Slashdot Mirror


Network Solutions Take 2

sirkin writes "Washington Post Technews is reporting that VeriSign is resurrecting the Network Solutions name with a new subsidiary responsible for domain name registration. It seems so eerily familiar."

32 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. I thought the same thing. by kaosrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems so eerily familiar.

    I thought the same thing, Hemos, but it actually isn't a dupe.

    1. Re:I thought the same thing. by Duds · · Score: 5, Funny

      You wait till next week when it gets posted again.

      "It's deja-vous all over again"

  2. Verisign Subterfuge? by johndiii · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given that Verisign seems to charge 3x as much as other providers of the various services it offers, I wonder about their motivation here. Could this be an attempt to camouflage their image?

    --
    Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  3. A little known fact. by Anand_S · · Score: 5, Funny

    Verisign tried to change the name last July, but it took six months for the change to go through.

    1. Re:A little known fact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's funny, because it sounds so true.

      My employer has been trying to the get organization name changed on our domain name since Network Solutions put the wrong one on the domain. That was Feb 14, 1995! Yes, it's been almost eight years, and they still haven't been able to fix a simple text record associated with a domain name. We've jumped through the "create a fake letterhead with the invalid name on it and FAX it to us" hoops several times for nothing. What do you have to do to get them to listen? Eight years!

    2. Re:A little known fact. by weave · · Score: 3, Informative
      They now allow changing of org name on an account via the normal manage accounts tab on their website. I did it to one domain and it worked fine.

      There is still a separate procedure for transfering ownership, although I have no idea why you can't now transfer ownership yourself by changing the org name, address, and admin/billing/tech contact handles yourself. Technically they want the new owner to enter a legal agreement with them (and charge big bucks to do an express transfer of course...)

  4. Some old favorites are set to return by levik · · Score: 5, Informative
    Verisign also stated that with the return of the Network Solutions brand, customers can expect a comeback of some of the special services that NetSol was so famous for.

    Among them are the hassle-free domain transfer as well as the "helpful and targeted" informational mailing sent out on the daily basis to thousands of small site operators by their "trusted partners".

    --
    Ñ'
  5. Finally by antis0c · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they're realizing people don't want to submit DNA samples to fix incorrect information regarding their domain name.

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  6. Actually... by SerialHistorian · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Verisign isn't trying to change the name; someone faxed forms with fake signatures in, and the temps just processed the forms without checking them. Next, Verisign will have to go through a dispute process to get its corporate name back.

    --

    --
    Vote for your hopes, not for your fears - Vote Third Party

  7. Network Solutions Redux by Dratman · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this move improves Verisign/Network Solution's customer service for domain names and DNS management, I'm all in favor. Although that service has been pretty abysmal, I get the impression they are genuinely trying to do better. I signed up for their Advanced DNS Manager for one of my domains after 24-hour failure at DNSMadeEasy made me nervous. The overall reliability and redundancy of Network Solutions' DNS servers appears to be outstanding, but the site for editing DNS records has sometimes been unavailable. At $24/yr/domain, all parts of the system should work all of the time, in my always humble opinion. ---- This is not really a sig.

    --
    Sigmund
    1. Re:Network Solutions Redux by ajs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      easydns has done very well by me. Backup MX, domain transfers, dns primary and/or secondary, aliases, redirects, dynamic DNS, etc.

      Good service, and cheap. Found a bug once. Got mail from the maintainer saying it was already fixed, and going out next week.

      Still on hold with Network Solvent three years later on how the hell to transfer or delete a freakin HOST entry. Sigh.

  8. Dang! by MoxCamel · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I was hoping to register netsol.com when they let it expire.

  9. Registration Highly Overrated ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Informative
    Okay here's the thing, it's cool to have your own domain, but I think the hype of buying a domain that Daddy Warbucks might want to come and buy from you for $1Mill days are long over.

