Slashdot Mirror


New Red Hat Beta

Alkini writes "Red Hat just announced a new beta, codenamed Phoebe. Their highlight list includes Mozilla 1.2.1 with Xft antialiased fonts and glibc-2.3.1. The new beta can be downloaded from RH's FTP site or one of the mirrors."

24 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Ah linux betas... by Exiler · · Score: 5, Funny

    The most unstable of the most stable of the stable desktop OSes... Wait I think I messed that up

    --
    Banaaaana!
  2. 8.0 was great, but... by MrZeebo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it left me feeling it could have been much better. It showed promise, but had a few faults which keep it just short of being, well... perfect. I always felt that if Red Hat addressed just a few concerns, 8.1 could be great. Problems, in my opinion, were:

    *Lack of NTFS support by default: Near-neccessary for 2000/XP dual-booters

    *That silly "Extras" menu: you never quite know where software is going to turn up

    *Lack of a good package management front-end: That Windows-like one they include is good for managing the software on the RH8 CDs, but for removing, installing, and upgrading third-party RPMs, one must resort either to the command line, or better yet, apt4rpm. Apt4rpm should be in by default.

    *No MP3 support in XMMS

    *DMA is off by default on CD-ROM drives. This is easily fixed through config files, but for the average user, this is a hurdle to DVD playing and CD burning.

    *No nVidia drivers

    These were all easily fixed if you knew what you were doing, but kept RH8 out of the realm of being usable for average people -- or even being usable out of the box for techies. Does anyone know if any of these gripes have been addressed?

    1. Re:8.0 was great, but... by JWW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are correct, Mandrake 9 fixed almost all of these issues. This new version will have a long way to go before it even catches up with Mandrake.

    2. Re:8.0 was great, but... by MSG · · Score: 3, Informative

      MP3 Licence costs USD 60k even BEOS could afford it.. Redhat can't ?

      Doesn't matter, licensing MP3 technology from Thompson is not an option. The GPL requires that all recipients of the software be free to use the software in any way (including resale) without license fees. If that can not be the case, as with patent fees, then the software can simply not be distributed. It's very clear on this, so the GPL does not allow anyone to redistribute MP3 software in areas where it is patented and requires that license fees be paid to Thompson for commercial use. The GPL was an inappropriate license for those pieces of software, if their goal was for redistribution everywhere. The software can still be redistributed in places where the MP3 technology is not patented, though.

      I have source NVIDIA GLX and kernel tarballs here.

      Yes, and those source tarballs contain a binary only module compiled with gcc 3.0 (which is known to cause problems, mixing gcc 3.2 kernel with modules from earlier compiler is a no-no) and a couple of source files which glue it in to the kernel's API. Red Hat is not free to redistribute them, and they would not even if they were free to do so. Without the source, Red Hat can not support the drivers.

  3. Nice features by frooyo · · Score: 3, Informative

    First, this is old news at OSnews here but also ... here is a small list of features to come:

    Gnome 2.2
    New HTree enable filesystem for ext3 (speeds enhancement). The HTree feature makes file creation, deletion, and lookup faster. On filesystems that have HTree enabled, these file operations should not get significantly slower as the directory grows in size.
    XFree 4.3
    CUPS is default

    but also note SENDMAIL is now only configured for LOCALHOST, if you want to serve you have to do some modifications:
    To use Sendmail as a server
    By default, the Sendmail mail transport agent (MTA) does not accept network connections from any host other than the local computer. If you want to configure Sendmail as a server for other clients, you must edit /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and change the DAEMON_OPTIONS line to also listen on network devices (or comment out this option entirely using the dnl comment delimiter). You must then regenerate /etc/mail/sendmail.cf by running the following command (as root): m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf Note that you must have the sendmail-cf package installed for this to work.

    The RELEASE NOTES can be found HERE

    NOTE: There has been problems upgrading if one if using Ximian Gnome, you must uninstall then reinstall using Gnome form gnome.org

  4. There goes my bandwidth by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was downloading at 300k till all the mirrors were slashdotted. Oh well, might as well Karma Whore.

