Slashdot Mirror


Hardware Bits

Zygo writes "Again a little bit of hardware news for today: At MonkeyReview a very cool case... At DV Hardware a little article about an aluminium mousepad, called the Steelpad... OCCanada takes a look at the Gigabyte GA8PE667-Pro... ExtremeMHz brings you a guide to power... Some Christmas stuff... And Modthebox checks out a cool tachometer for PC's!" richie2000 submits a holiday-themed case mod: "A gingerbread case mod. Don't tell me you didn't see this one coming. And here's a mirror of one of the images."

142 comments

  1. steel mouse pad looks nice by stonebeat.org · · Score: 3, Interesting

    would make a nice holiday present. it reminds of those old grid lined steel mouse pads that were shipped with Sun Sparc and Ultras. I think Sparc were shipped with a digital mouse, and so were SGI machines. I had a Sparc 20 and 10.

    1. Re:steel mouse pad looks nice by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Those were manufactured by Mouse Systems (who OEM'ed the "cigarette pack" three button optical mouse.

      I still have one of those pads lying around somewhere... (They later switched from metal to mylar on foam).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:steel mouse pad looks nice by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh yes, those.... they are actually very very bad for you. I used the Sun metal mousepad for quite a while.

      When you use a mouse, your wrist will actually rest on the mousepad quite often. A metal one will drain the warmth from your wrist nicely, which does nothing to help prevent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. After a few months of using this thing my wrist started to hurt, and my physician recommended "keeping my hands warm", even wearing gloves, since cold hands and wrists are more susceptible to CTS than warm ones. I switched to a regular mouse and my problems went away.

      No bloody way I am ever using a metal mosuepad again. I'm using an optical mouse now that requires no mousepad at all.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:steel mouse pad looks nice by stonebeat.org · · Score: 2

      that is very true. However in Arizona the cold mouse pads actually felt good, specially during summers when the: day temp = night temp = 115 F :)

    4. Re:steel mouse pad looks nice by moosesocks · · Score: 2

      My friend has one of these. Unfortunately, it doesn't work well with a mechanical mouse after several years of service, as the writing eventually begins to seperate from the aluminum.

      Either way, it's an awesome pad.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:steel mouse pad looks nice by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

      115 F/0.000001% humidity? That is nothing, Texas 99F/99% humidity. Now that is rough!

    6. Re:steel mouse pad looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used a homemade stainless steel mousepad with a randomly etched surface for a few years without problems(except that it wore out the pads of the first mouse I used on it before the etch edges where rounded off).
      The difference is probably that the steel is thin, 0.3mm or something so it will warm up to skin temperature fast. It doesnt seem to pick up very much cold from the table below either, probably since its rolled steel so it tries to curl up and I have only taped the sides of it to the table. Or maybe im just used to cold living in sweden.

  2. Maybe I just don't get it... by Soulfader · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Our total cost for this project was approximately $25.00. Considering that we can now power up to 7 external components, we believe it is well worth it. Now when we turn on our computer, anything that is connected to the surge protector will power on automatically....water pump, fan, auxiliary PSU, printer etc...etc.
    I know some mods are worth doing just because, but this strikes me as a little... odd. The last thing I want to do is run more stuff off my power supply. Why not save a couple bucks (and your PS) and just buy a power strip?

    Enlightenment, anyone?

    1. Re:Maybe I just don't get it... by cybergibbons · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't get it.

      It turns on a multiway mains adaptor (powerstrip, four way etc.)using the 12V as a signal from your PC, so everything will go on and off at once. The power does not come from the power supply in the PC.

      It was pretty clear from the article.

    2. Re:Maybe I just don't get it... by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      Relays don't pull all that much power, and thats all that is being powered, as the relay, which is just a switch, allows power to flow to the power strip. So flip on the computer, it flips on a relay which lets power flow to a secondary power strip.
      They could have done something similar with a triac and optoisolator and been able to pull off the 5v from the PSU.(or used a 5v relay)
      My dad did something like this off the userport of a C64 and Vic20 to trip some lights, 5v from some source, optoisolator(keep that 120v AC away), and then a triac to allow the AC to flow. When the power was removed, the triac would stay switched until the power it was passing hit 0v, which on normal 60Hz AC happens about 120 times a second.

    3. Re:Maybe I just don't get it... by Soulfader · · Score: 2
      You don't get it.
      But now I do. Many thanks. Too bad that someone wasted a +1 insightful on my previous comment, though. =) This would be worthwhile, I suppose, if you actually had fans and water pumps hooked up to your PC.
    4. Re:Maybe I just don't get it... by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So.... why not just use a PSU with an A/C passthrough, and plug a powerstrip into that.

      Requires a $2 adapter plus a powerstrip with no modifications necessary.

      Or even better, tell your bios to automatically power on the pc after a power failure (in other words, plug the PC into an outlet with a lightswitch.) Turn the lightswitch on, the pc goes on, as well as anything else plugged into the outlet.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Maybe I just don't get it... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      psu's ac passthroughs are usually only rated around 100w-200w. (hey, i dunno why so low, i suppose that's enough for monitor.)

      the second option is better though, but if you wish to use the computer's power management for shutdown & etc..

      these are just tweaky tweaks anyways, besides geeks keep their stuff running 24/7, i got no need for relay for my pump because it's on all the time.. (better be)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  3. Ooooh! New Mousepad! by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

    I need to get that pad...

    Oh wait, I use a trackball, nevermind.

    On a more serious note, I've used an optical Logitech mouse on an old Sun optical pad (from the mice that required such a pad) and it works all right. In fact, it's a little better than a random surface.

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  4. Oh Dear God! by Cyclopedian · · Score: 3, Funny
    My eyes screamed in pain on the overclocking christmas lights article. The neon green page background was just too much.

    Excuse me while I go and color correct my eyes.

    -Cyc

    1. Re:Oh Dear God! by garcia · · Score: 2

      it's better than having a Beowulf Christmas Tree Computer Farm... I heard that's what Santa uses to keep track of all the high tech toys on his list these days.

    2. Re:Oh Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about you're eyes! I tamed the background down a bit. I crapped that page out in 5 minutes at midnight last night so I could get the little "Overclock your X-Mas tree" joke onto HardOCP this morning :)

    3. Re:Oh Dear God! by Cyclopedian · · Score: 2
      Thank you! Now you have me thinking about getting some chocolate mint ice cream. =)

      -Cyc

    4. Re:Oh Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can suck my cock and see if it tastes link chocolate mint.

    5. Re:Oh Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should try degaussing your eyes.

      place them as close as possible to surface of monitor and hit the degauss function.

      the jittering should stop after a few seconds.

