Slashdot Mirror


Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines

An anonymous reader writes "There is a new Quicktime Trailer avalible for Terminator 3 up and avalible to download. Features include shiny chrome, blue LED's a-plenty and a few seconds of a CGI'ed army of Terminators." Looks like a pretty fun movie.

68 of 615 comments (clear)

  1. I won't ever see this one by ekrout · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are *some* disadvantages to having a girlfriend.

    Oh well, I'm sure You've Got Mail II will be pretty cool.

    Sigh.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:I won't ever see this one by image · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Oh well, I'm sure You've Got Mail II will be pretty cool.

      Ha. Although I suspect it will be called You've Got Mailer.

      Or, You've Got More Mail.

      No wait, I Still Know You've Got Mail.

      Thanks folks, I'll be here all week.

    2. Re:I won't ever see this one by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "There are *some* disadvantages to having a girlfriend."

      Shh! Don't admit you won't see it because of a girlfriend, call it an MPAA boycott!

    3. Re:I won't ever see this one by loconet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ha. Although I suspect it will be called You've Got Mailer.

      For a sec I read .... "You've got to nail her"

      --
      [alk]
    4. Re:I won't ever see this one by tezzery · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on baby.. the new robot is a girl. this movie empowers women!..

      (it's worth a try)

  2. T3 Looks ShitE by korea · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know it's unavoidable, but Arnold is getting old and just looks strange as the Terminator. And the fact that the new "girl" bot looks a regression of design versus the t1000 :| Damn I feel bad for saying this. If it's any consolation, I -hope- that this movie is good.

    --

    --

    "pain is weakness leaving the body."
    1. Re:T3 Looks ShitE by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the fact that the new "girl" bot looks a regression of design versus the t1000.

      I don't know about you, but if that's a regression, I'm all in favor of them sliding further and further backwards.

    2. Re:T3 Looks ShitE by zaffir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No kidding. I don't want another "the super machine came back in time to kill you and i'm here to protect you" story. I was hoping to see the the rise of the machines part of the story fleshed out - like the title indicates. But this looks just like the other two, only with better CGI.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  3. Obligatory Slashdotting joke ... by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Terminator 4: Skynet gets Slashdotted"

  4. Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by Myriad · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I just watched the trailer and am quite disappointed!

    I was under the impression that T3 was going to tell the story of Skynet coming on-line and the war - taking place entirely in the future.

    Instead we get the same concept as T2: an new, advanced Terminator is sent back in time to kill people (presumably Connor once again), and it appears a new Terminator is sent back to protect them, again (Arnold).

    The only difference is newer special effects and the evil terminator is a buxom blonde, with big breasts, and wearing a tight red leather outfit.

    All these years and all they could come up with is the Baywatch Effect?

    Mr. Cameron, I thought you could do better then that.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by melatonin · · Score: 3, Informative
      Mr. Cameron, I thought you could do better then that.

      Cameron's not doing this one. He's only credited to coming up with the characters. This movie is purely milking the cash cow.

      On the plus side, those Terminator box sets should be going cheap now. I think I'll pick one up.

      --
      Moderators should have to take a reading comprehension test.
    2. Re:Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only difference is newer special effects and the evil terminator is a buxom blonde, with big breasts, and wearing a tight red leather outfit.

      I'm betting it tops $100 million in the first weekend.

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    3. Re:Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by mskfisher · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Buxom" and "large breasts" are synonymous.

      Just FYI.

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    4. Re:Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was disappointed too. I was looking forward to someting along the lines of the "Burning Earth" Terminator miniseries of comics that came out a decade ago... Dark future, after the war, all that stuff.
      This looks like T2 with the villian having a sex change. Sigh.

    5. Re:Err, Maybe It Should Be Terminator 2.5 by zoloto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      he probably was encased into a flesh bubble, then shedded the skin when he arrived. as for the sending a nuke or 300 terminators back, they didn't want to disrupt the timeline entirely. it might have threatened the terminators alltogether ..

  5. I hear.. by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

    In this one Arnold passes a kidney stone made of pure medal.

