Optical Cellphones
foondog writes "Here is a story over at News.com about optical cellphones. It seems that the Department of Defense has given a grant to the University of California to develop optical cellphones that are faster and more secure. This sounds a little strange to me since you would need a line of site with no obstacles in the way to use this. The article doesn't explain how this might work."
I belive he was refering to the mis-spelling of 'site'. In this context, the appropreate spelling is 'sight'.
It probably has something to do with the "seams" mentioned in the second sentence, or with the "obsticals" mentioned at the end.
We're always learning new things. For example, I always thought that an editor's job was to check for errors (spelling, grammar, factual, etc.) in articles before publishing them...
RMN
~~~
Commence massive spelling correction project in
5...4...3...
Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
belive: no, believe.
refering: no, referring.
mis-spelling: no, misspelling.
appropreate: no, appropriate.
it seams like the editor made yet another spelling error...
Sig you!
I'm firmly convinced that none of the editors have more than a third grade reading level, and they wait to see the spelling complaints in response to the story so that they know which words are spelled incorrectly.
SITE != SIGHT
Learn how to spell, fuckhead.
You misspelled(2 S's):
E
*BELIEVE
*REFERRING
*MISSPELLING
*APPROPRIAT
And TECHNICALLY he is guilty of bad grammer, not misspelling. Site is actually a word, but not the one he wanted.
Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
Correcting myself: grammar
Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
I'm sorry for the rant, but for the last couple of years Slashdot has become a swamp. Half the articles are from someone pushing their personal agenda ("Microsoft sucks", "Apple rules", "Person X is a bastard", etc.), and the other half are simply wrong. The readers then comment on the Slashdot "news items" without even bothering to read the original articles (thus propagating the ignorance) and finally the moderators mod things as "interesting" or "insightful" without bothering to see if they're even remotely true.
-- Rui del-Negro
If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538