Slashdot Mirror


Audioscrobbler (Anyone Remember Firefly?)

asciirock writes "RJ, a University of Southampton grad student in the UK has just put his final year project online. Audioscrobbler is a free plug-in for Linux XMMS and Windows Winamp2. It tracks every tune you play, cross-references with others in the Audioscrobbler community and serves up recommendations. There's also msging, stats and user homepages. In other words... Firefly lives!"

185 comments

  1. Site by pbrinich · · Score: 0

    What about a site that works?

    1. Re:Site by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Suffice to say the article is now a post-mortem, at least if the suggestion servers etc are on the same server as the web site. ;)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:Site by vincevincevince · · Score: 1

      the site is up again :-D and fast i understand there were some glitches which under ./ load became a little more than minimal

  2. I don't get it by Cheeziologist · · Score: 0

    can someone plz enlighten me as to what this has to do with a cancelled tv show. I never saw firefly so i'm at a loss as to what this software has to do with it. Was there a version of something on the show like what this software does (or with the same name or something)?

    1. Re:I don't get it by X00M · · Score: 0

      I second this I have never heard of firefly or seen the tv show....anyone?

    2. Re:I don't get it by yandros · · Score: 5, Informative

      FireFly was a rating, preference-matching, and suggestion system developed at the MIT Media Lab long before anyone had really heard of Joss Whedon. :-)

      There were a couple research versions of the multidimensional matching system run out of the Media Lab (one for music, then an expanded one for music, movies, and books, as I recall). FireFly was the name used for the spinoff company. It went through a brief period of excitment during the internet boom, then (iirc) was purchased by some large corporation or other. (I have a friend who worked on the research project.)

    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's Joss Whedon?

    4. Re:I don't get it by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firefly.com was also a good internet community back in 96-97. Then they build a new bug-riddled javascript bloated system that was so slow the chatrooms and community pages became unusable.

      Spent many many hours chatting on FFly. You had to refresh the window to load any updates!

      Any other old Firefly people on Slashdot? My FFly id was Assar, and I used to hang out in the Save Ferris and Witty Repartee venues.

    5. Re:I don't get it by deepsky · · Score: 2, Informative

      > then (iirc) was purchased by some large corporation or other

      Yes. This particular large corporation is known as "Microsoft". And Firefly Networks' flagship product was called "Passport". Ever heard of it? :)

    6. Re:I don't get it by kuroth · · Score: 1

      > Any other old Firefly people on Slashdot?

      I was responsible for, afaik, the only operational installation of the initial version of Firefly's software. It was for a Ziff-Davis project, rating shareware in their software library. In that version they used parsed html to do everything; I'm not familiar with how the later versions worked.

      I've never met him, but I was apparently implementing designs created by a guy named Bob Sweeny. His site has some screen shots.

      As Bob says, the project fell apart sometime after it was implemented. I don't know the story behind that.

      I was at the company meeting when they were first discussing MS's interest in them. There was a lot of talk about how MS was just looking at them, and not getting ready to pull a Borg. A few months later, the company was broken up and moved to the West coast.

    7. Re:I don't get it by yandros · · Score: 1

      That's news to me -- the product that FireFly worked on when I knew about them (and the research project it came from) had nothing to do with what MS's Passport does.

    8. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefly was also implemented on Barnes and Noble.com and Launch.com, back in the day.

    9. Re:I don't get it by darqchild · · Score: 1

      Surely eveyone in north america is familiar with the Air Miles ( canadian version) card, and the business model behind it.

      To my understanding, passport is similar. It's supposedly a data mining operation.

      Now, in that case FireFly was probably purchased because it provided a framework for the data mining capabilities that would make Passport profitable

      Just my thoughts, what does everyone else think?

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    10. Re:I don't get it by yandros · · Score: 1

      An old friend of mine went over `to the Dark Side', becoming one of the founding members of MS's Business Data Mining & Intelligence (or somesuch) group, well before the days of FireFly, so I kind of doubt this.

      Certainly, FireFly's MD preference-matching system could be used with passport-style marketing information for things like ad-targeting (my friend more or less told me they were working on this sort of thing), but this use equires, rather than provides, the sort of technology that Passport represents. Shrug.

    11. Re:I don't get it by kuroth · · Score: 1

      Yea, the B&N development server was seven feet from my desk after Firefly moved to the Kendall Square office. I forget the name of the guy that was working on it. They came into the game a few months after Ziff-Davis, afaik.

      Iirc, the B&N site was developed using a newer version of the software, one that had moved away from the parsed html model.

      I don't remember Lauch.com at all. There were also a couple of other sites, BostonEats and a movie rating site, although I think those were both internal projects.

  3. It tracks every tune you play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Listen to *one* Britney Spears track out of curiosity, get distracted by something to do in another room, forget that it's playing repeatedly for 3 hours in the meanwhile, get labelled a teen music sheep by the system and get recommendations for more degrading music. Arg!

    1. Re:It tracks every tune you play? by cioxx · · Score: 4, Funny
      Listen to *one* Britney Spears track out of curiosity...[]

      What in the hell are you doing listening to Britney in the first place? It's like saying "I found this virus and decided to infect few of my computers.. you know, out of curiousity"
    2. Re:It tracks every tune you play? by Subjective · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the software hates you personally for some reason.
      It just seemed to sense the fact that you're a bad person the moment you ran it.

      What I'm really trying to say is:
      Quite possibly you could edit your 'history' through some config file or app.
      And if not, you can always write the history-editor

      Besides, I think that if the software is any good, it tracks changes in preference too. All the 'Boy bands' reccomendations will go away in a few days, if you're too lazy to edit them out.

      --
      My other .sig is also this bad
  4. Go further! by NineNine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recommendations are nice, but what I want is a tie in to Fast Track. I want a list of DATs that I can plug in to Kazaalite and download based on what I play.

    1. Re:Go further! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that with the DAT? How can I feed a list of songs into Kazaa? Is it an offical way - are there docs? Thanks.

    2. Re:Go further! by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Kazaalite comes with a few utilities that do this. http://www.kazaalite.com

    3. Re:Go further! by captainclever · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hi, i'm the guy who's writing Audioscrobbler.

      i want to steer clear of filesharing to avoid getting savaged by the RIAA etc.. but i'm planning on exposing the data so other people can write "unofficial" addons to do stuff like this, which hopefully won't get me in trouble :)

      RJ

      --
      Last.fm - join the social music revolution
    4. Re:Go further! by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, can you please tell me how you would go about convincing the RIAA (and/or a judge) that that is fair use? It seems to me that that can only be used to illegally download music, and there is no other use. Correct me if I'm wrong...

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    5. Re:Go further! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I tried to install the xmms plugin with the perl script you wrote, but it didnt work: The $nameoffile variable contains the string "xmmsplugin1.2 - Temporary version until new servers available.tgz". Its easily fixed, of coures :-)

      posting as AC because I am too lasy to ask for my forgotten password :-)

    6. Re:Go further! by Phuque+P.+Gianee · · Score: 1

      What record label do you work for?

      1.Where I'm from, what other people listen to is interesting food for thought.

      2. Ya might make a friend you wouldn't have met any other way.

      3. Musicians get ideas for their set lists by similar means.

      Three strikes.....you are OUT!

    7. Re:Go further! by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Up for a mirror? Your site is borked, if you can send me the contents of the site I can post a temporary mirror for you. I'm really interested in checking out the program, and can't.

      You can email me or contact me via IM systems, just check my user info.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    8. Re:Go further! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll write what we tell you to, you limey whore, or we'll bomb your country as soon as we're done nuking Iraq.

