Slashdot Mirror


New Red Hat Beta

Alkini writes "Red Hat just announced a new beta, codenamed Phoebe. Their highlight list includes Mozilla 1.2.1 with Xft antialiased fonts and glibc-2.3.1. The new beta can be downloaded from RH's FTP site or one of the mirrors."

104 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Ah linux betas... by Exiler · · Score: 5, Funny

    The most unstable of the most stable of the stable desktop OSes... Wait I think I messed that up

    --
    Banaaaana!
  2. Does this mean... by starseeker · · Score: 2

    we might finally see java and other plugins compiled for glibc 2.3? Those have been lacking for quite a while now.

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
    1. Re:Does this mean... by Tomah4wk · · Score: 2, Informative

      we might finally see java and other plugins compiled for glibc 2.3? Those have been lacking for quite a while now. They havent, blackdown has been producing them. Their version (especially java web start) is much better than that produced by Sun. And its based off of the sun sources before you ask.

    2. Re:Does this mean... by starseeker · · Score: 2

      I hadn't tried blackdown. Really does work. Thanks!

      --
      "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
  3. I'll wait for the next beta ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    Monica.

    My servers were really slowed down when I tried the Ross, and the network kept crashing after I installed the Joey.

    1. Re:I'll wait for the next beta ... by agentZ · · Score: 2

      I thought the next beta would be "The One with the Red Hat."

  4. 8.0 was great, but... by MrZeebo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it left me feeling it could have been much better. It showed promise, but had a few faults which keep it just short of being, well... perfect. I always felt that if Red Hat addressed just a few concerns, 8.1 could be great. Problems, in my opinion, were:

    *Lack of NTFS support by default: Near-neccessary for 2000/XP dual-booters

    *That silly "Extras" menu: you never quite know where software is going to turn up

    *Lack of a good package management front-end: That Windows-like one they include is good for managing the software on the RH8 CDs, but for removing, installing, and upgrading third-party RPMs, one must resort either to the command line, or better yet, apt4rpm. Apt4rpm should be in by default.

    *No MP3 support in XMMS

    *DMA is off by default on CD-ROM drives. This is easily fixed through config files, but for the average user, this is a hurdle to DVD playing and CD burning.

    *No nVidia drivers

    These were all easily fixed if you knew what you were doing, but kept RH8 out of the realm of being usable for average people -- or even being usable out of the box for techies. Does anyone know if any of these gripes have been addressed?

    1. Re:8.0 was great, but... by caluml · · Score: 2

      The NTFS thing is such a large thing to miss out - maybe they do it for licencing reasons, but if it's just out of bloody mindedness, well, they are shooting themselves in the foot.

      Lots more people are asking me (The 'Linux guy' ) to help them install Linux so they can try it out. And I curse Redhat for not including NTFS support. Sure, you can build your own kernel - but these are people that have never used Linux before. I know, I can do it myself, and build RPMs for them, but I roll my own as I use 3rd party patches.

      And with a dual-boot machine, you have to remove the necessity for them to reboot back into Windows, for once they do that, they remember how simple everything is (to them) and it's hard to drag them back to Linux land.

      The menu systems do suck, I must admit. Preferences, Server settings, System tools, System settings, and Control Panel. Anyone care to guess where a gui change password tool would be? All you need is: Prefs, System tools, games, media, office.
      And RedHat! For gods sake put a link to the konsole on the "Quick launch" thing. Start, System tools, Terminal is not at all useful.

      Has any one else noticed that when you do a man in KDE in RH 8, you get little boxes instead of dashes?

      And people, if you haven't used RedHat recently, don't slag it off. RPM isn't that bad either.

    2. Re:8.0 was great, but... by Majix · · Score: 2

      The NTFS thing is such a large thing to miss out - maybe they do it for licencing reasons, but if it's just out of bloody mindedness, well, they are shooting themselves in the foot.

      Red Hat is not including it because the legal status of the driver is unclear. Same thing as with the MP3 decoders and royalty payments, personally I think they're being too cautious.

      You don't however have to recompile your kernel just to get NTFS support! It's just one module you need, a single file. Grab it here in convinient RPM format.

    3. Re:8.0 was great, but... by JWW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are correct, Mandrake 9 fixed almost all of these issues. This new version will have a long way to go before it even catches up with Mandrake.

    4. Re:8.0 was great, but... by MSG · · Score: 3, Informative

      MP3 Licence costs USD 60k even BEOS could afford it.. Redhat can't ?

      Doesn't matter, licensing MP3 technology from Thompson is not an option. The GPL requires that all recipients of the software be free to use the software in any way (including resale) without license fees. If that can not be the case, as with patent fees, then the software can simply not be distributed. It's very clear on this, so the GPL does not allow anyone to redistribute MP3 software in areas where it is patented and requires that license fees be paid to Thompson for commercial use. The GPL was an inappropriate license for those pieces of software, if their goal was for redistribution everywhere. The software can still be redistributed in places where the MP3 technology is not patented, though.

      I have source NVIDIA GLX and kernel tarballs here.

      Yes, and those source tarballs contain a binary only module compiled with gcc 3.0 (which is known to cause problems, mixing gcc 3.2 kernel with modules from earlier compiler is a no-no) and a couple of source files which glue it in to the kernel's API. Red Hat is not free to redistribute them, and they would not even if they were free to do so. Without the source, Red Hat can not support the drivers.

    5. Re:8.0 was great, but... by binner1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try in Nautilus: Ctrl+L and enter applications:///

      It's not obvious, but it seems that menu editing and arrangement are done through Nautilus now, as opposed to a stand-along menu manager.

      I could be wrong on this, so please correct me if I am.

