AOL Reports Its First Drop In Subscribers
Flamesplash writes "Yahoo! is running this AP story about AOL's first drop in subscribers. 170,000 US subscribers have left AOL in their fourth quarter of 2002, apparently due to users becoming more comfortable with broadband connections. It should be noted though that 'AOL has said it has stopped simply signing up new customers for the sake of counting them.'"
Oh no! How are we going to easily identify the scum of the Internet without @aol.com on the email address!
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
We won't get as many free coasters anymore?
One Evil Empire beginning to crumble, one more to go....
...carpet bombing the world with their '100 HOURS FREE TRIAL!!!' CD
"ding-dong the witch is dead, the wicked witch! the witch is dead!" (define dead declining)
Of course, I could be wrong...
For its part, AOL has said it has stopped simply signing up new customers for the sake of counting them.
Well, this disproves the "To them, you are not just a number" Theory.
Signed,
24783
...oOOo..'(_)'..oOOo...
Isn't that like saying you made X number of dollars, when you only made Y?
The accountants from Enron had to find a job somewhere, you know?
I think it is rude of you to insult them like that
(30 seconds later)Jeebus! I finally got it to parse: "AOL used to sign up new members, not because it would increase revenue, but because it would increase their total number of subscribers (which presumably had some marketing value on its own). They have stopped this, and now expect to make money from their users." Someone, please explain the concept of scope ambiguity to the author of that article!!!
So are they all moving to the butterfly, or to popup blocker land, or have they wised up and are (doubtful) speaking easy? At the very least we know they aren't finishing the internet...
Large print giveth, and the small print taketh away
AOL is a national-available service for crying-out-loud!
Sure, many people may complain about some time of the day when access is 20% to 50% slower, but AOL lets its users roam!
Broadband is a local service that you can't get up and get access to in another territory! I would subscribe to AOL, but they built their network using Linux and did not create a Linux-client for their PROPRIETARY networking protocol. AOL could be better, like Netzero or Juno, but perhaps they should be a little lighter on the FREEWARE subscriptions because my calculator shows they are passing-on-the-cost-of-freeware to its subscribers.
AOL *gasp*
But I'm sure you already Gnu that.
$15 a month for all the sex you can get is TOO MUCH?
Oh, wait, this has got to be a
Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
A rather old cartoon, but it makes scence
Dad vs. AOL
YarrRrr