Slashdot Mirror


Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines

An anonymous reader writes "There is a new Quicktime Trailer avalible for Terminator 3 up and avalible to download. Features include shiny chrome, blue LED's a-plenty and a few seconds of a CGI'ed army of Terminators." Looks like a pretty fun movie.

38 of 615 comments (clear)

  1. I won't ever see this one by ekrout · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are *some* disadvantages to having a girlfriend.

    Oh well, I'm sure You've Got Mail II will be pretty cool.

    Sigh.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:I won't ever see this one by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "There are *some* disadvantages to having a girlfriend."

      Shh! Don't admit you won't see it because of a girlfriend, call it an MPAA boycott!

  2. T3 Looks ShitE by korea · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know it's unavoidable, but Arnold is getting old and just looks strange as the Terminator. And the fact that the new "girl" bot looks a regression of design versus the t1000 :| Damn I feel bad for saying this. If it's any consolation, I -hope- that this movie is good.

    --

    --

    "pain is weakness leaving the body."
    1. Re:T3 Looks ShitE by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the fact that the new "girl" bot looks a regression of design versus the t1000.

      I don't know about you, but if that's a regression, I'm all in favor of them sliding further and further backwards.

  3. Obligatory Slashdotting joke ... by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Terminator 4: Skynet gets Slashdotted"

  4. Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by Myriad · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I just watched the trailer and am quite disappointed!

    I was under the impression that T3 was going to tell the story of Skynet coming on-line and the war - taking place entirely in the future.

    Instead we get the same concept as T2: an new, advanced Terminator is sent back in time to kill people (presumably Connor once again), and it appears a new Terminator is sent back to protect them, again (Arnold).

    The only difference is newer special effects and the evil terminator is a buxom blonde, with big breasts, and wearing a tight red leather outfit.

    All these years and all they could come up with is the Baywatch Effect?

    Mr. Cameron, I thought you could do better then that.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only difference is newer special effects and the evil terminator is a buxom blonde, with big breasts, and wearing a tight red leather outfit.

      I'm betting it tops $100 million in the first weekend.

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
  5. only that by lingqi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gosh I really wish they can just let these things die.

    Really...

    Why does the movie industry have to pimp a franchise until it runs out of money, but at the cost of running out of charm too?

    Take MIB - it was nice, well, self contained. MIB2 was not NEARLY as good, but they just HAD to drag everyone back to make another sequel (and probably one after that too)

    Arnold is like how old now?

    And there is gonna be another Rocky? - so will I see dentures flying in the ring?

    Creativity just seem really lacking these days. Can't we go and start some new pop legend, instead of feeding on old ones till our brains shrivel?

    *matrix is the only "new" one i can think of it off the top of my head. Fight Club maybe too - and I really hope there is no sequel to that*

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why does the movie industry have to pimp a franchise until it runs out of money, but at the cost of running out of charm too?


      I agree. What the hell is up with making another Lord of the Rings sequel? The original movie was just fine and I think it ended clearly and left no loose ends. Frodo takes the ring off the Mount Doom with Sam and throws it in the lava pit to rid the world of that evil and the other guys (don't know their names... the elf guy and the guy from Indiana Jones and the other dude with the beard) can just go off back to their own people and live happily ever after. Why do all these movies have to be dragged out into 2 or 3 sequels these days? It destroys the franchise and makes the original that much less interesting. Could you imagine if they did this idiotic shit with books? Who would buy a book when they KNOW there's going to be two others they'll have to buy to finish the story?

  6. Re:More movie reviews / trailers / etc??? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Has Slashdot become an outlet for Hollywood? I thought we were against these people..."

    I'm not sure if you noticed this or not, but the movies that Slashdot covers are, coincidentally, scifi/fantasy and are of interest to the vast majority of the people who visit this site.