    Note: Remove spaces from URLs:

    Soviet Russia
    ftp://ftp.chg.ru/pub/Linux/redhat/linux/be ta/phoeb e/
    http://ftp.chg.ru/pub/Linux/redhat/linux/beta/ phoe be/

    Canada
    ftp://ftp.nrc.ca/pub/systems/linux/redha t/ftp.redh at.com/linux/beta/phoebe/

    USA East
    ftp://ftp.rutgers.edu/pub/redhat/linux/beta/ phoebe /
    ftp://mirror.eas.muohio.edu/mirrors/redhat/linu x/b eta/phoebe/
    ftp://ftp.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/red hat/linux/bet a/
    http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linu x/be ta/phoebe/
    ftp://redhat.dulug.duke.edu/pub/redhat /linux/beta/ phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.hiwaay.net/redhat/redhat/lin ux/beta/p hoebe/
    http://mirror.hiwaay.net/redhat/redhat/lin ux/beta/ phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.cs.princeton.edu/pub/mirrors /redhat/l inux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/ beta/phoebe/
    ftp://chuck.ucs.indiana.edu/pub/linu x/redhat/redha t/linux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.pa.msu.edu/linu x/redhat/linux/beta/ph oebe/
    ftp://ftp.cse.buffalo.edu/pub/Linux/redhat/ redhat/ linux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://kickstart.linux.ncsu.edu /pub/redhat/linux/be ta/phoebe/

    USA Central
    ftp://linux.nssl.noaa.gov/linux/redhat/li nux/beta/ phoebe/
    ftp://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/red hat/linux /beta/phoebe/
    http://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/ pub/redhat/linu x/beta/phoebe/
    rsync://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.ed u/pub/redhat/lin ux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirr ors/linux/redhat/ beta/phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/redhat/ redhat/linux/b eta/phoebe/
    http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/redhat/linu x/beta/phoebe /
    http://redhat.netnitco.net/redhat/linux/beta/ph oeb e/

    USA West
    ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/redhat/beta/phoe be/

    Pacific
    Australia
    ftp://planetmirror.com/pub/r edhat/linux/beta/phoeb e/
    ftp://mirror.pacific.net.au/linux/redhat/redha t/li nux/beta/phoebe/
    http://redhat.pacific.net.au/red hat/linux/beta/pho ebe/

    Hawaii
    ftp://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mirrors/redha t/linux/be ta/phoebe/

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  5. No thanx. by Martigan80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry but if it is like 8.0 they can keep it. I'm still running fine with 7.3. I appreciate the intense struggle for RH and other companies to improve their distro to help the community out, but are they not trying a little too hard to keep pushing out the newest release? I mean it almost feels like the CPU race where we are told that a 900Mhz is too slow to keep up with a 1.4GHz. It just seems a bit over kill. I'm not blaming RH, at least they make sure their Distro is beat and tested against many arch's and problems.
    I know this is a beta but come on, when was 8.0 released??

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  6. Re:Another Redhat, more Microsoftalike? by blakestah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can you say me where i can get WMP for RedHat please ?


    Here

    Any other questions ?

  7. Updated Mirror List by Laven · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is a more complete mirror list. Mirrors will hide and unhide as they become full. Please e-mail me if you find additions or corrections for this list.

    http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/phoebe_mirrors.html

  8. I was hoping they would wait. by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    KDE 3.1 has been delayed until early/mid January for a security audit. KDE 3.1 is VERY nice and is another big step forward for KDE. I had hoped that Red Hat would delay their 8.1? release until KDE 3.1 could be included. Unfortunately it looks like we will still have the "crippled" KDE 3.0.5 in Red Hat 8.1.

    I definitely understand that Red Hat has an affinity for Gnome, and that's fine for them, but for full compatibility you really need to install both Gnome and KDE so why not have the best KDE?

    With Mandrake's newly returned cash crunch, Suse is looking like a strong contender on the distro front. However, don't forget Knoppix, the newest "distro".

    1. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      KDE 3.1 has been delayed until early/mid January for a security audit. ... KDE 3.1 has been delayed until early/mid January for a security audit.

      I think you just answered your question before you asked it. RedHat has no assurance that the release of KDE 3.1 won't be delayed further. At some point, you just have to go with what you have.

      --
      Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
    2. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by ajs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1. KDE was never crippled. A release of 3.1 would have the same bluecurve theme that 3.0.5 did, so anyone who thinks bluecurve is the spawn of Satan, would likely think the same of this beta with or without a pre-release of KDE.

      2. Red Hat does not hold up a release unless they absolutely have to, otherwise they would never release. Making the call to go ahead without some key new development is always agonizing, but I don't think we can reasonably armchair quarterback those calls. I'd rather than both RH and KDE wait and make sure everything is ready for the public than get it all early in RH8.1 and find it's broken.

