Slashdot Mirror


TheOpenCD Launches First Edition

Emil fra Loeneberg writes with welcome news from TheOpenCD. "This article on NewsForge describes a project which plans to distribute Open Source Software (OSS) widely to Windows users. You can download a CD image from a mirror site and start spreading the OSS message. It's basically an OSS distro for Windows. This project was also mentioned on Slashdot back in April and now they are ready with a first release. Any first reviews?"

26 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Re:KNOPPIX by bahamat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've found that it's much easier to say to people 'hey, check out this software that runs on windows' than it is to say 'hey, ditch windows and use linux'. People are generally more responsive if they don't have to leave their comfort zone, then once they have a chance to use Free Software, see that they like it, that it's better, have used OpenOffice in windows, then say oh yea, Linux can do that, and more, and with more freedom. It's especially easy to nab programmers that way, because they get to see the source of what they're using.

    I've been doing this for a while, building my own CDs and passing them out. First with Win32 software then a Linux distro. Knoppix was rad because it let me add another step to the conversion process. It's a step to change mindshare and for a lot of people OpenCD will be their first step towards computing freedom.

    I leave a trail of little Linux users everywhere I go and this is the tactic I've been using for a long time. Now they've made my job easier.

  2. This is great by Bluesman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been using Open Office on Windows for a few weeks, and it's just fantastic.

    I think too many people focus on Linux when they talk about open-source software, when the beauty of this software is that it's portable and usable on so many platforms. When I have to use Windows, I love to be able to use The Gimp and OpenOffice, since I'm not locked into proprietary formats.

    Microsoft's monopoly exists in their applications, which have always been much better than the easily available alternatives, until now.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  3. Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    It's really too bad Mozilla won't be included on the CD.

    It deserves as much press time and attention as possible.

    Also, the inclusion of Celestia is a great move to demonstrate the possibilities of OSS.

  4. Value difference with free OSes lowers... by CaVi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free OSes (Linux, BSDs,...) have a lot of values, _one_ of which is their large library of free applications.

    By bundling those for windows, people will have less reasons to switch to one of those free OSes. Of course, there are still reasons, but there is one less.

    People who don't matter for ideology behind free OSes won't bother switching. ANd I'm afraid this means a lot of users...

    There is some momentum which is needed with free OSes to have the attention span of big companies, and convince them to throw resources at supporting their products under those OSes. Having less people switch to those means less momentum, and therefore less attention.

    On the other end, using those tools under Windows will at least render much easier data exchanges, and is therefore a first step in breaking the dependency on those proprietary and more or less closed formats.

    I'm not sure if this is ideologically good or not. It will for sure be usefull for those who have no possiblity to switch of OS (because of job requirements, or games,...).

    My 2 cents...

    --
    -- No signature yet.
    1. Re:Value difference with free OSes lowers... by concord · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with you. I don't know the answer to that either but it's not going to succeed or fail based upon what you or I do.

      Let's not forget the fact that free software _is_ free and that includes the fact that people will _always_ want to port it to unstable but popular platforms - we can't (thank you GPL) stop it. We don't want to anyway, right? If software is free but only to people who want to use it or port it to particular "approved" platforms, is it really free?

      Let's not lose sight of the fact that we aren't here to hurt Microsoft. We're here to help people enjoy better software and to give them the freedom to enjoy it secure in the knowledge that it'll always be there for them, their children and their children's children. The GPL ensures that it always will be.

      In the long run I hope you're right about the fact that it'll make popular free OSS windows programs which can save in formats compatible for _all_ users of the program, regardless of their OS.

      My 2

      --
      MFG: "The system supports both the LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) and WIMP (Windows, IIS, MySQL, PHP) platforms."
    2. Re:Value difference with free OSes lowers... by Peter_Pork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, let's make OSS look like M$... This is about free software, that you can use in any platform, in any way you want. As people use OSS more and more, the OS will matter less and less, that is the only way to get rid of monopolies (call them M$ or Linux, they can be as bad).

    3. Re:Value difference with free OSes lowers... by rickymoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe you have one reason less to switch, as you say, but you will have one reason less NOT to switch. Think of all the people who say: hu? OpenOffice? I don't know that, I'll stick with MS Word, at least I'm comfortable with it.

      So basically their reason not to switch is that they are not familiar with OSS. With this CD, they will be and this kills this reason which keeps them hooked on proprietary software.

    4. Re:Value difference with free OSes lowers... by kavau · · Score: 2, Insightful
      By bundling those for windows, people will have less reasons to switch to one of those free OSes. Of course, there are still reasons, but there is one less.

      I disagree. The widespread availability of open source software in the Windows world can attract people to open source operating systems in the long run, but it's a two-step process:

      Step 1: "Why do I have to dish out hundreds of dollars for Microsoft Office and its countless upgrades if OpenOffice.org works just as well? I'm gonna work exclusively with OpenOffice.org from now on!"

      Step 2: "Wait a minute - all the applications I am using have been originally developed for Linux. This means on Linux they are supported at least as well as on Windows, and may be even better. I won't lose anything by switching to Linux completely, but I will save an additional few hundred dollars!"

      The advantage is that such a two-step switchover to Linux can be performed without any (perceived) risk. The would-be windows converts can take their time getting used to open source applications without immediately giving up the (perceived) safety of their familiar Windows environment. Altogether, this is probably a Good Thing.

    5. Re:Value difference with free OSes lowers... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful
      By bundling those for windows, people will have less reasons to switch to one of those free OSes. Of course, there are still reasons, but there is one less.

      Whilst this is a valid point and true, one of the biggest problems with the Slashdot mentality (and I'm not suggesting that you have this, because I don't know you and your comment seemed well balanced) is that there is this misguided belief that everyone on the planet is unhappy with Windows and would change it at the drop of the hat.

      This isn't really the case. There are plenty of people (millions) who are just fine and happy about Windows and don't really care about moving. They see Windows as an enabler to other productivity applications and as long as it's enabling (which it does pretty well) then they have no reason to move.

      So the question ultimately is:

      Do you want to show these people the alternatives out there and accept they possibly aren't going to move from their closed OS?

      Or do you want to avoid doing such a thing and accept that they may never ever see any open alternatives?

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  5. NT, as in Not Today by OtisSnerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is an admirable idea. Unfortunately, it will suffer the same fate that Linux suffers in most businesses; no drop-in replacement for MS-Access. I'd love to see an 'Open Office' product replace that bloated hog MS Office, but my employer lives on Access. It's used as both a front end, and as stand alone single user databases. --- Is it possible for Newsforge to use an even smaller font? I can barely read it now...

  6. Re:Overkill? by sydneyfong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't have a broadband connection, you insensitive clod.

    Well, actually I do, but many don't.

    Besides, URLs change over time, and if people were so inclined to download the software, a simple google search would do the job, why bother getting it from a CD?

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  7. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yet another troll. What, exactly, would be the point in making the process of trying out all this open-source software more difficult by forcing a potential user to download all of it? That's what they're trying to do by creating the CD, you see. Make it MORE CONVENIENT, so that people less knowledgable about their computers, or OSS, will consider using it. I mean imagine how impressed someone would be if you gave them a CD of fully functional software that fulfilled most of the needs they'd ever have with their computer, without having to download a thing, with the added bonus that they can let any of their friends have it..legally.

    As for the Internet connection part, well..I more or less have come to respect ignorant remarks such as that from people like you. If you really have lost your perspective, try working out on a calculator how long it would take someone to download 650MB of programs on a 56k modem, which many people are still using for their Internet connections.

  8. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not everybody has a fast connection. CD's are cheap and hold tons of data. Why I bet this OpenCD project could put at least 15 major software pojects on a CD. Then someone could just, now get this, install off of the CD. No lengthy downloads. Huh! Huh! Howabout that? This isn't for people like us to use...this is for people like us to download and hand out to friends and family to see what we're talking about.

  9. Some Cynicism by Anik315 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This needs to be done in conjunction with a robust support system (that corporations would pay for). The software can be free, but for businesses to adopt this kind of thing, there will need people who provide the operational support and integration sevices which can not be effecively done without money. The prime candidate for this job is IBM. Once people use this at work, they'll use it at home.

  10. What a good idea by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like this. Easy to use software that is genuinely useful in a well presented form. Well done.

  11. Re:Target audience faux pas? by Sirius25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, while i agree with most everthing you just said, that doesn't mean we shouldn't try.

    I'm going to distribute this CD to everybody i can, & tell them, if they like it, to copy it for others!

    Even if it never gets a fraction of the market, more users are always good, even if it is just a few.
    Isn't that what keeps OSS going?

  12. Re:Does anyone really care? by concord · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many businesses are too smart to download and install warez versions of anything. It is illegal. Most businesses are too worried about liability issues arising from disgruntled ex-employees blowing the whistle on them for stealing software.

    OSS versions make it possible for these companies to save money, not suffer lock-in, and not worry about being eaten by their own young. :-)

    --
    MFG: "The system supports both the LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) and WIMP (Windows, IIS, MySQL, PHP) platforms."
  13. Re:Overkill? by stwrtpj · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seems to me like there's gonna be a lot of unnecessary downloading of files you'll never use. How about just a floppy with the Program Browser on it, but links to download the file from the internet? Along with a comprehensive description of the program, users would only have to download what they want. And i don't think i'm being harsh in saying that anyone without an internet connection really needs to shape-up!

