Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba To Show Laptop Fuel Cells at CeBit

war3rd writes "According to The Register, Toshiba has finally been able to build a fuel cell for laptops that they will unveil at CeBit next week. The fuel cells are expected to last approximately 5 hours and are compatible with existing lithium-ion batteries. Form factor remains the only issue. The trick is that they use the water by-product from the cell to dilute the methanol source as it enters the reformer, and are therefore able to store higher concentrations of methanol in the cell. My only concern is how quickly can they get this to market?"

69 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. Hehehehe ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... I can see it now ... some poor geek on the side of the road with a sign ... laptop out of gas, help please ...

    hehehehe that makes me smile

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  2. SHOULD be ethanol by nweaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want a fuel cell to be practically usable, you should make it run on 40% Ethanol, 60% water. That way, there is a commonly available fuel (Vodka) which can be easily purchased most everywhere in the US (outside Mormonstan at least).

    If you can make the fuel cell deal with more impurities, you could also use Whiskey or Tequila or similar distilled spirits.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh god, I'd never manage to refuel the thing to capacity!

      "... And one fur the doktuuur ..."

      On second thought, a laptop battery would be much more covert than a flask, for sneaking liquor into a club.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    2. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Canada, 80% to 90% of the cost of a bottle of hooch is taxes. Vodka power would be bloody expensive. Then again, if you power the user with vodka as well, they're less likely to complain :)

    3. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry sir, you must be 21 with 3 IDs to purchase fuel for your laptop.

    4. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by hping · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I can call this misusage of said fluids, but in case of emergency I can accept this usage.

      But think of this line: Well, officer, off course I have a drink with me, because I use it for my computer!

    5. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      A two liter bottle of cheap vodka, some porno and three AOL cds. I don't know what you had in mind for tonight, but leave me out of it.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    6. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 4, Funny

      Warning: Do NOT drink your laptop.

      I guess this is what they mean when they say alcohol is a Gateway drug...

    7. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by FireAtWill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh great. Here in Indiana we can't buy alchohol on Sundays. I'll have to take my laptop to a bar ("Barkeep! I'll have a Jolt on the rocks and a vodka martini for my little friend...").

    8. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm sorry sir, you must be 21 with 3 IDs to purchase fuel for your laptop

      That's still easier to get than an Indiana driver's license.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  3. All we need now... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'd be nice if the component makers would establish an "open laptop" form factor. We've alreadt got mini-ITX. We just need a chassis/monitor and DC power specification.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:All we need now... by Junta · · Score: 3, Informative

      The answer is that there is nothing in it for them. Manufacturing for OEMs means they have more control over the market and can get more cash per unit. The hard drives, optical drives, memory, CardBus, and mini-PCI all all standardized ways of manufacturers getting cash off the commodity laptop market. Meanwhile, the motherboards, case, power supply, battery, and display manufacturers make a killing by charging so much. Same reason Apple doesn't want clones, letting the market get too open and the prices start running down and eliminating profit margins very quickly. That is why PC laptops are almost as pricy as Apple laptops, and manufacturers recognize a good thing when they see it.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  4. Well, there goes the neighborhood by drblunt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does this mean you won't be able to take your laptop on the airplane with the fuel-cell battery? Nothing like having a lap full of methanol to freak people out.

    Doc

    --
    We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
    1. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Sitnaltax · · Score: 5, Informative

      Methanol on an airplane is hardly anything to worry about. It's no more dangerous than ethanol, which of course the airline will happily let you drink as much of as you want as long as you keep paying. It burns, but so does ethanol and paper.

      Explosion? Nah. It would be a very difficult task to get so much methanol vapor that an explosion would be much more than alarming pop--the same pop you could get by inflating a barf bag with your breath, twisting off the opening, and POPping it with your fist.

    2. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by TinheadNed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although I don't know about this particular fuel cell as it mentions more concentrated meths, one made by PolyFuel received air clearance and I think was mentioned on /. itself.

    3. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 3, Funny
      I've said it before, I'll say it again. No American (I don't mean the company, I mean the nation) airliner will ever be hijacked again (well, not EVER, but as long as living memories of 9/11 exist.) If a terrorist with a freaking AK-47 opened up on a plane, half the plane would still rush at him. And they'd probably win - it's hard to take down that many people with any kind of weapon, when those people have nothing to lose.