      3. Just because they're releasing a beta now doesn't mean that it's all final. If KDE 3.1 releases in time and has no significant changes from 3.0.5 that prevent fast Q/A, perhaps RH will include it.

      4. I don't think it's entirely fair to ascribe Red Hat's release timetable (which has been at a pretty steady pace of 6 months per release since the early days) to liking Gnome better than KDE.

    3. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by lunenburg · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think Redhat is still dumb as shit regarding KDE. Both X and GNOME-2.2 have not yet been released as stable versions, so they could very well have added KDE-3.1rc6.

      Did you even bother doing basic research before flapping your yap?

      ncftp ...en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS > pwd
      ftp://beta:PASSWORD@ftp.beta.redhat.com/pub/redhat /linux/beta/phoebe/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/
      ncftp ...en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS > ls kde* ...
      kdebase-3.1-0.9.i386.rpm
      kdebase-devel-3.1-0 .9.i386.rpm
      kdebindings-3.1-0.3.i386.rpm
      kdebind ings-devel-3.1-0.3.i386.rpm
      kdeedu-3.1-0.3.i386.r pm
      kdeedu-devel-3.1-0.3.i386.rpm ...

      Looks like just another "Red Hat is eeevil" fool.

    4. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Jahf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go for it.

      This is my opinion regarding everyone who posts responses like this when they don't like something that one of the other distributions has done ...

      If you have both the time and experience to run Gentoo or create your own distribution, then you're not the type of person who Red Hat is targetting.

      If you have the knowledge to install your own updated KDE 3.1 then you're also probably not the customer that Red Hat is looking for.

      I find it refreshing that Red Hat has not only recognized that most people with that skillset aren't their core customers (honestly, what percentage of the Linux "elite" pay for Red Hat?) AND that they have the balls to do what is right for their customers. It means they have a model that is starting to work, which is good for all of the Linux community.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    5. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by CondeZer0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why don't you check your facts before posting?

      1) As others have pointed out, this is a *Beta*, RedHat 8.0.92 to be exact, so many things can change between now and when 8.1 is released
      2) This beta actually *includes* KDE 3.1(RC5 or CVS I guess) see http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=redh at or check the RPMs in the FTP, or install the damn thing!
      3) This is *exactly* the same as with Gnome, the beta includes the latest Gnome 2.1(from CVS I think), that by the time 8.1 final is released will become Gnome 2.2(and the same is also true for XFree 4.3)
      4) KDE on RedHat is/was not "crippled", I will not bother arguing about this, but if you think the version in 8.0 was "crippled", then doesn't mater what version they ship in the next release you will think the same.
      5) You can be sure that RedHat 8.1 final release will include KDE 3.1, you may think that it's still "crippled" though...
      (BTW, Gnome 2.2 and KDE 3.1 are both looking very good, I'm sure RH8.1 will be a great release, even better than 8.0, and 8.0 was already very nice)

      Hope this sets some facts straight, BTW, I don't even run Linux or KDE/Gnome on my boxes(I administer a few RedHat desktops running both KDE and Gnome at work though), I love my FreeBSD box with Ion, just hate to see people spreading misinformation.

      Best wishes and do some research before you post next time!

      \\Uriel

      --
      "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
  9. Re:Phobe? by ACK!! · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually its Phoebe like the character from Friends.

    The joke in the changelog or release notes go like this:

    "You know, Chandler, you being here is the best gift I could
    ask for Christmas."

    "Aww. Thanks Pheebs."

    "Ok, now where's my real present?"

    It is right there in the link on the story if you take a look. Going to wait on this one. Got my 8.0 box running right and just updated the kernel not going to jump right now unless I get a good reason.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
  10. Windows XP was great, except.... by Drakantus · · Score: 5, Funny

    -Lack of EXT3 filesystem support by default: Near-neccessary for Linux dual-booters

    -That silly "start" menu: you never quite know where software is going to turn up, some make shortcuts on the desktop and in the menu, other programs only in the menu, some don't create any shortcuts

    -No MP3 encoding support in WMP

    -DMA is off by default on CD-ROM drives. This is easily fixed through device manager, but for the average user, this is a hurdle to DVD playing and CD burning.

    -No nVidia, ATI, S3, Creative Labs, Turtle Beach, AMD, Intel, 3Com, VIA, or Matrox drivers, except very limited (no openGL, poor directX) drivers for some older devices

    -These were all easily fixed if you knew what you were doing, but kept Windows XP out of the realm of being usable for average people

    --
    I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
  11. Put blame where it belongs... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    MP3 support is due to Fraunhofer licencing.