    The reason this is a bad idea is because this is NOT how most Windows apps are shipped. Most Windows apps do not force you to go to a website to download the software, they come on an easy-to-install CD. The idea is to have users believe that OSS apps are just as easy to install and use as Windows apps. You don't want to point people to a URL to download, only to have it change, or to suddenly have what was once a stable production-ready release replaced with the next beta.

    Also, recall that some of these apps are going to be GPL, which means they come with the source. Not everyone has broadband, and those source bundles can be HUGE.

    --
    Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
  14. Where is Gnucleus/Miranda ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Guys, I appreciate your work but you are truely amazing.

    Why didn't you give away gnucleus, miranda ICQ?

    Miranda ICQ is the most lightweight GUI and GNU ICQ you can find on windows. Even my most fanatical MS developer friends use it. miranda-icq.sourceforge.net

    and Gnucleus even has auto-update code... gnucleus.sourceforge.net

    The most funny is those 2 are your "domain neighbours"

    Oh as you don't know for sure, gnucleus is the gnutella client which was stolen by morpheus. Used by THOUSANDS of windows users, check download.com.

    This post will get +5 so, I post AC

  15. Re:How about GNUWin??? by Emil+fra+Loeneberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is similar to GNUWin, but it's more critical when including programs, focusing only on the best. That's also why the ISO is only 300MB.

  16. WHAT??? by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you slashdot the website the cd images are stored on and you want us to review them? Basically you've set the project back almost 2 days until the story leaves the front page.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  17. Open source philosophy?! by Christopher+Doopov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the What is TheOpenCD website:

    "It also includes a selection of essays about Open Source philosophy, and links to other programs that might be of interest."

    I'm sorry, but what is exactly open source philosophy? Open source is about technical and economical advantages. Free software is about philosophy. Please do not flame me for saying the obvious. When Eric Raymond took Debian Free Software Guidelines and published them as Open Source Definition in 1998 he did it exactly because he wanted free software without the strong philosophy associated with the "free software" term since at least the announcement of the GNU Project in 1983.

    I think that TheOpenCD project should not talk about philosophy if they want to promote the open source movement. But if they think that the philosophy is important, then they should promote the free software movement and change their name to TheFreeCD. Because the philosophy is exactly the difference between free software and open source movements. If they talk about "open source philosophy" they are being against the main priciples of both movements.

    TheOpenCD project people should read these books:

    Those books are not very long, but they provide enough background to let avoid using such unfortunate oxymorons like "open source philosophy." I strongly respect both free software and open source movements and I can not stay ignorant when people insult any of them, while the term "open source philosophy" insults both.

    --

    ~Christopher Doopov

  18. This is great! Software SHOULD be cross platform! by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A lot of these programs are cross platform.

    A lot of linux users don't understand why anyone should spend the time to write/port windows software. The reason is that this sort of thing helps users transition at their own pace.

    They have the ability to run open source software under the OS that their familiar and comfortable wth and the next time the license renewall comes up they can say, "hey, I can run this same software under a free OS instead of paying license fees!"

    I've gotten a lot of Windows users to start using PuTTY, WinSCP2 and OpenOffice. I really think this is the first step to becoming comfortable with linux on a daily basis.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  19. Re:Value difference with free OSes lowers... NOT. by dwheeler · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think you're looking too short-range. Look at what happened with gcc. Once gcc became a powerful C compiler, available on non-free platforms, it became extremely widespread, and eventually a massive amount of code became dependent on _gcc_ instead of a proprietary alternative. Then, once the Free operating systems became more mature, people MUCH more easily ported to them.

    The same can occur here, too. It's very difficult to get Word users to switch to Linux! But if the majority of word processor users (for example) used Open Office (or Abiword or KWord), then they'd find it essentially trivial to switch.

    People don't buy operating systems. They buy applications, and then get the operating system to run it. If you want people to use your operating system, you need to get them to use the applications that run on your operating system.

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  20. The Moral Issue by rinkjustice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think open source software is not so much an alternative to proprietary software but rather an alternative to stolen proprietary software, aka warez. I personally use GPL software because I can't afford the proprietary "versions" and I'd rather not steal it. Linux tends to be the perfect platform to run software of this ilk so I use Caldera OpenLinux as my main and only os.

    Open source is a lawful and creative answer to warez! Perhaps it's an angle distributers like OpenCD should look at.

  21. TheOpenCD is half empty -- fill it with music by alfaiomega · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The ISO image is only 300MB, so more than half of the CD is empty. I would suggest filling it with some music. The empty space should be filled with about 100 songs. Free software is not the only Free data out there, there is also Free music.

    --

    root@aio:~# nmap -sX -iR -p1- # Ho, ho, ho! Merry Xmas, everyone!