Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Regalia, Godseye, Undetection

Slashback tonight with a round of updates and clarifications on Yahoo! v. France, William Gibson's new book(tour), lowish-tech helping to solve the Columbia mystery, searchable utra-localized information and more. Read on for the details.

How very magnanimous. Amazing Quantum Man writes "ZDNet reports that Timothy Koogle and Yahoo were acquitted of condoning war crimes by selling Nazi memorabilia. The article is rather sketchy, so that's all I have. Here are some background articles from Slashdot history."

He doesn't sign anything, just sprinkles on some invisible nanobots. shawn writes "The Penguin Group's site has a schedule of upcoming book signing events for Willam Gibson's Pattern Recognition . The new book was mentioned on Slashdot earlier."

And now Gisbon's new book has been reviewed, as well. Look out for a review of the No Maps For These Territories DVD (with extras) soon too.

Aren't you glad some people are realistic enough to be paranoid? For everyone worried about your ISP suddenly deciding to detect and crack down on everyone who's taken advantage of the currently ubiquitous, simple-to-use NAT hardware (here's the post we ran about the means to snoop behind your NAT box, which links to the Bellovin paper mentioned below), an anonymous reader writes with one way to foil detection efforts: "Good news coming from OpenBSD camp! Read CVS log message (mail archive): 'Add scrub option 'random-id', which replaces IP IDs with random values for outgoing packets that are not fragmented (after reassembly), to compensate for predictable IDs generated by some hosts, and defeat fingerprinting and NAT detection as described in the Bellovin paper.'"

Right place at the right time when the wrong thing happens. fonixmunkee writes "an 11-year-old Mac and a COTS (commercial-of-the-self) telescope may have captured a very helpful image in solving the shuttle Columbia tragedy. this article here at CNN tells the story of how some self-proclaimed 'geeks,' working on an Air Force project aimed at watching satellites & incoming missiles, whipped up a contraption with some simple parts that captured an image of the shuttle on descent that may offer some light on what happened. also interesting is how many news sources mistook the image as a capture from the high-tech cameras that the people *actually* worked on."

Just a scratch in the historical record. truthsearch writes "In response to a leaked Sun memo complaining of Sun's Java implementation on Solaris, News.com has Sun's response. Many posters doubted its authenticity (myself included due to missing dates), but 'Sun confirmed the memo's authenticity, but said that the document is two years old and that the problems it describes have been fixed.'"

GPS, free databases -- these are a few of my favorite things ... Tony Pryor writes: "In April 2001, while there at arsDigita University, I developed a web interface called the Godseye Project, designed to enable 'grassroots cartography,' allowing individuals with web access to add subjective knowledge details about their surroundings to closeup satellite images. Although I wrote Godseye over a year and a half ago, it isn't currently online- I'll spare you the gory details of the events between then and now.

I just wrote two new pieces which *are* live. The first is a script that dynamically adds geolocation pages using Movable Type, and automatically registers each of them with http://www.geourl.org. The second part is a geolocation-based search centered upon any one of these geopages. The search aggregates the results of consecutive google queries on each of the sites (or geopages) within a given radius."

Visit the still-growing Godseye Project to test out this cool geographic search capability; Tony promises that the functionality will improve with lots of visitors and suggestions.

170 comments

  1. geourl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't have the link, but wasn't something similar to this one of the winners to that programming contest google was running a while ago?

  2. Sat tracking... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Satellite tracking itself isn't too hard, it is tracking a object that is entering the atmosphere that is tough.

    Sat Tracker allows you to track/image sats with a LX200 chipset telescope.

    1. Re:Sat tracking... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative
      Might as well add a link to a couple other progs in case anyone wants to play around with them...

      Sat tracking software

    2. Re:Sat tracking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the fuck are all the Free Software/Open Source versions? Damn it, find me a free software LX200 package and I'll buy a fuckin' LX200 telescope tomorrow! This is cool fuckin' shit, but FUCK the proprietary/commercial vendors.

  3. they missed the obvious way by sydlexic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For everyone worried about your ISP suddenly deciding to detect and crack down on everyone who's taken advantage of the currently ubiquitous, simple-to-use NAT hardware..., an anonymous reader writes with one way to foil detection efforts:

    The problem with this paper is that it describes an overly complicated way to detect multiple IP's behind a NAT firewall when there is a much easier, simpler and already used method: transparent proxying of HTTP and checking the browser identifier.

    Shocking, but true. Many ISP's already use this method to scan all of your outbound HTTP traffic. Figuring out if you have more than one computer (especially if their OS or browser's are different) is trivial.

    The only way to defeat this is to implement your own proxy (like squid) and have it re-write HTTP headers. Or... run all machines with the exact same configuration.

    1. Re:they missed the obvious way by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some of us use multiple browsers. I use Safari on my Mac (for testing purposes) as well as Chimera. On my PC, I use IE and Phoenix. On my Linux box, Konq and Galeon. So that's by no means a foolproof solution. :)

    2. Re:they missed the obvious way by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Not to mention download managers.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:they missed the obvious way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And under all of them your OS string in your browser id is different.
      Mine looks like this:
      Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.7 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.7-6
      Notice the Linux i686. Its not foolproof but its a pretty good bet that if you're getting more than one OS string from the browser ID within say 10 seconds from each other from the same IP there's more than one computer there.

    4. Re:they missed the obvious way by sigwinch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Its not foolproof but its a pretty good bet that if you're getting more than one OS string from the browser ID within say 10 seconds from each other from the same IP there's more than one computer there.
      How many people use VMWare?
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    5. Re:they missed the obvious way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      WINE, VMware, Win4Lin etc. Not to mention that many give fake user agents anyway and there are other apps and protocols besides http browsers. What if I surf the net on my Linux box and play CS on my windows box. What HTTP User-Agent do most games use?? How much CPU power would it take to detect something like that even if you could?