    Nvidia drivers is due to Nvidia licencing.

    DMA support, extra menu and NTFS support I agree is things RedHat should fix. But they can't do much about the rest.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. 8.1 will have to wait... by ACK!! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just got my RH8 laptop singing with the new kernel and they go out and release a beta!

    Well, I think I will just wait. Sit back and watch the flack and see what people like/dislike and have trouble with before I go jumping into a new release. I got a lot of the stuff they are pushing already from Nyquists apt repository. At least the stuff I wanted like fontillus and gstreamer and such.

    I think RH has come a long way so far and hope to see it progress even further.

    My wish list is:

    Larger set of server configuration tools like NIS server, client, LDAP server and client GUI apps. A network shares app that could handle samba and nfs would be really helpful (Ximian Setup Tools had one way back in the day).

    Menu-editing for individual users.

    Faster hardware check tool so bootup wouldn't hang there figuring out my configuration so long.

    Graphical boot messages screen so my bootup can get slower :->.

    System-wide font installer like KDE has. Fontillus installs fonts drag and drop for users.

    Package Management tied to apt freshrpms repository. I like the GUI package management tool but end up using synaptic because it is not tied to apt.

    I can think of other things. Can you?

    What things would you like to see?

    Constructive stuff not just RH sucks garbage.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
  13. Re:If RedHat versioned honestly... by ramirez · · Score: 3, Informative

    >RH6.2 - stable
    >RH7.3 - beta
    >RH8.0 - alpha
    >
    >I just got done evaluating 7.3 for use
    >on our production boxes, and the decision is
    >to stick with 6.2. Anyone else have issues
    >with RH releases above (or before) 6.2?

    Not really. I've had no trouble running 7.3 for both workstations and servers. What issues did 7.3 have that you found unacceptable?

    I'm currently testing 8.0, and so far so good. At least after the latest patches and compiling my own kernel.

    One thing I did notice about 8.0 is that it would be nice if you could create LVM physical volumes on top of a RAID partition in their installer, but that is easy enough to do after the fact.

  14. Don't forget kernel.org by caluml · · Score: 3, Informative

    Kernel.org mirrors Debian and Redhat. Or didn't you know? Plus they've moved from 100 to 250Mb/sec

    Grab em while they're hot.
    http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/beta /phoebe/
    Don't forget to use your local mirror from kernel.org if the main one gets slow. I find .pk and .ph are fast for me in the UK, believe it or not.

    This is not whoring. It's showing people an alternative source for the future.

  15. Re:super hi rez applications by tempfile · · Score: 3, Informative

    Too small text doesn't come from high physical resolutions, but from a wrong logical one. If you crank up your physical resolution, you have to adjust the dpi settings (called "User Defined Font Size" in Windows). A typical 17" running at 1152x864 has approx. 100 dpi, with 1600x1200, you're up to 140.

    Higher physical resolution means finer text, not smaller one.

  16. My comments.... by Micah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looking at the package list...

    On the surface it seems good that they're upgrading to Mozilla 1.2.1, but I've had several problems with it compared to 1.0.1. It doesn't display updates to some XUL properties correctly after they update with JavaScript (Yes, I filed it... Bugzilla #185432). Also, it's not caching anything. If I press the BACK button or View Source, it always reloads the page. That's bad news.

    OpenOffice.org -- fine now at 1.0.1, but I think the OOo folks are planning a bugfix release soon. Hopefully that will make it in the final release. OOo in RH8 has, for me, crashed the whole X server several times when scrolling around in certain Word and Excel documents. The development branch 643C fixes that problem. Has that happened to anyone else?

    Anyone know what "musicbrainz" and "redland" are?

    PHP: still at 4.2.2. Apache: still at 2.0.40. PHP 4.3 sounds like it will have a boatload of improvements. They're including beta versions of KDE, Gnome, and X (which will probably be finalized by release date), so why not PHP? And Apache has had several updates since then.

    PostgreSQL 7.3. Nice, but upgrading requires a dump and restore. Is that a wise thing to do inside the 8.x series?

    Why don't they include SDL_ttf??? Several programs require it. For 8.0, I couldn't find a binary RPM and had to build a source RPM. That worked, except that it conflicted with a /usr/bin/showfont that was already installed. That's not too cool.

    Overall, it looks like it will definitely be better than 8.0, but not a revolutionary upgrade.

  17. Put Redhat on Kazaaa and get it there by HanzoSan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Upload it to Kazaa so the rest of us can download it from you

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac