Slashdot Mirror


Apple Accuses Worker of Leaks

booboothefoo writes "A former Apple Computer contract worker in Sacramento has been slapped with both civil and criminal charges for allegedly leaking Apple's trade secrets on the Internet." I think the real message here is "don't trust contractors." Or maybe "rumor sites are evil." Or maybe "Setec Astronomy."

29 of 373 comments (clear)

  1. Not quite by bconway · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the real message here is "don't trust contractors." Or maybe "rumor sites are evil." Or maybe "Setec Astronomy."

    That's funny, the message I took away from it was that if you violate a contract, the company has the right to, and often will, sue you.

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    1. Re:Not quite by GeckoFood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly! From the article, here is a statement to further your point along:

      Apple says an employment agreement that Lopez signed with Volt's Sacramento office prohibited him from divulging confidential information.

      This is eactly what these agreements are for -- when you have some dumbass who decides to go against a contractual agreement, the nondisclosure is the company's legal route of recourse.

      No tears shed for this guy. I hope they take him to the cleaners.

      --
      Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    2. Re:Not quite by tchuladdiass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's why most large companies have, as part of their security policy, a documentation labeling policy. It is up to the document originator to properly lable such documents (such as, general use, internal use, confidential, trade secret, etc.). Then there is a correlating policy on how such documents are to be handled.

  2. Heh, Sneakers reference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Setec Astronomy" = anagram("Too Many Secrets");

  3. So? by 9Numbernine9 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Employee signs NDA. Employee breaks NDA. Employer gets mad. This is news?

    --
    Illegitimi non Carborundum.
    1. Re:So? by Apathy+costs+bills · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Employee signs NDA. Employee breaks NDA. Employer gets mad. This is news?

      In the case of Apple Computer, yes, it is news. Remember that Wozniak was one of the founders, and he is a famous phone phreak, a blue box-er like Captain Crunch. He was hacking Ma Bell and hiding from the Feds back in the day.

      Every corporation has a corporate culture. When was the last time you saw Microsoft publicly attacking it's one of its developers for 'leaking secrets'? It happens, but Apple has a disturbing history of jealously pursuing it's employees. The corporate culture of Apple has transitioned from the hackers' culture of Woz to a Culture of Fear. If you are a developer at Apple, high profile anti-employee actions like this send a message: secrecy first, collaboration second.

      It's a very interesting transition. I'm not making a value judgement about, other than to say yes, it is News for Nerds.
      --
      Kill Trolls Dead. Here's
    2. Re:So? by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with collaboration or corporate culture, nor should it scare any of Apples employees. If you go to work for any company and you then turn around and violate your contract you shouldn't be surprised in the least when they come after you with thier lawyers. If this was a developer talking about the latest technologies on a public mailing list there is a decent chance Apple wouldn't need to puruse it as such. In this case you have someone providing information that should not have been discussed outside of Apples doors before Apple gave the go ahead.

      IMO, if this was Apple going after an employee going after some developer for discussing information in a forum publicly without attempting to hide his identity, and not giving away "trade secrets", then it would be news. This is a corporation following up on the terms of a contract, nothing more.

    3. Re:So? by margaret · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you are a developer at Apple, high profile anti-employee actions like this send a message: secrecy first, collaboration second.

      This has nothing to do with collaboration. The guy was leaking info to a rumors site about an upcoming product. He wasn't seeking input from the community about how to make it better. It probably just made him feel cool.

  4. In the interest of free information by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's best that I disclose these trade secrets here on Slashdot, where they won't be deleted. Information longs to be free.

    • 'Think Different' means 'sue your employees'
    • 'Switch' is actually a metaphor for the one button mouse
    • Make sure everything is aerodynamic
    • Make sure everything is shiny
    • Industry standards are for idiots
    • People like paying twice as much
    • One button mouse masterstroke to be followed by one button keyboard
    • Quicktime will save us
    • If it's not from Berkley, it's CRAP
    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    1. Re:In the interest of free information by saider · · Score: 5, Funny

      One button mouse masterstroke to be followed by one button keyboard

      Joe: What does the one button do?

      Salesman : Whoa! I'm getting in over my head. Here's the number for technical support.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  5. Re:or maybe the moral is that Apple isn't Willy Wo by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obvious troll, but I'll bite I guess.

    When you sign a non disclosure agreement and then disclose information covered by the agreement you have violeted a contract. At that point any company will follow through with legal action against you. Not just Apple or Microsoft. Any company that has trade secrets is going to do what they can to protect them. This isn't apple holding on to brainspace. This is about someone violating the terms of a contract and Apple following through on enforcing it.