    Plus lets look at it from a pure financial arena. Back in "the day" Network Solutions was basically the only place to grab a domain name, but that's not true anymore. Check This out for a little taste of why NetSol is screwed in the market. I remember switching from NetSol, to register.com to finally, Tucows OpenSRS which is dirt cheap. But NetSol is like the microsoft of the DNS world where people know it as being fairly big and its security sucks.

    With the trtouble to get MY OWN DOMAIN out of their database, I hope they go bankrupt and never set up anytype of ecommerce site again. Does anyone have anything positive to say about netsol, I mean they really were and are a horrible company that overprices everything. I mean look at verisign now, the prices for a "virtual certificate". Insane.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Registration Highly Overrated ... by twofidyKidd · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Does anyone have anything positive to say about netsol, I mean they really were and are a horrible company that overprices everything."

      Not everything I got from them is overpriced. For instance, when I had a registered domain with them, I used to get lots of free email offers delivered straight to my inbox!

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  10. Regardless of what they call themselves, by AlfaGiik · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I will never deal with them again.

    Apart from the hokey 'mail from' security scheme they used to use, I find that getting through to them when there is a problem is nearly impossible. The drones on the phone (if you can find the phone number) know so little about DNS that it is physically painful, and they charge extra for what other registrars include in the price of the registration.

    In addition to that they are constantly trying to 'slam' my customers into changing registrars and breaking their domain names in the process. They also denied one of my customers' transfers because there was a 'special' on that account. (I later found that a special meant was set to expire in under a month, and they were trying to prevent the change of registrar from going through.)

    They are a thoroughly pitiful organization and they deserve all the headaches they have caused me over the years.

    1. Re:Regardless of what they call themselves, by BinBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you try to change the DNS IPs, you have to click a greyed out button. If you click the bright yellow button, you transfer your web site hosting to verisign. I spent 10 minutes going back/forward searching for the right button before I realized it was the disabled looking one. I wouldn't be surprised if thousands of people transferred unintentionally.

  11. pricing for domain registrations by Artifex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, if you want to transfer domains to Verisign/NetSol, they play the same game as Register.com and some others, of offering you a low first-year's transfer fee, then later renewals at higher than the bulk registration market's price.

    I recently switched a bunch of names from Melbourne IT to Register.com after getting a flyer in the mail offering a transfer ("plus remaining time on your old registration" for something like $15 per year, or cheaper if you get longer terms. Unfortunately, their normal quoted registrations are like $30 a year, so I wouldn't have done it otherwise. Verisign's offer was similar (no flyer needed but $19 a year for transfers), but I was a bit leery of their bad rep regarding tying up domain names that expire, yanking registrations away anytime a big business hints that it wants a domain, etc., and I remembered the spam that I got from them to my hostmaster address when a domain was registered through them.

    For that matter, the agent of Melbourne IT that I went through had prices similar to Verisign's, but I had to order and renew each domain separately, which was a pain, and I figured, if another provider (in this case, Register.com) could do it cheaper and put them all in one place for me to manage, great. If they try to charge me the "regular" price next year, I'll move them all again; I'll risk a few placements with "bulk" registrars once I see that they've survived another year post-internet-burst-bubble.

    One thing I do miss about having my domains at the old Network Solutions: the ability to use a crypto key to manage the domains, and doing it all through email. Of course, the downside of using email for their plaintext password alternative was that anyone could see that password, and I'm guessing that email insecurity made forging transfers easier.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:pricing for domain registrations by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I manage three different accounts at Network Solutions and I can tell you it's nothing but a pain. I try to mess with it as little as possible because the system almost always craps out on me. If I change a password, the new password doesn't work anymore, and the old one seems to take some time before it kicks in.

      On top of that, don't ever let your information in their records become obsolete. If they have a wrong e-mail account for you, you can pretty much give up seeing any use out of that domain until they get around to giving a crap (which is never).

      It's been several months since I could get any replies or answers out of them regarding the information on one domain that I own, and it wille expire in April. If I don't have any control of it by then, I'll renew it with someone else that will give me some control over it.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:pricing for domain registrations by weave · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't pgpmail your changes to them anymore, as far as I know. It's all done via SSL web pages using an id/password they give you. This kicked in over the past several months. I must have like 20 different id/passwords now, although they do have a form for allowing you to consolidate accounts.

