Slashdot Mirror


DALnet For Chatting, Not File Sharing

PFAK writes "DALnet IRC Network, formerly the world's largest IRC Network has announced that the IRC network has implemented a new "policy" that will phrohibit "Using a channel for the primary purpose of facilitating the transfer of files", as of March 1st, 2003. This will be another staggering blow for the formerly largest IRC network in the world, this comes after one of the many suprises on DALnet, such as the recent DDoS attacks against the network."

6 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Freenet Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We have freenet now anyway. DALnet will discover
    1. how hard it is to enforce this, and
    2. how quickly people will leave/turn against them if they try.
    1. Re:Freenet Anyway by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So let's see, you're saying that DALnet won't be able to stop users from using their network for warez, but they'll leave anyway if DALnet tries?
      If your idea holds, sounds like DALnet will be rid of the warez kiddies one way or the other.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
  2. What's the point? by Munra · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A lot of people seem to be asking "What's the point of an IRC service that prevents file users sharing warez?".

    Well, if there was no point, why would the (arguably) largest IRC network have a very strict anti-warez rules? That's Quakenet, by the way - and yes, it is my choice of IRC network.

    Clearly there is a demand for a warez-free (OK, no specific file transfer channel) network. And yes, I've just continued the trend and said "Don't worry, the IRC network I use rocks, even if Dalnet sucks!" ;)

  3. so what, by gladbach · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everyone is starting to use bit torrent anyways. Sure, a lot of it goes on in irc, but also on websites, instant message etc.

    --
    "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  4. Finally. by technix4beos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see this as a huge breath of fresh air, after having to inhale the fumes of chain-smoking file-sharing 31337 script kiddies who clog the network with absurd questions about how to lock down their channel from other "haxors", so they can share the latest Britney and UT patch file.

    Biased? Just a little peeved?

    You better believe it.

    I spent 6 years as an administrator on Dalnet, in the #1 help channel, often spending as much as 8-10 hours at a stretch JUST TYPING.

    I have helped literally thousands of anonymous (nicknamed) people come and go about Dalnet, from 1994 - 2000, and have watched with sickening disdain how polluted it got over time.

    It was bad enough to have the hordes of AOL users find Dalnet when they first got on the "real" internet, but these days, it's chock full of kids who have NO IDEA how online communities -should- behave.

    Those that used BBS's in the day (anything after 1992 don't even bother posting.) will remember what I mean about netiquette and online communities.

    I stand up, and applaud DalNet for taking this action. It's about time the filth that has clogged a valuable service has been flushed out of the system.

    And I know you're curious as to what nickname I used on DalNet.

    I am Duranos. I was one of the original help crew who volunteered their time in setting up #irchelp on Dalnet, still miss quite a few people to this day. I still check in from time to time, but have moved onto other avenues of internet life.

    Flame away slashbots. ;)

    --
    user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
  5. It is their network, but you happen to be an ass by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure they have a right to do what they want with THEIR network.. They can censor it if they want, even though that does get into a sticky legal issue. Once you start, you are libel for content under your control.

    Personally I think its a moral mistake to enforce their beliefs on others when they offer a free service, but that is their choice.

    But you sir are an ass for your attitude toward people that do things other then simple chat.

    Not all 'transfers' are illegal in all parts of the global network. If they are in your area, then consult your legislature, that's not my problem.

    People that do use IRC for transfers don't leech any bandwidth, the key component to DCC is *DIRECT*, it does NOT load the IRC network at all. In reality they use LESS resources then a 8 hour a day 'chatter'.

    Whiners? Not really, just people that would like to keep what they have now, ( or expand features )if you don't speak out you loose it, regardless of the topic.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----