  5. Dot... Dot... Dot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's... a... lot... of... ellipses...

  6. Re:RF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just have to dope the gingerbread to make it a conductor. What ingredients you use are up to you.

  7. I seen a case mod today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in bristol looking for some stuff for my pc, I seen my first real case modded pc, it looked very cool, but the actual pc sucked (celeron 1300)

  8. New mod box ideas... add them here. by dagg · · Score: 4, Funny
    Idea #1: A litter box

    Anything else?

    --
    Sex - Find It
    1. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by Student_Tech · · Score: 2

      TV/VCR unit, remove the VCR parts and place PC in there. It even has its own display and speaker.

    2. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by dirkdidit · · Score: 2

      That would be a really cool project actually. I wonder if I can find a nonfunctioning TV/VCR (or cheap) to gut apart.

    3. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could shit on a golden plate and eat it. That would be ten times more constructive.

    4. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      You could quit posting anonymously and do some constructive as well. Ever think of that? Of course not you're a dumb AC.

    5. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used all my two-posts-a-day-limit. Blame Taco, the pathetic whitetrash who go to his own wedding by cab.

    6. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A frosted cake.

      wouldn't that be funky? You could put some LEDs under the frosting. Cooling might be a problem tho. Better make it an ice cream cake. :-)

      Actually now that I think about it, you could put a sealed LCD screen just under the frosting and play animations. wacky!!!

    7. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you have a Slashdot ID? Now there's an exclusive club!

    8. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by ShadowDrake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Using a plastic prop for the cake is the sensible approach. Easy to work, and you don't need to worry about spoilage.

      Ooo! I know! How about building the computer into some sort of diorama. Use fibre optics so the drive lights become building lights, have the CD tray rise from out of the middle of a street like some sort of evil monolith, and make that heatsink really a 'Volcano'.

      The problem is that sometimes "cool" and "practical" would clash. I think a 50cm aluminium cube with no discernable features would be "cool", but I'd wreck ventilation, have to develop some clever approach to get to drives, and it wouldn't fit anywhere.

      Perhaps a really well-done computer-in-the-keyboard, like an Amiga 600. It would have to be 1000% professional though. Great mini-ITX application.

      Or an extremely flat desktop (like those 1U cases), but quite large so you can place it on the desk like a blotter and have your keyboard and mouse on it.

      Of course, I like the "retro" modifications... the big huge AT tower with ATX board inside. Perhaps one of those with a big old AT desktop would be nice. You could put more drive bays up front because the ATX board is shorter in that dimension than an AT, and you could save much space by replacing the big AT PSU with a small ATX one and rearranging the back.

      Odd materials might work. How about sheet brass? Easy to work, shiny, unusual colour, potential for nice patina over time.

      Sometimes, all you really need though is a classy colour scheme or art. The Atari 600XL didn't need windows and blowholes to be cool. It just was, in silver, black, and white.

      For fun, don't forget to use the case badge from your original 286.

      A trick I did was to tie front-panel switches to motherboard jumpers. I did this for the multiplier jumpers on an Elitegroup K7S6A recently. Took up one 3.5" faceplate. Might be useful to have a momentary "CMOS clear" switch

      The ultimate front-panel LCD: Bury an old Toshiba Libretto (remember those? Those little P75 laptops with the 5" screen, mass about 1kg) in the front panel, boot it to X, have it export a monitoring app from the "real" system. Colour and infinite display flexibility.

      There's been a lot of work on lights and displays, but little in movement. How about a "heartbeat":
      -rubber membrane over hole
      -slow motor behind membrane
      -off-centre cardboard/styrene oval on motor shaft
      -oval presses membrane, creating "throb"
      -For extra credit, tie it to system load

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    9. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by dypstick · · Score: 1
    10. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by dagg · · Score: 1

      Well I'll be dammed.

      --
      Sex - Find It
    11. Re:New mod box ideas... add them here. by handsomepete · · Score: 1

      Actually, that has been done. These days it's hard to come up with a case mod that hasn't.

  9. indestructible mouse pad? by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny

    [From the DV Hardware link]

    The black colored Steelpad comes from Denmark and is made out of a 3.5mm aluminium plate.

    So the Steelpad is made of aluminum; that makes sense.

    It's also hardended [sic] to ensure the durability under all conditions

    That's good, too: I know my mousepads always ended up twisted and mangled from daily use...

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  10. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet russia
    Aluminumpads are made out of steel?

  11. A few of my favorite things by SteweyGriffin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just put a really sweet computer together for my son's big Christmas present this year.

    I made sure to get him all the best computer case stuff, since that what all his friend will see. Looks are really important to little kids! I can't wait until he opens this up and sees how non-beige his very own PC is!

    Case: Kingwin KT-436B-WM Aluminum Case - Blue (image)

    Power supply: Enermax EG365P-VE(FCA) 350 Watt (image)

    Light kit: Dual Cold Cathode Light Kit (image)

    Screws: Anodized Thumbscrew - Blue (image)

    1. Re:A few of my favorite things by mstyne · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow. And to think there are children starving all over the world. Merry Christmas.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    2. Re:A few of my favorite things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks very cool but now all his friends will call him geek hehe of course that doesn't have to be a bad thing

    3. Re:A few of my favorite things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, there are. So why not cancel your internet account, sell your computer, and give the money to those starving children?

      Works both ways, man. Please think before you take potshots at people.

    4. Re:A few of my favorite things by Ty · · Score: 0, Troll

      why don't you sell yours too?

    5. Re:A few of my favorite things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, what I do for my son is none of your fscking business, fscktard.

    6. Re:A few of my favorite things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because I'm not the one initiating self-righteous jabs at people for spending money on their loved ones. My post served as a point to affirm that old saying: practice what you preach [if you're going to preach at all]. Since I don't go around telling people they need to stop spending money on what I deem worthless and start donating to charities, I don't have to do that either.

    7. Re:A few of my favorite things by cuyler · · Score: 3, Funny

      A nice computer for Christmas...? Nice.

      Are you interested in adopting a 21 year old Comp. Eng. student who could really use presents like this for Christmas?

    8. Re:A few of my favorite things by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 2
      Are you interested in adopting a 21 year old Comp. Eng. student who could really use presents like this for Christmas?

      What does a Comparative English student need a computer for? Just go to the lab to type your papers. :^P

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    9. Re:A few of my favorite things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha....I meant Computer Engineer but I gather you already knew that.

    10. Re:A few of my favorite things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you're a Computer Engineer surely you can build your own? Or is that another abuse of the title "engineer"?

