Slashdot Mirror
Apple Slams Microsoft Settlement
Versaj writes "In a move that may further escalate the growing rift between Apple and Microsoft, Apple openly condemned Microsoft's $1.1bn settlement to in the recent class action lawsuit. Apple interprets the settlement as Microsoft's attempt to thwart competition in the California education market. "Remember: this is a settlement imposed against Microsoft for breaking the law. It should not allow Microsoft to unfairly compete in education, one of the few remaining markets where it doesn't have monopoly power.""
A year ago, Apple would not have been so outspoken against Microsoft. They needed Microsoft to continue their applications for MacOSX. They needed IE and Office, for example. Now, with Apple trying to develop their own strong line of applications (starting with the iSeries of applications), and culminating most recently with their own webbrowser (or, Internet Explorer replacement), Safari.
The next logical step, would, of course, be to have an Apple branded office suite to compete with Microsoft Office (perhaps a mega-AppleWorks). Perhaps they are already porting OpenOffice or KOffice (or Gobe).
...what this is really about. Apple is upset that Microsoft can reclaim a third of any unclaimed vouchers. These vouchers were handed out as a settlement, allowing people to purchase software from anyone including non-microsoft and microsoft-rival companies. 2/3s of the vouchers go to state schools, just to be nice.
All in all, it seems like a pretty weak case to be 'upset' -- although yes, I agree that Microsoft should 'pay the fine' even if citizens don't claim it for their own. Then again, IIRC, it was a settlement, rather than a fine imposed by a court.
Say it ain't so!
:)
Actually, it makes me nervous when there (supposedly) isn't a rift between them. That weird pretend alliance a few years ago, where Microsoft got a slot on the Apple desktop and Apple got a $100 million "investment" (Bill spend more than that on real estate taxes) was too strange for words.
Someone suggested to me a while ago that despite Apple's desperate need for continued Office for Mac support, Microsoft maybe needed them even more. If Apple were to die, hey presto! incontrovertible monopoly that, with a few missteps, could lead to Microsoft's splitting up in antitrust action. Now that Linux is becoming a more credible alternative, Microsoft might be tempted to abandon Macintosh and cause Apple's fall into oblivion even if it means losing a lucrative niche. Cutting into the education market is a lot like cutting Apple out of the business market.
The key thing is that people need to be weaned off of Office.
On its attempt to bulldoze into education, I'm glad Microsoft got tagged, though it immediately trying to learn loss into victory with VOUCHERS and discounts in a naked attempt to steer those same purchasers back to the MS fold. The cyncicism of it is astounding, and I had assumed the settlement offer was dead on arrival. Please tell me California is smarter than this.
Most of all, I'm glad to see Apple acting like a normal bitter competitor again, too. I wonder what Jobs, who we know already has a bit of a vicious streak, says about Microsoft in private? Hmm.
There doesn't seem to be much they actually can do, unless they drastically change their business model/strategy. But in what way? Buying out MandrakeSoft may open some interesting options for them. Just a thought...
Could it be that as far as MS is concerned, Apple has served its purpose as a demonstration of the market not being a monopoly? In thise case, it may be better for Apple to appear to be in control of the relationship rather than have MS pull the rug out from under them.
An alternative is that Apple just don't need MS Office anymore. Open Office et al. have shown that MS do not have any particular edge in office suites anymore, and that Apple should be able to integrate with Windows users without installing MS Office.
Xix.
"Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
Alas, all of that pertinent voucher information is hidden in a "link", in the "article", where you might never think to look. ...and unless Microsoft is actually a bad spelling of "Mandrakesoft", no, I don't think you'll be able to use those vouchers for that purpose.
So continue with your regularly scheduled MS bashing, but do think about reading the article now, ok?
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
This is not an example of free markets-- if it were a free market, MS Would not have been able to become the abusive monopoly that it is.
government is a disease masquerading as its own cure.
Think about it-- if everyone could sue MS for forcing them pay for copies of Windows they didn't want (Even for macs that cant run it!) without MS having the protection of the class action limitation-- MS would be held far more accountable than they are now.
This problem is the result of corrupt government, and UNFREE markets. Not freemarkets.
Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23
this week's Pulpit, after MacWorld:
I, Cringely
Apple already has AppleWorks, which will knock out most of what MSO is used for (from a strictly utilitarian standpoint). Go check out their software section. Some recently unvieled software includes Keynote, a presentation software competing directly with MSPP, and Safari, a Konquerer based web browser to compete directly against IE.
Although I use Linux (because of cheap hardware and even cheaper software) I'd buy Apple over MS any day of the week and twice on Sundays. The only thing that Apple doesn't have is a low end offering. But I guess that can be taken care of with the used mac market, which is huge.
How incredible that a competitor of Microsoft would be upset at an outcome which does not help them in the market at all. Yes this is a Blinding Glimpse of the Obvious.
I just wonder if the problem of this story is that M$ gets a monopoly or if the problem is that education became a market ?
Just look at things, free trade is a chimera...
ALL ELSE FAIL IT.