Slashdot Mirror


January-February 2003 FreeBSD Status Report

Dan writes "FreeBSD's Scott Long provides the Jan-Feb 2003 bi-monthly FreeBSD status report. Highlights include focus on making 5.0 faster via more fine-grained locking, adding high-end features like memort support for i386. FreeBSD 5.1 is expected to ship in late May, early June, with 5.2 following end of summer with significant speed and stability improvements over 5.0. FreeBSD 4.8 release due shortly adds XFree86 4.3.0 and intel hyperthreading support. Major FreeBSD project statuses are also provided in this report."

23 comments

  1. Looking forward to 4.8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    To put on my laptop. Great OS, fast and supremely stable.

    Come on, someone else must want to post a comment here!

    1. Re:Looking forward to 4.8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you tell me why I would put FreeBSD on my computer rather than Debian Linux? I am just curious. Is it just to be different?

    2. Re:Looking forward to 4.8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you tell me why I would put Debian Linux on my computer rather than Windows? I am just curious. Is it just to be different?

    3. Re:Looking forward to 4.8 by Xsh-II · · Score: 0

      The reasons why I choose Linux over Windows are because of the choices it gives me. In Linux I can choose a variety of applications and test to see what the best is, without having to invest in buying the software (or being illegal). Linux provides you with a choice of most things and allows me to tweak and get deeper into the workings of my Operating System than Windows does.
      Other people don't like Linux however, as with the extra tweaking comes extra time that is needed to be put into getting the OS running exactly as you want it.

      --
      Xsh-II
    4. Re:Looking forward to 4.8 by Xsh-II · · Score: 0

      I definitely looking forward to the 4.8 release of FreeBSD because of this: "Lots of last minute work is going into to it to deliver features like XFree86 4.3.0, Intel HyperThreading(tm) support, and of course many more bug fixes". I have a Xeon game server going in to Telehouse in London that will be running FreeBSD and so the introduction of hyperthreading into the latest release will be a welcome addition

      --
      Xsh-II
    5. Re:Looking forward to 4.8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as does FreeBSD. But FreeBSD gives you more freedom. The question was more of a redundant question. Why one person chooses Linux over Windows is the same reason(s) a person chooses FreeBSD over GNU/Linux and Windows. Personally I feel FreeBSD is the better choice of the two.

    6. Re:Looking forward to 4.8 by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Let's see. It's extremely stable and robust. But more so than Debian? Hard to say. I would say "yes", but that's my opinion. So let's assume it's equally as stable as Debian. Let's move on to other stuff.

      FreeBSD has complete documentation. I've never seen any Linux distro even come close to FreeBSD in terms of documenation. FreeBSD doesn't believe in the GNU idea that man pages are bad. There are man pages for everything in the OS. And they're good man pages. Then you have an excellent handbook, faq, and miscellaneous books and articles. These are superb.

      Then there is "ease-of-use". Frankly, Debian is one of the harder Linux distros to use. Since you already know it, it may seem pretty easy, but you did have a very steep learning curve to get there. I've used both systems, so at least I can judge somewhat in their area. FreeBSD installation is much simpler than Debians. It's not as easy as, let's say, Lindows or Xandros, but it is very straight forward. Using packages/ports is as easy, if not easier than apt-get. In fact, building a CPU optimized package from source is just as easy as installing a prebuilt package.

      Finally, FreeBSD is more UNIX like than Debian. Is this a good thing? Yes! Why bother with a UNIX like operating system if it's not UNIX like. FreeBSD is real geniune UNIX in all but name (due to trademark issues). But at the same time, you can still run all your GNU's-not-unix software on it, because GNU wasn't designed to be for a single OS (even if it was orignally intended to be a single OS). You can even run all of your binary Linux software on it to, like Acroread, VMWare, etc.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  2. FreeBSD is LIVING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true. FreeBSD is a rock-solid operating system, distributed under a free software license. FreeBSD is becoming more and more popular with system administrators for web servers, DNS servers, and any other applications where stability and speed are required. It's not too shabby on the the desktop either, since it supports the latest XFree86 and desktop environments.

  3. Re:In case of Slashdotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy, you people are flaky.

  4. FreeBSD by thanjee · · Score: 1

    I am just waiting patiently for FreeBSD 5.x to become the stable version.

    I am also waiting for MIDI to start working properly too. As soon as MIDI works there will be no need for me to use any other OS.

    Yes, I know the documentation states how to add MIDI to the kernel, but the code behind it just doesn't seem to be written yet, cos it does nothing.....oh well, also waiting patiently for that.

    --
    Saying your OS is the best because more people use it is like saying MacDonalds make the best food
  5. Re:In case of Slashdotting... by essdodson · · Score: 1

    I was playing with my USB mouse a good 6 months before my Linux zealot friends were franticly recompiling their kernels to checkout the long over due USB support.

    --
    scott
  6. January-February 2003 FreeBSD Status Report by MainframeKiller · · Score: 1


    I thought FreeBSD was dead?

    --
    http://www.club977.com/ - The 80's Channel!
    Your source for commercial free 80's music!
    1. Re:January-February 2003 FreeBSD Status Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score 1???????
      Mainframe killer, along with your mainframes
      do us a favor and kill yourself too.

  7. FreeBSD is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Deal with it.
    2. Get over it.
    3. Move on.
    1. Re:FreeBSD is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder who pays bitches like the one above.

  8. Re:In case of Slashdotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >4) A prototype server called a web server is >now up and running for the FreeBSD >organisation. Soon we hope to get something >called a domain name.

    ????
    Check this out dumphead:
    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?mo de_u=off&mo de_w=on&site=www.apache.org&submit=Examine