    11. Re:A few of my favorite things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just means he can run his computer, just like an engineer runs a train.

  12. The secret... by ziggy_travesty · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the Antec case review:

    "Details & Specs

    As I had said earlier, this unit packs a punch in terms of performance. Due to its large size there is much more room for fans as well as allow much better air circulation. This particular tower came to us equipped with 2 80MM Antec fans serving as rear exhausts. I added 2 additional fans, 1 on the side, acting as a blower, and 1 in the front acting as an intake. In total there is room to place 5 80MM fans. Again, due to its size, and the fact that components aren?t tightly packed together, you can expect much better airflow right off the bat. With the combined fans, things simply run much cooler.
    "

    Damn...I wish I had known all this time that the reason my computer is so damn slow is because of the case! Instead of upgrading my PII/300 motherboard and processor, I'm gonna get my self a hi-performance case!!!

    Thanks Slashdot!

    1. Re:The secret... by The+Notorious+ASP · · Score: 1

      No no no! You've got it all wrong, it's the fans that make it fast!

  13. Overclocking is just not worth it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seriously, just pick up the better processor and you will save time and money. Overclocking is NOT reccomended by the big two. There are multiplier locks for a reason! Lets look at the costs.

    AMD 2000 : £60
    AMD 2700 : £250

    Your not gonna get much gain from buying the more expensive one, but overcloking the 2000 to the 2700 speed is more expensive than buying the 2700! Ive seen processors burn out, and its NOT a pretty picture. Unless your mad, buy a nice cheap processor and save yourself some trouble.

  14. Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by cybergibbons · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article at ExtremeMhz with the relay controlling the four way is pretty bad. Messing with mains voltage if you do not know what you are doing is stupid - and things like this encourage people.

    First off, the bit about the relay mentions that there is an AC side and a DC side. WTF? There is a coil, and there are switch contacts. Next, he says that they are rated in current and voltage. Yes, true, but a voltage for the coil, and voltage and current ratings for the contacts (for AC and DC). A "12V 10A relay" means very little. I have what could be described as a "12V 45A relay" here. It has a 12V coil and will switch 12V at 45A. Not mains (110V or 240V). See how easy it is to get this wrong when people just copy your article.

    In this country (UK), a 10A relay is not enough to power a four way. A maximum of 13A can be drawn through a plug, so you would need a higher current rating on the contacts of the relay. I do not know about the US, but because it is 110V, I would assume currents to be higher. This relay is probably quite inadeqate.

    And if you have to tell someone how to drill a hole into a plastic box, surely they aren't competant to play with mains?

    Moving on. He mounts a mains voltage relay inside a plastic box with absolutely no regards to strain relief on the cables. All it would take is a trip on the four way and the cables would be yanked out the box, possibly leaving live conductors bare. Not good at all.

    Also, those "quick disconnects", which are called spade connectors, should be covered by a plastic shroud when they are used on a relay such as that. There is the possibility of the 12V wire coming into contact with mains, which would have dire consequences. Also, try fixing the relay into the box...

    I'm just not keen on the number of people who write things like this, essentially idiots guides, which people blindly follow. They aren't a good idea when people can get hurt.

    It reminds me of a rudeboy car magazine I read which showed you how to install NOS into a Citreon Saxo. Drill this, thread this, this colour wire goes here, etc. No explanation of how or why... quite ridiculous really.

    1. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually code for America is standard house outlets
      are on an 10 amp fuse so there is about 8 to 9 amps
      for the computer.

    2. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone (with extensive electrical knowledge) from the US, allow me to say how I am continually surprised how few accidental electrocutions there are anually. Many, many, unqualified "weekend" electricians like to "fix" things in the most half-assed ways. You would find it hard to imagine (as I did) the dangerous situations lurking around most homes due to bad wiring.

      My own relatives were routinely plugging-in and unplugging a toaster who's rubber shielding had been damaged near the plug. I cringe at the thought of such terrible practices, but a surprising number of people are exposed to similar conditions multiple times every day, and yet surprisingly few get killed, although, there are no shortages of stories about kids who cut through lamp cords, or electricians who don't shut off circuit breakers, and get knocked 20 yards (err... meters) across a room.

      Perhaps if the standard US voltage was 220V like much of the world, there might be far more fatalities. In addition to the low voltages, GFI outlets or very common, which protect those people that like to take a bath along with their hair dryer, radio, etc. Although, a huge number of house fires are caused by electricity.

      So, I agree that things like this are very irresponsible, and dangerous, but they are not uncommon, and are probably less dangerous than conditions many people are exposed to on a daily basis. In my opinion, power lines should be converted to around 50v DC before they enter a residential home. Although that wouldn't help those poor bastards that decide to put up their TV antennas near high-voltage power lines.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      How would you stepup/down the voltage efficiently(in terms of power) with 50VDC? There would also need to be a gigantic AC/DC converter. Tons of home electronics use transformers to step down voltages into a usable range, this can only be achieved with AC. We made the right choice when we chose AC to power the world, it's much more efficient (see three phase generators,line power loss).

    4. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Tons of home electronics use transformers to step down voltages into a usable range, this can only be achieved with AC.

      Excuse me? Are you saying that you can't step-down DC voltage?

      (see three phase generators,line power loss)

      Sure, but nothing requires AC go all the way to the wall. DC doesn't work as well over the long-haul, but it should be fine for the last few feet.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      ...and most of the outlets (normal 2 vertical blades, with ground spot on top) are rated for 15 amps, and the circuit breakers are rated 15-20 amps, depending. (In the houses I have lived in they are 20 Amp breakers on the 120v lines, with the outlets rated for 15amps). ( Pictures of the outlets. tub site but the
      If I was using a relay, I would want it to be able to handle the 120v line at about 20-25 amps if possible, so if something fails it will (hopefully) not be that. Or maybe put a fuse or circuit breaker in the box with a rating bellow the relay. Of course this would warrant a bigger box, strain releaf on the cables and cost a bit more, if you wanted to try and do it safely I guess.

    6. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Intocabile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't stepdown DC voltages efficiently because transformers work on the basis of magnetic flux. To create magnetic flux you have to have an alternating current. The reason they are more efficient then DC alternatives(voltage deviders) is because they don't consume power(idealy).

    7. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, given how most people drive, I'm surprised there are not more people killed. But when you think about it, it does make sense. We learn from what we believe.

      First, getting killed by "accident" is, well, hard. Maimed, well, that's different.

      There are millions of people living today that have been shocked. Not killed, but they know...now. Or know of someone, just like you see a dumbass teen or middle-ager do something stupid on the road, and swear you won't be one of them. I knew electricity was dangerous as a kid, but when I was in the 5th grade, my teacher got shocked plugging in a projector. Rather impressionable on about 22 young ones in the room.