    9. Re:Go further! by akb · · Score: 1

      What about a catalog w/ digital signatures like Bitzi? It allows files to be found on p2p networks but does not require your application to interface with them directly.

    10. Re:Go further! by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      I was talking about the idea to link it to a downloadable Kazaa file. Not the idea itself, which I like.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    11. Re:Go further! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XMMS script fixed now, thanks :)

  5. Nice user profiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, I guess they can make really nice profiles of their users.. and then sent the customized advertisements. Nice ;-)

    1. Re:Nice user profiling by Nameles · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with customized adverts. If I got those, I'd turn off WebWasher. I don't want personal ads, I don't want a 100% legal smoke. I want hardware, games, anime, and industrial music.

  6. Next to be subpoenaed... RJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Can you imagine just how valuable the kind of information generated by a project like this might be to the RIAA? They somehow gain access to a server and now they know everything you're listening to

  7. oh swell.... by deanj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Great.... Firefly.com has a patent for this sort of thing, and now Microsoft has it (Microsoft bought them). Is this another case of something getting off the ground and then squashed because of lawyers?

    Eech.

    1. Re:oh swell.... by David+McBride · · Score: 4, Informative

      Software patents are not (currently) valid in the UK. Hence this is unlikely to be immediately squished by a megacorp from across the pond.

    2. Re:oh swell.... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Software patents are not (currently) valid in the UK.

      Correct. They are currently valid nowhere in Europe, although there are unfortunately plans to change that.

      However, this doesn't prevent an unethical company to sneak just such a patent past a sleepy patent office clerk, and once it's on the books, they can bully whoever they want with it. True enough, eventually the judge will decide in favor of the defendant, but until that date the defendant has to cope with a number of hassles (lawyer's costs, and more importantly: injunction to force him to change his software, so as not to use the disputed features, etc.). Just let's hope nobody patents the light switch!

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    3. Re:oh swell.... by NineBall · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this idea I had once to try to patent thermodynamics, so that then I could sue for millions of dollars whenever someone transferred any energy. I really hope that Bill Gates isn't reading this though, I wouldn't want to give him any ideas.

      --
      You may not agree with what I'm saying but I'll kill you for my right to say it
    4. Re:oh swell.... by David+Leppik · · Score: 2, Informative
      Great.... Firefly.com has a patent for this sort of thing, and now Microsoft has it (Microsoft bought them). Is this another case of something getting off the ground and then squashed because of lawyers?

      I haven't looked into their patent on "this sort of thing" in particular, but I wouldn't be concerned.

      First of all, collaborative filtering, a.k.a. "this sort of thing" was developed at about the same time at a few places, most notably MIT (hence Firefly) and the University of Minnesota (which lead to Amazon.com's recommendation systems, among others.) The U of M's research, which I was involved with, started out with recommendations/filtering of Usenet, but later moved into movie recommendations. They then formed Net Perceptions, Inc. which worked on Amazon, CDNow.com, and others.

      I've done the occasional patent search on collaborative filtering, and all the patents cover particular methods and algorithms. The technique itself is not patented, and anyone can do it. See http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~karypis/suggest/index .html for one implementation.

      This is significantly different from what Firefly was doing. For one thing, Firefly was based on explicit ratings: you would explicitly tell it what you think of a particular item. The song recommender in this case uses implicit ratings: your behavior is used to infer a particular rating. That was pioneered at the U of M.

      In any case, this sort of stuff is used by everyone from Netflix to Tivo to Amazon, without patent issues. So you can too.

      David
    5. Re:oh swell.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS doesn't have a patent on collaborative filtering. Amazon was awarded a patent for collaborative filtering (even though there was prior art, being Firely - that's the USPTO for you) but haven't enforced it as of yet.

  8. Winamp 3? by 5lash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Argh, why's there no support for Winamp 3? Now i have to choose between having my Media Library, or goin old-skool, but bein able to use this cool plug-in

    1. Re:Winamp 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Winamp 3 is bloated and slow(er).

    2. Re:Winamp 3? by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's probably because Winamp 3 is a bloated, nasty mess. I've tried Winamp 3 many times, and I always remove it to go back to Winamp 2. Most software reviewers tend to agree. Winamp 2 is pretty close to the perfect MP3 player.

    3. Re:Winamp 3? by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      If you visited the site you would know that a WinAmp3 version is in progress. Besides, WinAmp 2 is a near perfect MP3 player, WinAmp 3 sucks the llama's ass.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    4. Re:Winamp 3? by KDan · · Score: 2

      Yeah, shame they don't add just the lightweight cross-fader to winamp2. I know there's plugins that do this for winamp2, but the ones I tried tend to make winamp2 suddenly more bloated and nasty (cause they have to work by buffering the next song, so you don't get the ability to switch between songs quickly and skip ahead easily anymore because there's a five-second delay - and if you decrease the delay the fades aren't so nice anymore).

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    5. Re:Winamp 3? by op51n · · Score: 1

      /agrees.
      Plus the size of my music collection always crashed Winamp3 through it's media library. And I have it organized so I don't need a library.
      Music
      ..Artist
      ....Album
      does the job fine for mixing and picking out an album.

    6. Re:Winamp 3? by Lshmael · · Score: 1

      The second latest "news" item on the Winamp site is their own recommendation service. Go figure.

    7. Re:Winamp 3? by andyh1978 · · Score: 1

      Crossfading is in the 2.x DirectSound output plugin and doesn't have any of the problems you describe. Can't see it in the version history, unless it was one of the things added in the '* updated to PP's latest input and output plugins' entry in version history; but it's there in 2.81.

    8. Re:Winamp 3? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "Argh, why's there no support for Winamp 3?"

      Because WinAmp3 sucks, as you'll discover the next time you have to wait 10 seconds for it to load, or have Windows crash when you try to change themes.

    9. Re:Winamp 3? by RussGarrett · · Score: 3, Informative

      Winamp3 is an attempt at completely rewriting Winamp so it's cross-platform (there is a linux version). Also, the component/plugin architecture is much better - Winamp3 has MUCH more development potential. However, it was released much too early by management (even the developers agree with this). Version 3.1 should be much improved. Perhaps calling it version 3 is a misnomer - Winamp 2 is still very much under active development, and a new version will be out soon.

      If Winamp 2 is perfect for you, why is there any reason to try anything different? (heheh, there will be soon ;))

      Yes I am a Winamp3 apologist :).

    10. Re:Winamp 3? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Winamp3 has MUCH more development potential.

      I agree, its energy is much more potential than kinetic. I have over 1,000 CDs in my collection, and I've ripped most of them to mp3s. Every time I tell Winamp3 to catalog my collection, it ends up leaving a ton of stuff out.

      Sad to say, but MS's Media Player catalogs it correctly.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    11. Re:Winamp 3? by essdodson · · Score: 1

      Pretty much because everyone has accepted Winamp3 as a failure. It's slow, it's interface sucks. About the only cool thing it does it play videos... woooooohooooooo oh wow, look I've got Windows Media Player installed for just that.

      --
      scott
    12. Re:Winamp 3? by asciirock · · Score: 1

      Yah, Winamp has one. It's total ass... just like every other service of its kind since Firefly. What I like about the Audioscrobbler plugin is that it leaves me alone after I've installed it. With Winamp's you need too many windows open to much of the time - and ferchrissakes when are they going to ditch that stupid mini-browser! Moodlogic sucks too. For that matter, every free CF music rating service has sucked wand until this one imo. Even on a crap server Audioscrobbler kicks Gnodnet ass. Or Rateyourmusic ass. Or Mubu ass. etc.

