Larry Page: Google Was an Accident
DarklordJonnyDigital writes "Ars Technica is reporting that Google founder Larry Page has admitted that the Google project wasn't originally intended to be a search engine at all. "It wasn't that we intended to build a search engine. We built a ranking system to deal with annotations." ' Of course, happy accidents have often been the cause for advancement, technologically or otherwise.
How about Lexan... http://www.geplastics.com/resins/about/history.htm l
An accidental mixing of resins, which was left overnight in a beaker.
The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
Disclaimer: I'm not associated with this book in any way, just found it in, er, Google. Maybe the next edition will include this lovely search engine...
If you can read this, thank an english teacher.
Not to mention two marvels of modern civilization: Penicillin, and Microwave cooking.
I'd just like to point out that Flemming pretty did nothing with penicillin besides discover its existance (1928)-- he gave up on it after 6 months. It took a whole new generation of doctors and a world war 15 years later to actually make it useful.
To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
--E.C. Stanton
This was exactly what AltaVista was designed for! AltaVista was created to promote DEC equipment; to show what powerful applications could run on their machines. And it did this job really good.
Brain Tags |
Actually, I think Bob always said "There are no mistakes, just happy accidents," but I could be wrong.
--Stupid Sig Here--
Larry and others at google has said this in the past. Although I can't find proof on Google's web site (darn lousy search engine they use ;-), I did find this in an article on SearchEngineWorld:
According to this article, it was originally called "BackRub":
Another reference: http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/2002/08/30/
It makes you wonder how long until some company comes up with the idea to copyright "the accidental creation of useful products and systems" and attempt to sue google and other things. =]
Probably never, because you can copyright "The accidental creation of useful products and systems" and it doesn't mean a damn thing. In fact, it isn't even enforcable because it is not anything substantial enough to copyright. People could reproduce that text left and right, and nobody would care.
However patenting it would make a huge difference, and you can patent business rules. Although you'd have a lot of prior art, with that whole Pennicilin thing.
And as a public service announcement: Please, before making a joke, verify what you think you know so you don't look like a tool trying to karma whore.
Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
Check out the legal proceedings or gewgle.com.