Linus Torvalds On Linux 2.6

ceebABC writes "Linus Torvalds talks about the upcoming Linux 2.6 kernel, in an interview with eWEEK. Linus discusses the scalability and memory management in the new kernel. They also have a story about what's supposed to be in Linux 3.0."

Comments

Re:Version 3.5?!

[joshua404]

Welcome to the REAL WORLD were your mad linux skills are worth about as much as a monkey fart, you filthy asshole always looking for a handout. The country wasn't MADE by lazy fucks like you, always wanting something for nothing. Quit giving each other faggot AIDS and then looking to me for free healthcare, you dumb cunts.

AOL is on version 8, so it must be better than Linux version 3.

Re:Amazing coincidence

[L. VeGas]

Because I'm good enough, I'm strong enough, and gosh darnit, people like me.

Oh, and I'm not such a wimp that I post as AC, I have the courage to post under an anonymous pseuodonym, thank you.

Re:Interesting

[dagg]

The "kernel" holds all of the important gateways and modules. A good example of a gateway is here:

Sex Gateway

Rumor has it that this particular gateway will not be included in the next release. Only Linus knows why.

Re:Slashdot Beatitudes

[Lord Apathy]

Ahh, only if I had some mod points. Beutiful, brings a tear to my eye. You don't mind if I print it out and frame it do you?

Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55

[NormAtHome]

I checked all available news sites and can't verify this. I'm no Stephen King fan but if you post stuff like this you better damn well be right.

Re:Slashdot Beatitudes

[MrEd]

"Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after The First Post: for they shall have the Third or Fourth Post."

More like the #4752899th post (or whatever #1 is called nowadays)

Brought to you by the international pedants' association.

Linus' Linux is way behind...

[checkyoulater]

Is version 2.6 as good as version 7.3 of Redhat Linux? How come Linus Linux is so many versions behind Redhat Linux?

dude, you fail for the clasic troll bait....

[Pengo]

Serious.. like nobody falls for this one.

And you took it, hook line and sinker.

hehehe

Re:dude, you fail for the clasic troll bait....

[NormAtHome]

Please, if you're going to insult me at least use correct spelling and grammar. By the way "Dude" went out with Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure, remember we're in the 21st century here.

By the way, glad to see the reports of your early demise have been greatly exaggerated.

Re:Slashdot Beatitudes

[Sj0]

Blessed are those who mouth off about a business model while remaining ignroant of the fact that service is a lucrative business model in many instances.

Re:Ah, the memories

[NineNine]

Actually, I really don't like porn at all. I spend on average 10 minutes a day doing maintenance on the site, and that's it. Trust me, you see 10,000 or so pairs of tits & asses, and after that, they're all the same. Same thing for software, as far as I'm concerned. Oooh, look, another program that boots my computer. Oooh, yet another word processor. Wow. Ooooh, another web browser. It just sounds like the original poster may have some unhealthy obsession or worship type of thing going on... kinda creepy.

Re:LVM

[GreyWolf3000]

If you get good enough karma, all posts start at 2 unless you specifically tell it not to include the +1 bonus, like this one.

Re:what is up?

[tps12]

Yet you have no problem with the karma joke in your sig?

As it says in my sig, I really was the first to put my "obfuscated" karma in my sig. Initially I had it tracking my real karma (though it was pretty consistently "Excellent"), then for a short time I had a joke, and then when I noticed how popular Karma: sigs had become, I decided to claim my rightful place as the inventor.