  6. Re:Setec Astronomy by tmhsiao · · Score: 5, Funny

    -I'd like Peace on Earth, Good will toward Men
    -We're the United States Government. We don't do that.

    --
    "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
  7. Just do what I do.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have been asked to sign a few NDAs, I just said "I'm taking them home to review them." I then never spoke of them again, and was never asked for them back.

  8. The Message I'm getting by Alexander · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or maybe the real message is, on a slow news day we have nothing better to post.

    Really, in Lorne Greene/Marc Anderssen Internet years/time, how old is this news?

    How controversial is it? If it weren't Apple but somebody as supremely unsexy like say, Unisys, would it even be news?

    This is neither news - it's past it's prime, nor is it something "that matters".

    --
    "oohhh... I didn't know Schopenhauer was a philosopher!" ..."uhhh yeah, he's the one that begins with
  9. Re:Immuteable by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Funny

    Information is immuteable, if someone needs to know, someone else needs to know too.

    I donno think that word means what you think it means.

    "Immutable" means not changeable, or "carved in stone." The past is immutable. CDROMs are immutable. Stone tablets are immutable.

    Given that definition, your comment makes basically no sense, so I have to think that you meant something else.

    --

    I write in my journal
  10. Or Maybe Apple Truly Seeks to Protect Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple has a history of protecting its goods and creativity and for that reason, I somehow doubt if it mattered whether or not the person leaking the trade secret in this case was a contractor.

    My understanding is that if Apple does not actively protect and police its trade secrets, then its innovative goods and ideas no longer receive protection as trade secrets. No evidence is required to show that Apple is an innovative company --- if it did not receive protection for its innovation, then it may have little reason to create future innovative products.

    Considering the pervasiveness of companies to recruit employees from other companies by using 'moles,' and Microsoft's history of heavy-handed tactics, perhaps Apple has another reason to protection its innovation: Microsoft.

    Do you truly believe Microsoft has never placed a 'mole' or has an Apple employee it relies on for information? For also this reason, Apple has no choice but to pursue trade secrets claims in court against everyone it can, or it will entirely lose protection.

    Pretty much, Apple is all about innovation and cutting-edge products. Take that away, and all I see is a company making an OS, keyboards, and mice.

  11. Don't Trust Contractors by Aggrazel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You may as well say, don't trust ANYONE.

    The only real difference between a contractor and an employee is how you get your paycheck. To say that someone is going to be more honest just because they are an actual employee is assinine.

    I'm a contractor and I take my job very seriously, there is no way in hell I would ever betray the confidence of any of my employers. Not just because it would tarnish my reputation with future employers but also because I am that kind of person.

    The company I am contracted to right now is very contractor friendly, I've seen some that are not. But the whole attitude that contractors are somehow less deserving of trust than regular employees really irritates me.

    Now this guy clearly broke his contract. But it would not have made a difference if he were a regular employee or a contractor, the responsibility for trust is in the individual, not in how his contract of employment is written. I'm sure regular employees at Apple have the same moral obligations to keep a lid on trade secrets. /rant off

    1. Re:Don't Trust Contractors by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Smart contractors develop relationships with their clients in order to cultivate repeat business. When an employee bails out for another job, they rarely think about returning to the original employer - often they even harbor feelings of great mistrust, feeling that they were treated unfairly which is what motivated them to look for a new job in the first place. Because of these common situations it often makes more sense to trust the contractors than it does to trust the employees.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  12. Re:or maybe by iocat · · Score: 4, Informative
    Apple does not make it easy to forget. They are upfront, and in your face, constantly, about NDAs, and the consequences for breaking them. If Apple tells someone a secret, you can be damn sure that that someone KNOWS it's a trade secret.

    As a contractor, you have to be an idiot to leak stuff: who'll hire you in the future, especially if you're a Macintosh specialist...

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  13. Apple Isn't so Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a contractor for Volt, at Apple, in Sacramento, this guy did violate the NDA, and if you have ever worked here, thats a big big no-no, you don't leak confidential information, there are markers everywhere, he didn't do it on accident, and he should get in trouble for it, I can't comment on how big a fight they are putting against him, but he did mess up, and thats the consequences.

    and to the guy talking about 'ripping off BSD code and selling it for Millions' Apple GIVES AWAY DARWIN under open source guidelines, and it works on PC's and on Mac's, they only 'sell' the Quartz interface (the one WE developed), quit bitching, they give it away, they aren't ripping it off, its a superior product, its free, they used it, this is what SHOULD be happening, Microsoft is a different story.

