Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake Linux... Not Dead Yet?

bloodeu writes "Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts alike, but this new release of Mandrake may hold many promising Linux users what they have been waiting for, like NTFS resizing(which is a first), Automatic Network config(zeroconf), Supermount, and many more. You can download the Mandrake 9.1 RC1 Here"

19 of 494 comments (clear)

  1. As a distro... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mandrake is great. They've really built something that's useful in its own right, and provides many useful things back into the community. Maybe it's not for you, but it's a great place to start for a lot of people. A nice introduction.

    The problem is, Mandrake as a business is like a comedy of errors. All sorts of crazy problems, some of which were outside their control, and some that could (and should) have been avoided in the first place. 20/20 hindsight is nice, so I can't carp too much, but if they could get their shit together for just one release (no distribution problems; keep the paying club members happy, and get them a box before it's been on shelves for 3 months), I think things could turn around in a hurry.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  2. My experiance by hswerdfe · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've Been Using
    9.1 Beta 2 for about a month and I have to say ...
    it rocks

    it is much beter than Mandrake 8.0....

    it is by far the easiest distro I have ever used
    and with the exception of Knoppix the easiest to install...:)

    I personaly hope they survive....

    all of the needed aps are there I only have few complaints....

    1. I had to specially select Vi for install and emacs auto installed...(Flame away)..

    2. Gnome meeting was not installed...by default

    3. I am having trouble changing some of the default loggin, and boot manager stuff....

    other than that....I give the 9.1 Beta 2 an A+ ....
    give it to any newbee they will be happy

    --
    --meh--
  3. Re:NTFS by y2dt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mandrake is using ntfsresize which is part of the Linux-NTFS project.

    This is the project that contributed the NTFS driver to the Linux kernel

  4. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Hatter · · Score: 4, Informative

    The point is they only get a fraction of the money you spend at a retail store. It's divided up between the retail chain, the company which pressed the cds, Mandrake, and more than likely a middleman.

  5. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Resizing NTFS isn't as difficult as writing to it. The resizer only has to alter a few pieces of metadata. This is relatively safe.

    Note that the resizer cannot defrag, yet, so it can only shrink NTFS partitions by the amount of free space you have.

    Mandrake are using a 2.4 kernel patched with the new NTFS driver. This driver has limited *safe* write support. It can overwrite existing files (using write or mmap). This is enough to read-write loopback mount an NTFS file as a filesystem and use it as your root filesystem.

    FlatCap (Rich)
    ntfs at flatcap dot org

    Linux NTFS Project

  6. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by swv3752 · · Score: 5, Informative

    All new purchases from the Mandrake store and new release box sets will come with a one month complimentary subscription the MandrakeClub.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  7. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Hatter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I find it funny that so many people overlook urpmi. It's apt-get for rpms. It can retrieve packages from cdrom, or the internet and handles dependencies automatically.

  8. NTFS Resizing Done Before: Xandros OS by csisux · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xandros already supports resizing NTFS partitions.

  9. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by hogger · · Score: 5, Informative

    The biggest difference between Mandrake and Red Hat is urpmi. urpmi is the packaging system that Mandrake employees, and just about every desirable program is available (after a little setup) with a simple:

    urpmi (packagename)

    First though, it's very handy to setup urpmi so that it never requests the installation CDs, but rather gets the packages via the internet. Here's what I do immediately after installing Mandrake:

    1. Remove the three CD-based package sources:
    urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 1 (x86) (cdrom1)"
    urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 2 (x86) (cdrom2)"
    urpmi.removemedia "International CD (x86) (cdrom3)"

    2. replace them with an FTP source:
    urpmi.addmedia base-ftp ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz
    (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

    3. add the contrib source:
    urpmi.addmedia contrib ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/contrib/RPMS with synthesis.hdlist2.cz
    (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

    4. add the plf software source:
    urpmi.addmedia plf ftp://plf.chem.yorku.ca/pub/plf/9.0 with hdlist.cz
    (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

    After those four steps (don't forget to su to root before you run them) you'll be able to easily install just about any program that you run across . It brings the installation ease that Debian users enjoy (via apt) to linux newbies in Mandrake. Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi. The term "RPM Hell" exists for a reason -- RedHat.

  10. Re:Apache 2? by JM · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apache 1.3 is still present, but it's in the Contribs (separate download or extra CD in PowerPack).

    What's more, you can install *both* versions, and with a simple command (advxrun1.3 or advxrun2.0), change from one to the other.

    PHP 4.3.1 has been tested a lot, and we fixed most major bugs. I use it on production on several servers, and I find it more stable than the 4.2 series.

  11. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Informative
    I have yet to see a distro that is as easy to install as Corel Linux.

    Maybe this is cheating, but could I suggest Knoppix? It really _is_ 'Debian for the average Joe', probably more so than Corel, since it requires no installation at all.

    (On a slightly related note - can anyone recommend a tiny Linux distribution that runs off floppies? I am hoping to run an X server, icewm, PPP and ssh.)

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  12. Wrong! by JM · · Score: 5, Informative

    The parent post is complete B.S.

    Yes, the Club Members will have a more complete list of mirrors, possibly including Club-Only mirrors.

    But as far as I know (and I am a Mandrake employee, so I should know), Mandrake Linux 9.1 will be available for everyone on public mirrors.

    Don't forget that it's 100% open-source, most of the stuff is GPL, so it has to be distributable by everyone.

    That said, I strongly suggest our users become members of the Club, it's the best way to support our work.

  13. Re:zeroconfig? by ramdam · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the site of the ZeroConf technology :
    "
    • Allocate addresses without a DHCP server.
    • Translate between names and IP addresses without a DNS server.
    • Find services, like printers, without a directory server.
    • Allocate IP Multicast addresses without a MADCAP server.
    "
    Apple already uses this technology under the name RendezVous in Mac OS X.

