Slashdot Mirror


META Predicts Linux Software From Microsoft in 2004

trandles writes "According to this story at NYTimes (FRYYY), META Group is reporting that Microsoft will begin selling Linux software in 2004. It also goes on to report that a META Group study comes to the same conclusion as the earlier (MS-funded) IDC study that Linux has a higher TCO than MS solutions for some applications." Remember, this is speculation on the part of META, and has to do with back-end software, not Office. (But if Microsoft wanted to, they could become the world's biggest producer of Linux software.)

24 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. LinSolitaire? by morbuz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will we finally see MS solitaire for linux?

    --
    CAPS LOCK IS LIKE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL!
    1. Re:LinSolitaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Microsoft will never port the key Windows application to Linux. No way.

  2. ActiveLinux? by medscaper · · Score: 3, Funny
    Or maybe LinuxX?

    Or Linux Professional.

    How about .Linux?

    Visual Linux.

    MSL?

    Linux#?

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    1. Re:ActiveLinux? by medscaper · · Score: 5, Funny
      Insecure(tm) Linux?

      Un-Free Linux?

      Blue Screen of Linux?

      Maybe All-Your-Torvalds-Are-Belong-to-Microsoft?

      In Soviet Russia, Linu(*BANG!!!!*)

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    2. Re:ActiveLinux? by 1gor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Naaay, X-Windows.

      --
      --
    3. Re:ActiveLinux? by Annoyed+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You already have one :-D

      --
      Hmmm... Ok.. Chivas on the rocks.
  3. Blue screens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always wanted a blue screen kernel module.

  4. It only makes sense by oren · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that it is proved that Linux TCO is higher than Windows, why settle for a second best? Obviously they'd move to the platform more expensive to the customer. After all, they have to make a living, right?

    1. Re:It only makes sense by gazbo · · Score: 2, Funny

      No matter how many unbiased professionally conducted surveys there are to show that Windoze is cheaper than Linux, it still doesn't change the fact that it is just clearly and obviously untrue.

  5. The perfect strategy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What a brilliant idea: destroy Linux's security and stability by loading it up with MS Crap. Heh there goes the free software menace.

  6. Re:It's free in Yahoo. by ParnBR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, I'm not a copy and paste guru. No matter what I did, the above URL didn't work.

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  7. Another approach by leehwtsohg · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could also write a faster, more secure OS, that does not crash. Then sell it for production cost+1$/copy, and release
    the source code. That would ruin linux!

  8. I didn't know Bill was sick by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Funny


    My condolences to the Gates family - what does Bill have? Cancer? Alzheimers? AIDS? ALS? CJD?

    Whatever he has, my condolences. I know what it is like to hear your loved one only has about a year left. The next few months will be hard, but know that you will get through it, and while it never gets better, it gets easier.
    </humor>

    Because the only way Microsoft will start selling software for Linux is over Bill Gates' cold, dead body. So the only way you can say that MS will be selling Linux software in 2004 is to say that Bill is not long for this world.

    And somehow I doubt Bill is even sick.

    1. Re:I didn't know Bill was sick by SAN1701 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My condolences to the Gates family - what does Bill have? Cancer? Alzheimers? AIDS? ALS? CJD?

      GPF?

  9. distro by leomekenkamp · · Score: 2, Funny

    But Microsoft already has it's own linux distribution ready slated for release in november 2003. Knowing MS and it's slipping OS release dates this will probably end up being released in 2004.

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  10. Re:Sure.. by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you really know of no companies that sell GPL software? Can you see me from the moon? :-)

    --
    Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
  11. Older news already reported something like that by Kajakske · · Score: 2, Funny
    Original article


    I woke up one morning to the realization that Microsoft was going to announce a port of Microsoft Office to Linux. Now that would really be an icebreaker at LWCE. Such a port has been the subject of speculation for some time, so much so that Microsoft has actually denied it, thus giving the notion even more credibility.


    This was taken from an article on linuxworld 2000. So the point is already know for a longer time ...

  12. Re:MS could take control of Linux by gazbo · · Score: 2, Funny
    LOL! I get it!

    You're saying that MS are like the Borg ROFL!

  13. Re:BSOD by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think there is a screensaver under Linux showing different error/panic screens on different OSes. It does include the BSOD.

  14. Who the hell predicted this?? by mustangdavis · · Score: 2, Funny
    Did META hire Ms. Cleo?????

    META Predicts Linux Software From Microsoft in 2004


    *****bzzzzzzzzzzzzz*****

    wrong!

    Go take another look at your terrot cards or crystal ball!
  15. Re:LinNotepad - the *killer* app by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, Microsoft was the only one who got it right for once. They put a carriage return and a line feed at the end of every line. This of course, makes sense when you consider the days of typewriters or outputting directly to a dot matrix printer. The unix world is the one that screwed this one up.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  16. If Micro$oft releases their version of Linux... by rawrslashdot · · Score: 3, Funny

    They will call it Windex(TM).

  17. Aaargh, wrong setting, sorry... by jonadab · · Score: 3, Funny
    > I can't wait for Notepad to get ported, the true killer app.

    Actually, I'm waiting with baited breath for Microsoft Emacs. I'm hoping it will sport the following features...

    • Ability to treat .lnk files as symlinks.
    • Backward-compatible, so you can run all Gnu Emacs lisp modules.
    • Windows-user-friendly default keyboard and mouse bindings.
    • Microsoft Lisp extensions for your Windows desktop, to help you perform common Windows tasks.
    • Integration with Windows Explorer to make common file management tasks easier.
    • Editing modes for all .NET and MS Visual languages.
    • Modes for working with the Windows registry and ActiveDirectory.
    • Wizards to help you through common text-editing tasks.
    • All documentation repackaged as Windows .hlp files.
    • Integration with Microsoft Office, so that Gnus can easily display documents that you receive by email, using Word, Excel, Internet Explorer, or Outlook.
    • Easily embed Office documents in your text files.
    • Helpful Office Assistant, so Emacs can finally compete with vigor in the desktop text editor marketplace.

    Feel free to mod down the mis-posted original; I have the karma to spare.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  18. Re:No longer speculation by _Sambo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait to see IIS running on LINUX:

    NEWSFLASH: Microsoft extends Windows vulnerability to Linux!
    Redm0nd, WA

    Micro$oft executives today announced that they, too, would be jumping onto the Linux bandwagon by producing server-side software such as IIS and SQL Server for Linux.

    They added that all vulnerabilities that are inherent in Windows architecture will be available to crackers in the Linux environment.

    "We wouldn't want our Asian and Russian 'Security Engineers' to become bored." said an anonymous Microsoft Executive.

    Upon hearing that microsoft tools would be ported to Linux, the open source community (who all still use Microsoft tools of one form or another) had mixed feelings.

    Juan, an MCSE-turned-Linux-Guru, felt initial joy at being able to use IIS, then experienced the 'OH SHIT' effect of realizing the whole vulnerability factor. On the subject, Juan said, "crap".