    13. Re:Winamp 3? by Radix999 · · Score: 1

      There's a plugin for Winamp 3 that loads all of the older Winamp 2 plugin's if you're really that worried and want to stick with Winamp 3.

      url: http://www.winamp.com/components3/detail.jhtml?com ponentId=118230

      Doesn't work with everything - but might work for this.

      --
      -- Wireless WaFreenet user since March 2002
  9. Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by Krapangor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it might seem cool at the first sight to produce such a tool which creates recommandations from other people's playlists, it's in fact counterproductive at pratical applications.
    What we have here is a stabilizing feedback loop, songs often heard will be heard more often. This can be described by the following simple equation (h(t) - hear rate):
    dh(t)/dt = h(t) * c + sin(h(t)) * phi(dt,H(t)) where the last term is a stochastic diffusion corrector which models connection drops etc. This means that after a 3c/pi annealing time new injected songs (c1,...,ck) have no chance to be heard at all, because the system reenforces to old songs. The only possibility to get something new into the playlists, is to get an external stimulation at e.g. t0: phi(c-h(t0). Such a high current can be only injected be a very strong source covering a large part of the system.
    In simple words: after some iterations an equlibrium is reached and all new song turning up in the recommendations are the top 24 played at MTV.
    In fact, you are just replaying the shitty MTV mainstream taste.
    I can't think that this is very good, first you don't need a computer program to recommend the MTV top 30 when you have a TV and secondly you only get boring mainstream stuff and nothing like exciting french chansons or so.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by cide1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone finally proved mathmatically why clear channel is wrong! Quick, send this to the FCC, oh wait, they wont be able to understand it.

      I think, however, that a correction factor is missing, you should have a phi(c - (p*h(t0)) where p is a correction factor for how open a person is to new music. I know for me that it doesnt take much for me to try something new, but for many people over the age of about 18, they know what they like, and arent going to progress with the change in popular music. This is why old people like oldies.

      --
      -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
    2. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I have absolutely no clue whether those equations are correct (I don't even want to have a clue, really), but the tendency you describe certainly would exist. However, since people most likely won't base their hearing habits solely on such a database, I doubt equilibium will ever be reached - this is basically saying the "external stimulation" you refer to will always be quite strong.
      Nevertheless, it's certainly correct that such a system makes is unlikely for rare songs to be put into the main circulation - of course, since the developers are probably aware of this, they can counteract, for instance by adding modifiers for songs newly introduced into the system, or by allowing for user-moderated boosts to certain songs.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      I think that you'll have more than just the MTV top 30. You'll have all factions, the Goths and their Euro-industrial, the Preps with their Pop countdown, the wrench heads with their death metal, etc...

      Then we'll all meet in the parking lot and fight. All except the nerds because they will have mellowed out to Chopin.

      It'll be like high school all over again.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    4. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by Subjective · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is no real reason why that would be a feedback loop:
      You're listening to a set A of songs. So, you recieve a reccomendation from someone listening partly to A, partly to another set (all the songs he heard which are not in A), B.
      You exercise your own taste (which is not included in your text at all), and integrate part of B. (You might also give up a few over-played songs of A)
      Now you have new recommendations...

      There's absolutely no reason why this should gravitate towards the MTV play list: it'll gravitate towards "music you like and music people who like that, likes"

      I'm also not sure where that equation comes from. There's absolutely nothing which allows you to derive math from the situation.
      A person recieves a recommendation, and may choose to take it or not. He may listen to part of the song, decide to remove it, and the program will disregard that song.

      You cannot write an equation to tell what that person is going to do...

      --
      My other .sig is also this bad
    5. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is this phenomenon true for other suggestion-based systems, such as IMDB, Amazon, et al?

      I'm always skeptical of suggestion based systems that make simple inferences (eg, if you like X you'll like Y) because they never suggest anything I like.

      But I can buy into *complex* suggestion based systems that do a more in-depth job of matching preferences. For example, knowing that I like Tangering Dream, a simple system may suggest Brian Eno or Kraftwerk. But my personal playlist may go from Tangerine Dream, to the Replacements, to Miles Davis, to Richard Thompson, to the Velvet Underground.

      Someone who also listens to those same artists might also have suggestions that appeal to me since it better reflects the complexity of my taste versus simple comparisons.

    6. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by costas · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are easy ways around this: you can age songs (guaranteeing that new songs get priority) or you can use web-of-trust ratings to see what high-trusted peers recommend currently.

      BTW, I know this as my newsbot does the same sortof filtering for news articles, and although there is some feedback reinforcement for recent news, it does work suprisingly well.

    7. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 1

      Bingo. Or, for instance, configure the thing to base recommendations on songs played in the last n days, where n is configurable at each node.

    8. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by nehril · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I understand correctly, this system strikes me as somewhat similar to how google ranks pages. the google system obviously works... I have a feeling this will work too.

      the feedback only breaks things down if users limit their selections to received recommendations. since many people continually update their collection, we have enough input to avoid "the one giant recommended playlist." most people search out new music.

    9. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by Yokaze · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Let's see what you are saying:
      dh/dt = c * h + stochastic diffusion corrector
      So, in words, you're claiming, that the change of the hear rate (h) is mainly proportional to the amount one currently listens to the song?

      Don't know about you. But for me, listening to a song usually peaks after a certain time, and then declines.

      So, more something along:
      h(t) = c * e^(k*w) * cos(w*t) ; k > 2*w
      The problem with MTV is, that they're targeting the largest audience (hence mainstream). A large audience is less flexible in accepting new music.

      The program (without reading it, due to /.ing) seam to cluster the usership based on their preferences, thus creating smaller communities, which are more suspectible to new influences.
      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    10. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by Entropy248 · · Score: 1

      You cannot write an equation to tell what that person is going to do...

      Unless your name is Hari Seldon.

    11. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by jon514 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to work for a software company that did this sort of thing. While you can't predict exactly what an individual is going to do from an equation, it always amazed me just how good a hit-rate you can get when you test against a larger group.

      The mathematics behind it is actually fairly straightforward & there's a lot you can do to bias the results so the most commonly listened to tracks don't always appear at the top of the list of recommendations.

      The harder part is analysing the data-set & computing the recommendations in a reasonable time frame. Particularly since the quality tends to increase with larger & richer data-sets.

    12. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by elint · · Score: 1

      And even then, you can't write an equation to tell what ONE person is going to do... only what society will *probably* do in general.

    13. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by Subjective · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying, the program should delete the general case (i.e. songs the user probably already heard of)
      Hmmm...

      Anyway, I really don't think the calculations should take long... There are (only... hehe) a few tens of thousands of points with meaningful connections and if you're looking up through a person's history, you only need to check a few hundred points, no?
      The connections themselves are only updated daily (or worse), so the real-time calculation should be really small (in time) per user

      --
      My other .sig is also this bad
    14. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. by djMaxM · · Score: 1

      The algorithms used at Firefly tried to do lots of things to get around this problem (it actually turned out you didn't have to do much, but we ran a lot of tests with lots of different algorithms to prove it). Now what I can't stop is the fact that Britney Spears is popular because lots of people claim to like her. But the collaborative filtering algorithms are not subject to group dynamics in the same way that averaging or global algorithms are...

      --djMax - one of the Firefly-ers.

  10. Re:linamp by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1

    That is what XMMS is.

    --


    - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
  11. Re:linamp by Kourino · · Score: 1

    How about a Linux program that's not an interface clone and picks up toolkit themes?

  12. But ... by halftrack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm getting this plug-in and I'm going to test it because it sounds great, but it sounds creapishly like certain other pieces of software and licensing clauses.

    Think about it; it profiles your music taste and make recommandations. That's what spyware does (or says it does.)

    I don't doubt that this piece of software is completely innocent (it being made by a student,) but who knows when someone makes a "new and improved Audioscrobbler." That really profiles you and stores this information for resale and profit without you really knowing it. Sure you might prefere targeted music adwertising, but be warned such advertising would only come from a preselected, narrow artist pool.

    Now, I'm using Audioscrobbler, but if it ever becomes mainstream I would be careful using any commercial equivalent (or even a commercial Audioscrobbler.)

    --
    Look a monkey!
    1. Re:But ... by tmark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think about it; it profiles your music taste and make recommandations. That's what spyware does (or says it does.)

      I don't know about anyone else, but I can't see how a system could possibly make intelligent recommendations without profiling me. If I happen to like listening to (say) Britney Spears, Metallica, and Herbie Hancock, I'd like to see what other people who also do the same are listening to. I DON'T want to know that people who listen to Britney Spears is likely to also listen to N'Sync.

      To me, the value-added here is precisely in the profiling.

    2. Re:But ... by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everything that send out your info to the net isn't "spyware". That's a ridiculous term. If it's useful, then it's certainly not "spyware". Would you call SETI@Home spyware? How about email?

    3. Re:But ... by Subjective · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I really don't get, and sounds a bit fishy to me, is the whole username/profiling thing.

      I mean, this can be done without it:
      Have an anonymous user handle on that site. No email, no nothing. (sure, they can have your IP. They can have mine, too, if they want, it's a dynamic one)

      Whenever you hear a song, it sends the info: a user who heard (set of songs) decided to hear (new song), and of course heuristics of how much any song is heard, bla bla bla.

      The server keeps this huge database. When you want recommendations (downloaded every 15 min? or something) your program asks what the database recommends for someone who listened to (the set of songs you listened to). You're not giving away an email, no personal info, just an anonymous username (created automatically, or something. There is alot of 'or something's here)

      There's no real reason for the server to know who you are or what you like for this to work.
      Perfect profiling is also not nessecary, in my view, but that's a different issue altogether

      --
      My other .sig is also this bad
    4. Re:But ... by YodaToad · · Score: 1

      The primary purpose of SETI@Home or email isn't collecting information about what you're doing on your computer/in a certain program, spyware's is. I'm not saying that Audioscrobbler is spyware, but I probably won't be using it. It's just another service for the RIAA to subpeona for information.

    5. Re:But ... by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      How does it know my IP address isn't dynamic? If it is then that information becomes worse than useless, because it might tell you that I like Metallica, Jools Holland and Eden Burning while telling you the next person to get allocated that IP liked Queen, Why? and Tchaikovsky. Now, as it happens, I like all those artists - but you can't deduce that at all. And without that, if you're limited to IPs then you're also limited to sessions and are going to have a job tracking them.

      At the very least you need a unique key on your machine, such as a GUID, if this function is to be any use at all.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    6. Re:But ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's safe to say that if it tells you what it's doing, it's not spyware. If it takes that data and sells it to big companies, then it may be fair to call it spyware; on the other hand, if it only uses it to make recommedations, it's not spyware.

    7. Re:But ... by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1
      The server keeps this huge database. When you want recommendations (downloaded every 15 min? or something) your program asks what the database recommends for someone who listened to (the set of songs you listened to). You're not giving away an email, no personal info, just an anonymous username (created automatically, or something. There is alot of 'or something's here)

      I mostly agree with you, but who says the profiling has to be personalized at all? Take, for example, the way IMDB does recommendations. It combines user-supplied recommendations with a Bayesian network that correlates the movies together based on a number of characteristics (e.g. genre, rank, director, actors, etc.). I think it works pretty well, and you're also welcom to read the reviews of anything it recommends to form your own opinion before investing your time or money.

  13. MoodLogic anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    MoodLogic provides this service, at a cost. It works based on paid subscriptions, or submitted data, as tokens. It only does mp3/wma (despite some of us asking for ogg support), but it seems to work pretty well. I believe it's currently only for Windows, and has a WinAmp plugin, but I may be wrong.

    1. Re:MoodLogic anyone? by __drewmerc · · Score: 1

      i've used moodlogic and it's really good. It allows you to sort your music files based on all sorts of criteria (sad, mellow, angry, dance, country, etc.) and is generally really good at putting together a playlist based on your criteria. You can even sort by year and tempo.

      It is a subscription service ($30 for 10,000 activated songs i think) but you don't HAVE to buy the subscription. The way the system works is through users categorizing the songs and sending the info back to moodlogic. I suppose they then take the average of all the song profiles and use that to make a decision about how a song should be categorized.

      however, if you don't want to pay for the service you get a chance to use their database for free. For every 5 songs you profile they allow you to use thier "auto-profiling" database to categorized 20 of your own songs. So the more you contribute to the system, the more free profilings you get from them.

      As for linux goes... it doesn't work in Linux. However it does run like a charm in Win4Lin :-)

      --
      /* No Comment */
  14. What's even worse, if you do it a second time. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    You might be tempted to say, "Oops, I did it again."

    Ok, you can slap me now.

    I must say though, my friends have always been more reliable at alerting me to things I might like than any program, and they're more, well, friendly too. I've never yet seen any automated system that didn't, sooner or later, get messed up. Which would be ok, except I've never known one to make particularly valuable recommendations when it *wasn't* messed up either.

    Hey, you watched a car racing movie. Here's some other car racing movies you might like to watch.

    Well, I *know* that you moron. I'm into car racing movies. Get it?

    KFG

  15. Damit! by twfry · · Score: 2, Funny

    For just a second, just one second there I thought this was talking about the Firefly TV show and somehow it was being brought back. sigh time to wander about aimlessly again.....

    1. Re:Damit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not worth the comment; but I share your pain. Firefly is the only thing on P2P I'm letting eat up my bandwidth; because it's worth giving it to others.

  16. Remember when RealAudio didn't suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are starting to ask the same thing about Winamp. Sometimes, redesigns work out (Mozilla), and sometimes... they don't.

    1. Re:Remember when RealAudio didn't suck? by snol · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, redesigns work out (Mozilla), and sometimes... they don't.

      But how many years was it that Mozilla was a bloated crashy piece of shit? Netscape released the code in March 1998 and we finally got a usable browser around early 2001 (0.9.0 was May 2001) and there was plenty bitching in between about how the project would never turn out anything useful. I believe we started seeing early winamp3 builds in late 2000 so maybe they'll put out something good late this year. One can always hope.

  17. From the download page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As many of you will have noticed, Audioscrobbler.com went down recently. This was because the website took half a million hits from midnight to 5pm. My hosting company froze my account because the load put on the webserver was greatly effecting performance for their other customers.

    So do you just not like the guys there or something? :)

  18. not if we... by Subjective · · Score: 1

    ransack it.

    Just imagine: you'd be illegally telling people what you like...

    --
    My other .sig is also this bad
  19. You too can become a Mensa member by kfg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh no. You can't fool me. I'm too smart for *that* old trick.

    KFG

  20. Ideas. by EnsilZah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What i would like is a window that lets me rate a song the first time i hear it, or just add a rating to the ID tag thing.

    And also maybe keep track of the amount of times i play it..

    That way it could find songs that i like, and i could have a category by which to order my songs when i can't decide what to listen to..

    1. Re:Ideas. by Mark+Hood · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're on a Mac, iTunes does both of these things

      And with smart playlists, you can have 'most heard', 'never heard', top or bottom rated....

      Easy!

      Mark

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    2. Re:Ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you need to Switch and use iTunes 3? http://www.apple.com/itunes

    3. Re:Ideas. by jmkrtyuio · · Score: 1

      And what I would like is a system which judges the songs you like by how often you listen to the ( entire | majority ) of the song before skipping/jumping elsewhere. Included in this calculation would be 'mood' determination based on your actions for the past x compared to what you did say yesterday - whihc you could then label what mood is what. Furthermore a system like should be able to statistacly realize when you ran to the john and left the thing playing or were in DHM and didnt realize how bad the crap playing in your ears actualy was. Use this to match up to others playlists, make shuffle mode more intelligent etc....

    4. Re:Ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. Firefly? by Phalkin · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that the bogus sci-fi show that only survived for 3 episodes?

    --
    I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Firefly? by jaysedai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bogus?? How about the best sci-fi TV ever made. Try downloading some episodes off Kaaza and come back with an informed opinion.

      There were 12 episodes aired and 15 made. It didn't fail because it was bad (it wasn't), it failed because, as usual, Fox TV failed to get behind it, they barely advertised it, they bounced it around (because of baseball coverage), and they played it completely out of order (like playing the pilot LAST!)

      Excellent Firefly discussions at:
      http://forums.prospero.com/foxfirefly/messages

      As for the actual Firefly software thingie, I liked it, too bad Microsoft smothered it. :(

    2. Re:Firefly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      farscape anyone?

      I prefer farscape - but that said firefly was okay too. But it used steady cams far far too much. like blair witch.

    3. Re:Firefly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no evidence of thses so called "steady cams" in blair witch.

  22. Why submit this to ./? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    RJ is already having hosting trouble, slashdotting him is not going to help audioscrobbler.

    At least it happened before it moved to the new hosting service. Now only his university is going to be pissed, and he has a server to move to in the near future.

  23. This article is confusing by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, I remember Firefly
    That was an awesome TV show
    What it has to do with peer to peer file sharing
    I do not know.

  24. Already slashdotted? by qbproger · · Score: 1

    can someone post a mirror to the downloads? The site is painfully slow.

    --

    - Joe
  25. Firefly/HOMR/Ringo Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,11585,00. ht ml

  26. Beyond the music realm.. by Subjective · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that associations, in computing, is a great idea for user interface.

    A program like this (lets disregard the Big Brother for one second, and look at computer+user alone) tells you what songs it thinks you'll like, based on what you've heard before.

    It could also tell you what songs you'd like to hear NEXT, based on order of songs you had before, and make these easier to access on the playlist (like, on the recommendation list. I'm getting out of hand aren't I?)

    The whole idea of associating user actions can be great. Suppose you work on a project. Slowly, the computer (the brand-new GPLed Associator program) associates a certain directory, where all the files are, with the files themselves, your favorite editor, the compiler for that language, and certain sites you visited researching for it.
    via some UI, it'll make all these accessible when 'triggered' - when it is pretty sure you're working on the project right now, or going to.

    In some sense (in a small amount of cases), the computer will be 'one step ahead of you' - holding the line when you're just about to ask it to call...

    --
    My other .sig is also this bad
  27. I don't get it.. by sconeu · · Score: 1

    How is this different from spyware?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:I don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Spyware is unwanted and dishonest with users about its purpose.

  28. Re:Next to be subpoenaed... RJ by PoshSpod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't worry, they won't. The RIAA has no power in the UK and none over the government.

    Part of the fun of being British these days is the RIAA can't bribe - sorry, fund - polititions in Westminister nearly as easily as in Washington.

    --

    This is my sig.

  29. "remember firefly" by mattdm · · Score: 1

    Hah. Kids today. I remember HOMR and its e-mail based predecessor RINGO.

    1. Re:"remember firefly" by VistaBoy · · Score: 1

      I thought HOMR was the episode of the Simpsons where they remove a crayon from Homer's brain and end up making him as smart as Lisa... kind of contradicts the episode about the "simpson gene" though.

    2. Re:"remember firefly" by cei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was a RINGO user, so I was quite amused years later when not only the technology, but their initial data set went commercial. I could log into Passport and the obscure music I was into 6 or 7 years earlier was still related.

      Then again, back in the day I also contributed information to a system run by Dave Datta at UWP.edu. The system let you email a formatted list of links -- say, for instance, Tony Levin plays bass with Peter Gabriel -- and it would create symbolic links in an FTP structure. This was in the days when Gopher was fading, but HTTP didn't have many options in browsers yet. Kind of a cool system.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
  30. Tracks every song I play? Sounds like RIAA spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks!

  31. Re:Next to be subpoenaed... RJ by Kaeru+the+Frog · · Score: 3, Funny

    NO! Then they might start releasing music I like instead of the stuff they're pushing now.

  32. Re:linamp by Glytch · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with the Winamp/XMMS interface? It's fairly intuitive and simple. XMMS itself is reliable and well-written to boot. Even on my ancient K6 mailserver/jukebox, it uses almost no CPU and almost no memory.

  33. RIAA Read This: Killer App alert!! by HelbaSluice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forget all the bogus attempts to move your antique business model online. What you want to do is license this technology from its creators, and build a mechanism to sell digital copies of the recommended tunes.

    Imagine a dialog box comes up and says: Hey, people who like Weezer and Radiohead are also listening to Wilco. Want to download their latest single for 50 cents?

    Combine that with some fair-use-friendly DRM software, and you've got THE application that gives the recording industry legs for the digital age.

  34. mirror by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://casper.zvdk.nl/~casper/audioscrobblerinstal ler.pl

    Please be gentle, only 16Kb up.

    1. Re:mirror by Menkhaf · · Score: 1

      Hehe... that's kinda funny.
      Why would you want to post a link to your own server when you only have 16Kb upstream?
      On Slashdot....

      But then again, you did it because you belive in something. If I had a sevrer running, I'd post the link to the file on my server, just to help you out. But I don't. I guess you have to take the load alone. Sorry...

      --
      A proud member of the Onion-in-Hand alliance
  35. I build Audioscrobbler by captainclever · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hey, RJ here-

    I was kinda hoping NOT to get slashdotted for a few days - i'm moving to a bigger better server soon. :P

    The site is currently hosted by my Uni, no wonder the webserver ground to a halt..Oh well at least i dont have to pay for the bandwidth used at uni :)

    The site's gonna be pretty slow for a few days, but please bookmark it and revisit soon- should have much more bandwidth and a faster server..

    I could do with some help developing the XMMS plugin and the winamp 3 plugin. All the source code will appear on the site soon (GPL).

    RJ

    --
    Last.fm - join the social music revolution
    1. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by jamie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "All the source code will appear on the site soon (GPL)."

      Why not today?

      Don't be embarrassed about it being crappy code, all code is crappy in the early stages. :) Put the GPL LICENSE file in the root directory, and follow its directions for adding notification to your source files. Then tar it up and call it 0.01.

      Put it up and keep putting it up as you update it. If you think you might have security issues, best that you open the code now before your user base gets any bigger -- let people review it and send you suggestions. If you don't think you have security issues, you have no reason not to release it.

      For a project that demands community participation, a promise of GPL code in the future is worthless. What's valuable is the code itself.

      Licenses, releases, security feedback, other feedback... this is all part of doing a project like this. It's something that isn't normally taught in a university, but if you really want to run a project that depends on its community, this is not extra-credit, this is a prerequisite.

      Just my opinion :)

    2. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by grahammm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe one reason for not putting the source online now is that he is being slashdotted enough and putting the sources online would probably increase the slashdot effect.

    3. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by captainclever · · Score: 5, Informative

      The reason the code is not available under the GPL right now is that the project is not "finished" with regards to my university degree course.

      I'm not sure if i'm allowed to (university regulations) put the code up as GPL until i hand in the final project on May 8th this year.

      I will find out tomorrow when i go to uni, and post an article on audioscrobbler.com explaining the status.