  7. Modders by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Features include shiny chrome, blue LED's a-plenty
    So someone case modded a T1000?
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  8. Re:Budget by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    with a budget like $150 M they can actually build a real, functional skynet and instead of making a movie, make the whole series a self-fulfilling prophecy. ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. What's WRONG with you people? by Geekwad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can no one else see that this 'film' looks like complete shit. From the first line in the trailer .. "John Coonnoorrr... It's ttiimmeee.." it goes straight down-hill. What is this? Arny can't even play the TERMINATOR. The lines sound .. BAD .. not writing-wise.. but delivery-wise. Yes, there are only two of them (The second being the completely worthless "She'll be back.") but Arny reads them BADLY. Did no one else notice?

    And a female terminator? Does no one else see something wrong with that. I sincerely hope they didn't just do that for lame PC reasons. Why would the machines opt to make a smaller-framed, less physically imposing killing machine? The only way to justify it would be to have some sort of seduction bullshit and that would be stupid in its own right. Christ. So disappointing.

    I'm not even going to go into the fact that Arny is the ONLY member of the cast/crew who's come back for this. Cameron is gone and for good reason. He knew there was nothing to be done with the Terminator franchise after T2. T2 was as good as a film about futuristic cyborgs can get and it was the best action film of its (if not any) era. That's why Cameron's turned his attention to making True Lies II a good movie.

    God. I can't even count everything that's outlandish and ridiculous about T3. Yeah, we're all gonna see it .. but can we at least have a little backbone NOW and say that this trailer is shit?

    --

    - http://pakman.sytes.net/
  10. Re:More movie reviews / trailers / etc??? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well its news for nerds, and nerds love famous fictitious characters. No, its true. I just got back from LOTR, and there were people dressed up in star trek outfits and someone else had a lightsaber! I'm like what fucking movie did you guys think you were seeing? Its like they just want to congregate and dress up to show how nerdy they are. But I shouldn't complain, cause I like to laugh.

  11. Johnny Five Alive?! by Cadre · · Score: 4, Informative

    Speaking about bots from this movie. The conceptual art of one of the robots looks remarkedly similar to a character from an older movie...

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
  12. No Cameron by Patik · · Score: 5, Informative

    James Cameron is not in this one. Maybe that's why it doesn't look so good?

  13. Cameron's not at the helm this time... by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mr. Cameron, I thought you could do better than that.

    James Cameron is sitting this one out, AFAIK. He didn't direct this one, and I think he only got writing credit on the IMDB listing because he has to, since he created the characters.

    I think he felt there was no need for another sequel. To a degree, I agree with him. But on the other hand, I'm looking forward to checking out the continuation of the story on the big screen.

    I'm so dying for a continuation of the story, in fact, that I've devoured the books that have been written to do so. There are two so far by S.M. Stirling, and one so far by Russell Blackford. They are not related to what's going to happen in Terminator 3, they take different paths. Having read all of them, it takes a little effort to keep the storylines straight. But it's definitely worth it-- the books make reference to the most minute details mentioned or seen in the movies, which (obsessive Terminator fan that I am) I find very satisfying.

    ~Philly

  14. The reason why this is a poor movie by acehole · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay, for the benefit of the people who havent really looked into this movie I'll provide the following information.

    First off, I was quite interested in this movie so I found out if James Cameron was directing it, he is not... my interest dropped a fair bit.

    Secondly, they tried to get Linda Hamilton to reprise her role as Sarah, she refused to do it after looking at the script. Not a good sign.

    I've looked at the storyline, and this sounds shockingly familiar to a fanscript I read back in '98. Although there are a couple of differences, the overall plot is exactly the same.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:The reason why this is a poor movie by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Linda Hamilton thing worries me the most.

      James Cameron can get another job that pays assloads of money, but what the hell is Linda Hamilton going to do that would pay as much?

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
  15. OMG OMG OMG!!! by tcc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Who's been waiting for T3??

    I know that T2 is *MY* cult movie.