  6. only that by lingqi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gosh I really wish they can just let these things die.

    Really...

    Why does the movie industry have to pimp a franchise until it runs out of money, but at the cost of running out of charm too?

    Take MIB - it was nice, well, self contained. MIB2 was not NEARLY as good, but they just HAD to drag everyone back to make another sequel (and probably one after that too)

    Arnold is like how old now?

    And there is gonna be another Rocky? - so will I see dentures flying in the ring?

    Creativity just seem really lacking these days. Can't we go and start some new pop legend, instead of feeding on old ones till our brains shrivel?

    *matrix is the only "new" one i can think of it off the top of my head. Fight Club maybe too - and I really hope there is no sequel to that*

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why does the movie industry have to pimp a franchise until it runs out of money, but at the cost of running out of charm too?


      I agree. What the hell is up with making another Lord of the Rings sequel? The original movie was just fine and I think it ended clearly and left no loose ends. Frodo takes the ring off the Mount Doom with Sam and throws it in the lava pit to rid the world of that evil and the other guys (don't know their names... the elf guy and the guy from Indiana Jones and the other dude with the beard) can just go off back to their own people and live happily ever after. Why do all these movies have to be dragged out into 2 or 3 sequels these days? It destroys the franchise and makes the original that much less interesting. Could you imagine if they did this idiotic shit with books? Who would buy a book when they KNOW there's going to be two others they'll have to buy to finish the story?

  7. Re:More movie reviews / trailers / etc??? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Has Slashdot become an outlet for Hollywood? I thought we were against these people..."

    I'm not sure if you noticed this or not, but the movies that Slashdot covers are, coincidentally, scifi/fantasy and are of interest to the vast majority of the people who visit this site.

  8. Budget by tw1z · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given the stratospheric budget on this one ($150 MM at last check), it is really amazing that they aren't even attempting a twist... I mean come on, how hard is it to push everything forward 50 years and show the skynet war details, or do a prequel, or something besides Terminator 2 redone with better effects... it's such a predictable shame when production companies are given such incredible budgets and they destroy such seemingly indestructible plot concepts

    1. Re:Budget by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

      with a budget like $150 M they can actually build a real, functional skynet and instead of making a movie, make the whole series a self-fulfilling prophecy. ;-P

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. Modders by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Features include shiny chrome, blue LED's a-plenty
    So someone case modded a T1000?
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  10. What's WRONG with you people? by Geekwad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can no one else see that this 'film' looks like complete shit. From the first line in the trailer .. "John Coonnoorrr... It's ttiimmeee.." it goes straight down-hill. What is this? Arny can't even play the TERMINATOR. The lines sound .. BAD .. not writing-wise.. but delivery-wise. Yes, there are only two of them (The second being the completely worthless "She'll be back.") but Arny reads them BADLY. Did no one else notice?

    And a female terminator? Does no one else see something wrong with that. I sincerely hope they didn't just do that for lame PC reasons. Why would the machines opt to make a smaller-framed, less physically imposing killing machine? The only way to justify it would be to have some sort of seduction bullshit and that would be stupid in its own right. Christ. So disappointing.

    I'm not even going to go into the fact that Arny is the ONLY member of the cast/crew who's come back for this. Cameron is gone and for good reason. He knew there was nothing to be done with the Terminator franchise after T2. T2 was as good as a film about futuristic cyborgs can get and it was the best action film of its (if not any) era. That's why Cameron's turned his attention to making True Lies II a good movie.

    God. I can't even count everything that's outlandish and ridiculous about T3. Yeah, we're all gonna see it .. but can we at least have a little backbone NOW and say that this trailer is shit?

    --

    - http://pakman.sytes.net/
  11. Re:More movie reviews / trailers / etc??? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well its news for nerds, and nerds love famous fictitious characters. No, its true. I just got back from LOTR, and there were people dressed up in star trek outfits and someone else had a lightsaber! I'm like what fucking movie did you guys think you were seeing? Its like they just want to congregate and dress up to show how nerdy they are. But I shouldn't complain, cause I like to laugh.

