Slashdot Mirror


Lindows Releases Inexpensive Subnotebook

los furtive writes "As of March 1st $799 will get you this Lindows 2.9lb subnotebook with a VIA C3 933MHz Processor, 256 megs ram and a 20 gig HD, a 12inch screen, USB 2.0, firewire and of course the Lindows OS. Pre-orders have already started."

22 of 547 comments (clear)

  1. GNU/linux hardware by latroM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds neat. We need more GNU/Linux hardware makers to make users familiar with the free operating system. I don`t know how free lindows is but bringing choice to users is important.

    1. Re:GNU/linux hardware by kevinank · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Stallman has an ego problem. GNU is NOT an essential part of the Linux operating system. All GNU components could be replaced with BSD, or even propeitary versions, and it would still be Linux. How does he know that everyone using the Linux kernel is using the GNU tools?

      To dismiss the GNU from GNU/Linux as a clash of egos is to misunderstand the whole debate. Stallman doesn't have a problem with ego, he has a problem with ethics: specificially he doesn't think that Linux by itself promotes the right set of ethics. In particular, bashing Stallman for belaboring GNU is like bashing the pope for being religious. Stallman has been preaching the ethics of software and source code ever since he wrote the first Emacs source license.

      And in my opinion the whole Linux versus GNU/Linux thing is a red herring anyway -- the real point is to make people aware of the ethical values of GNU. And arguing about the name in public is as good or better a way to do that than everyone agreeing to change the name wholesale.

      So if you want to argue about the name, then cool. But don't assign the whole debate to Stallman's ego when the real debate is over how society should handle software.

      --
      LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
    2. Re:GNU/linux hardware by Ponty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you should call it Lindows or Debian or RedHat. Linux contributes a small amount of functionality, so does GNU. It takes a distribution to sew them all up together. My operating system is based on Mach, uses BSD and GNU tools. And I call it Mac OS X.

    3. Re:GNU/linux hardware by kevinank · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now that folks are beating you over the head with sensible arguments, you want to revise what that debate is.

      No actually, I was not trying to revise what the debate is, but to bring up what it was always about. I say this purely as an impartial observer who watched the original argument over first Lignux, then GNU/Linux as it happened. My own views fall pretty evenly on both sides of the debate; I think that the name GNU/Linux is stupid (having gone so far as to delete the 'GNU/' from all of the pages I sometimes maintain on Wikipedia except for one reference to the controversy), but I think that Stallman is basically standing on strong ethical ground as regards software.

      Paraphrased, Stallman says that if you can share something of great benefit to your neighbor at no significant cost to yourself, then you are morally obliged to do so, and that laws and systems that prevent you from giving that aid are morally repugnant.

      There is a point where you have to say "this is stupid." Not to go Kafka on you, but WHO CARES??? You might as well be having a pissing fight with Stallman about why he only uses his father's last name as his last name, and not include his mother's.

      I believe it is precisely to find out 'who cares' that was the core reason that Stallman pushed the GNU/Linux and Free Software controversy.

      --
      LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
  2. Kinda expensive by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering the C3 933Mhz is slower than a PIII 400.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Kinda expensive by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1, Insightful


      Yeah, but it still beats an iBook by 50% (pricewise, anyways). The only other true competitior is a refurbished/used notebook.

      I like how they compare it to a PDA: "Does a PDA have a full-sized keyboard? NO!" LOL...

    2. Re:Kinda expensive by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Besides which, you can't compare a VIA C2 to a G4. Hell, even comparing it to a G3 is sort of like comparing a scooter to a Harley. Of COURSE it's half the price...it's less than half the machine!

      And it begs the question: why are we supposed to trust a company that can't even get it's own marketing straight? They're just a company with a name that's a bad pun on the most effectively marketed operating system ever...I'd put more stock in AmigaOS. At least Amiga is trying it's own thing.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Kinda expensive by druske · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FYI, I sent Lindows a note on the iBook mistake on their feedback page... the one that tells you that you WON'T receive a response, and even has an autoresponder to follow up with a response, which, er, tells you again that you won't receive a response.

      So, naturally, a couple hours later I received a response. :)

      The encouraging bit is not just that a human read the message and took a moment to send a response, but also that they thanked me for the heads-up and said they'd pass the information on to their marketing department.

      Now marketing folks are sometimes just a pitchfork away from the embodiment of pure evil, but it is also possible that this was an honest mistake. Let's give them a little time to straighten it out and see what happens.

  3. Re:Graphics chipsets by bsharitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm guesing it's good enough for word processing and web browsing, which is okay since I'm guessing this isn't a gaming note book.

  4. Who else brands this one? by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously this is an OEM model made by someone else (probably VIA themselves). Lindows doesn't have enough market pull to have a custom model made to their own specs. So I bet it is already selling like hotcakes in Southeast Asia with someone else's name on it and Windows installed. Does any recognise it?

  5. Re:Yet for $699... by Bluetick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And, despite it's large size, the Dell doesn't have USB 2.0 or Firewire, not to mention that the Lindows one has both.

    Okay, the Dell is moderately faster. But it's not as flexible, nor is it a 'subnotebook' (I don't know why they call it subnotebook, makes you think they're targetting it for subhumans).

  6. Wouldn't it be nice if.... by old_skul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...if some nice hardware company, like an HP or a Dell, would produce a low-cost laptop similar to this with *your choice* of distro preconfigured?

    No, wait, no one reading /. would want to own one. Instead, wouldn't it be nice if they would sell you a laptop with *no* O/S installed, for $400 less than usual?

    I'd buy one.

  7. Re:Yet for $699... by arvindn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    isn't really that great of a deal if you shop around?

    You said it yourself. People's time is valuable.

  8. Re:I'd still rather have an iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Peace of mind, it's a well constructed notebook with a rubber-suspended harddrive, rugged design (designed with kids throwing them into backpacks and taking them on school busses).

    I also can have 802.11.. And a combo DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive.

    On top of it all, I get OSX, which is Unix for the Masses. Something Linux wants to be, but falls short of in a few categories. For portable computing, I have different priorities than the desktop. For a fast desktop, I want power and control. For a laptop, I want simplicity, ease-of-use, even if it's a touch slower.

    Oh, and I forgot. iMovie, iTunes, iPhoto.

  9. Bad chipset choice by Erwos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wasn't even aware that the Savage4 had functional 3D-accelerated drivers. It's hard to say in good faith "this notebook supports Linux" if you can't even run a 3D app properly.

    Nice try, but you could probably get a Dell laptop that's faster and cheaper despite the Windows tax. Sure, this one comes with Lindows, but that doesn't matter if the hardware support is not there...

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  10. Re:I'd still rather have an iBook by Kiwi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Considering that the ibook you mentioned weights almost as much as the Thinkpad I am typing this on (cite), this is not a fair comparison. The rule of thumb is this: if you want ultimate portability on a system which can run Linux, you have to pay through the nose for it. Until now, that is.

    - Sam

    --

    The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

  11. Misinformation by smcavoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a PowerBook their comparing their system to, which is no comparison at all. The PoweBook smokes it in everyway (except of course price), it's like comparing a BWM M3 to a Hyundai Tiberon...
    And they forgot that the 12.1" PowerBook DOESN'T have a PCMCIA slot.
    And a comparison to a PDA? WTF? can you stick the laptop in your jacket or pant pocket? NO!
    Do real people decide between a PDA and laptop? That seems nuts, both provide completely different user experiences....

    Fine it's a cheap laptop that's M$ free, but get the facts straight.

  12. Re:I'd still rather have an iBook by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aaargh.

    I use an iBook, and I love it. It's a great machine and I'm glad I spent the money (a little more that $999, since I bought it last year, and I maxed out the RAM, which was a worthwhile expenditure IMO.) If anyone asks me "what kind of laptop should I buy?" an iBook is usually at the top of my recommendation list.

    But.

    I'm getting really sick of the comments that seem to attach to any story about any product X talking about how you should use Y or Z instead. Linux story: a bunch of comments about how you should use OS X. OS X story: ditto, but from the Linux side. MySQL/PostgreSQL: duuude, MySQL/PostgreSQL sucks, use PostgreSQL/MySQL instead. Any story about programming language X: Language X 5ux0rz, Language Y r0x0rz. Et bloody cetera.

    Different people want different tools for different tasks. Deal with it.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  13. Selective marketing by JonathanF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm glad that I'm not the only one who noticed that they used the specs for the 12" PowerBook in place of the iBook; how fair is a comparison like that... to the Lindows system (or the others, really)? The 12" PowerBook is probably one of the faster and most full-featured laptops in the class, so of course it's going to cost $1799.

    The worst part is that it's evident that Lindows isn't just exaggerating the value of their system - they're blatantly trying to deceive people into thinking that they have the only affordable small-sized laptop in existence. One wonders if they think that the $999 iBook only exists in a parallel universe!

    No matter how much the cost or weight might be appealing, I can only see this laptop as being a nightmare for anyone who isn't technically experienced. Imagine some middle-aged couple trying to get an Internet connection, for example, or to get their USB printer to work. They probably wouldn't get much help at all from any company outside of Lindows, and "go check out the Ars Technica Linux forum" (as another example) is not going to help when many support-dependent people aren't even savvy enough to recognize when they have something like Windows XP! No matter what you might think of Macs, they at least have some official support beyond their manufacturer.

  14. No CDROM, no floppy, better have a network by dzerkel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    $799 is fine, but doesn't include either a CDROM or floppy. A USB CDROM is at least $100. And you would have to carry it around in addition to the laptop, adding the weight.

    An all-in-one solution might make more sense, there are a lot of them out there.

    --
    "What's the point of going abroad, if you're just another tourist..."
  15. Re:I'd still rather have an iBook by cowmix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am running Linux on a 733 C3 and it is very slow. Where it really shows its slothness is when you do something like SSH. The key exchange seems to take eons.

  16. why did they add in the pda comparison by towaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe its just me but what was the point of compairing a laptop to a pda. Laptops are good for a lot of things but pda's also have advantages.

    just seems a dumb comparison

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire