Slashdot Mirror


Wi-Fi Enabled Stereo From Philips In Beta

Orangerobot writes "Philips Electronics is undergoing the beta test for the latest model in the Streamium line called the MC-i250. You have to trudge through a cheesy Flash presentation to get all the details, but it looks pretty good: Wi-Fi, CDDB support, online playlist management and more. It looks like they might actually get it right." Reader UVWarning's review of the current generation of Streamium indicates plenty of ways the next generation could improve on the current one.

98 comments

  1. ogg vorbis by trelanexiph · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'd really like to see something like this support ogg vorbis or flac or somesuch, cddb and cd's themselves are outmoded as far as I'm concerned (except as an archival medium) for media playing.

    1. Re:ogg vorbis by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Aah, any time streaming music (or digital music in general) is brought up, someone always makes the obligatory "Ogg Vorbis" comment. It's getting to be as old as the beowulf cluster jokes. There are several reasons these players will probably never support ogg. The most glaring of these is a limited marketplace. Nobody outside the geek community even knows what ogg is. It has no real advantages over MP3, other than being "free," which most people don't give a flying fuck about.

      Ogg is essentially a solution without a problem. MP3 fills the void as a good quality compression scheme, and has been around a lot longer than ogg. I'm not saying they should give up, it's always a nice intellectual exercise to have a choice, but please, PLEASE stop posting the stupid "I wanna see this MP3 technology in ogg!" comments. It's old, we know you envy MP3, but if you want to use the technology, nobody is stopping you from using MP3. I'm sure the streamium format is proprietary anyway, so don't feed me the "but MP3 is proprietary" crap. I'm sure this will be modded down as flamebait, but honestly guys, we're sick of hearing it.

    2. Re:ogg vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you requested it?

      Companies can't read people's minds and they most certainly don't read /.

  2. article text (the phillips site was acting /.'d by trelanexiph · · Score: 5, Informative


    Philips Streamium MC-i250, the world's first Wireless Broadband Internet Micro Hi-Fi System.

    The MC-i250 builds on the highly interactive audio features of its predecessor. Only this time, it's wireless. Effortless access to a whole universe of music in any room in your home, within your home network - without wires, without boundaries.

    Product highlights

    It is as unlimited as your imagination.
    Create and explore your very own universe of music:

    Personalized Internet Audio:
    Pick'n'mix from a vast catalogue of artists, music styles and eras to create a personalized station playing your favorite music.
    Online Music Charts:
    Enjoy the best of your favorite music styles with dedicated online charts - all updated daily.
    Online Radio:
    Go global! select from thousands of stations of music, news, sports and special interests in any language, from every region.
    INFO! Service:
    Press the INFO! button to receive an email with detailed information on artists and tracks.

    Virtually unlimited
    -Wireless connection to your home network
    To be well and truly connected, wireless is the way to go. You can virtually stream digital music, access award-winning online music services and your PC's music files - from any room in the house.

    All this is made possible with the uniquely powerful concept of Wi-Fi - wireless fidelity.

    (Wi-Fi, also known as 802.11b, is the international leading industry standard for wireless broadband networking.)

    The missing link - PC Link
    PC Link wirelessly connects you - and your family - to not just 1 PC but all the PCs connected to your home network - at the touch of a button. And you can savor your vast collection of music through Philips' patented wOOx speakers for unmatched, deep and dynamic bass sounds.

    Get personal - My.Philips
    Created exclusively for Streamium users, My.Philips.com lets you log on to access and manage your vast online music collection, get special links to premium partners, download latest software updates, check out news and information, or even make purchases.

    This extended online product interface lets you venture where you want to go, while maintaining control right at your fingertips.

    Here, now, always - Futureproof
    The upgradeable Streamium MC-i250 is a secure investment. Get the latest scoop on online upgrades and stay up to speed with changing technology, new products and services. As a proud Streamium owner, you become part of a privileged league once you register with My.Philips. If it's hot and happening, here and now, you will be the first to get it...always.

    Ex-stream-ly feature-packed Audio System
    The Streamium MC-i250 offers multi-format CD playback and a full-function FM/AM tuner. Powerful (2x50 Watts) wOOx speakers ensure mighty, impressive sound.

    Built with brains - and brawn - this amazing set can handle both MP3 and mp3PRO compression formats. Its 5-line display shows artist, track title and time elapsed. A user-friendly jog dial scrolls quickly and accurately through stations and tracks. Top technology right at your fingertips!