  12. Trained in destroying. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Its trained in destroying other cybernetic organisms."

    You mean, it takes T-1000's and sends them off to be on the X-Files?

    I'd hardly call that "destroying".

    But then, I'd call anyone who could banish a T-800 to the world of Last Action Hero to be one mean bitch.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  13. Johnny Five Alive?! by Cadre · · Score: 4, Informative

    Speaking about bots from this movie. The conceptual art of one of the robots looks remarkedly similar to a character from an older movie...

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
  14. No Cameron by Patik · · Score: 5, Informative

    James Cameron is not in this one. Maybe that's why it doesn't look so good?

  15. Cameron's not at the helm this time... by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mr. Cameron, I thought you could do better than that.

    James Cameron is sitting this one out, AFAIK. He didn't direct this one, and I think he only got writing credit on the IMDB listing because he has to, since he created the characters.

    I think he felt there was no need for another sequel. To a degree, I agree with him. But on the other hand, I'm looking forward to checking out the continuation of the story on the big screen.

    I'm so dying for a continuation of the story, in fact, that I've devoured the books that have been written to do so. There are two so far by S.M. Stirling, and one so far by Russell Blackford. They are not related to what's going to happen in Terminator 3, they take different paths. Having read all of them, it takes a little effort to keep the storylines straight. But it's definitely worth it-- the books make reference to the most minute details mentioned or seen in the movies, which (obsessive Terminator fan that I am) I find very satisfying.

    ~Philly

  16. The reason why this is a poor movie by acehole · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay, for the benefit of the people who havent really looked into this movie I'll provide the following information.

    First off, I was quite interested in this movie so I found out if James Cameron was directing it, he is not... my interest dropped a fair bit.

    Secondly, they tried to get Linda Hamilton to reprise her role as Sarah, she refused to do it after looking at the script. Not a good sign.

    I've looked at the storyline, and this sounds shockingly familiar to a fanscript I read back in '98. Although there are a couple of differences, the overall plot is exactly the same.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:The reason why this is a poor movie by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Linda Hamilton thing worries me the most.

      James Cameron can get another job that pays assloads of money, but what the hell is Linda Hamilton going to do that would pay as much?

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    2. Re:The reason why this is a poor movie by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Informative

      James Cameron can get another job that pays assloads of money, but what the hell is Linda Hamilton going to do that would pay as much?

      She already finished that project, it was called "Divorcing James Cameron."

      She pulled in big bucks for that one, whew!

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  17. OMG OMG OMG!!! by tcc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Who's been waiting for T3??

    I know that T2 is *MY* cult movie.

    - Superb effects at the time (one of the first heavy-3d film actually and one of the few with a good storyline, especially with the crap coming out since a few years

    - Superb storyline (for an action movie)

    - Superb ending (something that Hollywood is usually good at screwing up (dragonheart comes to mind) on of the main hero "DIES", something you won't see often, because good guys always live and win with hollywood.

    - Overall, one of the best rounded movies in the 90s, I have yet to see a movie that will sustain me that much all long and heck even make me cry at the end (another rare thing with action movies, or totally screwed up that makes you want to laugh (or cry because you lost 10$ :) )

    Heck if T3 would be just 1/2 as good as T2 was, I'd pay 50$ to see it!

    Producers relying on 3D renderings should always look at T2 to learn how to balance that technology, I never seen anything that was as balanced as T2 in the 90s; the CGI effects were coexisting with the storyline (and not only being a CGI festival covering the rest that would be crap, like Hollywood is selling nowadays).

    Can't wait.

    Heck while at it, why not announce Neuromancer the movie, that would make my day! :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Interesting
      T2 flowed naturally from the end of T1 (moreso if you watch the T1 DVD and see the deleted scenes that explicitly name the factory where the first terminator was crushed). I'd always wondered "what the hell happened to those smashed bits of Terminator?"

      Plus it sets up a classic time travel conundrum: Terminator goes back in time to kill the mother of its enemy, fails and is destroyed, but its broken bits become the very meme that result in the creation of Skynet. T2 twists that around so that another terminator has to terminate itself in order to prevent Skynet's creation.