      The reality is, most electrical devices, while not completely safe or become so, are also not -absolute- death traps. The vast, vast, vast majority of people do NOT mess with electrical stuff. I work with computers a lot, but I sure as hell don't think I'm an electrician--I always hire out someone licensed and qualified to work on my home and barn. I pretty much change light bulbs. Wall switches, new fixtures--get permit, get electrician. Strangely, I'm probably, for an amateur, more qualified than most given I'm involved with real estate (building, renting), but I just don't mess with it. Heck, when I build a machine, I stand clear when I start it up, even though the risk to me is insanely small.

      Most people are like this. We are still animals, and we fear pain, even with all our stupidity that comes along in our water laden bodies. Electricity is something we understand. Same with gasoline. But accidents still do occur. Spark is bad. Bare wires bad.

      Add to that some adages that people know when working around electricity. And that, again, common sense, if you don't know, don't mess with it.

      And not to sound sexist, but I know most people leave electrical work "to the boys" or boyfriends or husbands or whatever. That splits the potential causality rate in half right there.

    8. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      IIRC, most components don't draw nearly 10A. If you do the math and pay attention, it shouldn't be a problem. My wiring is mostly 20A rating but that was a b!tch to install the outlets when the wire is so stiff.

      I do agree, a $20 "Craftsman Auto Switch" from Sears (at least in the US) will probably do better, costs less and you don't get the possible liablility of letting people tingle themselves.

      The article also neglected to point out some other alternatives, such as using the female IEC connector on the back of some power supplies. They used to be used a lot as a switched "outlet" to power CRT displays.

    9. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      Simple voltage dividers is probably the absolutely worst method of step-down.

      I think the efficiency of DC step-up or step-down is possible at up to 90%, which, granted, isn't as efficient as an AC transformer, which might be 99%, at least it isn't a simple divider.

      Some of the better DC steppers break up DC into something like a pulsed wave form and use inductive or capacitive networks.

      Better AC-DC supplies also tend to break up AC into a higher frequency so it doesn't require such a large transformer.

    10. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Similarly, given how most people drive, I'm surprised there are not more people killed.

      How many would you lik to see killed? IIRC, car accidents are the #1 cause of death in the US. IMHO that's really right on par with how people drive, although would be far worse if we did not have modern safety devices in vehicles.

      First, getting killed by "accident" is, well, hard. Maimed, well, that's different.

      By vehicle, I would have to disagree. People die all the time.

      By electrical means, that does seem to be the case.

      you see a dumbass teen or middle-ager do something stupid on the road, and swear you won't be one of them. I knew electricity was dangerous as a kid, but when I was in the 5th grade, my teacher got shocked plugging in a projector. Rather impressionable on about 22 young ones in the room.

      When you are occasionally doing something dangerous, most people are very careful. But with electricity and driving, it's so common that people just don't even pay attention to it anymore. Just the other day, there was a car accident at the side of the road. One person was watching it (probably thinking how he is a better driver), as he hit the car in front of him...

      With electricity, most people don't even think about it. Even after they have been shocked, it is just such a casual thing that they never even look at the frayed cable they are plugging in. The same is true for the people who touch power lines as they are putting up antennas... It's such a non-issue for most people, that they don't take the 1/100th of a second to ask themselves if anything looks dangerous.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DC is no good, because switching it is hard -there are no zero crossings, and there is consequently arcing - which is very likely to weld the switch contacts together. Maybe 50V would be OK, but only just I think.

      There is a fun article about solar panels where the guys used the DC output of a solar panel system to drive an electric kettle. They could not turn the thing off, and the coil melted.

    12. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      DC is no good, because switching it is hard

      "Switching" how? "Switch" is perhaps in the top 10 most overdefined words in the english language, so I'll attribute the fact that I don't understand what you are saying, to the vagueness of the word. Surely you can't be saying that it is difficult to switch DC on and off??? And 50V is significant to this how?

      There is a fun article about solar panels where the guys used the DC output of a solar panel system to drive an electric kettle. They could not turn the thing off, and the coil melted.

      That would be an interesting article, but the use of an AC device (more complicated than a lightbulb) on DC current is bound to have unfortunate consequences.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by PD · · Score: 2

      You complain about ignoramouses electrocuting ourselves, but what about the crappy design of our electric plugs?

      Who the hell designed a plug that makes it possible to put your fingers into contact with a live piece of metal as you insert it into a socket? I'm an adult now, so I don't have any trouble with it. But when I was a kid, my little tiny fingers would slip off the plug and accidentally contact the metal prongs as I was inserting it into the socket. Ouch!

      There are much better plug designs out there - Why don't we use them?

    14. Re:Geeks with no electrical knowledge? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Yes, I quite agree, but it wasn't exactly on-topic. If I was to start ranting about every practice involving electricity that surprises me, this would be a book, not a post/thread.

      If you pay attention to plugs, you'd see that there have been MAJOR improvements over the years. Just a few years ago, plugs did not usually have the ergonomic shape they do now, and the plastic rim that prevents your fingers from slipping, and sliding right onto the contacts. Although that does not eliminate problems, it seriously reduces accidents.

      Anyone that wanted to make a safe plug could install a spring-loaded plastic shield over the leads, and nearly eliminate this type of problem. However, that would add a buck to their production costs, so no company has done it.

      OTOH, I doubt there are many fatalities from that kind of accident. If anything, a lot of pain, and possibly destroyed portions of your hand would be the likely result... unless you make a habbit of standing in water while plugging in appliances. On the 220V outlets for large appliances (air conditioners, refridgeratiors, washing/drying machines, etc.) that type of protection might be more useful, but those aren't the type devices that people commonly plug in and unplug. So, I'd have to see some real statistics on electrical fatalities to know if companies are really being negligent by not providing more protection. Although, if I was the owner of a company, I would certainly add such protection (and many others as well).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  15. You know.. by The+Terrorists · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't want any of this stuff. It's mostly in the cool gadget category. If Slashdot wanted, it could be a force for quality in the basics of hardware construction, design, and performance -- a Consumer Report of computing, as it were.

    It will never be a cultural leader in computing. Others with cash take that mantle. The former, however, is needed.

  16. Huh? by Soulfader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By your own figures, you could burn out your 2GHz processor 4 times and still have spent 10 pounds less.

    1. Re:Huh? by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      I think he meant that to overclock a CPU by a lot you generally have to buy some sort of fancy cooler, instead of just using the heatsink+fan that comes with it.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  17. Christmas Stuff? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess not many people clicked on the "Christmas Stuff", huh? For one, I'm glad to find a source for the LED christmas lights. That's a really big plus. I haven't shopped at Albertson's for a while because of the prices.

