Slashdot Mirror


Segway Banned In San Francisco

bhsurfer writes "The city of San Francisco has banned the Segway [CNN.com] from it's sidewalks before they've even arrived. Apparently Santa Cruz, Oakland and San Mateo are considering a ban as well. What a bunch of spoilsports...or are they? Any thoughts on this?" According to the article, hiring high-powered lobbyists may have backfired. but the city claims safety concerns are behind the decision.

19 of 937 comments (clear)

  1. Not sure how they could ban something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    before they have any testing or real user experience on which to base their decisions.

    1. Re:Not sure how they could ban something... by User+956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not sure how they could ban something before they have any testing or real user experience on which to base their decisions.

      Because Tom Ammiano is a spoiled little bitch.

      From the article:
      Tom Ammiano, a San Francisco supervisor who supported the ban said Segway's campaign rubbed officials the wrong way.

      New Hampshire-based Segway hired lobbying firms but has made no contributions to any public officials or candidates, said Matt Dailida, the company's director of state government affairs.


      Basically, Ammiano is pissed that Segway didn't try to buy him off.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:Not sure how they could ban something... by JimPooley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you can get there on a segway, you could ride a bicycle or you could WALK. It would do you a hell of a lot better than standing on some ridiculous overpriced machine.

      Politicians have got the right idea if you ask me. I don't want some idiot riding one of those things on the same footpath I'm walking on.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  2. New Technology Apprehensions... by Murdock037 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think of it this way: in ten years time, what will have more fatalities per machine on the road, the Segway or the car?

    Judging from everything I've read about the Segway, it'll be the car, of course. So why don't they ban cars in San Francisco, too? Because use of cars is too widespread, and the public would be outraged if you tried to take them away.

    If the Segway's all the hype suggests, then maybe in years hence the new machine will become as entrenched in daily life as the car (...assuming San Fran doesn't become a national trendsetter on the issue, and kill the Segway before it's given a chance). Until then you can expect this sort of thing. Just imagine how many people are going to worry about the first supersonic turbo-boostered flying rocket cars, you know?

    1. Re:New Technology Apprehensions... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "So why don't they ban cars in San Francisco, too? Because use of cars is too widespread, and the public would be outraged if you tried to take them away."

      Don't you think you're perception of what's going on is a bit narrow? The reason that cars are okay and Segways aren't is because they have roads for cars to drive on. Segways do not. Put a Segway on the road and you get vehicles moving too slow piloted by unlicensed people. Put a Segway on sidewalks and you have motorized vehicles moving faster than pedestrian traffic with no real rules to follow since no license is required.

      This isn't knee-jerk reaction, it's common sense. San Fran's the type of place where a LOT of people can afford and will likely indulge in buying these machines.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  3. Re:I hope they banned bikes on their sidewalks too by tx_mgm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    youre not supposed to ride bikes on sidewalks! youre supposed to ride them in the street!
    as for the segway, i think they should wait for it to be a problem before wasting their time banning it....i mean, how many of these things did they anticipate being on the sidewalks anyway?

    --
    Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
    -Dr. Weird
  4. Re:I hope they banned bikes on their sidewalks too by svferris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Segways should have to adhere to the same rules that bikes do. Bikes aren't allowed on the sidewalk either. They have to follow many of the laws that cars do. This includes riding in the street, going with the flow of traffic. So, why can't the Segways use the bike lane (or curb area) too?

  5. Re:because... by Alderete · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ummm, my understanding is that the standard Segway goes 12 MPH max.

    Is 30 MPH a number you have a reference for?

  6. Danger Mobile by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Saw a Segway friday evening in Portland OR.

    The operator was driving down the street at night.

    No lights. No reflectors. Grey vehicle out in traffic and no helmet on operator.

    I'd ban the damned things too.

  7. Re:segways on hills by cornjchob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But you don't have to go that fast. Most cars have top speeds well in excess of 100mph...so does that mean we have to ban cars from the street? No. It means we put restrictions on speed, or 'Speed Limits'. Just let Segway users recieve tickets if caught speeding. Have a registration system so that the people couldn't get away with not paying. Anything. Just not an ignorant ban before any interesting injuries even have the possibility to occur.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  8. Where the hell do you park those things? by tstoneman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My biggest question is where do you put them once you're finished travelling? With cars you park them, with bikes, you can lock them in bike racks, but there is zero infrastructure in place to secure your Segway.

    What's the point in taking a Segway somewhere if you can't lock it down. This means you couldn't take it to go shopping, seeing a movie, go to the doctor's, go to class, etc. You might be able to take it to work and keep the Segway in your office... if you have space. That's about it... it doesn't have any other practical use.

    I would prefer rollerblades to the Segway any day, since they are small and portable.

  9. Typical San Francisco class war politics... by aquarian · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The price of the device didn't help its case either. Being a liberal city, a $4000 device is seen as a rich man's toy and rich men should be spending their money on social problems such as the homeless problem, not toys. This viewpoint is pretty common here unfortunately.

    Yeah, no kidding. Frankly, I think that's the heart of the matter. The rest is just political rhetoric.