      -Ben

    6. Re:8.0 was great, but... by pyros · · Score: 2

      You don't even have to build a whole kernel. Here's what I do after installing a new kernel (and the kernel-source).

      cd /usr/src/linux-2.4
      make mrproper
      make xconfig
      ( load a file from /usr/src/linux-2.4/configs )
      ( enable NTFS module support )
      ( save & exit )
      ( set EXTRAVERSION in Makefile to match the kernel rpm )
      make dep && clean
      make _mod_fs
      mkdir /lib/modules//kernel/fs/ntfs
      cp fs/ntfs/ntfs.o \ /lib/modules//kernel/fs/ntfs
      depmod -a

      I admit it's close to compiling a new kernel, but you still get to run the stock binray kernel RPM and add the one module.

    7. Re:8.0 was great, but... by captaineo · · Score: 2

      Presumably NTFS is off by default because the code is a work in progress and writing to it may corrupt your filesystem. Also NVIDIA doesn't allow redistribution of its binary drivers. The other points are reasonable...

    8. Re:8.0 was great, but... by Decimal · · Score: 2

      *Lack of NTFS support by default: Near-neccessary for 2000/XP dual-booters

      Unless you're a FAT32 user, such as myself. :)

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    9. Re:8.0 was great, but... by StillAnonymous · · Score: 2

      You can get an kernel-module RPM package for RedHat 7.3 and 8.0 that gives you instant NTFS (read-only) support, which is probably good enough for most users:

      http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/redhat.ht ml

    10. Re:8.0 was great, but... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      Natilus won't let me write to anywhere within applications:/// - it just lets me browse it.

    11. Re:8.0 was great, but... by bfree · · Score: 2

      Add in KNOPPIX's Debian roots, the potential to install the system, the default initial setup is useful and has excellent (in my experience) hardware detection (also useful as a diagnosic tool to figure out a PC). The other thing to give someone if you give them KNOPPIX and/or a distro is to give them ASPLinux as it can non-destructively resize NTFS partitions and it costs nothing (it's not Free(dom) but there's nothing to do the job that is, they licensed a commercial tool and built it into their installer).

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  5. Nice features by frooyo · · Score: 3, Informative

    First, this is old news at OSnews here but also ... here is a small list of features to come:

    Gnome 2.2
    New HTree enable filesystem for ext3 (speeds enhancement). The HTree feature makes file creation, deletion, and lookup faster. On filesystems that have HTree enabled, these file operations should not get significantly slower as the directory grows in size.
    XFree 4.3
    CUPS is default

    but also note SENDMAIL is now only configured for LOCALHOST, if you want to serve you have to do some modifications:
    To use Sendmail as a server
    By default, the Sendmail mail transport agent (MTA) does not accept network connections from any host other than the local computer. If you want to configure Sendmail as a server for other clients, you must edit /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and change the DAEMON_OPTIONS line to also listen on network devices (or comment out this option entirely using the dnl comment delimiter). You must then regenerate /etc/mail/sendmail.cf by running the following command (as root): m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf Note that you must have the sendmail-cf package installed for this to work.

    The RELEASE NOTES can be found HERE

    NOTE: There has been problems upgrading if one if using Ximian Gnome, you must uninstall then reinstall using Gnome form gnome.org

    1. Re:Nice features by fymidos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sendmail was like this from 7.2 if i recall..

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    2. Re:Nice features by HiThere · · Score: 2

      /sbin/shutdown -g 0
      That's right isn't it?
      (I don't usually bother with that approach.)
      Of course there's always: /sbin/init 6
      That should also work.
      I haven't checked, these might need to be executes as superuser, so you'd need a password. Should be trivial.

      Perhaps you really meant that the KDE menu logout only logs you out. If that's your biggest problem, then you have no complaints. My version has a broken version of KOffice installed. So far I haven't figured out what to do about it, but I suspect this is what is causing people to say that Red Hat's KDE is broken. They also configured a version of kppp that would hang the process if you installed it as a panel icon and clicked on it. This was solved by removing the parameters that they passed. And they made a remarkable number of truely goofy icon changes. I'm still re-learning which icon means what.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  6. There goes my bandwidth by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was downloading at 300k till all the mirrors were slashdotted. Oh well, might as well Karma Whore.

    Note: Remove spaces from URLs:

    Soviet Russia
    ftp://ftp.chg.ru/pub/Linux/redhat/linux/be ta/phoeb e/
    http://ftp.chg.ru/pub/Linux/redhat/linux/beta/ phoe be/

    Canada
    ftp://ftp.nrc.ca/pub/systems/linux/redha t/ftp.redh at.com/linux/beta/phoebe/

    USA East
    ftp://ftp.rutgers.edu/pub/redhat/linux/beta/ phoebe /
    ftp://mirror.eas.muohio.edu/mirrors/redhat/linu x/b eta/phoebe/
    ftp://ftp.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/red hat/linux/bet a/
    http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linu x/be ta/phoebe/
    ftp://redhat.dulug.duke.edu/pub/redhat /linux/beta/ phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.hiwaay.net/redhat/redhat/lin ux/beta/p hoebe/
    http://mirror.hiwaay.net/redhat/redhat/lin ux/beta/ phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.cs.princeton.edu/pub/mirrors /redhat/l inux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/ beta/phoebe/
    ftp://chuck.ucs.indiana.edu/pub/linu x/redhat/redha t/linux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.pa.msu.edu/linu x/redhat/linux/beta/ph oebe/
    ftp://ftp.cse.buffalo.edu/pub/Linux/redhat/ redhat/ linux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://kickstart.linux.ncsu.edu /pub/redhat/linux/be ta/phoebe/

    USA Central
    ftp://linux.nssl.noaa.gov/linux/redhat/li nux/beta/ phoebe/
    ftp://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/red hat/linux /beta/phoebe/
    http://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/ pub/redhat/linu x/beta/phoebe/
    rsync://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.ed u/pub/redhat/lin ux/beta/phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirr ors/linux/redhat/ beta/phoebe/
    ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/redhat/ redhat/linux/b eta/phoebe/
    http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/redhat/linu x/beta/phoebe /
    http://redhat.netnitco.net/redhat/linux/beta/ph oeb e/

    USA West
    ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/redhat/beta/phoe be/

    Pacific
    Australia
    ftp://planetmirror.com/pub/r edhat/linux/beta/phoeb e/
    ftp://mirror.pacific.net.au/linux/redhat/redha t/li nux/beta/phoebe/
    http://redhat.pacific.net.au/red hat/linux/beta/pho ebe/

    Hawaii
    ftp://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mirrors/redha t/linux/be ta/phoebe/

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  7. No thanx. by Martigan80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry but if it is like 8.0 they can keep it. I'm still running fine with 7.3. I appreciate the intense struggle for RH and other companies to improve their distro to help the community out, but are they not trying a little too hard to keep pushing out the newest release? I mean it almost feels like the CPU race where we are told that a 900Mhz is too slow to keep up with a 1.4GHz. It just seems a bit over kill. I'm not blaming RH, at least they make sure their Distro is beat and tested against many arch's and problems.
    I know this is a beta but come on, when was 8.0 released??

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    1. Re:No thanx. by xchino · · Score: 2

      This is a beta version to a .1 release.. not a full release. In Redhat terms 8.0 is an alpha, 8.1 is beta, so this release is a beta of the beta of the redhat 8 series. Old bugs will have been replaced by new ones, but by the 8.2 or 8.3 release all the Redhat children will be as happy as with 7.3. I mean, consider the diff b/w 7.0 and 7.3.

      Basically my point is that this beta release wasn't all that soon after the initial 8.0. This is just the way redhat works.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    2. Re:No thanx. by reaper20 · · Score: 2

      If you want slower, more tested releases, then RH offers their Advanced Server product with a lifetime of at least 18 months, or you can use Debian which has a slower lifecycle.

      There's no reason why their normal distribution should sit around on its laurels, when there's GTK2/XFT Mozilla and new glib changes for the rest of us to play with.

    3. Re:No thanx. by ajs · · Score: 2

      Red Hat has always released about every 6 months. Did you think this was a problem back at 4.0?

  8. Re:Another Redhat, more Microsoftalike? by blakestah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can you say me where i can get WMP for RedHat please ?


    Here

    Any other questions ?

  9. Updated Mirror List by Laven · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is a more complete mirror list. Mirrors will hide and unhide as they become full. Please e-mail me if you find additions or corrections for this list.

    http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/phoebe_mirrors.html

  10. I was hoping they would wait. by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    KDE 3.1 has been delayed until early/mid January for a security audit. KDE 3.1 is VERY nice and is another big step forward for KDE. I had hoped that Red Hat would delay their 8.1? release until KDE 3.1 could be included. Unfortunately it looks like we will still have the "crippled" KDE 3.0.5 in Red Hat 8.1.

    I definitely understand that Red Hat has an affinity for Gnome, and that's fine for them, but for full compatibility you really need to install both Gnome and KDE so why not have the best KDE?

    With Mandrake's newly returned cash crunch, Suse is looking like a strong contender on the distro front. However, don't forget Knoppix, the newest "distro".

    1. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      KDE 3.1 has been delayed until early/mid January for a security audit. ... KDE 3.1 has been delayed until early/mid January for a security audit.

      I think you just answered your question before you asked it. RedHat has no assurance that the release of KDE 3.1 won't be delayed further. At some point, you just have to go with what you have.

      --
      Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
    2. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by wormbin · · Score: 2

      I for one am glad that Red Hat doesn't wait for certain packages to be ready before shipping a distro. Predicting when a particular software package will be stable is very difficult and predicting when an open source package will be stable is practically impossible.

      As it is, Red Hat ships a distro every six months like clockwork and whatever packages are ready ship with it. If your favorite package couldn't get a stable release out then they have another chance in six months.

    3. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Majix · · Score: 2

      But it does include KDE 3.1, and GNOME 2.2 too (plus tons of new GNOME2 applications) which is also still in beta. And the XFree version is also a new beta with cool features (rotate and resize, yay). With all these new additions I'd say the final is still 2-4 months away.

    4. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 2

      I think Redhat is still dumb as shit regarding KDE. Both X and GNOME-2.2 have not yet been released as stable versions, so they could very well have added KDE-3.1rc6. It is so stable that I regret compiling with debug enabled to get backtraces. So far in one month of heavy use I have had not a single KDE program segfault on me!

      But in the end, Redhat will have to include KDE-3.1 or they will lose market share to SuSE. Too bad, they have already lost all their KDE competence with their crippled version in Redhat-8.0. Bero quit Redhat over this. See http://slashdot.org/articles/02/09/25/2042208.shtm l?tid=110

      --
      Moritz
    5. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by ajs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1. KDE was never crippled. A release of 3.1 would have the same bluecurve theme that 3.0.5 did, so anyone who thinks bluecurve is the spawn of Satan, would likely think the same of this beta with or without a pre-release of KDE.

      2. Red Hat does not hold up a release unless they absolutely have to, otherwise they would never release. Making the call to go ahead without some key new development is always agonizing, but I don't think we can reasonably armchair quarterback those calls. I'd rather than both RH and KDE wait and make sure everything is ready for the public than get it all early in RH8.1 and find it's broken.

      3. Just because they're releasing a beta now doesn't mean that it's all final. If KDE 3.1 releases in time and has no significant changes from 3.0.5 that prevent fast Q/A, perhaps RH will include it.

      4. I don't think it's entirely fair to ascribe Red Hat's release timetable (which has been at a pretty steady pace of 6 months per release since the early days) to liking Gnome better than KDE.

    6. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by lunenburg · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think Redhat is still dumb as shit regarding KDE. Both X and GNOME-2.2 have not yet been released as stable versions, so they could very well have added KDE-3.1rc6.

      Did you even bother doing basic research before flapping your yap?

      ncftp ...en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS > pwd
      ftp://beta:PASSWORD@ftp.beta.redhat.com/pub/redhat /linux/beta/phoebe/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/
      ncftp ...en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS > ls kde* ...
      kdebase-3.1-0.9.i386.rpm
      kdebase-devel-3.1-0 .9.i386.rpm
      kdebindings-3.1-0.3.i386.rpm
      kdebind ings-devel-3.1-0.3.i386.rpm
      kdeedu-3.1-0.3.i386.r pm
      kdeedu-devel-3.1-0.3.i386.rpm ...

      Looks like just another "Red Hat is eeevil" fool.

    7. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Jahf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go for it.

      This is my opinion regarding everyone who posts responses like this when they don't like something that one of the other distributions has done ...

      If you have both the time and experience to run Gentoo or create your own distribution, then you're not the type of person who Red Hat is targetting.

      If you have the knowledge to install your own updated KDE 3.1 then you're also probably not the customer that Red Hat is looking for.

      I find it refreshing that Red Hat has not only recognized that most people with that skillset aren't their core customers (honestly, what percentage of the Linux "elite" pay for Red Hat?) AND that they have the balls to do what is right for their customers. It means they have a model that is starting to work, which is good for all of the Linux community.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    8. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by CondeZer0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why don't you check your facts before posting?

      1) As others have pointed out, this is a *Beta*, RedHat 8.0.92 to be exact, so many things can change between now and when 8.1 is released
      2) This beta actually *includes* KDE 3.1(RC5 or CVS I guess) see http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=redh at or check the RPMs in the FTP, or install the damn thing!
      3) This is *exactly* the same as with Gnome, the beta includes the latest Gnome 2.1(from CVS I think), that by the time 8.1 final is released will become Gnome 2.2(and the same is also true for XFree 4.3)
      4) KDE on RedHat is/was not "crippled", I will not bother arguing about this, but if you think the version in 8.0 was "crippled", then doesn't mater what version they ship in the next release you will think the same.
      5) You can be sure that RedHat 8.1 final release will include KDE 3.1, you may think that it's still "crippled" though...
      (BTW, Gnome 2.2 and KDE 3.1 are both looking very good, I'm sure RH8.1 will be a great release, even better than 8.0, and 8.0 was already very nice)

      Hope this sets some facts straight, BTW, I don't even run Linux or KDE/Gnome on my boxes(I administer a few RedHat desktops running both KDE and Gnome at work though), I love my FreeBSD box with Ion, just hate to see people spreading misinformation.

      Best wishes and do some research before you post next time!

      \\Uriel

      --
      "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
    9. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 2

      Cool!

      --
      Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
    10. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by gol64738 · · Score: 2

      READ MY PARENT

      where is my mod points when i need them the most? the parent of this post is the most imformative post of this discussion.

    11. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by abigor · · Score: 2

      Huh? I've done 3 RH8 installs here at work as developer boxes, and screensavers do not work. Try setting a homepage in Konq (slashdot.org, for instance) - nope. And lots of people have complained about the panel; remove the clipboard and whatever else you have, then try getting rid of the blank area. You can't.

      These aren't just bugs. They are not present in the default KDE install (from source or whatever). Some things were changed by Red Hat - basic things.

      See dot.kde.org for many more problems.

      As for removed features, I'd call using Konq as a full browser, with a homepage, a feature. Screensavers, too. The panel thing is annoying, but hardly deadly, I admit.

    12. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by nitehorse · · Score: 2

      Another poster noted that Redhat is, in fact, including KDE 3.1 (probably RC6, although I wouldn't put it past them to be using CVS from 3_1_BRANCH) with Phoebe.

      Also, note that RedHat is the _only_ distro that ships GNOME as the default desktop (aside from Debian, but Debian doesn't ship any default desktop. Every Debian-based desktop distro uses KDE, or a derivative/hack of KDE.)

      Just some thoughts.

    13. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
      Also, note that RedHat is the _only_ distro that ships GNOME as the default desktop...

      And a good thing, too. KDE is just not the way to go, IMHO. It has some good ideas, but it's all in C++ (bastard C++, IIRC). While they've achieved some neat features, it doesn't really fit in with everything else I use (well, just about everything else). C is the language of Unix; it is the language of the Internet; it should be the language of the Unix desktop. It is the language of the Unix desktop: GNOME.

      Plus, GNOME just feels better to me:-)

      But KDE really is pretty cool. I wish its developers would have spent their energy within a more pleasant environment. They could have really achieved a lot.

    14. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by antirename · · Score: 2

      I like KDE. KDE does what I need it to do, and I'm used to it. I'll keep using it. That said, I've left Redhat 8.0's GUI alone on the last few installs I've done for newbies. I agree that having a single "desktop" would be good to make it easier for people switching from windows, but I do like having options. BTW, I'm sticking with 7.3 for the time being.

    15. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by antirename · · Score: 2

      Programming language aside, I really prefer KDE. However, what difference does it really make? Why should one desktop win, and the other lose? Just use what works best for you and/or works best with what you already have. I'm sure that's what redhat was thinking.

    16. Re:I was hoping they would wait. by antirename · · Score: 2

      I paid for 5.something (can't find the disk), paid for 6.2, and downloaded 7.2 and 7.3 because I couldn't find them locally. I have paid, I don't mind paying, and I'm sure I'll pay again. I'm used to redhat, and that's a lot of the reason I stick with it. I kind of doubt that I'm the only customer that likes what they have, sticks with what they're used to for production systems, and is willing to pay for the CDs and support.

  11. Re:Phobe? by ACK!! · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually its Phoebe like the character from Friends.

    The joke in the changelog or release notes go like this:

    "You know, Chandler, you being here is the best gift I could
    ask for Christmas."

    "Aww. Thanks Pheebs."

    "Ok, now where's my real present?"

    It is right there in the link on the story if you take a look. Going to wait on this one. Got my 8.0 box running right and just updated the kernel not going to jump right now unless I get a good reason.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
  12. Re:IN US of America by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2

    Admiral Poindexter beta test you!

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  13. New mozilla & Font server... by WPIDalamar · · Score: 2

    don't know about you... but these are things I patched into my system a long time ago to the last redhat release.

  14. Windows XP was great, except.... by Drakantus · · Score: 5, Funny

    -Lack of EXT3 filesystem support by default: Near-neccessary for Linux dual-booters

    -That silly "start" menu: you never quite know where software is going to turn up, some make shortcuts on the desktop and in the menu, other programs only in the menu, some don't create any shortcuts

    -No MP3 encoding support in WMP

    -DMA is off by default on CD-ROM drives. This is easily fixed through device manager, but for the average user, this is a hurdle to DVD playing and CD burning.

    -No nVidia, ATI, S3, Creative Labs, Turtle Beach, AMD, Intel, 3Com, VIA, or Matrox drivers, except very limited (no openGL, poor directX) drivers for some older devices

    -These were all easily fixed if you knew what you were doing, but kept Windows XP out of the realm of being usable for average people

    --
    I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    1. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by conan_albrecht · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the lack of zipping support. Yes, unzip is pretty seamless, but where is zipping?

      Disclaimer: I don't use Windows at all and haven't seen zip supported in any version yet. Perhaps you can zip stuff in WinXP, but that would be news to me.

    2. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by Brightest+Light · · Score: 2

      Well, though the poster should have said Windows XP BETA (though you shouldn't have had any problems drawing that from the context of the post), its far from a troll.
      Try to have a sense of humor the next time you reply to posts like that.
      Oh, and to stay on-topic: I agree, NTFS support by default would be a great thing for Red Hat to implement.

    3. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by Cyno · · Score: 2

      What about multi-boot support? No Microsoft OS has ever supported booting into Solaris X86, BeOS, Linux, BSD, etc. What do you expect a home user to do when they install XP next to their Linux installation and can't figure out how to boot back into Linux? Microsoft is a hostile proprietary software developer, not exactly the best choice for the average consumers, completely ignoring the fact that they are a monopoly. Mac OSX is probably the easiest to use since all home users would never have to worry about drivers or hardware compatibility. But to say Windows is even close to perfect is a flat out lie. A lot of the compatibility problems surrounding PCs today were caused by Microsoft and their anticompetitive nature. I mean how can you expect ANY OS to support NTFS when its still an undocumented proprietary format? You probably expect open source developers to sign Microsoft NDAs or something similar to give you the compatibility you want, and you still expect it to be free. You ask for too much.

    4. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by LordHunter317 · · Score: 2

      Actually NT has Multiboot support. Its just very limited multiboot support. Its there, but GRUB it ain't.

      I didn't ask for anything, or nor need you preaching to me. I was just noting that the troll was feeding off the bat about things that were of no relevance or importance.

    5. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by Cyno · · Score: 2

      Sure it has multiboot support, after it overwrites your boot record without prompting for or offerring an option to boot into any alternative OSs you may have installed.
      I wouldn't be preaching if I didn't just read some moron say that RedHat is great except it doesn't have mp3 or NTFS support and then proceed to compare it to some Microsoft OS.

    6. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by LordHunter317 · · Score: 2

      Multiboot is multiboot. You didn't say anything about capibilites or features or behavior.

    7. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by jensend · · Score: 2

      In 8.0, most of what RedHat installs goes into the main menu hierarchy, while other things (other Redhat packages, almost all 3rd party packages) end up in the Extras menu.

      This is (IIRC) because RedHat is attempting to move from the old, normal Gnome and KDE menu schemes to the freedesktop.org unified menu scheme. Unfortunately, very few applications have adapted to the freedesktop.org scheme, and so these install themselves in the old Gnome menu system, which RH displays in the Extras menu. This by itself would not be such a big problem, but 8.0 did not ship with a menu editor, so if you wanted to put things from the Extras menu into your main menu, you had to edit the freedesktop.org standard desktop files by hand (and learn the syntax, which is definitely not self-explanatory). The menu editor issue will be resolved in RH 8.1 (freedesktop.org menu editing was in the Gnome point release after 8.0, and I suspect the same is true of KDE though I don't know). The Extras menu problem will gradually disappear as more and more apps move to the new menu standard.

      Nvidia cards do *not* work "just fine, except w/o acceleration" in a base RH. In my experience, the RH-shipped driver refuses to run a lot of configurations (card, resolution, color depth combinations). Furthermore, Nvidia's drivers are easily available through Windows Update (though Windows Update is often one revision behind because Microsoft won't distribute any drivers which aren't WHQL'd). Nvidia's linux drivers are not available through Up2date- in fact, while NV drivers install on XP with a couple of newbie-friendly clicks, the NV drivers on Linux require manual editing of the X configuration file and often a recompilation.

    8. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by $carab · · Score: 2

      but where is zipping?

      Windows XP...
      Right Click => Send to => Compressed (zipped) folder

      It compresses to minimize space, not time, in case you were wondering.

    9. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by renoX · · Score: 2

      > My post was mostly a joke, but all of my points were true on some level.

      I'm not serious too, still I disagree with some of your points.

      About the installation of programs: most of the programs you install in Windows ask you where you want to put the programs, the menus and if you want to put an icon on the screen, etc..

      This is way better than the instalation of programs on Linux when programs don't ask where they are going to put their menus and where modifying the menus is more difficult (on Mandrake at least) than in Windows..

      As for the DMA mode: Windows XP misdetected my settings for my HDD for a year, then I found the solution: put all your IDE controler in PIO mode, reboot, put the HDD in 'DMA if detected' reboot it solved the problem but I lost many hours looking for a solution, trying weird stuff by modifying the registry, etc.
      I prefer the hdparm command! Still you're right it can be very annoying for beginners that DMA is not turned on for some of the devices.

    10. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      Yeah, imagine installing a piece of software written for windows in a time before everyone had a start menu (i.e. Windows 3.11 software). Install in on WinXP. Hmmm... and people wonder why some icons don't end up in RedHat's menu ;-)

    11. Re:Windows XP was great, except.... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      So how do you uncompress a .gz or a .bz2 archive? Most OSs I've seen can do this, but not XP.

  15. P2P to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How bout someone with the full images put them up on a Distributed P2P network like Overnet or eDonkey2000 so we can take the load off of the mirrors and help proove that P2P is usefull for something other than piracy.

  16. Put blame where it belongs... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    MP3 support is due to Fraunhofer licencing.

    Nvidia drivers is due to Nvidia licencing.

    DMA support, extra menu and NTFS support I agree is things RedHat should fix. But they can't do much about the rest.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Put blame where it belongs... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 2

      Are you looking for NTFS read-only or read/write?

      NTFS read/write is currently known to cause bad corruption. It's being worked on, but it's not stable yet.

    2. Re:Put blame where it belongs... by jmu1 · · Score: 2
      The DMA thing is due to the goofy shit that hardware manufactuers do. Namely VIA. Their chipsets are notorious for corrupting data when using DMA. Hence the default setting.

      The NTFS support, as is mentioned in another reply is goofy, at best. RedHat likes to keep their reputation clean. That is why their lawyers are so strict about licenses. That is also why they make the decisions they do. As for the extras menu... I don't like it... but it does keep me from having gargantuan menus that I end up clicking on the wrong app. ;)

      Cheers!

    3. Re:Put blame where it belongs... by Cyno · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the menus suck, but let's face it, the menus have always sucked in Linux. At least its getting better.

  17. 8.1 will have to wait... by ACK!! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just got my RH8 laptop singing with the new kernel and they go out and release a beta!

    Well, I think I will just wait. Sit back and watch the flack and see what people like/dislike and have trouble with before I go jumping into a new release. I got a lot of the stuff they are pushing already from Nyquists apt repository. At least the stuff I wanted like fontillus and gstreamer and such.

    I think RH has come a long way so far and hope to see it progress even further.

    My wish list is:

    Larger set of server configuration tools like NIS server, client, LDAP server and client GUI apps. A network shares app that could handle samba and nfs would be really helpful (Ximian Setup Tools had one way back in the day).

    Menu-editing for individual users.

    Faster hardware check tool so bootup wouldn't hang there figuring out my configuration so long.

    Graphical boot messages screen so my bootup can get slower :->.

    System-wide font installer like KDE has. Fontillus installs fonts drag and drop for users.

    Package Management tied to apt freshrpms repository. I like the GUI package management tool but end up using synaptic because it is not tied to apt.

    I can think of other things. Can you?

    What things would you like to see?

    Constructive stuff not just RH sucks garbage.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:8.1 will have to wait... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 2

      I'm hoping for Gnome2 speedups. Certain gnome applications seem to run dog slow when just scrolling or drawing.

      If you have access to a machine with Redhat 8.0 and Redhat 7.3, try launching gnome-terminal and write something large to the screen. dmesg usually works well.

    2. Re:8.1 will have to wait... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 2

      I've had the same problem on three machines, one running an ATI Rage Mobility, one with a Revolution IV card, and one with a Radeon All-In-Wonder. All with the same problem.

      I'm not sure if time would catch the difference since it's a difference in the time taken to display rather than time taken to execute.

      Do you see any sort of noticable speed differences?

    3. Re:8.1 will have to wait... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 2

      I just installed the new 8.1 beta, and it's pretty impressive so far. The entire system seems a lot faster overall, even on my laptop, which is the lowest end machine I usually use.

      The release is VERY buggy, but that's what a beta is for. The network configuration seems to die horribly when wireless is being used. ACPI is the default instead of APM, but most of the modules aren't loaded. Attempting to load the battery module causes a kernel panic. Hopefully I'll have time soon to check for existing bug reports and open a few up.

      And I'm surprised to see that they haven't taken advantage of XFree86 4.3's ability to change resolutions on the fly and have it change the desktop size. Then again, maybe I just didn't find the option.

      I can't wait to see the final release.

    4. Re:8.1 will have to wait... by JamesHenstridge · · Score: 2

      There is support for the RandR extension in the latest releases of gtk+ (including the version in the beta). I don't know if any apps have been modified to use it though. Probably the only ones that need to care about screen size changinges are the window manager (metacity), the panel and nautilus.

  18. Re:(off-topic) Sig by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Thanks, someone also mentioned Natalie Portman. I must of missed that one. Can you explain who Natalie Portman is?

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  19. Re:If RedHat versioned honestly... by ramirez · · Score: 3, Informative

    >RH6.2 - stable
    >RH7.3 - beta
    >RH8.0 - alpha
    >
    >I just got done evaluating 7.3 for use
    >on our production boxes, and the decision is
    >to stick with 6.2. Anyone else have issues
    >with RH releases above (or before) 6.2?

    Not really. I've had no trouble running 7.3 for both workstations and servers. What issues did 7.3 have that you found unacceptable?

    I'm currently testing 8.0, and so far so good. At least after the latest patches and compiling my own kernel.

    One thing I did notice about 8.0 is that it would be nice if you could create LVM physical volumes on top of a RAID partition in their installer, but that is easy enough to do after the fact.

  20. Don't forget kernel.org by caluml · · Score: 3, Informative

    Kernel.org mirrors Debian and Redhat. Or didn't you know? Plus they've moved from 100 to 250Mb/sec

    Grab em while they're hot.
    http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/beta /phoebe/
    Don't forget to use your local mirror from kernel.org if the main one gets slow. I find .pk and .ph are fast for me in the UK, believe it or not.

    This is not whoring. It's showing people an alternative source for the future.

    1. Re:Don't forget kernel.org by caluml · · Score: 2

      Current bandwidth utilization 72.69 Mbit/s @ 20:50 UK time. I'll check back in a bit and see how it is doing :)
      Also, ftp.pk.kernel.org only seems to be good for the RedHat 8.0 isos. Maybe I'm confused. I'll go and lie down.

    2. Re:Don't forget kernel.org by caluml · · Score: 2

      Current bandwidth utilization 105.17 Mbit/s @ 21:14 UK time. I control the internet! People ph33r me :) I'm so lame. I mean l33t.

  21. Re:Good stuff by Gomer+Pyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, the fonts (with Xft2) on the 1.2.1 version of Mozilla look great. Install freetype, Xfree, Xft2, free-fonts, share-fonts, (and Gnome 2.0 if you use it) from unstable. I just did a clean install of Gentoo over the weekend and I can't believe how good my fonts look now. I didn't even have to touch any config files.

  22. Re:Phobe? by mstyne · · Score: 2

    And that person would be you.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  23. Re:IN FINLAND by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    Student produces half-assed, inefficient and slow Minix clone and releases it under viral license; only working on it over the years laying poor hacks onto it in a sad attempt to raise it from its horribly coded depths. </quote>

    #!/usr/bin/perl

    open(QUOTE, "http://slashdot.org") or die "fucked again!\n";

    s/Student/Bill Gates/;

    s/Minix clone/Windows/;

    print;

    ====== Candidate for the perl de-obfuscation contest. :-)

  24. Re:Mission critical? by Mandi+Walls · · Score: 2
    Maybe you need to move off of ODS2 or something.

    The only kernel issue i've had on my machines is that the /boot partition (on vendor-installed boxen) is too freaking small to pull their kernels down with up2date and keep the old ones around with the new ones, especially with big Dell boxes (SMP, bigmem...sweet machines, really)

    but that is being fixed, according to bugzilla.

    but, since it's Red Hat, carry on with your bitching. red hat's customers, partners, and resellers are obviously smoking crack, and you are obviously grand 1337 master of the server room.

    :P

    Wasn't that better than me adding to your "Troll" total?

    --mandi

  25. super hi rez applications by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Xft antialiased fonts

    I can recall at more than one person who would set their screen rez incredibly high, so everything would be incredibly tiny.

    This way nothing would be readable except when you are really close to the screen. a good way to mess with managers and older ciollege professors.

    Now they'll have to set the rez even higher.

    the humanity

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:super hi rez applications by tempfile · · Score: 3, Informative

      Too small text doesn't come from high physical resolutions, but from a wrong logical one. If you crank up your physical resolution, you have to adjust the dpi settings (called "User Defined Font Size" in Windows). A typical 17" running at 1152x864 has approx. 100 dpi, with 1600x1200, you're up to 140.

      Higher physical resolution means finer text, not smaller one.

    2. Re: super hi rez applications by Antity · · Score: 2

      I can recall at more than one person who would set their screen rez incredibly high, so everything would be incredibly tiny.

      That's called "Hardware antialiasing" on CRTs. :-)

      --
      42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  26. good god... by erroneus · · Score: 2

    ...and I just got around to installing RedHat 8.0.

    And to all of you out there bad-mouthing RedHat 8.0? Even though I don't really know what I'm talking about yet, I think you're all wrong and suck and stuff. It looks pretty good to me so far.

  27. My comments.... by Micah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looking at the package list...

    On the surface it seems good that they're upgrading to Mozilla 1.2.1, but I've had several problems with it compared to 1.0.1. It doesn't display updates to some XUL properties correctly after they update with JavaScript (Yes, I filed it... Bugzilla #185432). Also, it's not caching anything. If I press the BACK button or View Source, it always reloads the page. That's bad news.

    OpenOffice.org -- fine now at 1.0.1, but I think the OOo folks are planning a bugfix release soon. Hopefully that will make it in the final release. OOo in RH8 has, for me, crashed the whole X server several times when scrolling around in certain Word and Excel documents. The development branch 643C fixes that problem. Has that happened to anyone else?

    Anyone know what "musicbrainz" and "redland" are?

    PHP: still at 4.2.2. Apache: still at 2.0.40. PHP 4.3 sounds like it will have a boatload of improvements. They're including beta versions of KDE, Gnome, and X (which will probably be finalized by release date), so why not PHP? And Apache has had several updates since then.

    PostgreSQL 7.3. Nice, but upgrading requires a dump and restore. Is that a wise thing to do inside the 8.x series?

    Why don't they include SDL_ttf??? Several programs require it. For 8.0, I couldn't find a binary RPM and had to build a source RPM. That worked, except that it conflicted with a /usr/bin/showfont that was already installed. That's not too cool.

    Overall, it looks like it will definitely be better than 8.0, but not a revolutionary upgrade.

    1. Re:My comments.... by Cyno · · Score: 2

      I believe they are including additional features in the install so something like PostgreSQL could be upgraded at a later time than the distro, assumings its dependencies are backwards compatible.

    2. Re:My comments.... by Micah · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you're right. It doesn't matter that they go from something like 7.2.0 to 7.2.2 in a minor series, but since their main goal is to never break binary compatibility, it seems as though it's a huge mistake for them to upgrade PG when it will break the database, UNLESS they make an automated dump/restore script run as part of the distro upgrader (which shouldn't be too hard to do actually).

      I just immagine the poor person who upgrades Red Hat and then finds that their PG databases are unusable. Now that the old version has been wiped out, how in the world are they going to get their data back???

  28. How bout the next beta by crea5e · · Score: 2, Funny

    be called smelly cat. Red Hat Smelly Cat. Sure pheobe can make a charming lyric for it.

  29. Re:Doh by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2
    Send to compressed folder to make a .zip file... why didn't I think of that, after all it makes so much sense!!
    Not only that, the advice is misleading, and untrue. This will only use NTFS file-compression on the individual files. This does bear any of the hallmarks of a real compressed archive. It's definitely not a cross-platform unit with stored pathnames, etc. In fact, if you copy these individual files off onto other media, or send them by e-mail, they are in fact uncompressed.
    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  30. Re:choices choices choices by kableh · · Score: 2

    Try CDBakeOven, good stuff. XCDRoast works, but is so painful to use I would rather use mkisofs and cdrecord at the command line.

  31. Put Redhat on Kazaaa and get it there by HanzoSan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Upload it to Kazaa so the rest of us can download it from you

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Put Redhat on Kazaaa and get it there by alanwj · · Score: 2
      Upload it to Kazaa so the rest of us can download it from you

      This is a fantastic idea that I fully support (and a perfect use of a P2P network). However, I'd like to point out that people should still download the file MD5SUM from a trusted source (such as ftp.redhat.com). That way you can check to make sure nothing malicious has been done to the disc images you are downloading (or, probably more likely, that they have not become corrupted).

      If you already have Linux installed, you can check the images by placing MD5SUM in the same directory and executing the command:

      md5sum -c MD5SUM

      Alan
  32. If I had a dime for every time I've heard this... by bogie · · Score: 2

    Since KDE has existed every single time a new KDE release is within a few months of a potential Redhat release(ie every freaking Redhat release) someone says this. I'll just make this clear in case you didn't know.

    Redat does not, cannot, will not, and should not, TIE THEIR EVERY RELEASE to what the KDE group is doing. If the latest KDE happens to be ready when Redhat begins its testing cycle then it gets included. If not, oh well, you'll need to download the new KDE rpms's when they are ready.

    In case you were wondering I AM a KDE user. I don't even use GNOME. But not matter how much I like KDE, I'm not foolish enough to think Redhat should dictate its release cycle on it. Maybe someday when KDE makes us more than .5% of the desktop market it will be worth considering. But until that day its not worth delaying.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  33. Yea it sucks, why are they trying so hard? by bogie · · Score: 2

    I mean what are they thinking? Trying to improve their product so quickly. Especially beta testing for a few months so that its as stable and bug free as they can make it. IMO they sould just wait till a few weeks before release, rush through a beta period, and then release it bugs and all. I know they make releases every six months, and that this too will follow that pattern, but what are they thinking getting the community involved so early in the release cycle? It's almost like they want to get our input so they can make a better product, weird?

    Oh well, too bad I'm forced to download this beta and also the final release. They'll probably have the nerve to make this release free as well. Bastards.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  34. Re:glibc by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    I've been compiling with 2.3.1 for almost 2 months now on my Gentoo system and the only real hitches I've had is with running code compiled against older versions.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  35. Re:Caching. by Micah · · Score: 2

    You can set the preferences to whatever you like under Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Cache -> Compare the page in cache to the page on the network.

    Well I HAD that set to the default, "when the page is out of date." I just changed it to "once per session" and it looks like it's still doing it.

  36. Whats so good about KDE 3.1? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    Its just KDE 3.0 with less bugs.

    KDE 3.2 will have all the new features.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  37. Xfree86 5.0 by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    When Xfree86 5.0 comes out thats when Linux will make its next advance on the desktop front.

    Currently 4.3 is just 4.2 bug fixes with maybe a resize feature called randr

    I would target a spring release for Redhat 8.1 and a Fall release for 8.2, then when Xfree5.0 comes out that will be Redhat 9.0 or 9.1

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  38. New operating System Features? by acoustix · · Score: 2

    So what's new in the operating system? Red Hat has nothing to do with Mozilla or glibc. At least microsoft adds new operating system features with new releases (along with 3rd party programs).

    What's the point?

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  39. My normal rant re: ISOs and paying customers... by weave · · Score: 2
    Ah, redhat, how about taking care of people who are paying you via the RHN and making the ISOs available through it? I just checked, not there. My company pays for an enterprise RHN license. It'd be nice if some of those couple grand a year we and others send your way could buy a nice fat pipe to download the latest ISO betas and get a jump on the paupers and cheapskates! :-)

    Remember, it's a big deal to be the first on the net block to install the latest!

  40. fontilus by JamesHenstridge · · Score: 2

    Note that the 0.2 release of fontilus is the second release. There are a number of areas where I can improve and extend it.

    Setting it up so that you can configure where fonts are placed when performing DnD font installation is a fairly simple imrpovement.

  41. Windows yes - applications don't cope well.. by Kjella · · Score: 2

    At least, that's been my problem.. ok the most mainstream programs work. But many programs seems to have a completely fixed font size, or f*ck up things when the text "grows" in their buttons/panels. Which is why I'm running my monitor at less than max resolution (but then again I get 85Hz instead of 72Hz :)

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  42. Musicbrainz - Rhythmbox by salimma · · Score: 2

    Rhythmbox depends on Musicbrainz - HTH :)

    Argh, and this comes up just when I'm going away on a Christmas break. Oh well :p

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
  43. Re:Good stuff by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2

    Gentoo's entire repository is located on ibiblio, so it shouldn't be too hard finding them.

  44. Re:choices choices choices by JCCyC · · Score: 2

    I like Eroaster. Try it.