Slashdot Mirror


Bookseller Purges Records to Avoid PATRIOT Act

Skyshadow writes "Vermont Bookseller Bear Pond Books has announced that they will purge their sales records at the request of customers . This would effectively sidestep typically insideous a provision of the PATRIOT Act which allows government agencies to secretly seize sales records. The store's co-owner, Michael Katzenberg, put it this way: 'When the CIA comes and asks what you've read because they're suspicious of you, we can't tell them because we don't have it... That's just a basic right, to be able to read what you want without fear that somebody is looking over your shoulder to see what you're reading.' Now if only certain other booksellers would show that same conscience, we might have something here."

12 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. Law Enforcement by jlrowe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why don't we just enforce the law in the USA. And the premier first set is the US Consitution and the amendments.

    Vote some decent congressmen in and maybe we can win the country back!

    1. Re:Law Enforcement by Poeir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The late Douglas Adams put it rather well: "Those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made president should on no account be allowed to do the job." And he's right. Just look at Bush.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  2. Farenheit 451 anyone? by DarwinDan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does this remind anyone of Farenheit 451? You know, where they burn the books so people won't revolt against the government? This is a similar restriction placed upon our libraries and bookstores that silences any mention of a subpoena for a list of books a certain individual has purchased or borrowed.

    I still don't understand how Mr. Ashcroft and his DoJ thugs got PATRIOT through Congress. Oh wait, I forgot! Our US Congress was so freaked out by September 11 and thought that somehow if they took away Americans' right to privacy and freedom from harassment that this world would somehow be a better place!

    --
    $DEITY bless $NATION
    1. Re:Farenheit 451 anyone? by BFaucet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm sorry about our government... It's the 1950's all over again and it sucks ass. Everyone is freaked out about all the terrorists that must be living next door, or down the street. Everyone watches CNN and FOX news for their information, and the 6 news agencies in the US are all for these horrible things as it will mean bigger sales in the near future. The government is being run by corporations at the moment, but I think another uprising of protest (ala early 70's) will put the government back in somewhat close to what could kind of be called balance.

      The american people are starting to get pissed off and the movements against these insanities are growing as more people are being educated.

      --
      -Derick
  3. Good way to go. by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Patriot Act is a violation of what my father fought for in Korea and Vietnam, and what I stood for while in the military.

    I am upset that people are associating the Patriot Act with conservatism. Violation of my rights isn't conservative, its facism. Fellow conservatives need to speak up. We DO need some stronger laws and enforcement tools, and I do believe this is a passing problem, but only if we speak up.

    Some may compare our current situation to that during the Civil War (oxymoron if there ever was one) when Lincoln suspended Habius Corpus, but I don't feel the two events can be compared in this way. The threat is real, more real than that era, but not as localized.

    Until then, destroying sales records is a legal way to not comply with this over reaching Act. Hopefully, others will follow their lead.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  4. Re:This deserves more than a comment by bdesham · · Score: 5, Funny
    Where's a HERO tag when you need one?
    Why, that's a farking good idea!
    --
    Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
  5. Amazon Lists by n0tqu1tesane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was, as a result of this post, going to create a list on Amazon cataloging a number of books that might make the government look at me a little closer. Little did I know, someone had already done just that :\ Here.[amazon.com]

  6. Re:Except for one minor problem... by Wingnut64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That was 'fixed' by the USPA.. Key quote:
    "Section 901 of the USA PATRIOT Act would empower the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency ("DCI"), to establish the priorities for the collection and dissemination of intelligence information gathered in the U.S."

    And I highly doubt they would be interested in what books a person reads, but that's just me.
    Uh, they want to know if people entering the US asked for meals without pork...

    This could be a subtle atempt to outlaw certain books. People would be scared away from 'subversive' material if they knew that the Gov't was watching their every move.

    --
    echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
  7. That would be nice but... by ewhenn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the problem is finding decent congressman. Remember, these people come from the population. The politicians don't suck, the population sucks if this is the best we have to offer. An ignorant population is easy to control. I bet the people who ran out and bought duct tape and plastic think the PATRIOT act is a great idea. Considering what it is the name, "PATRIOT act", makes me want to vomit.

    I have com to the the conclusion that in general us Americans give up lots of our rights (think freedom) without a fight for the illusion of protection. We are no better protected than we were before this abomination to our freedom, American politics at its finest.

    Think about that while you eat your red, white, and blue cake.

  8. GAAAAA! use the fourth! by Erris · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Just because you're not specifically guaranteed the right to privacy anywhere, doesn't mean you don't have it.

    Why not quote the 4th amendment? It's very clear about what circumstances are required for the government to invade your personal life:

    Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Indeed, the bookstore records should be considered "papers" and protected, so this whole business of "knocking down stovepipes" between government and private databases is FUCKING UNAMERICAN!

    The language of the constitution is so clear and the intentions are so obvious, that it is equally obvious that it has been broken. You have the right to assemble, to say, pray, and publish what you will. You have the right to bear arms. You will not be put upon by the military. The government can't harrass you without real evidence you are a criminal. The court system will not be used to abuse you. You will have a jury if you are sued. Bail will not be used instead of a conviction. You will not be abused in jail. All of these things have been violated recently with perhaps the exception of the 3rd. I'm not aware of any involuntary quartering of troops, unless eminent domain aquisitions for military bases are considered.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  9. Coming soon on Amazon.com by Mantorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    People whom we help get arrested also bought...

  10. That's a cheap shot at Amazon by 31+Flavas · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Now if only certain other booksellers would show that same conscience, we might have something here.
    What keeps me coming back to Amazon.com (and countless more people) is their record keeping.

    Every order is organized by year newest to oldest. Every order is clickable to bring up the exact specifics of what was ordered: the number of shipments, the tracking numbers, what was order, it's price, and totals (shipping, tax, subtotal, grand total).

    Attack the source problem *cough* Patriot Act *cough* not Amazon.com, BarnesandNoble.com, or whoever you want to smear because of some hivemind mentality.

    If you don't want even record of the sale you need not shop at all, online or offline.

    There is always going to be some paper trail; no matter if its a reciept, a CC statment, or the cashier remembering you.