      RJ

      --
      Last.fm - join the social music revolution
    4. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to try using the "Magnet" system from Shareaza to host the file, basically: p2p file downloading. It could seriously reduce your hosting usage.

      Or just put the thing on kazaa and publish the CRC/MD5/SHA1 or whatever people like.

      Legitimate p2p file distribution as an alternate method of transfer for files typically downloaded from a server is seriously underrated.

    5. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By releasing an XMMS plugin without source code, your are in violation of its license. (see: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlu gins)

      You may not be sure if you're allowed to (university regulations) put the code up as GPL until you hand i nthe final project on May 8th this year, but I'm sure you're not allowed to (US Copyright law) put the plugin up as binary-only ever.

    6. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by OzJimbob · · Score: 1

      Pfft - what if you look it as the code is just being code that happens to work with the XMMS plug-in API?

      For instance - say I create a media player, under, say, a BSD licence, that happens to use an identical plug-in architecture as XMMS - written from scratch so no GPL code is involved. "XMMS plugins" will work on my player - why should people be prevented from releasing binary-only plugins that work with the XMMS api when they may be intended for use on my media player?

      --
      -"I still believe in revolution; I just don't capitalize it anymore." - srini!
    7. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by OzJimbob · · Score: 1

      And another example - say a plugin exists for XMMS that, through Wine, allows you to use Winamp .DLL plugins? Are you going to go around filing lawsuits against the people releasing Winamp plugins, on the basis that their binary-only plugins violate the GPL when used with XMMS?

      --
      -"I still believe in revolution; I just don't capitalize it anymore." - srini!
    8. Re:I build Audioscrobbler by JJC · · Score: 1

      The reason the code is not available under the GPL right now is that the project is not "finished" with regards to my university degree course.

      If you signed the same agreement I did when registering at Southampton, then the University owns the copyright to code you produce in the course of your studies. Have you considered that? I'd imagine you'd have to get permission from someone to release it under the GPL?

  36. CDNow bought something like this? by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 1
    I'm digging deep into my memory on a Sunday morning, but I vividly remember something along these same lines written by a guy from the United Kingdom circa 96 or 97. I think it was called the Similarity Engine, and you would type in a name of a band, and it would bring up a ranked list of other bands you may like. It was just a web page, so it didn't dynamically give you new suggestions based on what you typed in next. It was a very cool thing at the time. Turned me on to a lot of obscure bands just based on My Bloody Valentine obsession ;)

    I think CDNow bought the guy out so they could use it for the 'If you like this artist, buy these!' links on their pages.

  37. "Free" but apparently not Free by jamie · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I can't find any licensing anywhere that tells me the terms under which their collected information will be used.

    As far as I can tell from prowling over the site's FAQs and other documents, the student who put this together might collect a ton of data about your personal listening habits for a year and then (A) get bored with it and shut the project down without releasing that data back to the community who might want to actually keep the recommendation-system running, or (B) sell it all to marketers who promptly turn it into a paid service.

    We've learned from CDDB what happens when users volunteer to build something that isn't Free: if it becomes popular enough to do any good, someone will buy it and shut out the very people who built it.

    The creator has a good idea but needs to think it through before he'll get my participation.

    1. Re:"Free" but apparently not Free by julesh · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell [...] the student who put this together might collect a ton of data about your personal listening habits for a year and then [...] sell it all to marketers who promptly turn it into a paid service.

      Fortunately, this service is being run from the UK. The Data Protection Act would have something to say about the matter - if the information contains anything personally identifying it cannot be disclosed in order to be used for commercial purposes without a whole load of criteria being met. Including that you have given your permission for it to be used that way IIRC. So you should feel safe from your personal info being harvested in this way.

      Of course, I'm not a law professional, so I can't actually give you legal advice, and you should just take the above as inane ramblings that have nothing whatsoever to do with you, and are probably completely wrong.

    2. Re:"Free" but apparently not Free by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, instead of spouting off, there are other options:

      Check out what the creator has to say on Slashdot.
      Ask him a question in email.

      Either of these would show that the creator wasn't ready to be slashdotted, and was still a few days from really being ready.

      And how was anyone hurt by CDDB being bought out? I use freedb myself, but if I couldn't, big deal. CDDB is not a good comparison for Audioscrobbler anyway. With CDDB, you had to actually spend a few minutes punching in title and track information. With Audioscrobbler, you just install a plugin. Yeah, I'm sure the users of the plugin/service put in tons of uncompensated work.

      The possible shutdown of Audioscrobbler is of no consequence at this point. It's similar to how the shutdown of Napster didn't matter in the end. The *idea* is out there. The implementation is a minor detail.

      Loosen the tin foil hat and send a few emails before you lay in with this hippy shit. RJ did all the work. He wrote the plugins. He wrote the backend. He's serving up the bandwidth. All the users did was install a plugin. If he closes it, or cashes in, fine. But maybe you could have asked him first.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:"Free" but apparently not Free by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Redundant

      BTW, the pinhead response should be:

      'free but apparently not Free'

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  38. *snap* by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
    This guy's taking a slashdotting for the ages, but still plugging away! We're tearing his entire service apart...

    But this is cool, they need more metalheads in there so I'm gonna try this out. I doubt it'll be able to recommend me anything useful because it won't have many people listening to my stuff.

    --
    Berto
    1. Re:*snap* by Sirch · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as he's hosted by the ECS department at Southampton University, they own a B-class subnet and are the best Electronics and Computer Science department in the UK (5*s and 24s for both Electronics and CS, if you know what that means), I would expect the servers to be able to deal with a Slashdotting!

      I'm only pissed because it's slowing down my webpage... =o)

    2. Re:*snap* by grahammm · · Score: 1

      yet they have now succumbed and closed down because the site was being slashdotted.

      Why wait so long? By the time the plug was pulled the usage had sunk to a tiny fraction of what it was yesterday after the /. story was published. So isn't this a case of locking the stable door after the horse has bolted?

  39. firefly by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 4, Funny

    A pox on fox for cancelling a show that rox!

    Seriously - I thought this was going to be about how the music you then upload helps you have adventures in Reaver territory.

    Ok! Ok, I'm moving on...

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  40. All data to be made available by captainclever · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been talking with robert from musicbrainz (audioscrobbler will be using TRM technology soon) and ben from agentarts. I'm gonna be using some agentarts data, and i will make all my data available freely when i've implemented the TRM system to sort out badly named songs.

    i also want to syndicate the data (xml/rss) so ppl can stick live info on their blogs/websites.. this wont happen till i move servers tho.

    i'm not gonna run off and give the data to the riaa or start emailing you crappy adverts. its a uni project that's about half way thru. the project will run and run tho- i'm not gonna shut it down.

    Should i ever get border of it (unlikely) there are plenty of ppl that will take over. i'll just slap it on sourceforge.

    RJ

    --
    Last.fm - join the social music revolution
  41. Re:linamp by theefer · · Score: 1

    How about a Linux program that's not an interface clone ...

    You have to try mpg123/ogg123 !

    --
    theefer
  42. Re:linamp by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

    How bout a Windows one that does that? Christ, I just want applications to use the *standard* GUI toolkits, whether it be on my XP box, my OSX laptop, or my SuSE box. Christ on a stick, is it that hard? To keep this on topic, man this sounds like a neat plugin, doesn't XMMS support using Winamp Plugins somehow? and doesn't Winamp3 have a similar feature?

  43. Consideration for Commons by mrmiasma · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would ask of people to check with grassroots startups before posting things on very influential entities like slashdot. RJ was recently bombarded with a huge amount of new users due to the publicity of Audioscrobbler from other blogs and news sites. His hosting service had shut down audioscrobbler.com because of the sudden surge of bandwidth usage. He then relocated the server to his own webspace, but with a slashdot hit, I don't see how it's going to survive. He's looking for cheap webspace for PHP/MySQL. If you can get to it, Here [www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~rwj100/] is the news posting about it. Here is the same posting but google-cached.

    1. Re:Consideration for Commons by mgblst · · Score: 1

      If we have to pay for downloading, shoudln't some money go to people who upload huge amounts?

  44. Re: Math (slightly OT) by Llywelyn · · Score: 3, Informative

    "I'm also not sure where that equation comes from. There's absolutely nothing which allows you to derive math from the situation... You cannot write an equation to tell what that person is going to do..."

    Hence the stochastic part of the equation--it is kind of a "fudge factor" to take guesses.

    What the original poster confused was ranking and searching. A tool that ranks the songs and plays those more frequently that you play more frequently can be bad, depending on implementation, and cause you to continuously play through the same playlist of < 20 songs. This is particularly true of the self-reinforcing designs where it counts when it plays it as well as when you select it.

    Mathematics can also be used to tell what *people* will do, rather than any one individual, through the techniques of social modeling, group theory, and other methods.

    That being said: I haven't checked his equation for correctness, though the formatting is standard.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  45. Pussy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i want to steer clear of filesharing to avoid getting savaged by the RIAA etc... which hopefully won't get me in trouble

    Don't you Limey bastards have any balls? Where's your bloody pride, damnit?

    1. Re:Pussy! by Stephen+Gilbert · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you Limey bastards have any balls? Where's your bloody pride, damnit?

      ... says the Anonymous Coward.

  46. Could you answer a question? by ctid · · Score: 1

    Congratulations on a nice project. Could you answer the question which is entitled, '"Free" but apparently not Free'? I'm sure many readers here would be interested in the answer.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  47. I don't want to be picky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But
    h(t) = c * e^(k*w) * cos(w*t) ; k > 2*w
    with c,k,w constants (so c*e^(k*w) is a constant >0) means that after some time your hearing rate goes negative, so that you wind music out.
    Are you that famous tape recorder man from Sony ?

  48. excellent! by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I used to listen to Launch so much that when I listen to songs now, I have this reflex to rate them, and then am always diappointed when I can't.

    I run Winamp 3 at work and have the NonStop skin on it, so I'm not sure if this will work with it or not since it says Winamp 2 there. I'd go and read the article, but it appears dead, I assume a slashdotting.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  49. XMMS W/ FreeBSD install? by fsckd · · Score: 1

    I had to edit the script a bit toget the wget function to work, I removed the '-q' flag so I could see what was going on. I brougth this line up to the same line that wget was one... "http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Erwj100/controlcentr e/queryxmmsinstall.php?option=currentversion" I did this in the instance below that one too... The script downloaded this file: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Erwj100/controlcentre /xmmsplugin1.2.tgz => `/usr/X11R6/lib/xmms/General/xmmsplugin1.2' ...as you can see, it doesn't have the .tgz extension... I did a tar -zxvf on it, and audioscrobbler.so was the result... So, I have audioscrobbler.so in: /usr/X11R6/lib/xmms/General When I open up XMMS, and look under General plugins, it is not listed, I really don't know what I could be doing wrong... Any ideas?

    --
    - fsckd
    1. Re:XMMS W/ FreeBSD install? by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      Could it be that this is compiled for "Linux"????

    2. Re:XMMS W/ FreeBSD install? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeBSD has binary compatibility with Linux. Even if it is not working with FreeBSD, XMMS should detect one of its plugin.

      (To the original poster) But note that a .so is not a normal extension for an XMMS plugin.

      Most probably an archive.

  50. how does it know what i'm listening to? by jonathanbearak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is this by ID3 tags or by filenames or what? i have a great deal of digitized (ogg) LPs that are named "~/albums/Artist/AlbumTitle/xx - trackname". there's not even playlists, because i'm lazy and added xmms to open-with for directories in nautilus. how will audioscrobbler respond to me playing those tracks?

    1. Re:how does it know what i'm listening to? by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      It goes by song name, so it should work for any media you can play, I'm not sure how it tells the song name from the song name, but its worked for everything I've tried.

  51. Now I can finish that poem by scotay · · Score: 3, Funny

    At last! A word to rhyme with cobbler.

    Hmm... cobbler

    1. Re:Now I can finish that poem by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you just reminded me a dumb joke:

      Two girls are riding their bicycles down a narrow side street, and one says to the other "I've never come this way before".

      The other replies "it's the cobblestones".

  52. Noatun plugin? by Resist148 · · Score: 1

    I would use it if someone hacked up a Noatun plugin for it. I love using Noatun because it integrates so nice into my KDE desktop.

  53. psst... by mosch · · Score: 2, Funny

    hey buddy... ummm... what sort of bribe would it take to get an iTunes version?

    1. Re:psst... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      hey buddy... ummm... what sort of bribe would it take to get an iTunes version?

      Read his site, they are working on it.

    2. Re:psst... by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      most likely a good iMac with development software included...

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
  54. Funny how... by essdodson · · Score: 0, Troll

    Funny how when MS does this we cry foul and suspect them of violating 30 different UN sanctions and our bill of rights. But when some geeky dweebs do it, we're sure as hell down with that.

    --
    scott
  55. Can you rate what you listen to? by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forgive me, but I've never used the system, just reading slashdot :). Anyway, what I was wondering, does it only collect the titles, or do you have some way of rating them too?

    Otherwise it seems to me there could easily become a self-feeding loop, song gets recommended to people, they play it, and even if they don't like it, it'll get recommended to other people with similar tastes.

    Having some kind of rating system also makes a alot more sense when recommending, otherwise you might be recommended the same music (that you dont like) time and time again. Loves Britney Spears, hates Nsync is a lot more info than just Loves Britney Spears.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  56. Who says they'll have to come to UK? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    If you can download it in the US, look out for a lawsuit there... could potentially be considered "doing business" there or whatnot. Don't forget they wanted to put DVD-Jon on trial in California, because MPAA is based there, even though he had done nothing in California or US at all. (And hopefully he'll be acquitted here...)

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  57. Re:linamp by Kourino · · Score: 1
    What's wrong with the Winamp/XMMS interface?

    It's not so much the interface I don't like as much as the fact that there's no option for it to use my GTK themes. (Well, that and the XMMS developers have said that it'll always be tied only to GTK1, which occasionally gives me grief with non-ASCII characters in filenames and metadata.)

    I also have to choose between an mp3 input plugin that has bad artifacts on stream errors (mpg123), or one that crashes consistently when it loads certain files ^^; And I could bitch a little bit about its source code layout, but, eh. Stylistic differences.

  58. Cross-platform my ass. by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2, Informative

    Winamp3 is an attempt at completely rewriting Winamp so it's cross-platform (there is a linux version).

    Ahem. There was a "Linux Alpha" version of winamp3 released almost two years ago now, which was completely and totally unusable, as was the alleged MacOS version. There has not been a linux release since, and it is not even currently obvious how to download the linux version. (Understandable, since it was not in any way useful.)

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:Cross-platform my ass. by RussGarrett · · Score: 1

      Their main aim is to get the Windows version functional first, and you can hardly blame them for that. There was an internal linux build released last month - I've tried it and it is indeed fairly functional (skinning works, it plays MP3 and oggs), although it still has a way to go. Unfortunately it's not publically available and I can't give you a date when it will be.

