It's sad that the first thing I thought of when considering such a train in the U.S. is terrorists. Sure, normal trains can be derailed, but derailing a train going 581kph would make bigger headlines.
How many Internet users, or even how many computer users there are in North Korea, remains unknown, although an Associated Press wire agency report on the email service said that few are believed to have any access. Leader Kim Jong II is known to be online, and has repeatedly mentioned the importance of computer technology.
There is complete privacy because Leader Kim Jong II is the only one allowed online.
Local TV stations, which are supported by residents in their areas, will struggle to further improve their community ties. In fact, the wave of digitalization will pose questions about their very reason for existing.
If they have to ask, then they should just give up now.
A person shall not manufacture, import, or package for sale or distribution in the United States any cigarettes unless its package bears a label:
stating, at a minimum, that the package contains or bears a radio frequency identification tag, and that the tag can transmit unique identification information to an independent reader both before and after purchase; and
in a conspicuous type-size and prominent location and in print that contrasts with the background against which it appears.
Seriously, is there still room to put warnings like this on cigarette packaging? With the cancer warnings and cartoon camels (not anymore:)), how much room is left?
Exactly. Microsoft keeps the competition afloat just long enough to keep the anti-Monopolists off its tail. Once the heat is off, drop off the competition at the nearest truck stop. I'm sure there is more to it then this, but this explains why Microsoft just didn't bury Corel to begin with.
One ISP, which asked not to be named in this story, received a letter listing the IP address of users who had shared movies, along with infringement times and dates.
Tracking by IP address is becoming more and more useless all the time. You can basically just wardrive around your neighborhood until you find an open network, and then download all your warez from there. Who will get in trouble? Not you!
Some people can even connect to other networks without leaving their own house (some California houses are really close together). You could even target someone to get in trouble just by using their open network (they might have thought they were being generous).
... to dramatically increase funding for promising new methodologies in the field of "human somatic cell engineering," which bypass entirely fetal stem cells.
I'm happy that this was brought up. I am getting tired of all the talk about banning this research and banning that research. There are certainly ethical ways to do things that don't necesarilly require banning large areas of research.
The book is considered definitive, and yet, the authors still answered the "little people"s questions. The first time that Randal Schwartz answered one of my perl questions in a newsgroup, I about fell outta my chair.
I'd be willing to bet that the architect of a replacement would certainly think about improving the original work. This doesn't mean having to change the outward appearance necessarily, it just means using electricity instead of fire, for example.
But it is great to actually read it. Sometimes common sense things need to be written down just to verify that your techniques really do make sense. There are so many great little tidbits in the article, I'm having trouble picking one out to really comment on. Here's one:
An important part of this approach is iterative development, where you run the entire software life-cycle many times during the life of a project. Agile processes run complete life cycles in each iteration, completing the iteration with working, tested, integrated code for a small subset of the requirements of the final product. These iterations are short, usually running between a week and a couple of months, with a preference towards shorter iterations.
A big issue with iterative development is that the QA folks will quickly fall behind and become very anxious. What's the solution to that? Either embrace the QA person to get closer to the real development environment, or if that is impossible, get a new QA person. That's the only way to succeed.
Humans will develop much larger asses so as to no longer need to purchase couches. And wheels. Evolution will finally come up with wheels. Who would have thunk it?
As for animals, they will be genetically developed to grow human faces and replacement butts. We're already growing human ears on rats, so you just know we're going to be growing full blown cosmetic replacements for every starlet in Hollywood.
What's he doing now-a-days? I always thought he was cool. Maybe it's just his name? His show must of had quite a budget to do some of the stuff that
he did. I think it was owned by Disney.
In this case, that's a very good point. I wonder, though, whether he had any warning that his page was really going to get posted. Regardless, the author asked for it:-).
Slashdot Mirror
perl -e 'print "seconds left: ", ((2**30) - time), "\n"'
It's sad that the first thing I thought of when considering such a train in the U.S. is terrorists. Sure, normal trains can be derailed, but derailing a train going 581kph would make bigger headlines.
There is complete privacy because Leader Kim Jong II is the only one allowed online.
If they have to ask, then they should just give up now.
Hand bar operates automatically
Nice :).
The Digital Deli Online
A person shall not manufacture, import, or package for sale or distribution in the United States any cigarettes unless its package bears a label:
Seriously, is there still room to put warnings like this on cigarette packaging? With the cancer warnings and cartoon camels (not anymore :)), how much room is left?
That's a great idea for a group. May I ask how many people usually show up at the meetings? Are there other groups like this outside of Santa Ana?
Exactly. Microsoft keeps the competition afloat just long enough to keep the anti-Monopolists off its tail. Once the heat is off, drop off the competition at the nearest truck stop. I'm sure there is more to it then this, but this explains why Microsoft just didn't bury Corel to begin with.
last post (mine)
Tracking by IP address is becoming more and more useless all the time. You can basically just wardrive around your neighborhood until you find an open network, and then download all your warez from there. Who will get in trouble? Not you!
Some people can even connect to other networks without leaving their own house (some California houses are really close together). You could even target someone to get in trouble just by using their open network (they might have thought they were being generous).
I'm happy that this was brought up. I am getting tired of all the talk about banning this research and banning that research. There are certainly ethical ways to do things that don't necesarilly require banning large areas of research.
If Mr. AC doesn't respond to this post, he fail it. He fail it.
Because if you use your new computer after washing your hands with anti-bacterial soap, you could kill all the little buggers.
The book is considered definitive, and yet, the authors still answered the "little people"s questions. The first time that Randal Schwartz answered one of my perl questions in a newsgroup, I about fell outta my chair.
I'd be willing to bet that the architect of a replacement would certainly think about improving the original work. This doesn't mean having to change the outward appearance necessarily, it just means using electricity instead of fire, for example.
A big issue with iterative development is that the QA folks will quickly fall behind and become very anxious. What's the solution to that? Either embrace the QA person to get closer to the real development environment, or if that is impossible, get a new QA person. That's the only way to succeed.
As for animals, they will be genetically developed to grow human faces and replacement butts. We're already growing human ears on rats, so you just know we're going to be growing full blown cosmetic replacements for every starlet in Hollywood.
What's he doing now-a-days? I always thought he was cool. Maybe it's just his name? His show must of had quite a budget to do some of the stuff that he did. I think it was owned by Disney.
still testing. you fail it.
Still missing it. Darn.
testing. Still missing an important one.
In this case, that's a very good point. I wonder, though, whether he had any warning that his page was really going to get posted. Regardless, the author asked for it :-).
--sex
--sex