    But come on, someone has to mention something about overclocking the Christmas Lights. Going from a mild 30hz to a blazing 60hz! Imagine a Beowulf chain of those... *

    * - These lights cannot be chained, from what I've read.

    1. Re:Christmas Stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic??? Huh? -thebigmacd

  18. Too much time... by johnraphone · · Score: 4, Funny
    Another example of too much time.

    "Toilet PC"
    "In my new quest to find odd objects to turn into computers, my fiancee Julie and I were at the grocery store one day when I thought of this idea. At the grocery store there was a child's training toilette sitting in a shopping cart"

    damn at lease i use my free time to get free tshirts

  19. Hardware Bits? by mthed · · Score: 1

    Hardware BYTES is more like it! hahahah... I kill me.

    --
    "There's a madness to my method." -mthed
  20. Cool case? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is a steel 'Alienware' case.

    Oh, oh, be still my beating heart.

    First review sites praise aluminum cases and now they praise a case because it is steel.

    Can PC case makers build some taste into these things?

  21. erhm.../. future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    askslashdot
    Dec 14
    (16 recent)

    slashdot is in the future!

  22. Slashvertisements by Niadh · · Score: 0, Troll

    product *plug* money.
    product *plug* money.
    product *plug* money.

    1. Re:Slashvertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Profit! :-)

  23. Dear Slashdot: by onomatomania · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Please, for the love of god, never link to dvhardware.net again. Fer christ's sake, with a readership in the tens to hundreds of thousands, you'd think Slashdot could accept articles that feature quality sites... which dvhardware.net is NOT. Hmmm, let's have a look at the checklist for crappy hardware reviews:

    1. Article split into unnecessarily high number of pages? Check.
    2. Verdana microsized font (specified in pixels in the stylesheet) which is unresizable? Check.
    3. Terrible spelling and grammar? Check. (Note: I realize that English was probably not the author's primary language. Nevertheless, it doesn't excuse passages such as this:
      One of the good things about it is the material it's made of , aluminium. Another good thing is that the pad looks very cool! One of the downsides of the pad is the noise, the pad makes lot's of noise when you're moving your mouse on it. And then another thing , which is good and bad together :p , the pad always feels cold. This would be very good in summer but now in winter it feels too cold.
      If you want to be taken seriously you must write articles that don't sound like a twelve-year-old puked on the keyboard.
    4. Useless pictures that look like they were taken by some retard with a digital camera, featuring a "click on me to enlarge" link which doesn't help at all? Check.
    5. Overall vapid commentary that ends with a predominantly positive rating, in this case three stars? Check.

      For fuck's sake...

    1. Re:Dear Slashdot: by Mnemia · · Score: 2

      I sort of agree with most of your points, but the font resizes fine for me in Mozilla when I press control-+. What exactly did you mean by "unresizable"?

    2. Re:Dear Slashdot: by sharkey · · Score: 2

      One question: Is your list of gripes about DVHardware or Slashdot?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  24. steelpads by snillfisk · · Score: 2

    The biggest problem with steel pads (as I have had one quite close to me for some time) is that it makes an AWFUL loud noise every time you get so pissed of in a game of quake or cs and you throw your mouse at it. It stays in your ear for quite some time :(

    btw, go for the func 1030 instead. better mousepad :)

    --
    mats
    One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
  25. How much does it cost to get a life? by LazloToth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The Xoxide PC Tachometer Kit is a neat and unique product that will definitely stand out at a LAN party." A person with better things to do than hook up an automotive tachometer to a CPU would stand out even more.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  26. Do people never learn?... by Xtraneous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had assumed that people had finally realized that there is many shall we say... "inconsistencies" in the boards that review sites get, and the consumer boards. Recently (about 2-4 months ago) asus realeased their P4S8X motherboard based on the SIS 648 chipset. Almost every hardware review site praised this board, yet when the boards hit the market, all hell broke loose, (some sites, such as Motherboards.org still have the P4S8X rated as the top board, when it is clear that this board is not worth the sand it was created with.) Enough hell that many people began reffering to the board as the P4Sux.

    So why:
    A)Post the review of a not-so-new board (based off of the I845PE board) and
    B) Why even post it's review at all, especially now that we have learned not to trust review sites?

    I am not trying to be troll-ish, but this is Slashdot, News for Nerds. Stuff that matters. Clearly this was neither of the two.

    --
    .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  27. slashdot summary 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Merkac Dot - The Slashdot Summariser
    In the footsteps of alterslash comes another slashdot summariser - Hoping to ease your slashdot browsing.
    This is the story with all links pointing to the google cached versions. See Merkac Dot for the full summary

    Hardware Bits Hardware [G] | Posted by michael on Friday December 13, @08:47PM
    from the bit-o-honey dept.
    Zygo writes "Again a little bit of hardware news for today: At MonkeyReview [G] a very cool case... At DV Hardware [G] a little article about an aluminium mousepad, called the Steelpad... OCCanada [G] takes a look at the Gigabyte GA8PE667-Pro... ExtremeMHz [G] brings you a guide to power... Some Christmas stuff [G]... And Modthebox [G] checks out a cool tachometer for PC's!" richie2000 submits a holiday-themed case mod: "A gingerbread [G] case mod [G]. Don't tell me you didn't see this one coming. And here's [G] a mirror of one of the images."

  28. Whoa... freaky! by Feztaa · · Score: 0

    Hey that link to OverClockersClubCanada... I know that guy! In real life! Went to Jr. High with him, now we're at the same University.

    Anyway, you all probably don't care, I just thought it was a weird coincidence.

  29. Mouse pad compatability.... by flxkid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hear so much about how compatablity with computer accessories isn't a an issue anymore. I never believed it myself....(page 4 of the aluminum mousepad review):

    "Another problem is that the pad isn't compatible with most of Logitechs optical mouses , only with the MX serie."

    OLIVER

    --
    Better VDF than VD...check it out: Data Access
  30. so much for running the PC BEHIND the surge pro... by dmnic · · Score: 1

    so, should we run a line conditioner in front of and behind the pc when running with this relay tool?

    yes, this was a joke...

  31. AC/DC Convertor by wynlyndd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wouldn't that have smoothed out the power and removed the flicker?

    --
    "Dogs and cats, living together...it's mass hysteria!"
    1. Re:AC/DC Convertor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this is one cap away from being a true AC/DC converter. I guess you could make a bigger one and plug all the light strings into it into it. But this way they are built into the cord and you don't have to think about it after that.