    Want to know more about MC-i250?
    Full details are just a click away...

    1. Re:article text (the phillips site was acting /.'d by hype7 · · Score: 1
      Philips? patented wOOx speakers


      It has wOOx speakers?

      Wow, this is just what I've been waiting for! I'd better rush out and get one of these things now!

      -- james
    2. Re:article text (the phillips site was acting /.'d by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      I've seen Philips wOOx kit that comes with a clear tube and a ping pong ball that can be fitted over the upwards facing bass drivers, turn up the volume and the ping pong ball bounces.

    3. Re:article text (the phillips site was acting /.'d by Dungus · · Score: 1

      I prefer my WooWoo speakers!

      They go Woowoo!!

    4. Re:article text (the phillips site was acting /.'d by famebait · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      INFO! Service:
      Press the INFO! button to receive an email with detailed information on artists and tracks.


      Too bad CDDB has become a tool of satan, and Freedb doesn't seem to have the developer resources to update its fomat to compete at the same level. *sigh*.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  3. Limited music stations by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If this thing is limited to certain internet music stations like its predecessor, you can write it off without thinking twice.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:Limited music stations by UVwarning · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there is already software out there to circumvent this problem. See my previous slashdot article. There is a small perl script on my website that does this and a guy named paul halloran has already improved it and has written mp3 cataloging software for it which can be found on his website.

  4. They are playing right into my lap... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My WLAN enabled home media server plan is getting hotter by the minute... bwahahaaa!

    No, but seriously, this is really the solution which makes sense... Why do you have to physically put a disc into your stereo to listen to something? It should be enough to buy the rights to listening (CD or not), have it on a media server of your own or stream right off the net.

    Think of the possibilities for internet radio stations and indie artists if every home stereo could do stuff like that... yay! :)

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:They are playing right into my lap... by daBass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their servers would die because of the overload as these indie bands can't pay for servers and bandwidth themselves and there is still no viable business model for online radio, wether it is indie or Britney...

    2. Re:They are playing right into my lap... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Their servers would die because of the overload

      Not necessarily. Unless I'm misinformed IP broadcasting enables streaming to multiple recipients using one TCP-feed. And solutions like PeerCast are creating yet another option.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re:They are playing right into my lap... by squaretorus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Danger Danger. I might buy a licence to listen to my new Coldplay album this week and assume its a licence FOREVER. But - the bastards go bust and shut down the service 3 years from now to replace it with a SUBSCRIPTION service - now I have to pay a $20 initial purchase plus $5 annual subscripiton for that album.

      No. I wan't some media! In my hand - that plays on generic hardware. No more. No less.

    4. Re:They are playing right into my lap... by daBass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IP broadcasting can be done, especialy when IPv6 arrives but even then the carriers will want more money than broadcasters have. On the internet, both sending and recieving party pay.

      Peercast will die the fate of popular P2P networks. Hailed as "the more users the better it works", the reality is: "too many users and it dies becasue non of these users have enough bandwidth to be hub". I have seen 10Mbit connections die because a PC was a Kazaa host. Kazaa saw it had a lot of bandwidth and made it a master. Ofcourse IT infrastructure shut this PC down.

      Either that or the horizon will be too close and many stations are out of range, just like cool FM station in the other town.

    5. Re:They are playing right into my lap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IP broadcasting can be done, especialy when IPv6 arrives but even then the carriers will want more money than broadcasters have. On the internet, both sending and recieving party pay.

      IPv6 will not arrive in the forseeable future. Certainly not in it's current incarnation. The firewall and security guys will never allow it. End-to-end IPSEC encrypted links through the firewalls? Are you daft? There goes intrusion detection, control of services, etc. Besides, we have plenty of address space now that the dot-bomb generation washed out. Everyone else just uses NAT which has made the IP address situation even better. Turns out you DON'T need an internet routable address on your Tivo and toaster. NAT is your friend.

    6. Re:They are playing right into my lap... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Peercast will die the fate of popular P2P networks. Hailed as "the more users the better it works", the reality is: "too many users and it dies becasue non of these users have enough bandwidth to be hub". I have seen 10Mbit connections die because a PC was a Kazaa host. Kazaa saw it had a lot of bandwidth and made it a master. Ofcourse IT infrastructure shut this PC down.

      A carefully designed P2P protocol will not necessarily suffer this fate. If I remember correctly the PeerCast protocol is designed to avoid this by rerouting streams when a link gets saturated.

      Generally speaking design can greatly affect a P2P network. I'm not surprised that Kazaa would have a problem like this, but don't forget that even DNS and Usenet are in a very real sense P2P applications. P2P doesn't mean that an application has to be completely disstributed (like gnutella) or centralized (like napster). P2P is about having autonomous nodes accomplishing a task together. Protocol design is the key to harnessing all that power lying around.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    7. Re:They are playing right into my lap... by CounterZer0 · · Score: 1

      You're misinformed, it's IP Multicasting that you're thinking about, and unfortunately, that's a distant dream on the real internet.

  5. That much for a friggin' boombox? by daBass · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nice idea, but it will be expensive and its only a boombox and although Philips's sound better than most, it will sound like one.

    WiFi or not, I'd rather still have a Turtle Beach Audiotron connected to my home stereo!

    1. Re:That much for a friggin' boombox? by simply · · Score: 2, Informative

      bah... i'd rahter have a slick slimp3 ontop of my rack...

      oh, wait, i already got one!

      --
      use me... abuse me...
  6. Re:As a concerned American patriot, by trelanexiph · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I look at this as someone who's been directly involved in bringing ogg/vorbis to both streaming mediums, and hardware players. Put quite simply if you want ogg vorbis support to pirate music you might as well stick with mp3pro, or mp3. Roughly (if not less than) .5% of music on the P2P networks is in Ogg Vorbis format, and quite frankly we're happy to see it that way. So how can Ogg Vorbis be supporting piracy, if none of the pirates are using Ogg Vorbis?

  7. WiFi by Multics · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Though an aside to the actual product, as I pay attention to netstumbler results I've come to the conclusion there is only so-much bandwidth in the WiFi sky and in technological areas (like offices or dense housing) there are soon (if not already) not enough channels in the WiFi system to do all the things that people are talking about doing...

    Do we need a WiFi NetRadio adding to the constant din of packets in the limited bandwidth available?

    -- Multics

    1. Re:WiFi by jkrise · · Score: 1

      Broadcast music has always been free (as in beer, as well as freedom) ever since, well, broadcasting. I could listen to music for free, AND make a personal recording. Simply packaging it in TCP/IP and streaming it over WiFi does not make sense.

      What I'd like to see is a CD/solid state RAM-based system that can play MP3 CDs and 'one-touch-record' about a 100 hours of audio. This would be useful when I do some loud-thinking, and my secretary could make notes and write articles later.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  8. why bother? by g4dget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get yourself a $200 PC (lots of other companies are offering them as well) and you'll have something much more flexible, without Philips or some other company spying on you.

  9. hp's new Digital Media Reciever is similar by Rkane · · Score: 4, Informative

    hp has a Digital Media Reciever that sits on a wifi network and scans the network for shared folders with music, AND pictures. Then, it plugs into a stereo/tv using s-video and rca cables. It seems to me that this whole phillips stereo is just another version of the same things you can already do with a computer and the hp DMR.

    For the record, I do acknowledge that the DMR is SERIOUSLY lacking in that it can't do video. When they support DivX, I'm all for it.

    1. Re:hp's new Digital Media Reciever is similar by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know whether the HP receiver requires Windows software? Or does it just need an SMB share?

      It lists Windows as a system requirement, but doesn't specify whether it *really* needs Windows or not. I think the device looks really neat, but I don't have Windows, and am not about to go buy it just for this.

      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
  10. more impressed by this by Sabalon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HP has a box that does something similar - the hp wireless digital media receiver ew5000 (DB226A#ABA) (tried to add a link, but session vars didn't help)

    It hooks to your TV/receiver and connects with wireless or cat5 to the PC.

    Though the first time I saw a pamphlet for this, it made it sound as if it would stream digital video as well, but looking at the specs, it appears the video out is just for menus and jpgs.

    Still, it's small, would easily fit in with other components, and since it uses the TV and not some small LCD, probably a lot easier to navigate directory trees.

  11. Hmmmmm by archetypeone · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ex-stream-ly...

    Who imagineered this word?

    1. Re:Hmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wi-Fi Enabled Stereo From Philips In Beta


      Isn't it nice that Betamax now has audio uses?
      Or is it stereo video?

  12. More Phillips hybrid tech... I wouldnt buy it by sleeper0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I owned a Phillips DVX-8000 which was one of their last attempts to bring some of the pc world to the stereo cabinet.

    The DVX-8000 was a high quality onkyo receiver coupled with a built in pentium 233 (modern at the time) and PC DVD player and line doubler. This system cost about $5000 new in 97 but quickly got dumped by phillips because it was a disaster. Custom software that never worked right, no upgrade path, custom hardware that broke, no vision for the future. They never bothered with any real software updates (it was never even able to run windows 98) and was so laden down with custom hardware including the video system that there was really nothing an end user could do. Once the units were out of warrenty thats the last phillips ever touched one leaving all of their owners stranded.

    This new phillips system seems novel but i would never consider buying one considering what a poor track record they have with their other 'experiments'

  13. Zeroconf support by iJed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since I seem to remember Philips being a supporter of the zeroconf (Rendezvous) standard it would be nice to see this having support for this. Then maybe it could support playlists from the next version of iTunes.

    1. Re:Zeroconf support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philips is one of the big supporters of UPnP so you may not see it until after UPnP support.

    2. Re:Zeroconf support by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      Found this on the Apple website:

      ?Apple and Philips share a vision for the future,? said Gerard Kleisterlee, CEO of Royal Philips Electronics. ?We both believe that consumers want devices throughout the home to talk to each other, so that, for example, the music stored in iTunes on your Mac can play through the Philips stereo system in your living room, or the photos stored in iPhoto can be displayed as a stunning slideshow on your Philips Flat TV. Rendezvous helps realize this dream. Philips is particularly pleased that Apple has adopted an open standard and architecture for Rendezvous, and we will support Rendezvous in future Philips products.?

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  14. Wi-Fi by tmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they're really trying to build a device to listen to music from any room in the house, as they say in the article, they're going to have to use something other than 80211b ... in my apartment, I get a weak signal just from going 80 feet between rooms, with none of the obvious obstructions except walls, even when all doors are open and I hold my laptop in the air and rotate it. They can say whatever they want, but if people are buying these to listen to stuff at opposite (or even not-so-opposite) parts of their house, they are going to be *sorely* disappointed.

    1. Re:Wi-Fi by kennylives · · Score: 1

      That's all highly dependent on the equipment in use. My TiBook has that famously weak antenna, but it still gets a solid signal anywhere in the house, and a little outside. My iBook gets a usable signal almost to the street (300 feet or so). Oddly, my AirPort WAP seems to put out a signal with its internal antenna(s) than my LinkSys (1.1) WAP does.

      My $0.02... make change as needed....

      --

      Where the value of X-Mailer: is the true measure of a man...

    2. Re:Wi-Fi by jamesangel · · Score: 2, Funny
      I get a weak signal just from going 80 feet between rooms

      Sounds like you need to get a smaller apartment. Want to swap? In my place you can just turn on the stereo and hear it everywhere...

    3. Re:Wi-Fi by djrogers · · Score: 1

      That's kinda like saying that the internal combustion engine needs to be replaced because your model T can only do about 35mph. You have poorly desinged/operating wireless equipment, period. Your complaint has nothing at all to do with the wi-fi standard, you simply need a better base station and/or adapter for your laptop.

      I gave my fiance an old linksys PC Card for her laptop when I first set her up wirelessly, she couldn't go 30 feet and 2 walls away without having problems. So, remembering why I ditched the old card in the first place, I replaced it for her. Now she can go 100+ feet away, through 4 walls, and out in to her backyard...

      Don't blame the standard because some companies built crap out of it...

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  15. Re:As a concerned American patriot, by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    only pir8tes use ogg vorbis

    Think about it. The vasy majority of people who use Ogg Vorbis, encode it from CD. Encoding one from MP3 or other format is just stupid!

    So, if they have the CD's then it's a good bet they also own it. And there ain't *nothing* illegal about ripping your own CD's for your own use! So there.

    Mp3 is for people who want music, Ogg Vorbis is for people who want quality!

    (Or Ogg FLAC if you've got a boatload of disk space)

  16. does it do? by lfourrier · · Score: 1

    ogg?
    wep?
    pc link to a mac or a linux?
    can we have more than one on a network?
    any no is a show stopper for me.

    1. Re:does it do? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      ogg? wep? pc link to a mac or a linux? can we have more than one on a network? any no is a show stopper for me.

      Face it, Ogg Vorbis is dead as disco. You're a statistic and irrelevent. MP3 support is the only thing 99% of the people want. Philips isn't going to waste their time with satisfying a tiny percentage of uber-geeks who demand some oddball encoding format when everyone else uses MP3. I'm sure they'd rather spend their research dollars adding Windows Media audio support and Real Player support before they even considered Ogg. Don't you guys realize whining about it only makes them laugh harder? If you want an Ogg player or a DivX viewer or some other machine to hypnotize and control your cat then build your own out of a Linux box like everyone else.