      T2 was also profoundly anti-violent (not non-violent, anti-violent) for an action film. It was the only Schwarzenegger film to date in which he killed no people (I would have said nobody but he did kill the T-1000 and himself). And Sarah's dream was pretty damn scary! T2 still stands as an all-time S.F. film favorite of mine.

      T3 has none of that appeal. At best T3 looks like it could be good in the same way that Star Trek IV was. Fun, winking at itself. Probably best ignored by serious fans, and it could really really suck.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    2. Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! by Spunk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a fascinating analysis of the Terminator time travel issues here. Other movies are covered on the site as well.

  18. identical terminators unwise by ColGraff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, you think all the Terminators look alike? They were created by Skynet, remember, to infiltrate human enclaves. If every single Terminator is a tall white scary guy who looks like Ahnold, then they're no good for covert infiltration. The "hot female" chassis is probably just one of many designs for the pre-T1000 series, with, yes, the added advantage that a female Terminator could have certain psychological advantages in manipulating humans over a male terminator.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:identical terminators unwise by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes, the added advantage that a female Terminator could have certain psychological advantages in manipulating humans over a male terminator.

      Notwithstanding how stupid this conversation really is, I have to wonder if a psychological advantage is needed when you have missiles flying out of your arms?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  19. Progression of sequels... by nemo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Terminator: Human protects Sarah from Terminator
    Terminator2: Terminator protects Sarah+John from advanced Terminator
    Terminator3: Terminator protects John from Barbie.

  20. Re:Kristanna Loken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The machines aren't the only thing rising! Whew!

  21. Playing under linux by Rufus211 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you like me that are on linux and want to see this, here are some tips:

    1) The latest version of mplayer does play all QT, including this one. The needed codecs are here along with a short how to.

    2) The standard view-source and play whatever it lists doesn't work. All trailer's on apples website are now redirects. Add an "m" before the size for the real movie (t3_tlr_480.mov becomes t3_tlr_m480.mov).

    3) mplayer http://... usually doesn't work (sits there at 0% cache). Just wget it.

    4) Here's a direct link to the large trailer.

    5) While I'm at it, here's a link to the large X2 (X-Men 2) trailer.

  22. mpaa.org by passion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ironic how just yesterday there was discussion of boycotting the MPAA, and here - just about 100 pixels below the trailer is a link to mpaa.org...

    Are we going to do this, or is a boycott just vaporware? Oh, I see - I'll watch the TT tomorrow, and after that I'll quit. I can quit anytime! They have a link to a really lame writeup on how piracy affects movie sales - they use the example of Star Wars: Phantom Mencace, that once it got to Asia, it was so pirated that nobody wanted to see it anymore. Bah! I say that everyone knew how badly Jar-Jar fucked it up that they didn't want to see it anymore.

    Let's pick a weekend for a big movie opening - at least a few months from now, so that we'll have time to organize and boycott it for a weekend. Then, we'll intentionally all go and see it on, maybe a tuesday afternoon - just to show them how many we are that protest their anti-piracy policies.

    --
    - passion
    1. Re:mpaa.org by Rew190 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Posts like these are old and tired- I wasn't aware that everyone who didn't like the MPAA was boycotting it. Did I miss something?

      I don't like the **AA's, that's for sure, but not enough to stifle my interest in movies/music that I find genuinely worth experiencing or at least learning more about.

  23. No James Cameron == bad movie by Schwern · · Score: 4, Informative

    A quick look at the cast & crew will tell you that T3 is going to be a big budget train wreck. The most glarring omission? James Cameron. He directed and wrote T1, directed, wrote and produced T2. He's nowhere to be found on T3. Very Bad. Nor do we get William Wishner Jr., co-writer of both T1 and T2. Very, very bad.

    So who do we have instead?

    Director: Jonathan Mostow
    Of "U-571" infamy.

    Writers: John D. Brancato and Michael Ferris
    The people who brought us "The Net", "The Game" and the terminally medicore "Interceptor".