      The strings require about 115 to run. I don't think I've ever seen a 115 AC to 115 DC converter for sale, you'd have to make it yourself anyway.

    2. Re:AC/DC Convertor by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not.

      I don't know a whole lot about this, but I do know that most DC->AC inverters (like one you would use to power a household plug from your car's cigarette lighter) don't perform a true inversion. Instead the AC that is produced (remember that's alternating current) is what's known as a 'modified sine wave' instead of a true sine wave.

      Kind of hard to explain, so here's a picture. To make a long story short, _true_ sine wave inverters cost a whole lot more than the cheaper variety.

      Anyway, I don't think a modified since wave one would fix the flicker, a true sine might though.

    3. Re:AC/DC Convertor by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      This is an AC/DC converter, of sorts. Add a high voltage capacitor between Vcc and ground on the DC side, and that's the flicker reduced... Of course, by doing that, you've instantly increased the bulk and cost of the mod.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
  32. teset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've gotta stop doing this

  33. Rails by itwerx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I liked this quote from later in the article:

    I noticed that the tower used drive rails for installing your 5 ¼" drives, this was my first time using them and I now see their very obvious advantage, quick removal.

    This guy's never heard of drive rails and he's a reviewer?!? Egads...

    1. Re:Rails by Atrahasis · · Score: 1
      It doesn't say that he has never heard of them, only that he, personally, has never used them before.

      The guy quotes the article and still doesn't know what it says?!? Egads...

    2. Re:Rails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is incredibly anal and posts on Slashdot?!? Egads...

      Oh, wait, that's normal. Never mind!

  34. a tachometer for my PC? by pcol · · Score: 1

    Yeah.

    It's called hitting Crtl + Alt + Del and looking at the CPU usage.

  35. 220 isn't much more dangerous than 110 by upper · · Score: 4, Informative
    Perhaps if the standard US voltage was 220V like much of the world, there might be far more fatalities.

    The danger doesn't always increase with voltage. It's the current, and the duration of the current, that kills. And the resistance of a human body varies so much with so many variables that a factor of 2 in the voltage isn't likely to be the difference between life and death.

    Voltage does affect how your muscles react to a shock, though. As I understand it, you are likely to close your hand tightly and involuntarily if you come into contact with voltages in the 100-250 range. If you can't break contact, you're in serious trouble, hence the old advice to touch the wire with the back of your hand first. But for voltages more than a few hundred volts, muscles react so strongly that you're likely to throw yourself clear, even if you make contact with your palm. (I'm not sure I completely believe that.) So both US and european line voltages are about as dangerous as any voltage we could have chosen.

    I'm not sure that a lower voltage would reduce fatalities, though. It would increase current, and probably increase the risk of fire from overheated wires. Which kills more, electrocution or home fires?

    Do not trust your life to the info in this comment. IANA electrician or safety expert.

    1. Re:220 isn't much more dangerous than 110 by quahog · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree that the resistance is a huge factor. I myself have been shocked by 110V a few times and it wasn't a big deal...just some tingling through my whole arm for a few minutes (although, not nearly as painful as when I twigged some nerve in my elbow and it felt like my hand was on fire...good times).
      I do remember my grandfather showing me a trick where he had a cord plugged into an outlet with bare wires. He then proceeded to dry his fingertips on his pants and then lightly grabbed onto the wires. I wouldn't want to try this with nice wet, salty hands though ;) (Note: he did have thick-skin mechanic hands which probably helped greatly). Here's an experiment you CAN try at home (if you have access to a multimeter with resistance measurement). Grab onto the contacts of the multimeter and try varying your finger pressure. Also try wet/salty hands.

      Disclamer: Don't even think of trying the first trick with 110V!!!

    2. Re:220 isn't much more dangerous than 110 by panurge · · Score: 2
      I had to decide whether to reply to this or moderate it down.

      In fact, there is NO safe lower limit for electric shock, and I write as someone who at one time designed unusual power supplies (5kV 5000A, for instance) and had to spend a lot of time consulting experts. The effects of shock on the body are actually highly unpredictable, and if you are really unlucky a couple of milliamps can cause cardiac fibrillation and death. Confusingly, voltages from 60 to around 1000V are all called "low voltage" and regarded in roughly the same way from a design safety point of view.

      As for the difference between 110V and 230V supplies, it is true that 220V is very considerably more dangerous. The reason there are so few fatalities is that generally when wires are cut, both current conductors contact the body close to one another and the current flows in a local loop. The amount of current that reaches the sensitive areas (heart, brain, spinal cord) is extremely small. The really dangerous situation is when one part of the body is in contact with ground and another comes into contact with a line conductor. In these circumstances the 220V supply will put more current through critical areas, increasing the chance of fibrillation or cessation of breathing.

      The observation about relative currents is also incorrect. Since the resistance of power conductors is low, a 230V supply will generally put more current into a short circuit than 110. In the worst case, the UK 230V supply can put about 6000A into a domestic circuit for a short time.

      But that is what we have circuit breakers and fuses for. The weakness of the US system is that individual circuits are often not protected to the same extent that they are in Europe, and that is why the risk of cable fires is greater - the use of cables with a rating lower than the upstream protection device.

      A big problem is that our entire electrical systems are now obsolete. They were designed when electrical appliances were bar heaters, washing machines and incandescent lamps. Now we need much lower current systems with multiple outlets to power all our tiny toys. We have lots of thin cables being connected to outlets rated at 10, 13 or 16A. But the cost of developing and installing more modern systems is prohibitive. Hence all those annoying little power supply bricks. Now that even CRT monitors are on the way out, we really need something like a safe, simple domestic 12 or 24V small appliance rail that can be locally backed up with batteries, supported with solar panels, even charged via exercise machines. But don't hold your breath waiting.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    3. Re:220 isn't much more dangerous than 110 by evilviper · · Score: 2
      The danger doesn't always increase with voltage.

      I theory, you are correct. In the real world, that is NEVER the case. Since even 1 amp of current can kill you (eg. a small battery), it really is the voltages that chages the outcome.

      It's the current, and the duration of the current, that kills.

      True, but the higer the voltage, the further the current can travel around impeedances, such as your skin, the air, etc. Just take a look at lightning some time. It jumps so very far because of the incredibly high voltages.

      As I understand it, you are likely to close your hand tightly and involuntarily
      But for voltages more than a few hundred volts, muscles react so strongly that you're likely to throw yourself clear

      Any time electricity gets to your muscles, your body will contract. Some people get lucky, in that their reaction causes them to pull the wiring from the wall.