    2. Re:does it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ogg, no. No one requests it.
      Wep, Yes.
      PC Link to mac or linux, yes through people who have posted to slashdot and reverse engineered the protocol.
      Yes you can have more than one on a network.

    3. Re:does it do? by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      Face it, Ogg Vorbis is dead as disco.
      No, it isn't (disco neither, for that matter).
      Why I want ogg is because I have a lot of it allready encoded (far more than mp3) and I don't want to re-encode it (those are my CDs).
      Perhaps most people want mp3 because it is what is most used on kazaa and friends, but this reason is irrelevant for me.
      Now, saying I'm a statistic and ignoring me is in total contradiction with currents trends in marketing. They can, for a small cost, provide me with a solution using ogg, and make me and many others happy customers.
      But ogg support is only a small part of the question. What I deduce from their site is that geek are not a target for them at all, or else, my questions in the parent post would have been answered.

    4. Re:does it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now, saying I'm a statistic and ignoring me is in > total contradiction with currents trends in
      > marketing. They can, for a small cost, provide me
      > with a solution using ogg, and make me and many
      > others happy customers.

      Even Linux-geek-friendly devices (like the Slimp3,
      with its GPL'd Perl server) have difficulty supporting Ogg properly *because the MP3 decoder chips they use do not*.

      Given the choice between engineering their own decoder chips with the additional horsepower to decode Ogg, or buying something off-the-rack that does everything 99% of their user base cares about, what are they going to do? Supporting Ogg is, most emphatically, definitely NOT a "small
      cost" for these guys.

    5. Re:does it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No
      No
      No
      and No
      Not to worry, nothing for you to see here, please move on. Have a nice day!!

  17. Music hardware becomes like PC hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Music hardware is starting to evolve way to fast
    and in many different directions:
    - DVD-Audio
    - Super Audio CD
    - PCM Upsampling
    - DRM
    - Dolby Digital 5.1, 6.1, 7.1, etc....
    - DTS
    - mp3, ogg vorbis, ...
    - ...

    Even highend music hardware is outdated after 3
    years. Since music and video are becoming more
    and more digital, they dependent on all kinds of
    codecs. You can offcourse upgrade the firmware,
    but sooner or later your DSP will lack power
    to calculate the most recent codecs.

    The most recent DVD-players even support the very
    cpu-intensive divx-codec, thus outdating even the
    most highend older DVD-players

    Things are getting so complex that even now
    Joe sixpack is/will be unable to use this complex
    hardware.

    Just try using a highend audio-video receiver
    to play an audio CD with a external player...

    Greetz.

    1. Re:Music hardware becomes like PC hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since music and video are becoming more and more digital,

      Wow! "More and more digital" where can I get more and more of this digitalness than I already have. My standard digital is shit now :-)

  18. Will they do something useful instead? by jkrise · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Broadcast music has always been free (as in beer, as well as freedom) ever since, well, broadcasting. I could listen to music for free, AND make a personal recording. Simply packaging it in TCP/IP and streaming it over WiFi does not make sense.

    What I'd like to see is a CD/solid state RAM-based system that can play MP3 CDs and 'one-touch-record' about a 100 hours of audio. This would be useful when I do some loud-thinking, and my secretary could make notes and write articles later.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  19. bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With more and more providers starting to impose limits on downloads/bandwidth, why exactly would i start looking into streaming audio systems? So i can actually go over my rediculously low imposed download limits without actually even turning on my PC?

  20. Vorbis not used for piracy? You've never used giFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So how can Ogg Vorbis be supporting piracy, if none of the pirates are using Ogg Vorbis?"

    Yeah. No piracy using Ogg Vorbis anywhere. Uh-huh.

    Time for you to go and play with giFT, methinks. It's where mp3 is the minority.

    Unhappy to see this, I guess.

  21. Re:As a concerned American patriot, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huh? A little off-topic I would say... :)

    Of course, it's nice to see someone's so incredibly naive as to think the weapons inspectors are compotent, and Saddam Hussein isn't hiding anything. It's cute, in it's own sorta way ;)

  22. Re:As a concerned American patriot, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just glad to see Moderators using their points to benefit this forum instead of furthering their political opinions. Give this guy a break he deserves to be modded up.