      Let's get this back on topic. Realistically, can you really hijack a plane using a laptop fuel cell? "Everybody down, or I'm gonna bust this cell open, let the methanol evaporate for 20 minutes, and then light it, making a 'pop' noise that may be quite loud!". I think not. Of course, that's not to say that overzealous security standards won't let them on anyway, but I don't think they're a realistic threat to airline safety.

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

  5. but how long will they last? by Pompatus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My question is, how long will the battery hold up? I don't mean a single charge, I mean how long will the battery be usuable. Also, it states at the end of the article it will take 2-3 years to get to market. It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:but how long will they last? by cribb · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article

      you're new here, aren't you?

      --
      Hostes alienigieni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
    2. Re:but how long will they last? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Informative
      by Pompatus (642396): It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article
      by cribb (632424): you're new here, aren't you
      ,
      Actually, from your user IDs, it's obvious that you're both new here. :^)
  6. Good luck... by szcx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure airlines or the TSA will be thrilled about people using fuel-cell-powered devices on those long-haul flights.

    1. Re:Good luck... by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not, they already sell 40% alchohol solutions in greater quantities to anyone who wants to pay the couple bucks and allow liquid butane in larger quantities, both have at least as many BTU potential and in the case of the liqued Butane the conainer is activly designed to ignite the contents.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  7. Dumb question... by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I RTFA, but still have a basic question - how does one recharge the battery? Will you purchase methanol packs, or just pitch the battery and get a new one? Either way, that cuts into the "environmentally friendly" bit...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  8. Better concept by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make it run on atmospheric methane, and install a pay-per-use WAP in every Taco Bell.

    It'll like be like printing your own money!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Better concept by grondu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Make it run on atmospheric methane, and install a pay-per-use WAP in every Taco Bell.

      Widely Available Phart

      --

      I'm the urban spaceman babe, but here comes the twist... I don't exist

  9. Problem with Security ... by airrage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah yes, this will definitely get your through airport security?

    Rent-a-Cop: "Sir, you wouldn't happen to have a explosive gas in that laptop would you?"
    Slashdot-Geek: "Uh, no, duh -- it's a fuel cell laptop."
    Rent-a-Cop: "Riiiiiigggghhhhhtttttttttttt. Please come with me."

    Why do the chemists and chemical engineers keep coming up with such volitile compounds -- why can't we start fueling devices out of garbage like that dude on back to the future?

    I could be wrong --

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Problem with Security ... by dr2chase · · Score: 2, Informative

      Methanol != Ethanol
      Ethanol's what's in vodka, methanol is poisonous.

    2. Re:Problem with Security ... by BFaucet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Marty, we just need to go to the year 2015 and bring back a Mr. Fusion power unit.

      --
      -Derick
  10. First Legitimate Post by ShadowDrake · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Runs for 5 hours" under what circumstances and configuration? I'll be downright impressed if they can get five hours out of a desktop PIV running full-blast, and running those drives full-time and the 802.11 won't help. I'd be impressed if the 'smart' battery/fuel cell realy was. My "10% low battery alarm" means anywhere from 5 to 30 minutes on a 2:30 or so charge life.

    --
    It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  11. Oh, and obviously denatured as well by nweaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Making it run on 40% ethanol, 60% water, denatured with methanol (nondrinkable) also is good, for the "lower cost (no booze taxes), lower availablity" fuel.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Oh, and obviously denatured as well by SUB7IME · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good call! We'd finally have a good reason to steal the ethanol out of chem lab ;-)

  12. Usefulness? by mr_zorg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see. Now I can have a batter with a moderately longer runtime, but refilling it is much more difficult than simply plugging it in. Who's going to go for that? OK, it's cool. OK, it's environmentally friendly, but is that enough to overcome the convenience factor?

    1. Re:Usefulness? by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can carry around a bunch of $2 refill packs and not need to be attached to a generator out in the middle of nowhere. Now there's convenience. You can also recharge your power source in a minute or two.

      This is important for other uses like a prospective Segway using these things. Right now you run out of juice, it's time to get tethered to a wall socket but with this you just fill it up and go further.

    2. Re:Usefulness? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Laptop batteries have their own costs. A quick check of Dells website shows them selling a battery for $130, which is advertised as being good for 500 charges. That works out to about 25 cents a charge, assuming that the cost of electricity is negligible. If a fuel cell can approach that cost per charge ratio and not wear out, I'd rather go that route.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
  13. fuel cells run hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even with a good catalyst like a fuel cell has, the reaction that takes place has a temperature of several hundred degrees Centigrade.

    Sounds good for a little hot action on your laptop!

  14. Re:one for me one for you... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> smoking thier laptop for it's menthol? lord knows i would

    Go for it! I'll start preparing your Darwin Award nomination now.

    (Methanol will kill you dead, AFAIK)

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  15. Not that great by gr8_phk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuel cells would be great replacements for non-rechargable batterys, but not rechargables. Think about it. You hate to recharge your laptop, but you'll hate it more if you have to pay for fuel. You pay for electricity, but you don't usually think about it. You also don't pay for it if you charge your laptop at work. Yes, one way or the other we all pay for it - I'm talking about noticing it.

  16. Mmmmm Methanol..... by smoondog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the methanol safety card. I don't see these on airplanes anytime soon. Anyway, remember those old photocopies from the 70's/early 80's that made pages with blue text? They always smelled a bit and came out a little wet. Yup, methonal was the fluid used in them....

    -Sean

    1. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by sliph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely unlike the alternative right? I doubt it would be too hard to package methanol into safe, disposable, self-sealing packages.
      At least methanol doesn't ignite when it comes in contact with air.

    2. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by frostman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those old photocopies were actually mimeographs, generally referred to as "dittos" (though I think there was some difference between a "ditto machine" and other mimeographs).

      Even though we had a photocopier, large runs went on the ditto machine, and it was always a mysterious and magical thing to operate. I miss them.

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

  17. If I recall correctly... by edashofy · · Score: 5, Informative
    The DOT has already approved Methanol in small quantities for uses such as powering fuel-cell powered laptops, see here.

    You "recharge" by popping in a new cartridge of methanol, which should be cheap ($3-5 initial starting price, probably down to $0.30 eventually. You don't actually have to plug the laptop in for a few hours to recharge it either, so on that long airline flight you can run the laptop indefinitely with enough little cartridges. I saw a pic of a prototype cartridge once somewhere, it looked about the size of a AA battery.

  18. Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by w42w42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't Hydrogen the desired fuel for a fuel cell? I may be wrong, but I thought that anything besides pure hydrogen would have additional exhausts besides just warm or hot water.

    If that is the case, I am not sure why I would opt for this, being that it 'only' gives me five/six hours run time between refills.

    That's another point - buying refills for every six hours use is a little bit more cumbersome than just plugging your laptop into the wall and charging the battery, even though the battery will not last as long.

    1. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by limproach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hydrogen is the preferred fuel, but it is unstable and difficult to work with. Methanol (which is easier to handle) can be used in conjunction with a reformer, which basically extracts the hydrogen from the methanol.

      At that point, it is the same thing as a normal fuel cell, just a bit less efficient

      HowStuffWorks has a good explanation about it http://science.howstuffworks.com/fuel-cell.htm

    2. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are correct in that Hydrogen is the only fuel that lets out water vapor as its only by-product. Any other fuel has carbon dioxide (and possibly carbon monoxide) as byproducts. Insert Global Warming debate here. I don't think at these levels you'd have to worry much about the ice caps.

      The main problem is that hydrogen has a very low energy/mass ratio. The only way to get anything even close to a decent range is to have massively compressed hydrogen. This in itself is a hazard. If you see a fuel cell in a car, look at how much cladding they have on that hydrogen tank. You're not going to have that kind of hydrogen tank shielding on something meant to be portable. Methanol is the simplest chemical that is liquid (and therefore relatively dense) at room temperature that they can use in a fuel cell.

      The other big problem is hydrogen is very reactive - read explosive. Probably not a good idea to have explosives on your laptop.

      Also, its easier for you to refuel methanol than to refuel hydrogen. There's no hydrogen infrastructure. Not much of a methanol one either, but you probably could get methanol if you looked for it.

    3. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by dhovis · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Methinks you may be missing the point.

      A fuel cell IS a battery. It is a refillable battery. One of the biggest anoyances of rechargable batteries is how long they take to recharge. That is the reason (well, one of them) that electric cars have never become popular. If you run out of juice, they take HOURS to recharge.

      With laptops, this problem is not so bad. You can use a laptop while it is recharging, and most places you would want to use a laptop, you will be within range of a plug anyway. Still, there are times when I would like to be able to run unteathered for long periods of time. So whenever the fuel cell gets low, you just add some more methanol and in seconds, you're good to go for another 5 hours.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

  19. New LAW the CUI by nlinecomputers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coding under the influence.

    Honest officer I was just fueling my laptop.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  20. Re:More details? by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 3, Funny
    Can you hook up a fuel tank and run it as long as the tank is kept full?
    [snort] I just got a visual of some ubergeek with one of those stupid hats made to hold dual beer cans, two bottles of methanol in place, tubes running down to his laptop...

    ..actually, one can of methanol and one of beer wouldn't be bad. As long as you remember which tube is which.

    --
    Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
  21. Re:one for me one for you... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) you misread this - it's methanol, not menthol.

    2) methanol is a poison. Low levels of methanol will permanently blind you. At higher levels, you'd be dead. "Denatured" alcohol is ethanol ("normal" drinkable, get drunk on alcohol) with very low levels of methanol. It's used in industrial processes. There's not enough methanol to screw up most reactions that require ethanol, but enough methanol to make it poisonous to drink so people wont use it as a way of avoiding government taxation.

  22. Re:Refuelling is easier... by briancnorton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, but where do you get fuel from? I get power from a socket.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  23. Um, what's the point? by Visigothe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As others have pointed out, 5 hours on a laptop is *nothing* The batteries on my iBook do that just fine. Sure it takes me a couple of hours to fully recharge, but that's what a second battery is for, should I need one. Also, I don't have to refill, nor throw away spent fuel cells. It sounds like manually refueling would be a pain in the arse [for a laptop]. Vehicles using fuel cells sound much more interesting

    What would be interesting would be a fuel cell laptop that got maybe 24 hours on a "charge".

    This just seems like gadgetry for its own sake

    .

    1. Re:Um, what's the point? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Given the battery life of an iBook, adding a fuel cell to an iBook probably means you could extract 8 or 9 hours.

      Don't tell me that wouldn't be convenient, with a recharge being as simple as swapping methanol cartridges.

    2. Re:Um, what's the point? by Visigothe · · Score: 3, Informative
      Quoth:

      Given the battery life of an iBook, adding a fuel cell to an iBook probably means you could extract 8 or 9 hours.

      Don't tell me that wouldn't be convenient, with a recharge being as simple as swapping methanol cartridges.

      While ~10 hours is cooler than 5, I don't think it is that much better [yes, technically it is *double*]. For it to make sense, it would need to last 20h at minumum to convince the majority of manufacturers and users to make the switch. It would also be nice to not have to throw away a spent cart.

      It's a value proposition. Can companies make more money by switching to the fuel cell technology? My guess is that it isn't at this time. Maybe in a few years when everything gets smaller/faster, but not now.

      I still think fuel cells in cars is a better idea than laptops.... of course now we're talking about a completely different fuel.

  24. Ultracapacitors? by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why don't we here more about ultracapacitors:

    http://www.maxwell.com/ultracapacitors/ According to the above page, ultracapacitors "deliver up to 10 times the power, last up to 10 times as long, operate more reliably in high- and low-temperature conditions, require far less maintenance and reduce environmental issues associated with battery disposal" compared to batteries. I recently read about a hybrid automobile that will be using ultracaps (don't remember who). It seems like these could be implemented in laptops and cell phones.

    1. Re:Ultracapacitors? by chill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because batteries deliver the charge over a long period of time, whereas capacitors deliver it in a quick burst.

      Yes, "ultracapacitors", too. The company you linked to is trying to market their product as an adjunt to batteries -- to deliver the surge of power needed for certain operations like startup, burst writets, etc. They aren't a replacement for batteries.

      The confusion is the phrase "last up to 10 times as long" -- meaning their total lifetime is longer than the batteries, but not while delivering constant power.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  25. Maybe by papasui · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Computer manufactures should focus on lower power solutions instead of building better batteries (or combine the two). My 17" Powerbook I ordered is rated at 4.5 hrs already with a standard battery. In general the pc world seems that the solution is always to throw more power at the problem instead of trying to come up with a more elegant method of dealing with it. (This isn't a rip on PC's I use both Macs and Pcs daily, just that there's more than 1 solution to most problems)

  26. Fuel? No, thanks. by Frobozz0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really don't want a contained fire on my lap. I know Lithium-ion reactions are probably just as bad, but there's just a big mental difference. Do you really want something that can run your lawnmover on an airplane? Does the airline want it on your lap, either?

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
    1. Re:Fuel? No, thanks. by juhaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's alcohol, not dynamite.

      Having this thing on your lap is no bigger deal than carrying one of those miniature bottles of booze. Horrified about danger of explosion when holding one of those? No? Thought so.

      And yes, you could run your lawnmower on ethanol just as well as on methanol.

      Airline certainly doesn't seem to have anything against selling you ethanol for your lap on flight themselves, either.

  27. The InfoWorld Link says to Market in 2004 by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Inforworld link (that I was submitting at the same time that this story got posted, BTW), says they will be available in 2004.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  28. Re:one for me one for you... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, it's toxic, but so is ethanol. Methanol is mostly only toxic due to secondary effects. You can get drunk on methanol and feel fine... for a while. The problem is what happens in your body once it starts breaking it down.

    Methanol breaks down via alcohol dehydrogenase into formaldehyde and formate, which of course are pretty toxic. Ethanol breaks down into these things also, but the body does a much better job of breaking ethanol down more completely.

    The antidote for methanol ingestion is ethanol ingestion. Really. :) The ethanol has a much higher affinity for the dehydrogenase so it prevents the body from breaking the methanol down into toxic things.

    For this reason, if you drink something like ethanol denatured with methanol, you will probably not die, but only get very sick.

    Also, some commercial drinking alcohols contain small amounts of methanol, which is likely why you get more of a hangover when you drink cheap liquor vs. the good stuff, you actually slightly poisoned yourself.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  29. Re:Interesting... by dbrutus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, that's CO2 emissions, not CO. At worst, you might feel a little light headed but in no way poisoned.

  30. Exactly... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And, you can use any power outlet anywhere for free (except at home of course) whereas the fuel always costs extra - if you can find it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  31. If The Fuel Cell Would Use Ethyl Alcohol by DoctorMabuse · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would be more suitable for most of the executives I work with. They could top it off from the mini-bar.

  32. Lithium by philip_bailey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "safety card" for lithium.

    It's doesn't seem to me that methanol in a sealed cell is any more dangerous than the lithium you have in your current laptop battery, or for that matter than the ethanol in the spirits sold as "Duty Free" on international flights.

    --
    There is no place like ~!
  33. The Water Byproduct.... by Fapestniegd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just needs to be re-routed to the single cup USB enabled coffee maker.

  34. Tired of the Airline Regulations argument by nonoriginal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, what makes carrying a small AA battery-sized container of methanol any different than carrying a butane lighter onto an airplane? I don't see one. Not to mention all the other flammable products carried in small quantities on airplanes in cosmetics and toiletries.

    As for the waste/disposal issue, the reason fuel cells are considered advantageous is that both production and disposal is cleaner, not containing toxic chemical compounds. The cartridges could easily be recycled into new cartridges...maybe even someday like inkjet printer cartridges.

    As for the runtime on a single charge, that is certain to improve over time. The point is that they get new technology in the marketplace.

    1. Re:Tired of the Airline Regulations argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..so i should add "fuel cell refill" to my spam-filter already you think ?

  35. Why I can't wait for small fuel cells... by cr0sh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I am currently in the process of building a recumbent electric vehicle from bicycle frames (I basically have everything done, still need to get the foot rests in place, and the drive system in) - I have designed it to use four 12V gel-cell batteries (ie, the 7AH powercell kind), or possibly even glassmat if I can get them cheap enough. However, the things are heavy. I would love to have a fuel cell that I could easily "fill up" with common fuels (gasoline, methanol, ethenol, butane, propane - I don't care).

    BTW, before anyone questions "why don't I use a go-ped like engine" - noise is the main reason, laws are another (as in legal grey area).

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  36. Re:seriously by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Very safe.

    People aren't yelling about how scary and flammable vodka, or any other strong ethanol containing liquid is, but for some reason when they hear the word "methanol" associated with fuel cells it only takes nanoseconds before someone is screaming about safety...

    If you live somewhere with cold weather you've probably used diluted methanol in your windshield washer for godssake! Did it explode then?

  37. 5 hours? by anethema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I sure hope that improves. Thats barely better than my current celeron 633 laptop. If better at all. Certainly not at idle.

    I dont relish paying a lot of money for a battery that doesnt last any longer than my current one.

    Well, then again filling it is a lot quicker than charging a battery.
    Ignore me i guess, i must be in a bitching mood. :|

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.