    6. Re:they missed the obvious way by netsharc · · Score: 1

      My solution to that would be: use Proxomitron!. It acts as a proxy, and it can rewrite outgoing/incoming headers and HTTP content (to remove ad banners, mostly). One hack allows you to change your browser ID to what you want. Unfortunately it only runs on Windows, but I'm sure it runs fine under Wine. So all that needs to be done is get it running on your NAT firewall box, and let it modify all HTTP-browser-id headers, and while you're there, make it remove the ads, as well!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    7. Re:they missed the obvious way by rabidcow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its not foolproof but its a pretty good bet that if you're getting more than one OS string from the browser ID within say 10 seconds from each other from the same IP there's more than one computer there.

      There's 4 computers on our network with the exact same OS on them.

      You might as well throw darts at a board and read the score as the number of computers behind the firewall.

    8. Re:they missed the obvious way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ZyXEL Prestige cable modem comes with build in NAT (4 CPE's) AFAIK you cannot connect a NAT router to one of the Modems ports. It has a proprietary way of determining if the device communicating with it has NATed devices behind it. The modem has been on the market for a while now.

    9. Re:they missed the obvious way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Precisely!

      This means that you're using more than one computer on the same line, and, supposedly, that's exactly what they're after.

    10. Re:they missed the obvious way by error0x100 · · Score: 1

      This is nuts. I often use at least two browsers. I use Mozilla for most browsing, but occasionally will also open IE if a page needs it. Furthermore, opening media files off the internet with that crappy Windows Media Player ALSO fetches files via HTTP but with a different browser identifier. So opening IE and MPlayer together will get you flagged by your ISP? Thats ludicrous.

      Lastly, certain types of tasks REQUIRE many browsers to be used together. Ask any of the hundreds of thousands of people who do web page development. (At least, those who actually bother to check if their page works in anything other than IE). Every responsible web page developer, while coding HTML, typically tests their page in at least two browsers.

      Personally, I think ISPs should just start selling what they're supposed to be selling, i.e. bandwidth and a (usually temporary) IP address. If they can't afford to do that at current prices under a flat pricing structure, then change the pricing structure, or offer less bandwidth. I don't see why two people doing casual, low-bandwidth-using web surfing through one NAT connection should be seen as worse than one user downloading huge files at full speed.

    11. Re:they missed the obvious way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, fake the browser identifier. Some browers and download managers already implement this (iCab lets you make it anything you want, or offers several common preset choices). At worst you could binary patch it.

      However, it would still be possible to spot trends in HTTP traffic that could separate individual hosts, in a manner to the IP ID field trendspotting.

    12. Re:they missed the obvious way by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Also anyone that uses Outlook and Mozilla will show up as using IE and Mozilla, if they open any HTML emails. When I occasionally ran Mandrake at home, I browsed some pages with Konqueror and some with Netscape.

      So what are people supposed to do, if they have 2 home PCs and want broadband? Do they have to get 2 broadband connections? I have friends that play Diablo 2 online, on 2 PCs. Is that so wrong?

    13. Re:they missed the obvious way by geschild · · Score: 1


      In addition, it seems that some browsers are even able to... send fake identification strings.

      Let's all use just those and rotate ID strings every 5 minutes, that should teach 'em!

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    14. Re:they missed the obvious way by espresso_now · · Score: 1

      Yeah right... it won't work

      I use one PC#1:
      Mozilla(Win32)
      Internet Explorer
      Opera(Win32)
      Phoenix(Win32)
      Mozilla(Li nux)
      Phoenix(Linux)
      Konqueror(Linux)

      On PC#2(connect shared from PC#1):
      Mozilla(Win32)
      Internet Explorer

      So tell me, how do you suppose your idea would prove that I share my connection? Especially considering the most use is on PC#1.

      --
      Of course, and I highly suspect it, I may be talking out of my ass. -oqti
  4. Re:Jesus Saves! by Smidge204 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...but Moses gets the rebound!

    =Smidge=

  5. Which Gibson is it again? by Some+Bitch · · Score: 3, Funny

    He doesn't sign anything, just sprinkles on some invisible nanobots.

    Is this William Gibson we're talking about or Steve Gibson?

    1. Re:Which Gibson is it again? by Cheeziologist · · Score: 1

      Neither. It's the gibson at Ellington Mineral.

      Hack the Planet!!!!

      For those of you with no clue http://us.imdb.com/Title?0113243

    2. Re:Which Gibson is it again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hack the Gibson! Errr, wait, wrong movie... :)

    3. Re:Which Gibson is it again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That movie is so awesome. I've never seen anything that portrays the life of a hacker as well as that movie does. It's so damn 1337, I can't handle it. I want to have his baby.

  6. Signing URL by Nix0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since Penguin's homepage is several clicks away from the actual signing schedule page, try this: Gibson Rocks Come on, submitters, you can do better than that.

    1. Re:Signing URL by derch · · Score: 1

      Thank You! After a day at work, my eyes were tired and for the life of me couldn't find the freakin' link.

    2. Re:Signing URL by mithras · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's too late to help those folk in Portland, OR; his visit to Powell's City of Books was last Sunday, 9 February.

      BTW, he *does* actually sign books; I've now got first editions of The Difference Engine and Pattern Recognition, and an advance reader's copy of Mona Lisa Overdrive, signed by the author. Hee, hee, hee.

    3. Re:Signing URL by endquotedotcom · · Score: 1

      Funny that they don't mention that his first stop was on the Microsoft campus.

  7. ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by rickthewizkid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder what will happen if ISPs were to limit their customers' ability to use NAT devices...

    Either they will lose customers in droves due to the fact that the users can no longer use their fancy-schmancy Linksys router to connect all their computers together, or the router manufacturers will cook up an option in thier firmware to use the NAT-hiding approach mentioned above...

    Just my 192.168.1.1's worth
    --RickTheWizKid
    P.S.: FIRST INTELLIGENT POST :)

    1. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by Target+Drone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish ISPs would just bill like other utilities. You pay a fixed cost per month + X dollars for every GB of traffic. Instead they charge a flat rate and put all sorts of rules on what you can do such as no Servers, no NATs, etc. They should just provide Internet service to me rather then sniffing my packets to try and see if I'm running a Windows machine and XBox behind a NAT. The electric company doesn't care what appliances I hook up, they just bill me for what I use.

      </rant>

    2. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by Tokerat · · Score: 3, Insightful


      They are afraid of misuse. They don't want people running warez servers or spam sites. Thank you, $krypt K1ddi3z.

      It's a sad world when an ISP can be held reponsible for user misuse. It's not like the electric company is the party responsible when somebody throws a toaster in a bathtub with someone else in it...

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    3. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by GuruJ · · Score: 1

      It depends on the ISP. In my experience, you can choose between flat-rate ISPs, and ISPs offering cost + per MB download.

      I also know of ISPs that offer more or less restrictive conditions on what you can do with your link.

      Of course, all of the above probably depends on what country you live in (Australia in this case).

      --
      -- Askari: Give JavaScript the bird.
    4. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by extra88 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Gas and electric is charged based on use because those are consumable resources and the cost to you is proportional to the cost to them. 1 kW or 1 "therm" requires X amount of gas, coal, hydro capacity, etc. They don't charge for use just to keep you from using more than your "fair share."

      ISP bandwidth costs are largely flat. They pay for an OC3 whether their customers happen to use most of the available bandwidth or not. They have to buy their bandwidth based on peak capacity. If they were to charge based on use it would *only* be to discourage use and therefore reduce the need to add capacity.

      The most important part of a network connection is binary, either you have it or you don't. How many actual bits you can cram through it in a given day is far less important. The only use fees I would be cool with would be ones which specificlly charge for (and therefore discourage) the behavior which ends up costing the ISP money, disproportionate use at peak times. Monthly or daily GB limits are stupid because if I download a bunch of .isos at 3am, it isn't going to cost my ISP *anything* because there's not much other bandwidth use going on. Now if I download .isos at 8pm on a weekday, then that could lead them to needing more capacity.

      Most ISPs aren't stupid enough to care about whether you're using a NAT within your home. You don't need multiple computers in your house to use a crazy amount of bandwidth. They *do* care about you using a NAT in your home to share your connection with your neighbors, that's robbing them of a potential customer. Your electric company would also care if you were doing the same thing with an extension cord instead of Cat5 because they also have flat fees. My utlity bill has a "Minimum Monthly Charge" of $17.50. If I just used my neighbor's electricity and split the bill, we would be robbing the utility of that monthly charge from me.

    5. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by lommer · · Score: 1

      This system would also have the added advantage of making people pay actual $ for keeping code red-infected machines online (or some other worm that scans the net in volume). Not to mention that it would helpo draw the problem to the attention of users who don't know better.

    6. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what my isp does.

      Yet another reason they had to retire the contest for 'Best Hawaii ISP.'

      http://www.lava.net

      Lava Rocks!

    7. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      If the ISPs are smart, they won't discourage things like the routers, WAPs, etc. Those are SELLING POINTS for broadband, and the ISPs should welcome them.

      Think about it: who in their right mind is going to pay for multiple cable modems for multiple PCs, when a single broadband connection would serve the whole house just nicely? Mom and Dad aren't going to pop for extra cable modems so that Johnny and Sally can each have broadband in their rooms and broadband on the computer in the den.

      Multiple PC households are starting to become as common as multiple TV households. Heck, my brother's not a much of a computer-type and his family has THREE of them. A single broadband connection has plenty of bandwidth to serve them all at once.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  8. / dolts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now why the fuck don't you modify the code so that only logged in users can use that reply button?! It would wipe out the frist pron pstrs.

    The replytothis link wouldn't be nearly as interesting to the morons.

    1. Re:/ dolts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wouldn't.

      Why don't you just close this browser windows and continue masturbating to gay porn...

  9. Re: Moses Invests! by petepac · · Score: 1

    ...with a better annual yield.

    --
    >> Practice Safe Hex
  10. Hah. by OverRated · · Score: 4, Funny
    an 11-year-old Mac and a COTS (commercial-of-the-self) telescope

    What, he pulled it out of his ass?

    1. Re:Hah. by hayden · · Score: 0
      an 11-year-old Mac and a COTS commercial-of-the-self) telescope What, he pulled it out of his ass?
      Maybe he's the ultimate karma whore?
      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    2. Re:Hah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have this kind of telescope. You look into it, and you see an ad trying to sell you the telescope you're looking into.

  11. Perceptive Management by theGreater · · Score: 4, Funny

    [snip] ...The people who work here are geeks. [/snip]

    Finally, management who understands! Now when are they going to let me start dinking around with gadgets at work when I have a good idea, instead of telling me to file more paperwork.

    -theGreater Geek.

    1. Re:Perceptive Management by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Never. Remember the golden rule: its easier to beg forgiveness than to request permission. Don't wait for them to "let" you. Just do it. Make it happen. And let the suits bury their own paperwork.

  12. Columbia Picture by sparkhead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    also interesting is how many news sources mistook the image as a capture from the high-tech cameras that the people *actually* worked on."

    Yes, that is interesting. Interesting in a way that might make one wonder if this story is total fabrication to conceal the existence of higher-quality images from the "professional" scopes at that site.

    Not saying I believe that's the case, but it is simply more fodder for the anti-NASA conspiracists

    1. Re:Columbia Picture by RadRafe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here is the relevant quote from the earlier article: "[Lt. Col. Andy] Roake said that the Air Force will transmit classified images and data to Columbia accident investigators on the condition that they not be made public."

      You see, they can't release the photos from the Starfire Optical Range until NASA's examined them, because if they did that, the uninformed public would leap to conclusions. But that doesn't mean they were trying to misinform us about the origin of the picture. I think they just made an honest mistake.

      ...more fodder for the anti-NASA conspiracists
      I didn't know there was a conspiracy against NASA. Did you mean, anti-NASA conspiracy theorists?

    2. Re:Columbia Picture by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *Everything* is more fodder for anti-NASA conspiracists. If NASA says something, it's part of a conspiracy. If NASA doesn't say anything, it's a cover-up of a conspiracy. NASA can't win.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    3. Re:Columbia Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Everything* is more fodder for anti-NASA conspiracists. If NASA says something, it's part of a conspiracy. If NASA doesn't say anything, it's a cover-up of a conspiracy. NASA can't win.

      That's what you'd like us to thing, isn't it?

    4. Re:Columbia Picture by sparkhead · · Score: 1

      ...more fodder for the anti-NASA conspiracists

      I didn't know there was a conspiracy against NASA. Did you mean, anti-NASA conspiracy theorists?

      If you're going to flame regarding a definition, be correct.

      A conspiracist is someone who has a conspiracy theory.

      A conspirator is someone who is part of a conspiracy.

      The term as I used it is correct.

    5. Re:Columbia Picture by sysadmn · · Score: 2, Informative
      You see, they can't release the photos from the Starfire Optical Range until NASA's examined them,
      More likely, they won't release the photos from the Starfire Optical Range, since that would allow other governments to figure out how good the equipment is.
      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    6. Re:Columbia Picture by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1
      also interesting is how many news sources mistook the image as a capture from the high-tech cameras that the people *actually* worked on."


      Yes, that is interesting. Interesting in a way that might make one wonder if this story is total fabrication to conceal the existence of higher-quality images from the "professional" scopes at that site.

      Well I saw the press briefing live when this photo was shown. Dittmore(sp?) said it came from that site. He did not say it was amature photos taken by employees at that site. We all know how to spell assume but to be fair the way he said it implied that fact and I think evn Dittmore thought that the photo was a Government photo as well.

      --
      Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    7. Re:Columbia Picture by shumacher · · Score: 1
      Yes, that is interesting. Interesting in a way that might make one wonder if this story is total fabrication to conceal the existence of higher-quality images from the "professional" scopes at that site.

      Not saying I believe that's the case, but it is simply more fodder for the anti-NASA conspiracists

      Or perhaps it's a little backpedaling to cover up the failure of an over-budget, underachieving program that's yielded only very poor images.
    8. Re:Columbia Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tell you in the article how good the equipment is. It's no big secret.

      Honestly, these days this stuff is used to track space crap. Even then it misses most of it (it's even possible that's what punctured Columbia - unseen, unanticipated, teeny-tiny junk).

    9. Re:Columbia Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no word "conspiracist" in the English language. Honestly, would it have been that hard to actually check at dict.org or m-w.com? Or just open a dictionary?

      Maybe save the indignant tone for the next time you have a leg to stand on. Here's a hint: don't take as your source people who refer to themselves or others as "conspiracists".

    10. Re:Columbia Picture by sparkhead · · Score: 1
      There is no word "conspiracist" in the English language. ... Maybe save the indignant tone for the next time you have a leg to stand on.

      I'll keep that in mind coming from an AC. I suggest you get a better dictionary. The online ones aren't usually the best. However, here's one apparently better than what you had: conspiracist.

      Maybe the makers of those other online dictionaries are conspiring to hide words from you.

    11. Re:Columbia Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [QUOTE]
      Or perhaps it's a little backpedaling to cover up the failure of an over-budget, underachieving program that's yielded only very poor images.
      [/QUOTE]

      Are we talking about NASA(which has a miniscule budget) or Social Security, Public Schools, or Medicare here?

  13. Commercial Off The Shelf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    COTS (commercial-of-the-self)

    I'm sorry that is incorrect!!

    "commercial-of-the-self" would be if Ellen Feiss made an ad just about her. (Admit it, you'd watch.)

  14. Re:NBC to raffle off unwed mothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally! Linux nerds gonna git some!

  15. Gibson chokes in Boulder, CO by GrendelAlex · · Score: 3, Interesting
    No really! He quite literally coughed up a lung in front of us after some water went down the wrong pipe. The Father of Cyberspace was at the Boulder Bookstore this past Tuesday night reading from pR. A very cool guy and extremely modest in person given his fame and prestige amongst the gadget adorned attendees.

    I asked him for some pearl of wisdom. He offered: "Never eat anything bigger than your head!" Should have thought *a head* and gotten a few extra signed books for eBay... ;) - Alex

    1. Re:Gibson chokes in Boulder, CO by erturs · · Score: 3, Funny

      No really! He quite literally coughed up a lung in front of us after some water went down the wrong pipe.


      Now there's a memorable souvenir to take home with you from a signing -- a famous writer's lung!
    2. Re:Gibson chokes in Boulder, CO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He quite literally coughed up a lung

      Please, if you are going to use a figure of speech, make sure you understand it first. Unless you are saying that he really did cough up a lung.

    3. Re:Gibson chokes in Boulder, CO by itemsix · · Score: 1

      Gibson really is prolific! He explicitly stated that now all us geeks that saw him gag on water were going to go online and tell the world he died in Boulder, and look where we are now!

    4. Re:Gibson chokes in Boulder, CO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they say in Paris -- no duh!

    5. Re:Gibson chokes in Boulder, CO by abe+ferlman · · Score: 1

      Was it bigger than your head?

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    6. Re:Gibson chokes in Boulder, CO by GrendelAlex · · Score: 1

      Err!!! Why do you think that I prefaced "literally" with "quite". That's called a weasel word, a leading print marketing trick. I gather that you have the intellect to take it from there, although many hardwired geeks can't make the leap since this wasn't covered in 7th grade English... ;)

  16. Dear Slashdot by falsification · · Score: 4, Informative

    regalia != memorabilia

    1. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      regalia [reference.com]: The distinguishing symbols of a rank, office, order, or society.

      Seems relevant to me.

      -AC

  17. Jealousy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The french are just jealous because no one wants to buy french militaria (ever seen their uniforms? yuk!)...

    1. Re:Jealousy by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you can find them in great condition, I bet, since the roughest duty they get is usually in a parade. The pants might be soiled, however.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Jealousy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Lafayette ring a bell to you?

  18. Gibson reading at UW by lucasw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw Gibson do a reading at the University of Washington about a week ago. The lecture hall was packed- I get the feeling he isn't quite mainstream but having comparative literature courses that feature Neuromancer and occasional media references to the 'inventor of cyberspace' probably help with that.

    Gibson mentioned the book started coming together after he was sent by Wired to meet with a lot of music video directors at a festival a few years back- He even fictionalized the Bjork video with the sexy female robots into background material for one of the main characters.

  19. Actually, the Columbia picture quality... by saddino · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...would have been much better if he hadn't also been playing Dark Castle at the time.

  20. Re:Dear Professor Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh, I thought you were talking about Bush.

  21. That'll work by hayden · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The problem with this paper is that it describes an overly complicated way to detect multiple IP's behind a NAT firewall when there is a much easier, simpler and already used method: transparent proxying of HTTP and checking the browser identifier.
    And when somebody fires up IE because a site they are looking at doesn't work in Mozilla? Or they change their browser ID to make a site that checks the browser type before letting you access it?
    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    1. Re:That'll work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about less then 1/2 of 1 percent of the users. Probably even less than that.

      Think about it. How many people do you know? Now, how many of them have broadband? How many of those are technically competent enough to operate more then one browser?

      At the company I work for, 99.96% of the traffic going through our proxy server is from Internet Explorer 4/5/6. The other .04% or the browsers are Mozilla, Phoenix and Opera. There are around 95k employees. That means that only a very few actually use something besides IE.

      This leads me back to my original point of you assuming that a significant number of people would use something besides IE. And if they are using it on one box, it's damn likely that every other machine they have behind their little Linksys router is *also* running IE, and the same version at that.

  22. Tour dates URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    here is a direct link to William Gibson tour dates information.

  23. William Gibson by Whitecloud · · Score: 1

    was awesome when he wrote neuromancer, no doubt about it. These days the tech has taken a back row seat, and character relationship dymanics are in the front. Much more techy stuff is being written by the next gen of writers (or is it the gen after the next gen?) such as Neal Stephenson, writer of Cryptonomicon, and Quicksilver, which is due for release next month.

    --

    Do you need a website upgrade?

    1. Re:William Gibson by woboz · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the release of Quicksilver has been pushed back to september.

    2. Re:William Gibson by zor_prime · · Score: 1

      His fountain pen must have run out of ink.

      --
      "We all do no end of feeling, and we mistake it for thinking." -Mark Twain
  24. Re:Dear Professor Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Know that most of it is bullshit, and that your here today because of it. Hindsight still offers you little chance and that says alot concidering what passes by today undetected.

  25. Signed books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is to say you didn't get several more signed copies. You have a black marker, right?

  26. Sun's JVM Woes by IanBevan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    'Sun confirmed the memo's authenticity, but said that the document is two years old and that the problems it describes have been fixed

    The problem is that many of these issues are not fixed in the 1.3 JVM, which is still the one that most enterprise systems ship with (WebLogic for example). I've just done a six month contract performance testing a WebLogic 6.1 J2EE application on Solaris and I can tell you now that performance of their JVM is less than stellar. Memory requirements, for example, are insane.
    1. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by jtharpla · · Score: 1

      Exactly...I would NOT say Solaris runs Java "like the wind" IBM's JRE is better anyhow

    2. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by IanBevan · · Score: 1

      Exactly...I would NOT say Solaris runs Java "like the wind" IBM's JRE is better anyhow

      Perhaps, but the IBM engine has other troubles - in particular it does not scale across multiple processors. You get the same performance on one versus eight CPUs in the benchmarks I've seen. These are the same symptoms you typically see in heap intensive multithreaded C++ programs run in SMP. Whether or not that's the cause of the WebSphere scaling problems I don't know (unlikely I think). More likely it's just some sychronisation primitive(s) that they need to tune or remove.
    3. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by hobbs · · Score: 2, Informative

      It may be the case that 1.3 is (too) prevalent, but you only need to spend a little time with 1.4 to see that it is far and away faster than 1.3 in a "default" setup.

    4. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by hoeferbe · · Score: 1
      IanBevan wrote:
      The problem is that many of these issues are not fixed in the 1.3 JVM...
      Yes, that is a shame, as version 1.3.1 is the only version I feel comfortable using in a production system. The standard edition of their Java 2 runtime environment 1.4 and above have some Microsoft-esque terms in their license agreement that allows the runtime environment to automatically update itself. That's the last thing I need on a tested, configuration management approved system -- having the software decide by itself that it "needs updating".

      I haven't checked to see if the other editions of their 1.4 J2RE have the same terms. The funny thing is that in my e-mails with Sun, they see no problem with these license terms!

    5. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by GoRK · · Score: 1

      You really like that heap stuff, don't you buddy?

    6. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by IanBevan · · Score: 1

      Pays the bills ;-)

    7. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by wossName · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the downloading part in the license is about Webstart. I've never heard that a conventionally installed JRE is able to update itself, although I would really like that feature.

      So don't use Webstart.

      --
      Someone is wrong on the Internet!
    8. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by kinga · · Score: 1

      it does not scale across multiple processors. You get the same performance on one versus eight CPUs in the benchmarks I've seen

      And these would be which benchmarks, exactly?

      SPECjbb 2002 Q1 and SPECjbb 2003 Q3-- look at the xSeries 360 and 370 results, where it scales quite nicely as you double the number of processors.

      More likely it's just some sychronisation primitive(s) that they need to tune or remove

      Holy shit, let's all rush out and tell David Bacon that his locks suck :)

    9. Re:Sun's JVM Woes by IanBevan · · Score: 1

      And these would be which benchmarks, exactly?

      These benchmarks would be from the theserverside.com. And as for locks, you can have the most "featherweight" lock in the world, but if it's in a 'bad' place in the code, it'll still throttle your performance.
  27. Already by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I was looking for broadband some providers made you pay extra for the privilege of connecting more than one computer, with fines if you used a NAT and got caught.

    I think currently most providers take the sensible option of allowing it but not supporting it.

    I am told that similarly, phone companies made you pay when you hooked up another telephone to your existing line, but this was challenged in court and declared illegal.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  28. Yahoo v. France by (nil) · · Score: 4, Funny
    ZDNet reports that Timothy Koogle and Yahoo were acquitted of condoning war crimes by selling Nazi memorabilia.

    France surrenders.

    -(())

    1. Re:Yahoo v. France by mvdw · · Score: 1
      France surrenders.

      Again.

    2. Re:Yahoo v. France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      France surrenders.

      One million French people died in WWII. They did not have the possibility to flee to Britain like the British army did in 1940 or to the USA like the American army in Vietnam.

      Thank you for laughing at them.

    3. Re:Yahoo v. France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ordinary French are fairly nice. The problem is the kind of politicians they elect to represent them; always ready to greet invaders with open arms (and open legs) at first knock on the door.

      Thus the ordinary man and woman dies by the score.

      People don't laugh at the dead French but sneer of their politicians.

    4. Re:Yahoo v. France by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1
      Yes, well, some of those Frenchmen died because other Frenchmen turned them over to the Germans.

      And your choice of Vietnam as a point of contrast is terrific. Did you ever wonder why it used to be called "French Indochina?"

      However, that said, you're right in that many Frenchman fought hard and died for their country, and not a few fought for the United States when we were young. That they were fully prepared for the wrong war in 1940 was hardly unique to them, and I'd say it's time we got over all that.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  29. Re:PLEASE HELP!!! NEED PROWAR IRAQ TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since south park we all know that saddam and the devil have a special anal relationship

  30. Starts with a V? BAN IT! by yerricde · · Score: 1

    How many people use VMWare?

    Now watch residential ISPs ban VMWare along with VPN and VNC.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  31. Re:Had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When cyborg-hitler has returned and conquered the world, all history books will be rewritten.

  32. Not 'Yahoo v. France', dammit -- RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read the freaking article. It's Jewish groups that happen to be based in France who sued, not the French government. Actually, from what I know, most French people don't even approve this pointless lawsuit.

    1. Re:Not 'Yahoo v. France', dammit -- RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the jewish associations are known here for bringing lawsuits in order to censor various stuff.
      Most French do not agree with them, they're just a private party that happens to reside in France, and they certainly are not representative of France.
      The headlines should have been 'Jewish associations' vs Yahoo.

      Saying France vs Yahoo is as stupid as saying USA vs McDonald's when this lady sued for too hot coffee.

    2. Re:Not 'Yahoo v. France', dammit -- RTFA! by praedor · · Score: 1

      Point certainly taken and appreciated...however, how do you respond to the NO DEODERANT accusation? Hmmm? Yes or no, do you Frenchies use deoderant?! Answer the question!

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  33. Pisses me off... by nomel · · Score: 1

    That really makes me mad when news people assume everything, and don't even look into what they are talking about. I would much rather see a news person say "we don't know" then give me a bunch of garbage, that forces me to continue watching the news just to see if they have to correct themselves. Maybe it's a big scheme to make us watch the news.

    PS: this is NOt offtopic.

    1. Re:Pisses me off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen some idiot on Fox showing a 40mm grenade round and telling us that "this is what a rocket propelled grenade launcher fires."

      I've seen it twice and figure I'll probably see it again. What a moron.

  34. Re:Dear Professor Linux... by fragged+one · · Score: 0

    well, wouldn't it be a shame if you did soil your pants. then you'd actually be subjected to a shower! OMG! you won't be called that when your country decides that they actually care if they get invaded (ww1 & ww2), and get the cajoles to stand up to international threats, especially when the ideas your country gives, are proven to not work.

    --
    if it wasn't for that horse, i wouldn't have spent that year in college.....
  35. Shuttle Simulator by kryten · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember a game from about 10 years ago that was a shuttle simulator?

    I remember it ran on a pc and was amazingly hard to figure out with no instructions. There were about a million knobs and buttons to play with.

    There were many screens of the shuttle interior and you could also switch to an external view.

    Anyone know what I am talking about?

    1. Re:Shuttle Simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, not really

    2. Re:Shuttle Simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yup, I believe it was called "Shuttle", Virgin Interactive, 1992. A true underrecognised classic.


      It's at Underdogs, merry Christmas!

    3. Re:Shuttle Simulator by MrDelSarto · · Score: 3, Informative

      yeah, and here is a good site about it. You can even download it from here, i guess it is classed as abandonware.

      I remember you could play "realistic" mode where the shuttle platform moves out in real time, which is about 3 days I think. now that's realism!

      if you bought it, it came with a *huge* wall chart with all the switches. The two real life shuttle disasters look positivley pedestrian compared to some of my botched landings in that game.

    4. Re:Shuttle Simulator by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      I don't remember that one but I remember the one for regular Nintendo. It was hard as hell, then again I was like 5, but it kept me entertained for hours. You had to get arrows to line up with each other to make the shuttle do different things, like liftoff, open the cargo bay, capture a satellite, re-entry, etc. It was called "Space Shuttle Project." If anyone is interested, you can read a little more about it here.

  36. Thoughtcrime by duncan+bayne · · Score: 1

    Condoning war crimes is illegal? It seems Mr. Orwell was only out by 9 years :-(

    1. Re:Thoughtcrime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you r a dumas,tx.

  37. Re:I posted an article about the new BLUE laser DV by captainktainer · · Score: 2

    Maybe because of this and this and various others on the subject of blue laser DVDs. Quite honestly, they get hundreds of submissions a day... some good ones are bound to fall through the cracks.

  38. Re:Isn't it funny... by praksys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    bits of the WTC or Columbia on eBay

    Both are actually required as evidence in ongoing investigations. No doubt some bits of the WTC, at this very late stage, would not be of much use to anyone, but even the smallest fragment of the Columbia could be crucial to figuring out what happened. The US is hardly the only country that gets excited when people wander off with bits of evidence from crime scenes and crash investigations.

    Unless this nazi regalia is actually needed for some continuing investigation into war crimes there is no real comparison here.

  39. sun publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the memo was part of Sun's strategy to attack Microsoft into getting Java shipped with windows. They know it STILL to this date reminds me of the classic tale "The Turtle and the Hare".

    I don't know why, but java reminds me of turtles. They bite hard and are really slow.

  40. Feedback for the Godseye Project by dpplgngr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've seen passing references to Joshua Schacter's Geourl, and the Geocoder project Dave Egnor wrote (which won the Google programming contest)... but not much feedback here on Godseye.

    Please take a moment *look* at the Godseye Project, look it over, try the search feature at the bottom of one of the geopages, and then yell at me if you would.

    There's more to this project than you can see- the orthophoto polygonal clickthrough tool is already written, and I'm working on making this distributed.

    You can add geosearch functionality to your own site fairly easily with the directions provided.

    --
    --
  41. How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the quote from the book 2+2=5? I guess 2003-1984=9!

  42. For sale! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 French Army rifles, circa WWII... great condition! Never fired, and only dropped once!

  43. Java note: it could have been written today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it somewhat telling that people could have thought that it was written today? All the problems that they talk about still afflict the JVM.

    Runs Java like the wind? Please, Scott, learn to program will ya?

  44. The Media are Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Fall over themselves to be the first to report 'news', even if it's wrong:
    • CNN Said the shuttle was going 18 times the speed of light
    • Foxnews said the shuttle was 200,000 miles above the earth
    • CBC Newsworld had an interview with a redneck who claimed to find an 'afterburner' and a 'solenoid' from the shuttle that looked suspiciously like it was from an old dodge
    • CNN publishes crap photo as high-tech secret military photo
    Tomorrow CNN will probably report the "shuttle blown up by palestinian suicide bomber" story again.
    1. Re:The Media are Morons by Forgotten · · Score: 2

      Where do they even find these idiot self-proclaimed "expert" pundits?

      From the original CNN article:

      The poor quality of the photo NASA displayed last week has led some experts to suggest that better photographs of Columbia's final moments are being withheld for security reasons.

      "It may represent the worst available image that shows the relevant phenomenon," said John E. Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org.

      Or, you might be an idiot conspiracy theorist with nothing useful to offer.

      The thing is that the quality of pundit commentary is always exactly this stupid - it's just usually not exposed. So why do they bother talking to these empty spaces? Because it's the easiest way to lend the appearance that the article writer actually talked to someone about it. By-the-numbers journalism.

      I can't decide who I'd prefer to have a late-falling piece of shuttle landing gear land on their head, the useless pundit or the useless journalist. The latter should know better to than to ask idiot questions of people unqualified to offer a useful opinion. The former should know better than to answer.

  45. Re:Columbia Picture-Breaking up is hard to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some dutch pilots may have gotten a better view of the breakup.

  46. Regarding France vs. Yahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think France's GDP is lower than Yahoo!'s revenue. In any case, I'm sure Yahoo! uses deodorant.

  47. Re:ISPs "cracking down" on NAT users-Power trip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The electric company doesn't care what appliances I hook up, they just bill me for what I use."

    Actually if your "appliances" affect the power network, then yes they do care. Some industrial customers have to deal with this issue. Just like ISPs.
    <pretend rant>
    Now if one could only get the Slashdot crowd to realize cause and effect. Like P2P apps and their effects on a network. Or everybody suddenly going Buffet style on a shared network. But it's always easier to blame the "other" guy, than look at the consequences of one's actions.
    </pretend rant>

  48. Re:they missed the inconclusive obvious way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First a quick note to others replying to this, IE indicates the version of the OS in the UserAgent field, so it is possible to tell there are different OSs behind a NAT.

    However my main point is, that is _all_ (different OSs) every one of these methods prove. So what, you've just caught my Linux workstation running 1 or more virtual machines running other OSs (Something I do).

    If they decide to try and cancel my contract simply because I am running multiple OSs at the same time, they are in breach of the contract and I _will_ sue, if only to make a point.

    Until they have a way of proving that there are multiple _machines_ sharing a connection, then you have some fairly decent plausable deniability, and the best thing is _they_ have to prove that you have multiple machine not just multiple VMs.

    Of course this all depends on the wording of your contract.

  49. French uniforms come with built-in white flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How many of you Frogs out there don't speak German?

    You're fucking welcome!

  50. Go Tiger! by Curt+Cox · · Score: 1
    I pity anyone who has to use 1.3.x because of all the great new stuff in 1.4.x. It is hard to live without exception chaining, for example, once you have lived with it. The biggest issue mentioned in the memo is the memory footprint of multiple JVMs. It isn't scheduled to really be addressed until Tiger.

    JSR 121 -- The Isolation API

  51. Because *my* kids will grow up safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Peace in our time", eh? Why the hell do you think that would work this time?


    For sensitive poets
    We have this news
    Saddam is why God
    Made B-52s

    courtesy of http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110003063

  52. Must be a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No one is really that stupid.

    You really do need to follow the links from the PLO through Haj Amin el-Husseini and tell me where they lead you. Try it - you'll like it.

  53. Re:Yes RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government brought the case, based on a complaint by various groups.

    Little hint, if you see the threat of jail time, it's a criminal case by the government.

  54. Geek ISP and NAT boxes switching user agents? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    And when somebody fires up IE because a site they are looking at doesn't work in Mozilla? Or they change their browser ID to make a site that checks the browser type before letting you access it?

    I agree, that's a point... (though Mozilla's finally gotten to the point where I can only think of one non-microsoft.com site which doesn't work with Mozilla, and that's because it doesn't like the fact that the term "MSIE" isn't in the user agent string)

    However, if I were an ISP looking for a short but sweet way of coping with massive NAT usage, I'd be collecting that list anyway, and shortlisting those users for closer inspection.

    Anyone know of any way of transparently replacing the user-agent strings at the NAT box?

    Not that I personally care, my ISP kicks ass. They offer a 1.2Mbps DSL service with the option of a static IP address for cheap. And they don't care if you run servers, truly a geek's ISP. www.dsl.ca

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  55. ISP's checking behind NATs by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    They can bitch at me for using multiple machines when they start paying my power bill and remove the upstream and downstream caps on my service!

    My current provider, Adelphia, seems to think 15KB/s is reasonable. My previous ISP, Roadrunner, was at 60KB/s. I won't depress you or myself with my previous previous ISP's stats, but here's a hint: university.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    1. Re:ISP's checking behind NATs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume when you say 15KB/s, you mean the upload cap? I can't imagine paying for that as "broadband". You may as well use a modem.

      In Canada a typical cable modem connection (anywhere) is 3-400KB/s down, 50-100KB/s up. If you find a download proceding at 15KB/s, you cancel it and download from somewhere else. ;) And that's not even fast (I've been on an academic OC-3 too...yum).

    2. Re:ISP's checking behind NATs by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      Oops, I forgot to specify. Yes, I mean the upstream. The downstream is much faster. I have no complaints about the downstreams. Those numbers are both upstream ratings.

      And that is kilobytes (B, not b) so it is still faster than a modem.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  56. Re:PLEASE HELP!!! NEED PROWAR IRAQ TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use BSD is dying troll and s/BSD/Iraq.

  57. Junkbuster is your friend. by The+Darkness · · Score: 1
    Anyone know of any way of transparently replacing the user-agent strings at the NAT box?

    Yes, one way is to transparently proxy to junkbuster and have it rewrite the user agent.

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those that need closure
    1. Re:Junkbuster is your friend. by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      Yes, one way is to transparently proxy to junkbuster and have it rewrite the user agent.

      Yeah... Thanks, but that's not really what I was looking for; I'm already running Junkbuster on the LAN at work.

      I'm hoping to do it at a NAT level... though, I suppose, if I make all outgoing port 80 run through a given box, it's imperceptable to the user.

      Why? I've got 600 bored secretaries here who can at least skew webmasters demographics toward developing for Linux, in the hope that one day something other than the kernel will be ready for the desktops of the masses.

      (See my previous rants, I'm currently far too drunk to be copying and pasting URLs.)

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    2. Re:Junkbuster is your friend. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      I very much like your plan. In should be in the Linux Acovadcy FAQ, if it is not.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  58. Agreed by freeweed · · Score: 1
    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  59. Hilarious! by Quila · · Score: 1

    How do you "come within two digits" of cracking a code?

    1. Re:Hilarious! by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. Haven't you seen the cracking tools in the movies? Running-digit displays, where one digit locks in at random intervals, until the whole code is broken?

  60. get the same funtionality on Linux with grsecurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just take a look at this wonderful kernel enhancement for Linux.

    Moreover is has something on lines of "systrace" from Niels Provos. Basically you create ACLs for what applications may or may not do, including an autolearn-mode.

    PS: I know that PaX can be circumvented, but there is much more than PaX included in this project.

    PS2: I am aware that parts of this patch is based on SolarDesigner's OWL patches. Although you can get OWL for 2.4 kernels (finally), they lack a lot of the cool protection functions included in grsecurity.

  61. How to make JVM memo woes irrelevant? by GrendelAlex · · Score: 1

    I'm curious what version of Sun's JVM or OS patch levels you need to be running to rule these issues "irrelevant" and to allow Java to run like the wind? Anyone know or interested to find out?

  62. Re:Isn't it funny... by rodgerd · · Score: 1

    You're the first person I have seen object to grabbing chunks of the WTC or the shuttle on the gounds of investigative necessity in an on-line forum. The bulk of complaints (and death threats, and what not) are from people outraged at others exploiting the tradgedy. Which is reasonable enough - but, oddly enough, many people in France werenn';t very fond of the Nazi regime, either.

  63. Re:Had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dipshit, if Isreal really wanted to commit genocide in Palestine, there wouldn't be any Palestinians left alive. It would take, what, three or four days?

    Fortunately, the Isrealis mostly just want a peaceful coexistance.