Slashdot Mirror


Where are the 70% Efficient Solar Cells?

VernonNemitz asks: "Back in 1984 a patent was granted for silicon chip micro rectennas, which would convert visible photons into electricity in the same way that ordinary rectennas convert microwaves into electricity, at perhaps 70% or greater efficiency. Nobody could make such solar cells back in 1984, but we certainly can today, with sizes of antennas that would capture everything from infrared to the edges of UV -- and the patent has expired. So, where are they?" Currently the most popular type of solar technology is photovoltaics, however PV technology only has an efficiency of about 7-17%. With the potential gains claimed by the technology in the cited patent, has anyone even tried to build one of these units to see if it can live up to the given promise, or at least prove to be a technology than we should be exploring?

24 of 550 comments (clear)

  1. Beats me by dmanny · · Score: 5, Funny

    They keep me in the dark about these things :-)

    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
    1. Re:Beats me by The+Dobber · · Score: 3, Funny


      Brought to you by the folks who gave you cold fusion in a jelly jar.

  2. Rectenna? by medscaper · · Score: 5, Funny
    a patent was granted for silicon chip micro rectennas,

    Anyone else get a sorta shifty feeling when they look at that word and picture the consequences of such an invention?

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    1. Re:Rectenna? by jtheory · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, you won't feel a thing after "utilizing an electron beam and suitably coating and doping the rectifying areas" (from the patent description).

      Seriously, I wouldn't be surprised if there are a few grad students who've been toiling away on this project but can't get any funding. Or... maybe the idea just doesn't work out in practice.

      We also can't overlook the fact that lots of important stuff is, well, overlooked. Any comments from anyone in the field?

      --
      There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    2. Re:Rectenna? by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


      The goatse.cx guy can generate over 800 megawatts with his rectenna.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Rectenna? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heheh, my girlfriend saw me reading and laughing and asked me, "What's so funny?"

      I asked her, "Are you sure you want to know?"

      "Yes, show me."

      So I covered my eyes and shift-clicked.

      "Eeewwwww," she said, "is that real?"

      "Yes dear, it's real and the burning sensation in your eyes will clear in a few days."

      It's scary shared-experiences like these that really solidify a relationship.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  3. Where the sun don't shine by Arrowmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think that rectenna is going to be in much sunlight.

    1. Re:Where the sun don't shine by McCarrum · · Score: 3, Funny

      Speak for yourself .. that's where my Manager's sun shines from .. just ask him!

    2. Re:Where the sun don't shine by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Funny

      You may wish to rectify that statement.

    3. Re:Where the sun don't shine by Blahbbs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why does everything today have to do with something going in or out of my ass!
      </cartman>

    4. Re:Where the sun don't shine by SirDaShadow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps it doesn't use the sun but it may use the "moon" as its power source ;)

  4. We knoew where they are... by smack_attack · · Score: 1, Funny

    Saddam is hiding them with his Weapons of Mass Destruction. Invade Now!!!

  5. Re:Research by BabyDave · · Score: 4, Funny
    What the US needs is a Manhattan Project for alternative energy to oil.
    They should threaten their enemies with windmills?
  6. Re:Ask yourself... by deft · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Why haven't you built one of these things? Chances are that's the same reason that they haven't yet been built."

    90% of slashdot just simultaneously realized that these solar panels havent been developed because they are too busy looking at porn and playing warcraft.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  7. Re:Research by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 5, Funny

    > They should threaten their enemies with windmills?
    Notice anyone threatening the Netherlands lately, Wisebeing?

  8. What, or rather Who keeps this off the market? by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who controls the British Crown?
    Who keeps the metric system down?
    We do, we do.
    Who keeps Atlantis off the maps?
    Who keeps the Martians under wraps?
    We do, we do.
    Who holds back the electric car?
    Who makes Steve Guttenberg a star?
    We do, we do.
    Who robs cave fish of their sight?
    Who rigs every Oscar night?
    We do, we do!

  9. Re:Heres a company - up to 80% efficiency. by bperkins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nanotech material, once they arrive, will of course make 90% efficient material practical.

    What kind of nanotech material are you talking about? Little nano robots that run around catching photons IN their nano baseball gloves and pitching them into nano furnaces that run nano generataors?

    If you want people to take you seriously, a statement like, "nanotech materials _may_ be able to produce 90% efficient material," is more reasonable. "of course" is just silly.

  10. Re:Why we have to have 80%+ by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yea, I say let global warming take its toll! We'll grow oranges in Alaska!

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  11. Re:Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    They should threaten their enemies with windmills?

    They're not windmills, they're giants! Charge!

  12. Re:Heres a company - up to 80% efficiency. by Tailhook · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have know about this company for years. Lumeloid Solutions [polar-solar.com] claims their technology is theoretically capable of efficiencies of up to 80%.

    Lets see. They claim thier stuff is theoretically capable of efficiencies of up to mumble mumble.

    Wow.

    Now I know it's got to be an oil industry conspiricy repressing this stuff. With credibility like that...

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  13. Re:Heres a company - up to 80% efficiency. by dbenhur · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what happens when these guys line up against the Maxwell's Demons in the Nano Series?

  14. The real problem with solar cells... by aquarian · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is that they only work when we don't need to turn the lights on anyway.

  15. Re:Heres a company - up to 80% efficiency. by LMariachi · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll be playing with particles, but everyone in the stands will be doing the Wave.

  16. Re:U-235 vs. U-238 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, anything BOTH the nazis and the south africans did MUST be a good idea.