    Writer: Tedi Sarafian
    He wrote the script for "Tank Girl".

    Actors...
    The only returning actor is Arnold, because you can't have the movie without him. Neither Linda Hamilton nor Edward Furlong are coming back.

    Given the exodus of the original cast and crew and the lame second string players they've brought in for replacements, I can predict it won't be worth $10.

    Rent the T2 Special Edition instead.

  24. Hasta la Vista, Arnie... by Maul · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stop terminating a dead horse.

    Seriously, though, I don't understand why they are making this movie, or at least why they are making it the way they are now.

    First off, Arnold is a bit too old now. 5-8 years ago, maybe it could have happened. Not now, though, despite the massive amounts of makeup.

    Second off, looks like they are just turning this into a cheeseball cliche action movie. Very little originality, lots of mindless action, special effects, and the obligatory hot chick.

    Now, the trailor gives away very little except that the machines have sent thier latest robot back in time to kill us. The original Terminator must also go back to stop that machine. Sounds a lot like the Plot of Terminator 2.

    I might be wrong. It might end up being a good movie. I just doubt it.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  25. "I have detailed files..." by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here is an excellent site with lots of info on T3, including interviews with Stan Winston (the famous SFX guy), Arnold, and others.

    Also, whenever there's talk of T3, the question comes up, well, didn't they stop it from happening? Obviously not, and here's how. Arnie tore off his own arm after the T1000 stuck it in that machine in the steel mill. So, they used his arm for the research instead of the original Terminator's arm and CPU. Also, I've heard the idea that Cyberdyne Systems had off-site backups. ;)

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:"I have detailed files..." by happyhippy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Didnt the young John Connor throw the arm into the lava?

      I havent seen T2 in a while

    2. Re:"I have detailed files..." by demaria · · Score: 3, Informative

      That was the arm from the original Terminator, not the Good One.

  26. Really bad by geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the future we will be hunted by teenage blondes that look like Buffy the vampire slayer.

    This movie is going to be a joke. No James Cameron is bad enough, but making Buffy the vampire slayer into the terminator is just over the top.

    Yes I know it's not the real Buffy chick, but honestly, does it matter? It's the same cliche.

    1. Re:Really bad by Steve+G+Swine · · Score: 3, Funny
      In the future we will be hunted by teenage blondes that look like Buffy the vampire slayer.
      Freeze me now, thaw me then...
      --
      "Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer." - Linux Advocac
  27. umm by geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We aren't the fucking borg man. I didn't agree to any boycott nor has anyone I know. Maybe you did, but don't dare include me in your "we".

  28. There's no subtext here, honest! by duck_prime · · Score: 5, Funny
    There are *some* disadvantages to having a girlfriend.
    Yes, like wasting time trying to think of sly ways to advertise the fact on Slashdot.

    ;)
    1. Re:There's no subtext here, honest! by btellier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Very interesting that you point this out. I hadn't really considered the male angle of this phenomenon, only the female angle.

      Ever notice how women on the internet almost always advertise their gender? Stained wife-beater, Hitler moustache, playground lurking perverts not withstanding, ACTUAL women truly enjoy the Internet lifestyle. This only increases exponentially with how geeky the forum is. If it's a simple screenname/handle/nick, they might be "jane125851", but if it's an MMORPG forum they might also post a pic (real or otherwise, it doesn't make a difference). I think women who are otherwise jilted by men are very attracted to the Internet, and can become addicted to the way that men act around them in a non-confrontational setting. And not without good reason either. Nerdmen on the Internet are so smitten with women with similar tastes (being on the net constitutes "a taste") that they will do virtually (pun intended) anything to please them.

      I could go on and on, but I guess my point is that male geeks on the net like to advertise that they do have women, female geeks on the net like to advertise that they want attention.

  29. Re:Or... 1.5? by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only problem is, they didn't destroy the Terminator's arm, that was torn off in the giant gear. They destroyed the arm that was left by the original Terminator, but Arnie only had one arm when he took the molten lead bath. There's still an arm (and thus a chip) floating around somewhere. Hence, the ability to make a sequel.