    - Superb effects at the time (one of the first heavy-3d film actually and one of the few with a good storyline, especially with the crap coming out since a few years

    - Superb storyline (for an action movie)

    - Superb ending (something that Hollywood is usually good at screwing up (dragonheart comes to mind) on of the main hero "DIES", something you won't see often, because good guys always live and win with hollywood.

    - Overall, one of the best rounded movies in the 90s, I have yet to see a movie that will sustain me that much all long and heck even make me cry at the end (another rare thing with action movies, or totally screwed up that makes you want to laugh (or cry because you lost 10$ :) )

    Heck if T3 would be just 1/2 as good as T2 was, I'd pay 50$ to see it!

    Producers relying on 3D renderings should always look at T2 to learn how to balance that technology, I never seen anything that was as balanced as T2 in the 90s; the CGI effects were coexisting with the storyline (and not only being a CGI festival covering the rest that would be crap, like Hollywood is selling nowadays).

    Can't wait.

    Heck while at it, why not announce Neuromancer the movie, that would make my day! :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Interesting
      T2 flowed naturally from the end of T1 (moreso if you watch the T1 DVD and see the deleted scenes that explicitly name the factory where the first terminator was crushed). I'd always wondered "what the hell happened to those smashed bits of Terminator?"

      Plus it sets up a classic time travel conundrum: Terminator goes back in time to kill the mother of its enemy, fails and is destroyed, but its broken bits become the very meme that result in the creation of Skynet. T2 twists that around so that another terminator has to terminate itself in order to prevent Skynet's creation.

      T2 was also profoundly anti-violent (not non-violent, anti-violent) for an action film. It was the only Schwarzenegger film to date in which he killed no people (I would have said nobody but he did kill the T-1000 and himself). And Sarah's dream was pretty damn scary! T2 still stands as an all-time S.F. film favorite of mine.

      T3 has none of that appeal. At best T3 looks like it could be good in the same way that Star Trek IV was. Fun, winking at itself. Probably best ignored by serious fans, and it could really really suck.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  16. identical terminators unwise by ColGraff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, you think all the Terminators look alike? They were created by Skynet, remember, to infiltrate human enclaves. If every single Terminator is a tall white scary guy who looks like Ahnold, then they're no good for covert infiltration. The "hot female" chassis is probably just one of many designs for the pre-T1000 series, with, yes, the added advantage that a female Terminator could have certain psychological advantages in manipulating humans over a male terminator.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:identical terminators unwise by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes, the added advantage that a female Terminator could have certain psychological advantages in manipulating humans over a male terminator.

      Notwithstanding how stupid this conversation really is, I have to wonder if a psychological advantage is needed when you have missiles flying out of your arms?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  17. Progression of sequels... by nemo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Terminator: Human protects Sarah from Terminator
    Terminator2: Terminator protects Sarah+John from advanced Terminator
    Terminator3: Terminator protects John from Barbie.

  18. Re:Kristanna Loken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The machines aren't the only thing rising! Whew!

  19. Playing under linux by Rufus211 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you like me that are on linux and want to see this, here are some tips:

    1) The latest version of mplayer does play all QT, including this one. The needed codecs are here along with a short how to.

    2) The standard view-source and play whatever it lists doesn't work. All trailer's on apples website are now redirects. Add an "m" before the size for the real movie (t3_tlr_480.mov becomes t3_tlr_m480.mov).

    3) mplayer http://... usually doesn't work (sits there at 0% cache). Just wget it.

    4) Here's a direct link to the large trailer.

    5) While I'm at it, here's a link to the large X2 (X-Men 2) trailer.

  20. No James Cameron == bad movie by Schwern · · Score: 4, Informative

    A quick look at the cast & crew will tell you that T3 is going to be a big budget train wreck. The most glarring omission? James Cameron. He directed and wrote T1, directed, wrote and produced T2. He's nowhere to be found on T3. Very Bad. Nor do we get William Wishner Jr., co-writer of both T1 and T2. Very, very bad.

    So who do we have instead?

    Director: Jonathan Mostow
    Of "U-571" infamy.

    Writers: John D. Brancato and Michael Ferris
    The people who brought us "The Net", "The Game" and the terminally medicore "Interceptor".

    Writer: Tedi Sarafian
    He wrote the script for "Tank Girl".

    Actors...
    The only returning actor is Arnold, because you can't have the movie without him. Neither Linda Hamilton nor Edward Furlong are coming back.

    Given the exodus of the original cast and crew and the lame second string players they've brought in for replacements, I can predict it won't be worth $10.

    Rent the T2 Special Edition instead.

  21. "I have detailed files..." by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here is an excellent site with lots of info on T3, including interviews with Stan Winston (the famous SFX guy), Arnold, and others.

    Also, whenever there's talk of T3, the question comes up, well, didn't they stop it from happening? Obviously not, and here's how. Arnie tore off his own arm after the T1000 stuck it in that machine in the steel mill. So, they used his arm for the research instead of the original Terminator's arm and CPU. Also, I've heard the idea that Cyberdyne Systems had off-site backups. ;)

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  22. umm by geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We aren't the fucking borg man. I didn't agree to any boycott nor has anyone I know. Maybe you did, but don't dare include me in your "we".

  23. There's no subtext here, honest! by duck_prime · · Score: 5, Funny
    There are *some* disadvantages to having a girlfriend.
    Yes, like wasting time trying to think of sly ways to advertise the fact on Slashdot.

    ;)
    1. Re:There's no subtext here, honest! by btellier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Very interesting that you point this out. I hadn't really considered the male angle of this phenomenon, only the female angle.

      Ever notice how women on the internet almost always advertise their gender? Stained wife-beater, Hitler moustache, playground lurking perverts not withstanding, ACTUAL women truly enjoy the Internet lifestyle. This only increases exponentially with how geeky the forum is. If it's a simple screenname/handle/nick, they might be "jane125851", but if it's an MMORPG forum they might also post a pic (real or otherwise, it doesn't make a difference). I think women who are otherwise jilted by men are very attracted to the Internet, and can become addicted to the way that men act around them in a non-confrontational setting. And not without good reason either. Nerdmen on the Internet are so smitten with women with similar tastes (being on the net constitutes "a taste") that they will do virtually (pun intended) anything to please them.

      I could go on and on, but I guess my point is that male geeks on the net like to advertise that they do have women, female geeks on the net like to advertise that they want attention.

  24. So you don't like Terminator 3, huh? by duck_prime · · Score: 5, Funny
    I just watched the trailer and am quite disappointed!
    I hear Terminator 3.11 is going to be awesome.
    1. Re:So you don't like Terminator 3, huh? by medscaper · · Score: 5, Funny
      I hear Terminator 3.11 is going to be awesome.

      Yeah, and 36D should be enough for anyone.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  25. direct link to trailer by noodlez84 · · Score: 4, Informative
  26. Re:Or... 1.5? by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they'll introudce a plot device as outlandish and unbelievable as Cyberdyne keeping offsite backups.

    Naah. Too unbelievable.

  27. Holy Fuck by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are we going to do this, or is a boycott just vaporware?

    I think I speak for everyone on Slashdot when I say, "We?"

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  28. To all of you who say "It's just like the others" by Robber+Baron · · Score: 5, Funny
    From thearnoldfans.com:

    Like all Terminators, Kristanna Loken WILL arrive naked.


    Howzat!
    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  29. Scandinavian Women by Rothron+the+Wise · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm just curious.
    As you may or may not know, the actory playing the T-X is norwegian.

    Do scandinavian women appear as exotic to Americans? For a native norwegian I get a disturbing notion that the T-X is just about to tell the weather forecast or work in the state financial committee. Personally I think this makes her even more scary.

    --
    A witty .sig proves nothing