Inside the Tuna Can
blackcoot writes "Now folks walking through MIT's Infinite Corridor get to play with the virtual fishies (they react based on sensor data). I don't know if this will end up looking much nicer than the fish tank that used to come with MS Plus back in the day, but anything that requires months of computation to calculate just the raw data is cool in my book."
Short, basic moves should take only a few hours to parse, said Qiang Zhu, a research engineer at the vortical flow lab, and one of the FLEX3D programmers. Long, slow turns, however, may take several days.
"But the net effect should be a more realistic movement of the fish than what you see in a screensaver, for example," he said.
But FLEX3D will yield only numerical data for the flow fields and vortices created by each move. After that, it's up to the iQuarium investigators to bring their virtual fish tank to life.
"That part actually shouldn't be too difficult," said Aaron Sokoloski, a mechanical engineering student in the School of Engineering. Sokoloski said he will be using C++ and Microsoft's Direct3D graphics software to model the fish for iQuarium
--quote--
These students are paying top tution dollars and ahve access to some of the most powerful equipment available to what? That's right. Make a giant SCREEN SAVER that "looks pretty".
Proof that students have waaaaaaaaay too much time on their hands.
Sony announces Flippo the first mechanical dolphin.
Très useful.
Owner of a Mensa membership card.
It takes me months of compuutation just to work out my taxes, and there's nowt cool about that.
This may look completely useless to you, but read the article and the MIT website again. This system will be a playground for research releated to propulsion in water, and the long term results could give more efficient boats and submarines, that move more like fish.
There are a lot of things in nature that looks simple, yet we still can't mimic good enough. How birds fly, fish swim and snakes crawl are some of them.
Harald
Unlike other simulated fish, the iQuarium's scaly denizens will be driven by the same forces that manipulate birds and fish in nature,
I reckon they should throw in a few great whites if they want people walking down the corridor to have an experience
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
I can't wait to see the possibilites for pranks with this system. For halloween there will be monsters on the other side of the wall peaking in whenever someone approaches. Or what about some max headrooms? :-)
Harald
Talk about inflation! Geez!
Oh really??? So *THAT* is what makes fish cool, eh? I had been going on the shiny, colorful, moving object theory up until now.
I see, so incredible ammounts of number-crunching power are going, not to research of anything important, but to making a large, 3D, screensaver. Well, as long as Microsoft's money is paying for it, what the heck.
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
.... they could do the maths to work out how to realistically show a toaster flying... ;>
Doogie. If you can read this, my sig fell off
Would be interesting to know what the result of cleaning using magnetic aquarium cleaners is :)
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
- Serge Wroclawski
AFAIK, the Infinite Corridor is open 24/7... are they going to have to beef up security to ensure none of the plasma screens get damaged/stolen, or do the people up there generally behave and not destroy things for fun like at other colleges?
evil adrian
Unquestionably animal movement is more sophisticated than any currently available mechanical movement or propulsion systems. Its debatable though how useful mimicing this sort of movement is in real world vehicles would be.
Take aircraft for example. They are faster but less agile than birds. In transport terms though we really only want them to fly in straight lines from A to B so agility is not an overwhelming consideration in their construction. If we want them to be more efficient we make them lighter and more aerodynamic.
Undoubtably there are niche requirements that will benefit from this sort of research but I doubt the ability to product ships that move like fish (my god think of the sea sickness from the motion of the waves AND the ship itself) will revolutionize transport.
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
Geez... whatever happened to truth in advertising?
What's next? A "Mobius Corridor" that dead-ends?
Watching real fish move gracefully through a tank is one of the greatest pleasures in life. You can easily zone out for an hour or so just staring at the tank. El-Fish was almost as captivating. Cheers to anyone who tries to improve on that early effort.
--madgeorge
I can see it now; A professor stands in front of the class and begins his lecture:
"Modern science doesn't have to be all boring numbers, bridges and wires. Today we will learn how to make FUN and EXCITING stuff. Be sure to make it COLORFUL and LARGE otherwise investors will take their money else ware!"
What's next, rides? "I'm sorry Timmy, you have to be This High to ride the particle accelerator."
If you outlaw the law, only criminals will have laws
Visitors can also use a wall-mounted control panel to manipulate the fish..
And then the fish (intelligent as they are) calls 911 and gets the visitors charged for rape.
Am I suppose to be funny?
but anything that requires months of computation to calculate just the raw data is cool in my book
;)
your like my girlfriend then.. I still aint figured her out.
moo
Another deceptively simple thing is just trying to keep your balance while walking on two legs. Getting a robot to do that is not as easy as it looks in cheesy SF flicks.
Half of all Americans have below average intelligence.
Do you have a source for this? Half are below median intelligence, I'm sure, but mean? Or is your confusion of the two just evidence of your categorization?
I've had this sig for three days.
Anonymous, Homophobic.. look whos talking "in fact".
moo
I know no facts, this is conjecture: They say the project is funded by Microsoft, which is only a fraction of the story. I'd guess there are a couple of people working on this project, and a hell of a lot of computer time. Figure $100-200k per person (includes pay, tuition, university claimed overhead, etc). Figure $50-100k for the computers or computer time (including costs for administrator?). Microsoft's contribution is nothing, and in reality is probably "market value of zero cost donated software", with a possible condition or expectation that the pretty fish tanks have prettier butterflies pasted onto the corners. That said, the project is real cool, and does have scientific merit in my opinion, as the goal is modeling the actual movement mechanism of fish in a virtual 3-D tank. The added benefit is the projection to 2-D on the corridor walls. And by the way, we're talking a very small section of the corridor, right?
The need for all those massive calculations has been under debate within the robot builders community for some time.
By using simple analog components from transistor radios and similar hardware, some robotic engineers have built robots that learn on their own 'how' to walk. The movements are never pre-programmed, the robot is just given a simple goal like 'move foreward'. It is then up to the robot to 'learn' what actions best meet that goal.
Seems like this technology applied to Robotuna would be a no-brainer. I wonder if they have considered this approach.
Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy
An engineering professor at UC Berkeley created a project that uses video cameras to track the position of fish in a tank, then a projector projects onto a nearby wall what the view looks like from one of the fish.
Pretty slick combination of engineering and art.
Anything that propels itself through water creates vortices - it's unavoidable. With propellers, the vortices create drag. With fish, the vorticies create thrust. So fish are more efficient swimmers than propellers. That's what makes them cool.
Did anyone else notice the bit that states that it will cost 'em $16,000 for enough 5ft X 2.5ft flat panels to cover all of the surfaces in a 1/6 mile corridor? That sounds absurdly cheap for flat panels of that size.