  30. So you don't like Terminator 3, huh? by duck_prime · · Score: 5, Funny
    I just watched the trailer and am quite disappointed!
    I hear Terminator 3.11 is going to be awesome.
    1. Re:So you don't like Terminator 3, huh? by medscaper · · Score: 5, Funny
      I hear Terminator 3.11 is going to be awesome.

      Yeah, and 36D should be enough for anyone.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  31. direct link to trailer by noodlez84 · · Score: 4, Informative
  32. Urrgghh by cranos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well thats one movie Im not going to go and see. Just watched the trailer and I had an amazing sense of deja vu all over again.

    Basically it looks like Terminator 2 with tits.

  33. Re:Or... 1.5? by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they'll introudce a plot device as outlandish and unbelievable as Cyberdyne keeping offsite backups.

    Naah. Too unbelievable.

  34. Good, yet not good... by WCLPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just some quick background information...

    I remember back when I was a kid, I convinced my parents to sneak me into the Drive In to watch the original Terminator on the big screen. I remember being blown away by the action, the story, and well... okay, I had a school-boy crush on Linda Hamilton. ;-)

    Of course when T2 came out I hadn't seen the original in years, so I went out and rented it from the local Video Store and checked it out again. Again I rather enjoyed it, and was able to have an even deeper understanding of the films story.

    Then I went and saw T2, and I started to feel uneasy. For it was then that I started to realize that the entire film was basically just a rehash of the entire first film.

    The structure, plotting, even the scenes are almost completely ripped off from the first movie. From the arrival scene, to the "Finding *insert* Connor.", to the ending sequence where both films ended with a car chase, tanker explosion, and a climactic battle scene in a manufacturing plant with lots of belts and gears and pullies and crap.

    It was almost as if Cameron had didn't really bother to come up with anything new. So when I found out that he wasn't doing it I was quite happy. Not because I think his movies suck, but more because I didn't really want to see a rehash of T1 & T2 yet again.

    But after watching that trailer, I'm pretty conviced that we're going to see the same film as the first two.

    We're going to have a similar arrival experience, although with the Bimbornator it might be interesting. Then we're going to be subjected to a wasteful 20-30 minutes of "Is the Bimbornator bad or good, and just where in the heck is John Connor, and why doesn't he look like Eddie Furlong, anyway?" Despite the fact that all the advertising for the film is going to make it quite obvious that Bimbornator is bad, Arnie is good.

    We're going to probably have a the flimsy filler that will attempt to make a story, but will probably follow quite closley to the original plot, "John you are destined to be this great leader, you better make sure you don't die! Oh and by the way, this evil Sky-Net thing you killed in the last movie, it didn't die."

    It will most likley end with a cheesy car chase scene, /* Arnie hanging from a crane driving down the street? Or would this be a rehash of the "Saving ____ Connor from the evil terminator by jumping in front of, on, or shooting at the chase vehicle?" scene? */ followed by a big truck exploding ending with a fight in some factory type of place.

    The sad part though is that the coolest part, the first 15-20 minutes of the movie that takes place in the future, would probably make a more interesting and exciting movie to watch.

    But the even sadder part though, I'll probably go and see it. Even though I know it'll probably suck badly, deep down I have this faint hope that they might actually make this film interesting, exciting and worth seeing.

    Oh, and one last thing... Did anyone else get the feeling that when the Bimbornator was running through the forest in the red leather outfit; that for just a split second you were watching a trailer for an upcoming episode of Buffy? ;-)

  35. Re:on the bright side... check out her OS. by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.apple.com/switch

    So, like, I tried to sent an assassin robot back in time and it was like "beep beep..."

    --
    What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  36. theater of the mind by spoonyfork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The T3 of my imagination is better than this drek. In my T3, we see hubris of man as they give the keys to the kingdom to a machine. Skynet become-self aware and the war starts. John Connor rises up and fights in a dark painful world where the banality of mindless evil crushes everyone's soul and body. His soldiers, friends, and mother die around him.