    As a Mac OSX user I can say that this techno does exactly what is supposed to (since RendezVous is deeply embedded in the system and some third party software, and Rendevous-enable products are available, it's a true real world benefits, not just a lab's experiment)

    It's easy to understand the point when more OS, network devices, Consumer Devices (Philips is already doing prototypes), and P2P softwares (the mac version of Limewire is RendezVous enabled) will adopt the technology.

  14. Mandrake not the first by jensend · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xandros Deluxe also resizes NTFS with PQDisk, proprietary software by PowerDesk (the makers of Partition Manager).

    Mandrake's market niche is getting squeezed at both ends, by Redhat working to make their system more user-friendly as well as by up-and-coming distros like Xandros working to make a simpler Linux experience. If RedHat decides to work more at their dependency/updating system (outdoing urpmi and apt rpm) for 9.0, Mandrake's niche will disappear.

  15. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by SiChemist · · Score: 5, Informative



    Without touching off a flame war, I will have to disagree with:

    Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi.

    There is a version of apt for RedHat-- Here's how to install and use it in RH 8:

    Download and install these:

    http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/apt/ apt-0.5.4cnc9-fr1.i386.rpm
    http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/apt/ apt-devel-0.5.4cnc9-fr1.i386.rpm

    Make sure you're online, then, as root (or sudo)issue the following commands:

    apt-get update

    (You will see apt download package listings)

    apt-get -f install

    (This is to fix dependencies that will prevent apt from working.)

    Your output should look something like this:

    Reading Package Lists... Done
    Collecting File Provides... Done
    Building Dependency Tree... Done
    0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 removed and 0 not upgraded.

    If your output is different, make sure that you know what you are doing before you let apt make changes to your system.

    Now, do:

    apt-get install synaptic

    and run synaptic as root or sudo root. You now have a gui tool to resolve dependencies and install packages.

    This was shamelessly stolen from an excellent article by Robert C. Dowdy on OSNews:

    http://www.osnews.com/printer.php?news_id=1890

  16. More or less out-the-box by buchanmilne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here (195kB PNG) is a screenshot of Mandrake 9.1rc1 running Gnome with the Galaxy theme. I hae done almost no changes to Gnome (I don't usually use it), so this is pretty much how it looks currently out-the-box after changing to the Galaxy theme (which I assume will be enabled by default on rc2). The window decorations for KDE went in only a few days ago, wait till I update some stuff from cooker for a KDE screenshot.

    My USB flash disk was detected automatically, just had to right-click on the desktop and check "removable" (in KDE an icon appears which you can just double-click). ACPI works (though I am not sure how much functionality my Thinkpad 600X supports). Note the ACPI is not enabled by default (acpi=off is in the default append for the bootloader) due to problems with desktops. Zeroconf works (ie over a crossover to a windows box I get a "auto-configuration"-compatible IP address and can resolve my own hostname via "dns"), but the gui tools need a bit more work (config only works during install currently), but my NIC does not support ifplugd, so I do not get automatic interface management.

    I did make some changes to the fonts in Mozilla, which may have affected how Galeon displays.

    We just hope that freetype-2.1.4 will be out in time to make it, since the maintainer will not agree to shipping CVS versions (which Redhat seems happy with, even with glibc to the point of breaking things like winbind - for those of you who think Mandrake is not stable).

  17. Re:Mandrake rocks. by peter_gzowski · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, apt-rpm and urpmi do the same thing, only apt-rpm does it better :). To me, apt-rpm and synaptic are godsends to the upkeep of my box (Mandrake 9.0). I didn't invest too much time in figuring out urpmi. It's configured to handle security updates quite well, but I didn't want to fiddle with it to go grab KDE 3.1. I know, someone's going to reply saying it's easy, just do blah, blah, but I grabbed the apt package, and the synaptic package from texstar rpms and I was up and running after one rpm -Uv command.

    Great job, Mandrake! I've used Slackware (for quite a while) and Redhat, and I think Mandrake is the shit.

    --
    "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
  18. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    be warned unless you want to find and report bugs.

    And if you do want to report bugs, they have BugZilla set up to make it really easy.

    Sometimes it's difficult to determine which package things go in when reporting, but the developers have been very nice and helpful in moving my bugs around to the proper places. And as another comment mentioned, the turn-around time is quick.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  19. Re:I'm not dead yet! by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok first of all it does matter a lot that they have these improvments and its NOT true that they aren't making money. They do have sources of income which for certain areas actually create a profit. The overall Mandrakesoft situation is different. Mostly because of their failed investments such as their Mandrake Online Learning plan. Once they go through bankruptcy and rescructure their spending they will be able to turn a real profit.

    I dont understand why people are saying they are going away. The only place i hear about "Mandrake Linux is dying!" would be slashdot. I am surpirsed i dont see trolls more often screaming that since there are some good FUD opportunities here. If you read almost anywhere else about Mandrake all you see is people talking about the upcoming version which looks very good so far.

    To address your first point last i will say that most definetly what they release matters. Even without an increase in income they can probably turn a profit so by releasing a better product they can get even more profit. You know... that's what business's do. If Mandrake can put in many more firsts for linux yet continues to improve their ease of use and auto-configuration, which they did in this release, then more people will join the mandrake club.

    Also as a side note the Mandrake club is a great idea and i think if you download this and you like it you should join. Some people say that setting up a business on a subscription based model will scare off investors and you should buy the CD's instead. That is oh so very wrong. If MandrakeSoft can pull it's self out of debt and show everyone that their business model works i think we could potentially have many more sucessful open source companies make it.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep