Slashdot Mirror


Help Wire Remote Laos Villages

rODbegbie writes "Lee Felsenstein is appealing for donations to help provide Internet access to remote Laos villages. The New York Times considered the idea one of the best in 2002, but they need to raise $25,000 to get this in place before monsoon season. Donations can be made using Paypal (mention that it's for "Remote IT")."

25 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. I'm sure AOL... by craenor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would be more then happy to send them a bunch of CD's if that helps.

    1. Re:I'm sure AOL... by jareth780 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The people of Laos don't need internet access, they need more food and a better standard of living.

      "Why don't you help them out with that, then?"

      I'm only one person. What can I do? Besides, I'd rather just sit here and surf the web.

  2. Weirdly appropriated money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People need food and shelter before they can worry about getting online. I know that it's stupid to say that they should be donating something else, but...it just seems like there's a huge push to get underdeveloped areas on the 'net instead of taking care of necessities first.

  3. CommentAnticipator: by mumblestheclown · · Score: 5, Funny
    CommentAnticipator says:
    • Will the computers run open source software?
    • Aren't there more valuable projects that we could spend money on?
    • Jokes about the guy pedalling running out of power just as half the pr0n picture is downloaded.
    • In soviet russia, computer bicycles you
    • Comments about pop-up ads, spam, and the fact that internet access is no guarantee of anything.
    • A few semi-related comments about land mines.
  4. More important things than the Internet by stevejsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think that Laos needs free Internet connections. I think what they need is houses, and a literacy rate above 60%. How do expect a small village, only 60% literate, to know how to use the Internet? In a country where the phones to people ratio is well over 1:100, I doubt that the Internet will be of must use.

    I'll repeat what I said about India regarding the Simputer: there are more important things than the Internet. You know, food, water, shelter during the monsoon season

    1. Re:More important things than the Internet by plierhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't think that Laos needs free Internet connections. I think what they need is houses, and a literacy rate above 60%. How do expect a small village, only 60% literate, to know how to use the Internet?

      I agree theres a whole lot of other stuff they need more than internet access. But, if thats whats on offer, I wouldn't say it is useless because of high illiteracy rates. It might only take one semi-literate person in a small village, AND some compelling content, to plant the seeds for others to teach themselves to read. It might be surprising just what people can teach themselves, and perhaps the internet could be the key to reducing illiteracy.

      --

      [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    2. Re:More important things than the Internet by stevejsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      However would you disagree that $25,000 worth of teaching jobs would probably be at least twice as useful? When teachers get paid less than $500 per year, that could buy five teachers for ten years. A much better investment, I would say.

    3. Re:More important things than the Internet by Draxinusom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you bother to read any of the linked webpages? First of all, there are plenty of useful applications for the internet: to get accurate and timely information about crops pricing, to stay in touch with relatives scattered by poverty and war, to bid on things like construction jobs. The bare necessities are also desperately needed, but it's not completely inconceivable that one communally-owned computer could bring much more cost-effective and immediate benefit to a village than, say, literacy education, which while necessary in the long-term is expensive and doesn't pay dividends for years. Secondly, if you take what's been written about this project in good faith, this is something that the Laotian villagers asked for. It's fantastic that you seem to know better than the people themselves what they need, but unless you're going to put your money where your mouth is and pony up some housing, why deride the efforts of people who are actually trying to help?

    4. Re:More important things than the Internet by raju1kabir · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't think that Laos needs free Internet connections. I think what they need is houses, and a literacy rate above 60%. How do expect a small village, only 60% literate, to know how to use the Internet?

      So you don't think that anyone should be able to do anything beyond subsistence until everyone has been raised to their level?

      You have to keep education and opportunity moving forward, or else there's no room for people to grow into.

      Among the 60% who are literate, some will do great things given the opportunity. They will also be able to prepare their society for a smoother transition into greater capacity when more resources are available, because computers will not be alien to them.

      Of course, you and Trotsky are free to disagree with me.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  5. Pointless by geek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people in Laos don't have computers or even a need for one. Why would internet connections be "one of the best ideas of 2002"??

  6. Who initiated? by tau_bada · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this project at the behest of the villages or an outside person assuming only positive things will result? Cultures have been quickly torn apart by ideas which seemed positive to outside initiators.

    1. Re:Who initiated? by ntk · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's my understanding that it was initiated by the locals, who asked for access to information and knowledge about stuff like crop prices.

      I wrote a bit about this in my Irish Times article on the project:


      Farmers will be able to monitor the price of crops in the town markets, negotiate group purchases with the other villages, and make business deals without having to spend days travelling away from the farm. And families will be able to make direct contact for the first time with the Laotian Diaspora - relatives who've left the war-torn area to earn money in the capital of the country, and beyond.

      Cheap technology like this, dropped into the very poorest of countries, may provide a chance for these nations to leapfrog into the digital revolution.

      Of course, there'll always be someone who'll argue that providing this kind of technology to the least developed countries of the world is missing the point: that we should, as Bill Gates said recently, be spending our money instead on medical and food projects. And, of course, everyone involved in the Jhai project suggests we should do that too. But it's notable that it was the rural villagers themselves who asked for ways to communicate and gain knowledge, not the foundation.


      Info about donating via Paypal here.
  7. oh for the love of god by tps12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is just rediculous. Couldn't we focus on giving them something a little more practical like, you know, food, clean water, and medical supplies?

    I'm just sick of the techno-fetishism that's taking the place of true humanitarian efforts and generosity. These people don't need cell phones and microwaves, they need basic living supplies. Let them establish some hygenic standards and bring the infant mortality rate down, and we can worry about convenience later. Never mind that the health effects of wireless networks have not yet been studied in great detail. For heaven's sake, we could be sending these people to their graves with invisible radiation!

    The PayPal thing is just insult upon injury. I'll make my donations by check, thanks, so none of my money goes to line the pockets of some hokey e-business that can't even protect its own databases (and doesn't claim to!).

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  8. Is this necessary? by rblancarte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just came back from a small village in Mexico about the size of this one. They have internet access now, but I have to ask: Do these people really need it?
    These people have gotten along fine without computers, why do they need them now?
    Sure, it is a nice convenience for tourists when they travel to these areas, but you can't tell me indiginious people, such as these, truely need internet access or computer usage.

    --
    It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
  9. You're Joking Right? by _Neurotic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remote Laos villages?
    Sorry but speaking as an American, I'm more worried about wiring remote US villages and schools.

    1. Re:You're Joking Right? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Peace Corps is the single most effective anti-terrorist technique used by humans in recorded history.

      No, really. If you solve people's immediate problems, there is less cause for extremism. The cheapest, most effective way to end terrorism, is to make foreigners happier. If we can help some village in Laos better able to market it's goods, this could help you and I, sitting in our warm cozy chairs in the US of A.

      Your ROI in Laos can be higher than your ROI in Kansas. This is enlightened self interest. Welcome to classical liberalism.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  10. This crap is absurd. Did Al Gore start this? by ThresholdRPG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am getting really fed up with these appeals to make the general population of either our nation or the world PAY for internet access for others. Internet access is *NOT* equivalent to food or health care.

    I realize we all feel the internet is a miraculous invention that is "setting people free." I generally hold this view as well. But it is not a necessity!

    This reminds me of all of the extra fees on your telephone bill that were put there by Al Gore. Yes, the "creating of the internet" that Al Gore takes credit for is largely the sneaky tax increases he jammed through Congress by adding numerous fees to your phone bill. That money is then used as welfare to (supposedly) give free internet access to low income folks. That is *NOT* the proper role of government.

    Similarly, bringing internet access to the jungles of Southeast asia is *NOT* the role of charitable organizations and it is certainly not the type of project that should be gobbling up the limited funds charitable people have to donate to causes in the world.

    Internet access is a part of a nation's technological and industrial infrastructure that needs to evolve organically along with the rest of its culture. You cannot take a country that is 50+ years behind the western industrialized world and plop down mondern internet technology. It makes no sense and it is a huge waste. If you want to help these countries economically, you need to help them get a basic economic infrastructure in place so they can actually grow in a normal fashion.

    This kind of crap is frivilous, back-patting BS being done by people who want to feel like they are "making the world a better place." In truth, they are accomplishing nothing.

    If you want to help out people in the 3rd world, join the Peace Corps.

    --

    -Michael
    Threshold RPG
    1. Re:This crap is absurd. Did Al Gore start this? by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I am getting really fed up with these appeals to make the general population of either our nation or the world PAY for internet access for others. Internet access is *NOT* equivalent to food or health care.

      First of all, nobody is making do anything. They are asking for a dontation. If you don't think it's prudent use of your hard earned money, then don't give.

      Second of all, internet access is not equivalent to food or health care, but it could be considered as part of a close third. Communication.

      The internet is a very cheap but capable communications device. Email allows people who don't have a phone and can not pay of a service to send messages to love ones, as someone else stated.

      It does not mean everyone is going to have a laptop with 11b. There could be one office, similar to a telegraph office, for send and delivering messages.

      World news can be printed, everyday and distributed. How much would a newspaper subscription cost otherwise? Maybe it's read over the radio, maybe it's sold at a price closer to what locals can afford.

      This kind of crap is frivilous, back-patting BS being done by people who want to feel like they are "making the world a better place." In truth, they are accomplishing nothing.

      How easily you dispatch the hard work and efforts of others trying to do good for people that probably never could repay them.

      When was the last time you tried that?

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  11. Get to know Lee by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read an interview here.
    Lee was involved in getting public access terminals deployed in the early 70's in San Francisco, created the Pop 'Tronics "Penny Whistle Modem" project, and the highly collectible SOL-20 personal computer, member Honbrew Computer Club - this guy was /there/ during the genesis of the personal computer revolution.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  12. Aye ... welcome to the slashdot donation network . by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I think we need a new category with the Southpark Salley Struthers head as the icon for all "Cries for monetary help".

    And of course ... more of my opinion on the post ...

    Like I said to mandrake (a company) and many before on the slashdot donation network, NO ... the only thing that I donate to is things I can directly control. IE scholarships, trusts, etc. I wanna know who I'm benifiting not the well dressed president of the NON-PROFIT organization. I still can't believe the black-tie events I've been invited to in the name of "Charity" ... I love the fact that "feeding children" requires a fucking charity dinner ... how about this ... invite everyone to a charity dinner and then don't have one, make them see what it's like to be hungry.

    As far as internet in Laos ... laughable ... I would really like to see the benifit of this ... not from the begging for money site too. Plus ... $25,000 because grants won't come in time ... pretty optimistic about those grants coming in.

    You all really have money to burn after the holliday season? Why dontcha look at what's happening in your own backyard. Call your old college and tell them you want to start a scholarship (they won't mind really). Education is the key to it all, don't care what you say.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  13. oh sure.... by Lxy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in a large US city, 20,000 ft from the CO. My only option is dialup.

    If I move to a grass hut in Laos, I get high speed wireless.

    Yeah.....

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  14. Urban legend by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Funny
    This is actually an urban legend. Well, it started off as a real appeal but...

    From snopes.com (www.snopes.com/spoons/felsenstein.html):

    Legend
    A village in Laos needs funds to connect itself to the Internet
    Status:Not any more

    Example (collected from the Internet, 2001):

    Pass on to everyone you know: Little Lee Felsenstein wants to collect as many Paypal contributions as he can so he can give his mud hut in Laos an Internet connection before he dies. All he needs is $25,000. Please send him a Paypal and pass this message on to your friends!
    Summary

    In 1982, Lee Felsenstein, who lives in Laos, a small village outside of Berkley, California, started a project that involved hooking up his ramshackle shack to the, then, ArpaNet connection at the University of California, Berkley. Unfortunately, at the time all communications were regulated by the FCC and owned by AT&T, and so he was forced to dig up the wires he had buried and ask AT&T to lay the cables instead. They demanded $25,000 for the task, which Lee, aged 11, was unable to raise.

    An appeal was started, and when Paypal was founded in 1997, the appeal switched over to donations by email. The full $25,000 was raised in 1998, and Pacific Bell, who now owned the telecommunications system in California, agreed to install the line, now a fiber optic link, for a little less than the original price, $759. They began work in December of 1998, and the line was officially declared operational in October 2000, in time for Felsenstein to be able to watch the flawed 2000 Presidential election using a video over IP link.

    The rest of the money donated was sent on to the RIAA, a group of publishers dedicated to helping independent artists have their works distributed across the world.

    Felsenstein now lives in Detroit, Michigan, where he runs a profitable Internet advertising concern.

    References

    The Isaac Asimov Book of Facts (Asimov, 1992)
    The History of the Felsenstein Standard Company (Tarbell, 1908)

    So, you see, it's an urban legend.
    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  15. Excuse my skepticism... by Pollux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But something's not adding up here.

    1) We're delivering internet access to a remote country to remote villages in a far-east Asian country. Villages in that area (Laos, Vietnam, Thailand) consist mostly of small farmers and laborers who have probably never heard of the internet, let alone a computer.

    2) The reasons the villagers need computers are (taken from the article):

    a: a way to make phone calls so that they could communicate with relatives overseas

    b: to secure local crop pricing information.

    c: the use of small spreadsheets and simple word processing so that they could bid on things like construction jobs.

    A sounds understandable. B...that would work as an excuse here in America, but it doesn't make sense for Laos. Remembering some old cultural information, most farms there are very small-scale (a few acres at the most), meaning that farmers wouldn't own silos. Along with the lack of huge harvests, there's seems to be no necessary need for them to periodically check up on crop pricing. And option C? ...if you read the article, it says that "This year, they're living in the 19th century; next year, they'll be in the 21st," meaning that they're doing this right now with pencil and paper, or by oral arrangement. Why a pressing need to move them into the 21st century?

    3) Expenses (again, from the webpage):

    a: $1,000 One RT US-Laos Trip for One Technical Consultant

    Why are we paying a "consultant" to set up a single computer system in a remote village? Typically, someone who volunteers the time and energy to undertake such an adventure finds ways of appealing to travel agencies to cut expenses so that volunteered dollars go further.

    b: $1,500 One Complete Jhai Computer

    Why in the world are they paying $1,500 for a computer system for "the use of small spreadsheets and simple word processing"? Sure, many readers might think they're just buying a "new computer" without knowing how to get cheaper deals elsewhere. But the supposed letter has some very detailed information: "...interconnected by Wi-Fi (802.11b) digital data links and coupled to the local phone system several miles away. Through this system VOIP (digital telephone) calls could be placed to the local phone lines..." If they have that technical knowledge, they should know very well how to set up a cheaper computer system (As cheap as $400 for a new Lindows system including monitor, etc) that will accomplish the same thing.

    c: $2,500 One Complete Village Set-up

    What the hell is this? "Complete Village Set-up?" I didn't know that we were turning this into a profitable business when it involves volunteered donations! I mean, seriously, look at this supposed "line-item" description of what the project costs:

    $10 20 lbs. shipping costs
    $25 Keyboard
    $50 Headset
    $75 Antenna
    $100 Battery
    $250 Bicycle Powered Generator
    $450 CPU or Mountain Top Solar Panel
    $850 Base Station
    $1,000 One RT US-Laos Trip for One Technical Consultant
    $1,500 One Complete Jhai Computer
    $2,500 One Complete Village Set-up
    $3,000 Relay Station

    $25,000 The Full 5 Village System

    This sure doesn't add up to $25,000! And why does the village need a solar panel if they're going to generate electricity with a bicycle generator?

    This list keeps getting longer and longer. Why are they setting up a wi-fi network when much of Laos is mountainous and forest? That kind of terrain will eat up any 802.11 communication!

    On top of it all, how are they asking for donations? Through PayPal. A slick way of getting easy money, and an easy way to bag and run.

    Now, I could be completely wrong, and all this might be an actual true organization with good intentions. But as I said before, something just isn't adding up.

  16. MIT's Nicholas Negroponte said it best by madro · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Here's the quote:
    "In the comfort of being digital, we forget the enormous leverage a single Net connection provides to, say, a rural primary school in one of the hundred poorest nations. In these places, there are no libraries and almost no books; the schoolhouse is sometimes a tree. To suddenly have access to the world's libraries - even at 4,800 bits per second - is a change of such magnitude that there is no way to understand it from the privileged position of the developed world.

    But the [rest of the world] understands. World leaders realize that the most precious natural resource of any country is its children, and that the digital world is key to education. For this reason, development is starting not only to include but to mean telecommunications."

    (http://web.media.mit.edu/~nicholas/Wired/WIRED6 -0 1.html for the original.)

    To be fair, Negroponte got the 'how' wrong (he thought satellites would provide cheap internet access), but the why is spot on. People talk about how you can't leapfrog 50-200 years of development to catch up to the industrialized world ... but third-world countries can't wait around -- they *must* find ways to accelerate the process and skip stages (like the industrial revolution, perhaps) in order to build an economy to support their citizens.

    We talk about helping the poor in the US or in Europe ... you want to see poverty? Get to the rural areas of Asian countries. Do whatever you want with your money -- but at least hope the project or something like it will somehow succeed.
  17. and ... by Greedo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... I now know where to send some of the $30 MILLION DOLLARS that my dear friend Mr. Mboto of Nigeria will be wiring to my account very shortly.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.