    2. Re:Cross-platform my ass. by the_truk_stop · · Score: 1
      skinning works, it plays MP3 and oggs
      That's fantastic...wait, wait, XMMS does that too, and can handle Winamp's (2.xx) skins. An emphasis on Winamp's superior playlist randomization, or its outstanding no-skip track switching, etc, would be more effective. As it stands, I have no reason to switch from an open source application built specifically for my operating system to a closed source port that's placed on the back burner while stability is sought out for a broken OS I don't use. I'd love for Winamp's porting efforts to come to fruition, though; Winamp is very much superior to XMMS.
  59. He can't be a graduate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intelligent chap but he's not a graduate.

    At Southampton University usernames consist of the students initials, then a number cataloguing the number of peeopl with those initials(in this case he's the only one) and then finally the year he registered.

    The year in which he registered is 00(2000), as Bsc. degrees last 3 years in the UK he is therefore due to graduate in June, and hasn't even finished his dissertation yet.

    Nice work though. :)

    1. Re:He can't be a graduate by zabieru · · Score: 1

      Umm... He says that. Above. The part where he says it's not GPL'ed yet because he's not done using it as a dissertation.

    2. Re:He can't be a graduate by vincevincevince · · Score: 1

      and the reason that matters is?

  60. Re:What's even worse, if you do it a second time. by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
    Hey, you watched a car racing movie. Here's some other car racing movies you might like to watch. Well, I *know* that you moron. I'm into car racing movies. Get it?

    I agree. The reason I've never gotten use of systems like this is that they often make recommendations that are too obvious. If you listen to a particular style of music, you get all of the major bands from that style recommended to you. Not helpful. A balance needs to be reached between just recommending things that are too obviously related to what you are already into and recommending things that are completely unrelated.
    --
    I'd rather be lucky than good.
  61. If it's got more development potential... by Catullus · · Score: 1

    ...why did they remove the very useful ability to control the app using Windows messages? I'm the developer of an app which controls Winamp 2 using the fairly fully-featured Windows messaging API, but the only way people can use it with Winamp 3 is by getting hold of a third-party plugin.

    As proven by Mozilla, what most people want is an application, not the world's geatest plugin architecture!

    1. Re:If it's got more development potential... by RussGarrett · · Score: 1

      Bleh, the idea of that was that since windows messages aren't cross-platform, support isn't included in the distribution - not a particularly stunning argument. I think there'll probably be a WM api component included with 3.1, but I make no promises.

  62. And I am unconvinced. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    given the complexity of human taste, that such is even really possible.

    For music I have found nothing so effective at finding things I like but haven't heard of as simply listening to college radio stations.

    KFG

  63. Nope, will never fly.. by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forget all the bogus attempts to move your antique business model online.

    They're bogus for a reason.

    What you want to do is license this technology from its creators, and build a mechanism to sell digital copies of the recommended tunes

    No, it most certainly isn't what they want to do.

    The RIAA represents the recording industry, not the music industry. Their entire existance relies on tying music to physical objects. Doing as you suggest would be simply hastening their own demise.

    A recording session used to cost huge $$$ - but due to advances in technology, now costs relatively litte (it's possible to build your own recording studio for a few thousand dollars.) The internet has started a similar revolution with regards to distribution.

    The RIAA knows this, and they know that it dooms them - with cheap recording and distribution, the artists no longer need them (and their lop-sided contracts). The problem is that the artists don't know this yet.

    The recoding industry's whole "this is theft" mantra is basically a smoke screen to prevent artists from finding out they have an alternative to being a slave to a record label.

    1. Re:Nope, will never fly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The RIAA represents the recording industry, not the music industry. Their entire existance relies on tying music to physical objects. Doing as you suggest would be simply hastening their own demise.

      If you're gonna be a prick and nit-pick, at least get it right. So, by 'recording' industry, as opposed to 'music' industry, you mean...? As the name implies, they look after RECORDING studios, which have jack shit to do with the DISTRIBUTION companies. When a fee is collected for a download, the DISTRIBUTION industry does not see that money, but the RECODRING industry still does. So why would the RIAA care where the money comes from as long as they get it?

      The truth is, the RIAA does represent the entire MUSIC industry, as you, in your haste to be the proverbial prick, completely missed. It is not in their interest to see internet sales, as they don't know how to make those more profitable and popular than CD sales. No one's switching to a new system until it can be MORE profitable immediately, there's too much greed. They also don't want to back two horses, because should the internet side take off, they have to worry about their members losing many millions (possibly billions) of dollars invested in the CD production / distribution / sales industry.

  64. Parent is interesting, just left a detail out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If t's anonymous, it would become a promotion tool.
    So lets say i start up my Britney lopez girls(totally a knock off of course) then i create thousands of anonymous users listening to a variety of britney spears , jennifer lopez and the backstreet boys.
    So now all the britney fans get to sample my new band, and i might be able to gain fame.

    Nothing wrong, they like the music, so i haven't cheated them or so, but i have messed up the integrity of the system.
    And what f i'm not good at juding or go spammin?
    Then i also infiltrate te salsa, 70s soul and what have you channels.
    With user names it's better cause you know the spammers and can delete their input.

    Alternative:
    use anonymous id's, that contain no personal information whatsoever and that everyonecan make.
    Use PGP style encryption to make sure that certain playlists belong to certain userids and with every recmmendation users get to do +1 or -1 if they liked the recommendation, if a certain userid is mostly negative disregard is input, he's either weird or spamming.
    Sure it still won't eliminate shameless self promotion in the same genre, but it would elimainate the (or you could have a -1:shameless self promotion option if you found the recommendation to be that)

    And perfect profiling tis what you want, because you want recommendations to be as accurate as possible.

  65. Re:Group think, bad taste and braindamage. ??? ok by djsalt++Prozak · · Score: 1

    counter preductive, the program is mearly to aid the listener?! - people only have to listen to what they want, and it would be great if audioscrobbler would one day link present bands in its database to new ones in development thus creating some kind of breakthrough point for them.

  66. MoodLogic is slightly different by elbobo · · Score: 1

    MoodLogic, whilst an excellent app, is aiming to provide something slightly different.

    MoodLogic is all about helping you organise your music collection. It provides extensive metadata on your tracks, and allows you to create playlists based on artist, genre, mood, etc.

    If I'm reading right, Audioscrobbler is about providing you with suggestions of new artists based on your current listening preferences. Something that (last time i checked) MoogLogic doesn't do.

    1. Re:MoodLogic is slightly different by elbobo · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Looks like newer versions of MoodLogic are providing music suggestions based on your tastes. Good shit. MoogLogic's definitely a quality app, as long as you're running windows.

  67. I am voting patriotically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kate Smith's "God Bless America" is on 25 winamp instances on my spare machine all the time.

    It will make #1 by Christmas.

    English - not French

  68. Reasons to listen to Britney. by uqbar · · Score: 1

    Maybe because the production work on some of her later records is done by the Neptunes and is simply amazing? Problem is that, rather than send you to listen to other Neptunes projects like N.E.R.D and Clipse it might very well send you to listen to other bubblegum artists. Then again, if (human) Slashdot readers make blanket assumptions about Britney listeners, what is a stupid program supposed to be able to do...

  69. Or even better by Duds · · Score: 1

    Let's patent courtrooms :)

  70. What is the lower limit? by nullard · · Score: 1

    At what point should any given project release their code? I'd want to clean up any obvious blunders or "ugly" code before having others examine it. I often get phone calls while coding and put hte messages in as comments. Sometimes I forget to transfer them elswhere and leave things like "// mtg @ 5 Ash" in the code.

    You seem to be suggesting that it would be good to release code even if it has errors and junk like that comment in it. Can you identify a lower limit? At what point between an empty file and a completed 1.0 version should the code be released to the public?

    --


    t'nera semordnilap