    Sure, he sends Ahnuld back to save his bacon but that is what is so interesting to me about this mind-flick -- what happens after? I'm sure it would have a Millenium type feel with timequakes or something or would the future just instantly change into something more pleasant, too easy, like Ender at the end of Ender's Game. Where do you go next?

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  37. Holy Fuck by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are we going to do this, or is a boycott just vaporware?

    I think I speak for everyone on Slashdot when I say, "We?"

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  38. To all of you who say "It's just like the others" by Robber+Baron · · Score: 5, Funny
    From thearnoldfans.com:

    Like all Terminators, Kristanna Loken WILL arrive naked.


    Howzat!
    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  39. Hey, there is a missunderstanding here! by haggar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have already seen Terminator 2!
    Oh this -is- a new episode? Terminator 3? I thought it should be somehow different from the previous two episodes. I thought these people are PAID to be original and creative.

    Joking apart, I am not going to waste my time and money in watching a pathetic re-make of Terminator 2. I wish nobody did, because it's about time that the habit of sqeezing out the last cent from a franchise while adding NO NEW IDEAS, came to an end.

    --
    Sigged!
  40. Oddly appropriate error message: by Sits · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was watching the trailer and about three quarters of the way through it crashed with the following:
    Abnormal Termination Error
    How apt.

  41. Scandinavian Women by Rothron+the+Wise · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm just curious.
    As you may or may not know, the actory playing the T-X is norwegian.

    Do scandinavian women appear as exotic to Americans? For a native norwegian I get a disturbing notion that the T-X is just about to tell the weather forecast or work in the state financial committee. Personally I think this makes her even more scary.

    --
    A witty .sig proves nothing
  42. metallurgy , disaster recover & history by Martin+S. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the lamest explanation they could use.

    It likely the arm of a Terminator contains some distributed neural processing capability consider the Terminator equivalent of muscle memory particularly part of a 'learning machine/computer' with redundant systems and fail-over capability.

    The idea of Cyberdyne using off-site disaster recover or fire safe backup vault are also very credible.

    Building Terminators requires advances in metallurgy.

    There is also the unsettled issue of a batch of steel containing some highly unusually elements, or a part of the liquid metal terminator surviving. There are several clues that detached liquid metal is somewhat autonomous but with reduced effectiveness, how can we be sure it is all accounted for ?

    If a T-800 can self repair it is likely a T-1000 Liquid metal terminator can also, perhaps this is become SkyNet.

    The final point is that we as outside observers know that despite their best efforts, the future is already set. It cannot be changed, otherwise a cause and effect paradox arises. The idea that the heroes can change anything is an error in their knowledge or percecption.

    All that has happened IS history. The T1 & T2 stories, the future fall, the fight for survival, and ultimatly John's victory have already happened.

  43. Re:T3 - It's Gimmick Time by gosand · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I have to say that I was impressed with T2, because they took the story in a new direction. They made an even cooler terminator, innovative effects, and did the ol' switcheroo making Arnold the good guy. It was good, and a worthy sequel.

    I know I have just seen a trailer, but it seems like a bandwagon flick. Nothing innovative from what I can see - sorry, making the terminator a chick is just a lame gimmick. This might be a "wait for the rental".

    I gotta say though, hearing that booming theme "Duh Duh Dum Da Dum" still sends chills down my spine.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  44. For those that don't have audio... by Hard_Code · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...here is the transcript of the trailer:

    In A.D. 2101
    War was beginning.
    Sarah Connor: What happen ?
    Kyle Reese: Somebody set up us the nuclear bomb.
    John Connor: We get signal.
    Sarah Connor: What !
    John Connor: Main screen turn on.
    Sarah Connor: It's You !!
    Terminator: How are you gentlemen !!
    Terminator: All your base are belong to us.
    Terminator: You are on the way to destruction.
    Sarah Connor: What you say !!
    Terminator: You have no chance to survive make your time.
    Terminator: HA HA HA HA .... stalavista
    Sarah Connor: Take off every 'zig' !!
    Sarah Connor: You know what you doing.
    Sarah Connor: Move 'zig'.
    Sarah Connor: For great justice.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?