    I'm no fan of the Segway. I think it's pretty stupid, and will never be anything more than a toy. But when I read about it being banned in San Francisco, one thought came to my mind -- "typical!"

    Personally, I hate all the little punk speed freaks begging for money all over the city. But I don't propose banning skateboards, which I'm sure pose a greater threat to pedestrians.

  10. not so insane ... by legLess · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm not a luddite, and I don't think we should preemptively ban Segways. We've got plenty of laws for people acting unsafely in the public right-of-way. If some nut on a Segway mows down an old lady in a crosswalk, bust him for that, not for his ride. Read on, though ...
    Are they going to ban skateboards, roller blades, and inline electric scooters as well?
    Here in Portland you're not allowed to skateboard or roller[blade|skate] on many sidewalks, and I can't imagine electric scooters are permitted on any sidewalk. Neither do I want Segways typing up the bike lane. I've put over 20,000 miles on a couple bikes in Portland, so I speak from experience. It's dangerous enough without these slow (12MPH top speed? barely spare change to me on a a bike), bulky (wider than a bike) things being driven by total newbies running down the middle of the bike lane.
    Seaways are supposed to be safer then these things.
    There you have the crux of it. "Supposed to be" accordng to whom? According to research done by the company that stands to make a fortune if they're are widely adopted, that's who. There have been no large-scale tests done by disinterested 3rd parties, so we have no idea how safe these things are. I've only seen one in real life, and I nearly got nailed by it. They're quiet, they're bigger, faster and heavier than anything else on the sidewalk. Maybe they have horns or bells or something, but the guy who nearly creamed me didn't use it.
    Bleh, fucking lame ass government stifling innovation because of imagined phantoms.
    Stifling innovation? Christ, breath into a bag for a minute before you hyperventilate; no one's outlawing the manufacture or distribution of the bloody things. A couple cities are reacting badly to being pressured to accept them site unseen. I'd much rather my city council give the high hat to a high-tech lobbying firm than just rubber-stamp their ideas. NYC also banned them in the city: the ban is only good for a year, and doesn't apply to some government employees, who will be testing them for safety. What's wrong with a city deciding for itself whether or not to allow a new and potentially disruptive form of transportation?
    Lets keep things exactly the way they are ... I hate this preemptive rulemaking bullshit.
    If you really thought that, then you'd be equally outraged by states preemptively allowing Segways, hmm?
    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
  11. Walking only zone? by FuryG3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can understand this happening in SF, where you can't walk slowly without touching shoulders with everyone. On a large moving platform with handlebars, you're just begging for injuries and lawsuits and whatnot.

    Oakland is a bit less crazy, same with Santa Cruz, and San Mateo is just silly (hey we're a big city too! give us some press!)

    Anyway, there are definitly areas of all these cities where I'd love to be moving a bit faster, as well as areas where everyone should be walking. Bikes, rollerblades, skateboards, mopeds, etc should be banned by an area-by-area basis.

    How about Walking-Only zones (handicapped excepted) in certain areas as opposed to shooting things down individually before they are even being shipped....geez

  12. Re:I hope they banned bikes on their sidewalks too by bfields · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Segways should have to adhere to the same rules that bikes do. Bikes aren't allowed on the sidewalk either. They have to follow many of the laws that cars do. This includes riding in the street, going with the flow of traffic. So, why can't the Segways use the bike lane (or curb area) too?

    This is mostly true, but note that it's not universally true that bicycles are banned from sidewalks; in the US this is usually a matter for local governments (though there may also be a few states with such bans, I'm not sure).

    Certainly it's true that, whatever the law says, people on vehicles with nonzero stopping distances (like bicycles) are better off riding with traffic rather than riding on the sidewalks.

    --Bruce F.

  13. Re:I still don't get it. by marko123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, you got it all right. Years ago, when they were spouting, "Cities will be redesigned around this invention!" we thought that it would be so great, that the cost of redesigning a city was well worth it. What they actually meant, was that it has no place in today's cities. Doh!

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  14. Re:Phobic by oh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's irresponsible to ban an environmentally-friendly transportation vehicle without evidence it is a threat.

    Umm, so they only run on bio-fuels such as ethanol or vegetable oil? Oh, they are electric? So they can only be re-charged from solar or hydro-power?

    Sorry, electric != enviro-friendly. It can be, but not always. Most times, electricity is just shifting the polution some where else.
    --
    Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
  15. Re:Well consider the momentum aspects of this.... by dbrutus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since Segway comes with speed governors, it would be just as simple to mandate they be dialed down to their slowest setting until there was more experience with it. When cars were introduced, the same thing happened. Eventually, when people understand the issues, reasonable accomodations can be made.

  16. Re:it's a bad idea by Proc6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Of course the only people buying and using Segways in that test would be beta-testers, people with a few grand to drop on a toy, etc. Chances are, these are also fairly responsible people.

    Now wait till WangCo makes a $150 knock off with turbo, wheel spikes, flashing LEDs and a subwoofer, and a bunch of drunk teenagers get them. No accidents?

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!