      When you hit high voltages, the reaction is more of an explosion than an electrocution... An accident in the 440V range caused someone I knew to be thrown about 50 feet across a room... He's no longer an electrician.

      So both US and european line voltages are about as dangerous as any voltage we could have chosen.

      The difference in doubling voltages is very significant. This comment is simply wrong.

      I'm not sure that a lower voltage would reduce fatalities, though. It would increase current, and probably increase the risk of fire from overheated wires. Which kills more, electrocution or home fires?

      Wires don't just combust. It's usually two nearby electrical contacts (not sufficiently insulated) that cause a fire. If you increase the voltage, the further away those two contacts could be while still causing a short, and the more insulation would be needed to prevent shorts. eg. Think of Lightning, Tesla Coil, Static, etc.

      Do not trust your life to the info in this comment. IANA electrician or safety expert.
      I don't think your disclaimer is suffecient. Through your whole post you state these things as fact. Changing your style through the whole article might have told people that you weren't sure of this information... A disclaimer rarely makes an impact on a person's faith in the information.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:220 isn't much more dangerous than 110 by evilviper · · Score: 2
      I just have to say this is a very good comment. I find it amazing that the comments from "upper" get moderated up, while he has shown he does not have even basic knowledge of electrical systems.

      it is true that 220V is very considerably more dangerous.

      Thanks, it's nice when I'm not the only one saying it. I never would have imagined that the words of those with electrical knowledge would be blocked out by a dozen amatures talking as if they were experts. I guess it's true... Slashdot's moderation system doesn't work in ANY situations.

      Now that even CRT monitors are on the way out, we really need something like a safe, simple domestic 12 or 24V small appliance rail that can be locally backed up with batteries, supported with solar panels, even charged via exercise machines. But don't hold your breath waiting.

      The one issue I have with this, is that I like CRTs. Well, it's not that I like CRTs, it's that I don't like the alternative... LCDs that blur, have pixels burn out, do not have as good of a picture, etc. So I wouldn't say they are on the way out, although they are becomming less popular as many people are willing to make the trade of in exchange for more table space.

      I'd still be one of the first to buy a "small appliance rail", as 99% of objects that I plug-in are just that...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:220 isn't much more dangerous than 110 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6000A @ 230 V? That is 1.38 megawatts, a substantial quantity of the output of a rather small power station. That's an insane amount of power, I can't imagine that it would take very long for wiring to simply evaporate.

    6. Re:220 isn't much more dangerous than 110 by cybergibbons · · Score: 2

      You would be surprised at how much current can flow during fault conditions. For a fraction of a second, very, very, very big currents flow. It can cause fairly sizeable pieces of cable to vapourise.

  36. Good idea, awful construction technique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree; the guy's construction technique is dangerous.

    You can buy "automatic outlet strips", where current draw on one master outlet turns on the other outlets. They're usually used for audio gear.

  37. I've been doing it all wrong... by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Funny

    DV Hardware a little article about an aluminium mousepad, called the Steelpad

    Wow, and to think all this time I've been using nice, soft gel. Time to throw that out and get me a nice block of steel...that'll do wonders for the 'ol carpal tunnel...

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  38. That's odd, it was rejected... by richie2000 · · Score: 2

    2002-11-25 06:43:27 Gingerbread case mod, hohoho! (articles,hardware) (rejected)

    So Slashdot editors go through the garbage heap now and then to find stuff. Interesting. Ah well, I should rejoice, now I just have to get slashdotted to be Übergeek Alpha-One in the hood. :-)

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  39. Re:In Soviet Canuckistan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this isn't a troll asswipes; did you not read what annonym,ous JUST SAID? it's flaimbait... and this is only offtopic AFTER you fix it --;

  40. Still some way to go, there by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 2

    You still have to beat JaS whose _Internet_Draft_ made Slashdot. :-)

    (Hmm, time to write an RFC for April 1, perhaps?)

    1. Re:Still some way to go, there by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      You still have to beat JaS

      Det orkar jag inte. :-D

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  41. This techometer idea could be expanded by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    What about a speedometer showing fps in Quake, a water temperature gauge for l33t d00ds with water cooling and a handbrake light to warn you that you've locked the workstation? You could also have an "engine check" light for when something goes wrong, but you'd have to replace the bulb frequently if you were running Windows Me ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  42. Monster Tach! by DG · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, come on.

    If you're going to add a tach, don't go with one of those puny little Sun tachs. Use one of these bad boys:

    http://www.autometer.com/hp/2001_catalog/data_ac qu isition/76.html

    It'll be about as much use on a computer as it is on the typical riced-up Civic....

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  43. PC Makers with Taste? by gaudior · · Score: 2
    Can PC case makers build some taste into these things?

    Yes.

  44. Steelpad???!? by atheken · · Score: 1

    Mousepads are sooo '90s. This is a little over the top. What purpose does a mousepad serve for an optical mouse?

    ...

    That's what I thought. March all your superfluous stuff to the round file, us geeks need our deskspace for actual useful stuff (or toys).

    1. Re:Steelpad???!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Optical mice don't really require a pad , but hey they DO run much smouther on a pad (not on all , but mostly on the ones specialy ment for optical mouse)

  45. Re:MOD PARENT UP - OR OFFTOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thread has three great quotes:

    Great grandparent:
    Mods who moderate stuff like that should be bitchslapped and be forced to use GNU/hurd

    Grandparent:
    And if they read it and still moderate it as a Troll, I will personally meta-moderate my foot into their balls

    Parent:
    too filled with their own sense of self-importance at being able to fsck and mount their own partitions

    What a good way to start the day.

  46. Getting Slashdotted 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.)Wait for an article to be posted relating to a movie and a new trailer. Matrix/Anime movies are probably the best for this.
    2.)Mirror the file and post a link. Instant karma + slashdotting for the rest of the day. Whee!

  47. Everyone seems to hate mouse pads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't say that I'm keen on mouse pads... in fact, I replaced all of my balled mouses with optical models, which work just great on my desk.

    The only problem is, where I use my main mouse, I've worn away a lot of the varnish from my desk.

    Now I think I should use a mouse mat again just to protect the desk.

    Sucks :(

  48. I've built a couple of boxes using GA-8PE667s by cowbutt · · Score: 2
    ...and they're pretty sweet, IMHO. I built them a couple of months ago, so maybe I'd wait for a dual-channel DDR board now.

    Red Hat 8.0 supports them out-of-the-box - Promise RAID controller, ALC650 sound, Intel Ethernet. Debian 3.0 doesn't seem to support the ethernet (it's on the CNR bus, apparently). Promise supply a binary module for the RAID controller, but there doesn't really seem to be any point - the hard bits are done in software anyway, so either use Linux ideraid or md and be done with it. I've gone with md, which also allows me to have mixed RAID0 and RAID1 devices using only 2 discs (not perfect resiliance, but good enough for my needs).

    I threw a Celeron 1.7G in one machine and a P4 2.40B in the other.

    The only thing I've found that doesn't appear to be terribly well supported is the environment sensor. I haven't tried the smartcard/memory card interface yet, nor the USB2.0 ports.

    One thing to note is that the AGP slot is 4x, which limits you to 1.5volt cards - Geforce, Radeon, or Matrox, essentially.

    --

  49. Tacho... by Shanep · · Score: 2

    And Modthebox checks out a cool tachometer for PC's!

    I have been meaning to get my hands on some old retro voltage meter and hook it up to the parrallel port with a simple R2R DAC to use for display of CPU occupancy.

    I guess I could multiplex it to display more stats onto more meters too for fun.

    Could look cool, having an orange backlit glow and old meter needle flicking into the "red zone". ; )

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  50. Much less than 1A by upper · · Score: 2

    evilviper (135110) wrote:

    Since even 1 amp of current can kill you (eg. a small battery), it
    really is the voltages that chages the outcome.

    Lethal current levels are much less than 1A. Most sources say fibrillation
    will start between 100-200mA for most people. One source said 75mA. And
    much lower currents than that will stop breathing for as long as a current
    flows -- some sources say 20mA. And if you read this as an assertion on my
    part that currents lower than that are safe, you seriously misread it. The
    information in this paragraph was mostly drawn from:

    http://pchem.scs.uiuc.edu/pchemlab/electric.htm
    http://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/sections/section06.htm
    http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/elecovrv.html

    I'm not sure that a lower voltage would reduce fatalities,
    though. It would increase current, and probably increase the risk
    of fire from overheated wires. Which kills more, electrocution or
    home fires?

    Wires don't just combust. It's usually two nearby electrical contacts
    (not sufficiently insulated) that cause a fire. If you increase the
    voltage, the further away those two contacts could be while still
    causing a short, and the more insulation would be needed to prevent
    shorts. eg. Think of Lightning, Tesla Coil, Static, etc.

    Wires are resistors. Connections, especially connections made by sloppy
    amateurs, are likely to have higher resistance than the wire around them.
    Too much current through a resister and it will get hot. When wires get
    hot enough, their insulation melts, and then the real trouble can begin.
    This may not seem like a likely problem, but much of typical US residential
    electrical code is aimed at it.

    Lower voltage at the same power means higher current. Higher current means
    larger wires and bigger, more serious connectors that are more expensive
    and -- in my limited experience -- take more tools, skill and care to get
    right. My opinion, based on the above, is that if we ran our high-power
    appliances on a lower voltages, there would be more electrical fires.

    Do not trust your life to the info in this comment. IANA
    electrician or safety expert.

    I don't think your disclaimer is suffecient. Through your whole post
    you state these things as fact. Changing your style through the whole
    article might have told people that you weren't sure of this
    information... A disclaimer rarely makes an impact on a person's faith
    in the information.

    You wrote this about a short comment containing "As I understand it" and
    "(I'm not sure I completely believe that.)". And you wrote it in a post in
    which you confidently misstated a danger level by a factor of 10.

    1. Re:Much less than 1A by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Lethal current levels are much less than 1A.

      I'm well aware of that. I use 1amp for a number of reasons. For one thing, the 'much [lower]' currents aren't very consistent at killing someone... While 200mA may kill one person, another may survive it without any serious problems. That can vary even more when taking in to account moisture, salt, the area of the body where the electricity was induced, etc. I think 1 amp is a good figure, as it will kill anyone under just about any circumstances...

      But, the main reason I use one amp, is simply because just about every power source we deal with has at least that buch power... Including something as small as a 'AA' battery.

      So, I wasn't trying to imply that less than 1A would be safe... Just that your assertion (that lover voltage would mean more current, hence wouldn't be any more safe) wasn't correct.

      And if you read this as an assertion on my part that currents lower than that are safe, you seriously misread it.

      That goes double for my message.

      Wires are resistors. Connections, especially connections made by sloppy amateurs, are likely to have higher resistance than the wire around them. Too much current through a resister and it will get hot. When wires get hot enough, their insulation melts, and then the real trouble can begin. This may not seem like a likely problem, but much of typical US residential
      electrical code is aimed at it.

      Again, that works in theory. The reality of it, however, is that I have NEVER yet come across any home wiring that was even warmer than room temperature, let alone hot enough to melt through it's own insulation... even in cases where outlets are being seriously overloaded.

      It takes a great deal of power to get anywhere near even a thin wire's maximum capacity. Unless someone is trying to power a large air conditioner through a $1 extention cord, I doubt most people would ever have an issue with a warm wire.

      Higher current means
      larger wires and bigger, more serious connectors that are more expensive

      You can take your pick. If you want higher currents, you need thicker wires. If you want higher currents, you need to have thicker ruber insulation on each and every wire, while needing to keep any bare connections further apart, to prevent storting.

      You wrote this about a short comment containing "As I understand it" and
      "(I'm not sure I completely believe that.)".


      That sounds nice, but let's take a look shall we.

      The danger doesn't always increase with voltage. It's the current, and the duration of the current, that kills. And the resistance of a human body varies so much with so many variables that a factor of 2 in the voltage isn't likely to be the difference between life and death.

      That comes across as a rather confident statement... I can understand if you didn't mean it to be, but it's just as dangerous to readers. As for the disclaimer, most of the time, they are used simply to prevent legal liability, and otherwise do not indicate possibly incorrect information.

      And you wrote it in a post in
      which you confidently misstated a danger level by a factor of 10.

      As I said, it wasn't a mistake. When I mentioned a "$1 extention cord" above, I didn't mean to state that an extention cord retails for exactly $1, it was just atn approximate figure used to convey my meaning.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Much less than 1A by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Allow we ta make a minor correction:

      You can take your pick. If you want higher currents, you need thicker wires. If you want higher VOLTAGES, you need to have thicker ruber insulation on each and every wire, while needing to keep any bare connections further apart, to prevent storting.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  51. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    There was a college student trying to earn some pocket money by
    going from house to house offering to do odd jobs. He explained this to
    a man who answered one door.
    "How much will you charge to paint my porch?" asked the man.
    "Forty dollars."
    "Fine" said the man, and gave the student the paint and brushes.
    Three hours later the paint-splattered lad knocked on the door again.
    "All done!", he says, and collects his money. "By the way," the student says,
    "That's not a Porsche, it's a Ferrari."

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...