More On Airplanes And Internet
fonixmunkee writes "as a sometimes-traveler for work, and a huge nerd, I am always excited about news like this. it appears that some airlines may start offering internet access next year when you need to get that internet fix at 35,000 feet. I was pleased when they started selling wireless internet in airports, so this is another welcomed suprise for techie travlers. apparently they want to use satellite to get high-speed connections to the planes in the air. pretty cool. " Too bad Northwest isn't going to have it for my DTW -> NRT -> KUL -> PER for CALU.
I haven't flown in a while, do they also offer power connections for your laptop?
Cuz a 12+ hour flight wouldn't be very much fun after your backup batteries die.
And remember, the foldable tray will stop your willie from overheating:)
He tried to kill me with a forklift!
I've always wondered why airlines got the policy that using a portable cd player or radio in flight is dangerous while laptops aren't.
At least that's the situation on all domestic flights I've taken. I've got a suspicion that they want to compete with trains etc. for business customers and therefore don't give a damn about their own rules.
How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
It's safe to use laptops etc on a plane... ?
--- Stop the world! I want to get off!
If you commit a crime via the Internet at 30,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean, whose jurisdiction does it fall in?
A plug for a mate IPSky talks about the market and the issues and is a pretty good starting doc on this sort of stuff from a technical/management perspective. The interesting part of some of these elements is that it enables additional information to the pilots and potentially between planes. Getting the internet to the passengers is relatively simple, combining it with elements like TCAS to reduce the risk of collisions and also to enable less reliance on Air Traffic Controllers in areas where they have no Radar coverage.
An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
They are talking $30 per leg.
I imagine that at those prices it will go the same way as inseat phones. One of the phone carriers is killing their $5 per minute service because there was on average 1.5 phone calls made per flight.
If you are carrying all that extra weight, you have to be able to get people to buy it or it is just going out backwards.
Secondly, how long until we see groups of people smuggling on battery powered Linksys (et al) routers. $30 split a few ways is always cheaper..
It wouldn't be hard. Most of things draw DC from a power brick. RadioShack used to carry a power brick-type thing that would hold batteries in what would normally be the brick. And I imagine that there are or will be other third party solutions such as a rechargeable power brick for using routers with batteries before too long as portable, wireless high speed access becomes more and more important.
My journal has hot
Hey, what about those fuel cells you have these days!?
-------
Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
Now all three passengers behind my seat and my two neighbors will know the name of my wife and kids, what a great week-end I have had, how bad the food was, and how much money the deal closed.
Err, what if one of the three happened to be an executive from a competitor ? Think about it for a minute :)
And I think that most people will not want to watch pr0n on my screen throughout the flight either !
Almost ten years ago, I worked for InFlight Phone Corp., which offered dial-up connectivity (19.2K, which was fast for the time) from commercial flights, along with digital voice phone, faxes, games, etc. Each seat had an embedded PC, talking to a file/radio server buried in the cargo bay.
The system actually worked, and was installed in over 100 planes (mostly USAir). Unfortunately, it cost enormously more to set up and operate the system than customers were willing to pay, and the company went out of business.
Years later, I was on a plane that still had the system installed (but turned off). The rumor around the office was that it cost $250K to remove the now-dead system from a plane, and the airlines weren't willing to foot the bill, so the dead system stayed in planes for years to come.
PS. The folding tray may stop your todger from doing a Hindenberg, but the little magnetic catch may zorsch your hard disc.
"I was pleased when they started selling wireless internet in airports..."
In Singapore airport, wireless and cable based internet access is free. When travelling last year via Singapore I wandered out of the plane and into the internet access area, booted up (using my cable as I had no wireless adapter) and I was online in the time it took for w2k to boot. You can get wireless adapters there to use too, or use an IR port if you have one.
What about when your about to land? They just cut you off mid connection? About to send that document to the office, or in the middle of an important system/database callout fixing session and they just cut you loose! "Sorry about that Boss, I know we had 20,000 clients who couldn't connect for 4 hours, but Delta cut my service halfway through and I couldn't get back in til I got into the airport lounge, after customs, the gift shop, duty free, cavity search, etc!"
Windows guys please stop pissing on everyone and the Linux guys stop pissing in the wind, hoping to hit Windows guys!
the problem, IMHO, is not with the equipment used - most of us are knowledgeable enough to know what we should and shouldn't operate in the air. But the same doesn't seem to apply to the cabin crew. On a recent BA flight to Paris, I was asked to turn off my MD player(note this - a player. Not any form of radio at all) because 'it could interfere with the flight instrumentation'. I politely explained what the mysterious object I was listening to was, but the cabin crew were adamant. How are they going to know the difference when it comes to people waving laptops and PDA's around? Some additional training for crew will be needed - cue an increase in flight fares to cover it?
"This is your life - and it's ending one minute at a time" - Narrator, Fight Club
Has anyone ever thought of the security implications of allowing someone to have silent access to the rest of the world on an airplane? Let's set up the scenario: Some nutbag with a portable GPS device on his laptop is able to provide real-time coordinates to someone on the ground via AOL Instant messenger or some other chat program. With the elevated threat of surface to air shoulder-mounted rockets on the news lately, isn't this giving terrorists a new way to track planes? Call me paranoid, but as cool as it would be to be able to get an IRC fix at 40,000 feet, I just don't think its a very wise idea in these troubled times.
Will Windows file sharing be blocked? If not, it would be lots of fun to see who is in your network neighborhood. Kind of like the old days with cable modems.
Could someone have a little pop-up window show up on passenger laptops that says "This plane has been boarded by alien space invaders. Stay calm. They mean us no harm"? Or maybe "I am Colonel Ogo Mumbasso from Nigeria. If you help me transfer money, I will arrange frequent flyer miles..."
If your children ever found out how lame you are, they'd murder you in your sleep