Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Human vs Computer Intelligence

Posted by michael on from the humanconf dept.

DrLudicrous writes "The NYTimes is running an article regarding tests devised to differentiate from human and computer intelligence. One example are captchas, which can consists of a picture of words, angled and superimposed. A human will be able to read past the superposition, while a computer will not, and thus fails the test. It also goes a bit into some of Turing's predictions of what computers would be like by the year 2000."

10 of 405 comments (clear)

  1. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    Computer plays human!

  2. In Soviet Russia... by Yakov+Smirnoff · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Computer Intelligence vs. you!!!

  3. Iraq Dossier: First Breakdown +1, Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    As suppliers: Israel, United Kingdom, United States.

    Case closed.

  4. Re:Non-issue. by grub · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Oh, I guess the protocol in a case like this is to scream " FIRST POST " :))

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. much like with RadioShack by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I hate this... why do we have to register with the NYTimes to read these articles? I don't give my info to RadioShack when I buy my batteries, and I damn well ain't gonna give my info to NYTimes for some article.

    Why not post a google link? Why support the NYTimes campaign to identify all us anonymous cowards?

    ahhh nuts, I forgot to check 'Post Anonymously'... gooodbye precious Karma!

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:much like with RadioShack by sjwt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      proberly because you dont pay anythign to NYTimes
      to access the web page, but ehn you buy batters you accatly pay for them..

      just a though.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  6. Here's a tip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I love to put up insightful/informative posts that are laced with tons of profanity. I just get a kick out of watching people get pissed off that there IS useful information, but that there is also a lot of profanity. Just goes to show you that language means nothing. It's my way of getting back at the grammar nazis and the people who feel that informative/insightful mods should only go to people who don't use profanity. It's like they have some kind of weird disease that makes them think that just because some swears a whole FUCKING lot, mans that they don't have anything useful to say. This isn't true. Some of us just swear because it has style...

  7. Re:A much more accurate test... by Cuthalion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is this testing whether I'm a replicant or a lesbian?

    --
    Trees can't go dancing
    So do them a big favor
    Pretend dancing stinks!
  8. Year 2000 predictions by Pedrito · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It also goes a bit into some of Turing's predictions of what computers would be like by the year 2000

    I initially misread this line thinking the article was making predictions about what computers would be like in the year 2000. Damn, I knew I was going to get some karma for the jokes I had ready to go.

  9. Why? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Actually I'm 25 (26 if you round up).