  14. Leaks and Contractors by one9nine · · Score: 4, Funny


    This is why I do my own plumbing. Anyone who puts their toilet main in the hands of other is surley misguided at best.

  15. Re:Setec Astronomy by Bonker · · Score: 4, Informative

    What a great movie. It dealt with information security before most people understood what it was... and explained digitial encryption in way most people could understand.

    Whistler: Cryptography systems are based on math problems so complex that they can't be solved without a key.

    They also explained why being able to easily solve just one of those problems would render all encryption based on the same problem (Long factorials, anyone?) moot. We're coming up against this with Quantum technology. While it will provide encryption that can't be broken, all previous encryption will be pretty easily brute-forced with even a relatively weak quantum computer.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  16. Re:or maybe the message is have some ethics? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's called being paid fairly

    The wonderful thing about the word "fair" is that the opposing parties on any issue will have radically different ideas of what it means.

    It is also the word that the parent of a six-year-old hates most. If I had a nickel for every time I've cringed at, "But it's not fair!" I wouldn't have to work for a living.

    In other words, my friend, quit your whining.

    why cant companies do something simple like NOT STEAL FROM THEIR EMPLOYEES?

    If Slashdot ever posts an article about an employer stealing from an employee, you can post this comment again. For now, though, I think we should all just stick to the subject at hand. Okay? Thanks.

    --

    I write in my journal
  17. Making an example.... by greymond · · Score: 4, Interesting

    out of the guy is what it sounds like according to the article

    "This suit against Lopez helps show the company vigorously tries to protect its secrets, Mireles said. In addition, such suits could serve to deter other potential leakers, he said"

    Apple has taken legal action against coworkers that leaked info in the past (also mentioned in the article) but I think the real reason why they got upset is

    "Steve uses Macworld and other appearances more effectively than any other (technology) leader," Bajarin said. "In that context they want to have that surprise element," because posting those secrets early dilutes the impact, Bajarin said."

    of course the lawyers will argue:

    "Innovation is in Apple's DNA, so the protection of trade secrets is crucial to our success. Our policy is to take legal actions where necessary to preserve the confidentiality of our intellectual property," Apple said in a prepared statement.

    Just because Apple made a great new OS - doesn't mean they're avid sourceforge users :)

  18. Re:Not that it hurt anything by ipjohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He broke an NDA point blank, it doesn't matter if it hurt sales or not.

    I have no simpathy for him he signed it, he knew what he was donig when he broke it. Why do you feel it makes a difference if sales where hurt?

  19. Re:Apple... you disgust me. by JordoCrouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I for one find this extremely disgusting. I understand that businesses need to protect their trade secrets, but I think this crosses the line.

    Lemme see. The guy signed an agreement, took the confidental information, and purposely violated the agreement and posted the information on the internet. Oh, yeah, there was a line crossed, but news flash - it wasn't Apple.

    If I had a company, and one of my employees breaks any NDA agreements like that, I'm gonna fire him first and turn him over the authorities second.

    I don't care what sort of Stallmanistic view of society you have, you cannot possibly believe that somebody should be allowed to sign an agreement, and then break it because they feel that "information should be free".

    When you sign your name to an agreement - thats it. You can't just go back later and say "oh, I was kidding". I hope when they throw the book at this guy, it hits him square in the forehead.

    --
    Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
  20. Re:Setec Astronomy by mu_wtfo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Setec Astronomy:
    "cooty's rat semen"
    "too many secrets"

    --
    If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
  21. Re:or maybe the message is have some ethics? by Mahrin+Skel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The message is that if you don't show any loyalty to your employees (if, for example, you employ them "at whim" through a temp agency, without benefits or job security) you shouldn't expect them to show any loyalty in return.

    Way back once upon a time, I worked a fab line as a "contractor", it royally sucked. "Night and fog" atmosphere, people you work with would just stop showing up, and getting curious about why was a good way to follow them out the door.

    --Dave

  22. additional damages... by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful


    The followup damages are this:

    If consumers know that a new computer is about to be released with compelling features, it will be harder for retailers to sell the current inventory at the current retail price. Usually, in advance of a product introduction, Apple will curtail availability of products to retailers if the products are to be replaced. This helps prevent them from getting loaded down with the last model when the new model is released.

    Blowing the secrecy of a new product release corrupts this process because consumers can make a tangible comparison of what waiting X days will get them vs. the mystery of knowing that a potentially-cool new product might be available soon. Retailers are then less-able to move the product that's currently on the shelves and they have to offer discounts on the leftover stock after the new product is out.