  12. Good Grief Charlie Brown by airrage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether you consider yourself a Keynesian, or in the old-clasical camp of economists, I somehow tremble at some industries inability to make a profit.

    The registration of domain names seems fairly staid, and yet, common-sense would dictate that little or no profit could really be meagered from such a one-point sale business. Wal-Mart on the other attempts multiple low-cost sales, with a wide variety of products. Though I'm not sure of the ROI for Verisign, I have a feeling, once all said and done, it's less than ten-percent. As a another inidicator, airlines make five to eight percent return on their money (though probably that number is worse as of late).

    So the question I pose is thus: if a business or industry barely breaks even, and that industry or business is crucial to the welfare of our nation-state, shouldn't the government monopolize that business for the sake of our well-being? The answer, unfortunately, is NO. Because no matter how badly a business is run in the free-market, the government would only do worse.

    So when it comes to privatization of airlines, oil, or domain names (the free flow of information is becoming more central to our security), I applaud a business trying to be more competitive, trying to evolve, trying to find a better way to manage customers, even if they stumble in doing so.

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Good Grief Charlie Brown by Queuetue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't discount the ROI of the registrar model... If you can automate the process, overhead becomes ... Electricity, the bandwidth required to fill out a form, two executives, and two or three sysadmins that watch a thousand identical boxes?

      Startup costs are minimal (and have been long-since absorbed, two buyouts ago) the infrastructure will never need to get bigger than it was in 2000... This *should* be a tidy profit center, if they could get customers.

      I don't know what thier infrastrucutre is like, but i think thier problems stem from being born in a govenment-sponsored monopoly environment, and not having to scrape and fight in a free economy.

    2. Re:Good Grief Charlie Brown by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 3, Informative
      I worked for a very small domain registrar for a couple of years (GKG -- Global Knowledge Group) and you're absolutely right, there is no money in domain registration. It costs domain registrars about $6 to register a .net, .com, or .org domain (at least when I was employed there back in May). When you factor in the amount of customer support required to explain things like how a dns server works to the average Joe Shmoe, it's pretty obvious that you really can't make money by selling single domains to average people. The successful domain name registrars make their money in two main ways:

      1. Volume registrants. Joe Schmoe might register one domain, once a year, but some high volume registrants will register 5000 domains a year. You give them a volume discount, but at this level of domain purchases it really is feasible to balance customer support costs with the meager income a domain registration provides.

      2. Hosting. This is typically very profitable (at least compared to registrations). If a customer on the phone or at the website is interested in purchasing a domain they're probably also looking for hosting. Presenting a complete web package from design to registration to hosting makes it easy for a consumer to do it all in just one stop.

      Versign (network solutions) is screwed. Sure it was a cash cow at first when they had a monopoly, but now they have a broken business model.

  13. Simple really by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Verisign has realized that this part of their business is not profitable and is getting ready to sell it off, again. By putting the name back, they separate Network Solutions from Verisign and play on the name recognition for the eventual sale of the company. I doubt that such a sale would do as well if it were sold as The Company Formerly Known as a Division of Verisgn.

  14. VeriSign is the WORST company EVER. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Man... I HATE VeriSign. They've recently allowed a large number of my company's domains to be hyjacked TWICE within the last 3 months. (and yes all of our contact info and passwords are secure)

    We're now getting started with a criminal investigation (I'll probably send the details into Slashdot in a few weeks). VeriSign is a horrable company. They are insecure, they have a pathetic legal deptartment (only about 3 people), it is nearly impossible reach anyone aside from tech support, etc etc. VeriSign makes MicroSoft look like an angel.

    dotster anyone?

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  15. NOOOOO!!! by alispguru · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Network Solutions" has been a very sincere curse around our company ever since I went through hell and back getting our domain name registered (around 1994). We had 'gsti.com' at the time, 'gst.com' had lapsed about a year previously but not been officially released by the previous owners, and NS refused to transfer the registration without an email or a fax from the previous owners (as opposed to their current policy of allowing transfer within 30 seconds of lapsing). I finally had to track down the previous holders and beg and plead them to send a fax, as their company and its email services were long since defunct.

    I'm no longer a sysadmin around here, but the people who are admins respect my opinions, and we will deal with a reconstituted "Network Solutions" over my dead body. How they can think that that name has any positive value in the world today is beyond me.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  16. and who really cares about this???? by mustangdavis · · Score: 3, Informative
    VeriSign is resurrecting the Network Solutions name with a new subsidiary responsible for domain name registration. It seems so eerily familiar."


    Why would you register a domain name through VeriSign anyways???

    Use register.com's Name Bargain!! ... domain names are only 8 bucks per year ... and register.com isn't going anywhere anytime soon!

    BTW: Anyone know of a RELIABLE place that is cheaper than this??


  17. Best quote: by Greedo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But in a 2002 survey of Internet address buyers, VeriSign found that 87 percent of them were familiar with the name "Network Solutions" and could identify it as a domain name seller ...

    Of course, they don't say why their name is recognizable. Long hold-times, bad support, dubious transfer-away procedures ...

    87% of Internet address buyers are also familiar with the phrase "bunch of crappy morons".

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  18. Being well known isn't always good by phorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...a 2002 survey of Internet address buyers, VeriSign found that 87 percent of them were familiar with the name "Network Solutions" and could identify it as a domain name seller, while few recognized the name "VeriSign,"...

    A lot of people recognise the name "Osama" too, but that doesn't necessarily come as a positive thing for him when a large portion of those people want him dead.

    Verisign should recognise that there is a difference between "famous" and "infamous"... from reading the posting of the slashdot crew here, I think Verisign would be much better off to build a new easy-to-remember untarnished name, rather than resurrecting one dripping with poor opinion and bad history.

  19. Verisign horror stories by mabu · · Score: 3, Informative
    With fans sites such as these, you'd be trying to switch names as well...

    Verisign Horror Stories

    The Verisign Sucks Page.

  20. The American way by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 3, Funny

    What do you have to do to get them to listen? Eight years!

    Easy. Sue them.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  21. VeriSign, Network Solutions, The Incompetent NIC by lanner · · Score: 5, Informative


    I own three domain names, one of them under VeriSign/Network Solutions. Recently I had to make changes to the records for my domain names. It was a hassle.

    How long has this company been at domain name handling? While they finally have a completely web based interface for the majority of functions related to domain names, you still have to use the eMail to hostmaster@networksolutions.com to change hosts records -- that is, your domain name's domain name servers. This shows blatant incompetency in regards to automation and their engineering staff.

    How hard is it to make a little web form that is attached to a database? It's not.

    Password, what password? I had been using the old crypt-password scheme for modifications to my domain names though the old eMail change method. When I went to use their website, I found that my account required a password. What password? It was not my old password, and they never asked me to modify my account. So I had to call up and get a password assigned to my domain name account.

    And how long did it take for changed to propagate? For everything other than the hosts records, 24 hours or less. For the hosts modifications, it took over four days, and intervention by engineers because their system apparently was dropping the request for change. That would be four days of downtime for a website. Holy crap.

    Trouble ticketing system for issues? They don't really have one as far as I can tell. I had to harass the support phone-droid to give me something to track the issue by, and she gave me some tracking number that they use in their database, but she seemed to indicate that they did not have any kind of trouble ticketing system.

    If you are in business, you can't afford to do business with VeriSign/Network Solutions.

  22. Transfering from Network Solutions is a nightmare by bleeeeck · · Score: 4, Insightful
    it wille expire in April. If I don't have any control of it by then, I'll renew it with someone else that will give me some control over it

    If you're thinking about moving your domain somewhere else, I would recommend you start NOW. If you wait until a few weeks before the name expires, Network Solutions will screw you around untill it expires and you'll have to re-renew with Network Solutions before you can transfer it (true story).