Slashdot Mirror


Biotech Genome Patents Invalidated?

bruthasj writes "The Boston Globe has a piece about all the Biotechs grabbing patents that dealt with segments of the Human Genome. It appears there are work arounds and that the USPTO basically disregards further patents on the genome. As one quoted: ''The land grab is over''. Read about it here."

10 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. It makes a great cocktail garnish by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    ''In the early days, a company could say, in effect, that if you accumulated enough of the gene, you could fill a vessel with it and use it as a paperweight - there was the utility,'' said Bruce Sunstein, a partner at Bromberg & Sunstein LLP in Boston, only partly in jest.

    Ironically, this is an argument that cannot be used to defend a software patent.

  2. Re:Fighting software patents by chrisos · · Score: 4, Funny
    translate some patented software to base 2 (A,C,G,T)

    Surely ACGT is four bases, hence base 4. Base 2 is binary, your basic 0 and 1.

    Of course you could encode two bits of binary information to create a base four digit.

    BTW, I am prepared to consider that I have dropped though a hole in the space-time fabric into a parallel universe with differing number theory (I have been playing with chroniton particles and theta-band radiation today) :)

    Remember kids, 1 + 1 = -17 (On a complex plane)
    --
    If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
  3. Re:Leaps and Grounds by l810c · · Score: 1, Funny
    To the extreme, it's like patenting Oxygen because I discovered it.

    Enjoy your last breath as I release the hounds(lawyers).

  4. Umm.... by Oxygen99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't anyone else think patenting genes is a little bit too much like this for comfort?

    Who said satire was dead? Woo-hoo!

    --
    I had a dream, bright and carefree, but now there's doubt and gravity
  5. Re:What a surprise by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least his bible belt texan redneck outlook means there is no danger of Bush being cloned. thank f*&k for that!!!!

    --
    OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  6. DMCA violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't decoding the human genome violate the DMCA anyway?

    I mean: god obviously made it very hard to read the code (and didn't post the sources anywhere). So, surely, circumventing His copy protection must be illegal?

  7. Ummm .... well.... by ThundaGaiden · · Score: 2, Funny

    Patents on the human genome , doesn't this affect
    us all in a very personal way ?

    Biotech : "Excuse me sir , we have a problem"
    Person : "Yes , exactly what is that"
    Biotech : "You need to give us $100,000 for a
    license"
    Person : "Or what ? "
    Biotech : "Or we are going to remove the part of"
    "Your genome that lets you're body
    Process food"
    Person : "I don't have $100,000"

    One week later

    Person : "Gurgle gurgle gurgle" and promptly dies

  8. So... by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, did God finally come down hard on the USPTO and yell "Prior Art!"?

  9. Darn... by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1, Funny

    must change my nick...

  10. Re:Copyright by ndogg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, you just wait until that God(TM). guy sends you a cease and desist letter...

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"