26. Re:Reminded once again... by selectspec · · Score: 2

    Oh, I forgot. All Americans are idiots. Nothing intelligent ever happens in the USA, and just the stupid people of the world emmigrate to America.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  27. Re:Who's going to buy these things? by downix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Initial market, of course, is to developers. Notice it's placement at CeBIT (heavily developer-oriented show) and other developer shows. The price is low enough to convince many shadetree coders to take a look into the system, especially those that remember the ease of coding on the Amiga. Lock in a core of developers, you get apps. Once you get apps, then you can attract joe-schmo users. Till then, the best bet is to attract the "way cool" buying folks and developers.

    Then look at the other boards they have coming. Eclipsis, a PDA-scaled board... how many PDA's do you know that run the same OS as your desktop? Makes developing for them super-easy. And sharing software and data would also be easy... great USP for businesses and software makers.

    MorphOS API's are designed around a distributed setup, message-passing similar to QNX. It would also be simple to make MorphOS-based supercomputers, something many developers will not ignore for long.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  28. Re:Foolishness by lexus99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How often do we have to learn this lesson? Small proprietary OSs are doomed propositions, especially when tied to a hardware architecture. Every few years we go through this again. Lisp machines, Amiga, OS/2, BeOS, etc. and on and on.

    You have these choices in PC operating systems: Windows, Mac and the free OSs. And there's no guarantees on the Mac either.

    Ok, granted you admit the Mac may be doomed, but look what you just said. This is no different than the Mac. In fact, the Mac is a perfect example of an OS being tied to the hardware.

    Please show me the difference(s) here between what Apple is doing and what this company is doing.

    What would really help them out here to make MorphOS run on multiple hardware designs, like x86 for example

  29. Re:Foolishness by anarkhos · · Score: 2

    Well there were 7 million amigas sold

    --
    >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
    >life