  23. That's not the point! by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I already have a server with hundreds of MP3s connected to a stereo. I want to be able to listen to my mp3s whilst I'm in the kitchen, whilst I'm in the bath, wherever. A *portable* solution rocks: it's not meant to replace your main hifi, but to extend it. This is *exactly* what I wanted a few months ago when all I could find was the SliMP3, a separate amp and speakers and a wireless bridge-expensive and NOT PORTABLE. this looks like a great product, I want one.

    1. Re:That's not the point! by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Informative
      Here's what I do:

      I have an old PC ("the server") that has my music collection and is wired to my stereo, and wired to my LAN.

      I mostly work on a wi-fi laptop.

      I use remote desktop software to control what's playing on the server. That way, no matter where I am, I can control what's on the stereo, using any audio source available to the server (whether it's my software or services like Rhapsody or other Web sites or Internet radio).

      You can use pretty much any remote software, such as WinXP's Remote Desktop or PCAnywhere or VNC (I have some notes about that here).

      Next, you could also make that same server-based collection available for playback over your LAN -- and even out over the Internet (if you have enough upstream bandwidth).

      Andromeda lets you do that, provided you're running a Web server that can do PHP or ASP.

      That all might sound complicated, but it's not, and it's really convenient.

      My 2c, -Scott

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    2. Re:That's not the point! by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To get a portable solution, next step is to get a 20UKP FM tranmitter to hook up to the music server. This means anything within 100 feet or so can tune into it: I can use a cheap old radio to listen to mp3s in the bath without the risk of drowning my laptop. I can also sit in the garden and listen to it without worrying someone will nick my laptop whilst I'm making a brew as well...

    3. Re:That's not the point! by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      I never tried an FM transmitter, but I did get a 900MHz doo-dad (perhaps from X10?). It didn't work so well -- it was too sensitive to interference from other devices (especially the microwave) and I don't use it anymore.

      I live in NYC, and I most of my wireless stuff gets a little flakey at times.

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  24. How about some real innovation! by Macka · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I was quite tickled when I stumbled on the iTrip.

    It turns your iPod into an FM transmitter, so that you can listen to your mp3's on your home hi-fi, or on the car radio!

    Don't know why this hasn't been thought of before. It's a really cool idea.

    1. Re:How about some real innovation! by Webmonger · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't know why this hasn't been thought of before.

      It has. Not specifically for the iPod, but check your local Radio Shack analogue.
    2. Re:How about some real innovation! by justforaday · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember "Hey good lookin we'll be back later to pick you up"??? Mr. Microphone did this 3 decades ago, albeit using AM instead of FM...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:How about some real innovation! by mookie-blaylock · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, if you live in a city of any size, these FM transmitters aren't worth the cost at all, as the FM dial is pretty well saturated with enough signal bleed on the rare unused station to make using those impossible, unless you hold the transmitter itself and act as an antenna. Not really practical.

      --
      I am not Herbert.
    4. Re:How about some real innovation! by Eslyjah · · Score: 1

      Actually, the iTrip is pretty innovative in that it gets its power directly from the iPod. You don't need to stock up on AAs.

  25. Re:More Phillips hybrid tech... I wouldnt buy it by dago · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that they also pionneered compact discs (incl. recorders) ...

    I wouldn't call that a "poor track record".

    Of course, you can also talk about DCC ;)

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  26. DIY - Mac, iTunes, Home Theater & Wireless by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Try something like this...and this page is over a year old.

    Consumer goods are just that...for consumers. You want something that matches your needs, and you're not a middle-of-the-road consumer, you know you're better off DIY.

    ./...the first stop for consumer reports?

  27. Re:Vorbis not used for piracy? You've never used g by trelanexiph · · Score: 1

    I wasn't aware people used GiFT :)

  28. getting there...but where's the digital out? by schvenk · · Score: 1
    All this stuff is exciting and steps in the right direction. This new Philips stereo is great for those who want a portable option, and the SLIMP3 and HP Digital Media Receiver look great for those of us who want to integrate this kind of technology into a component system. The prices are getting reasonable, and the sooner I don't have to worry about physical media to listen to music, the better.

    But why no digital audio out on the HP and Slim devices? Seems odd...these things are obviously targeted at geeks, yet I won't buy one until it can match the quality I get off a CD...which means it has to have a digital audio out.

    1. Re:getting there...but where's the digital out? by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      True, One of the reasons I got a Audiotron, was because of the optical output.
      btw, they should have a new line of boxes out "any day now".
      Oh yeah, and to all the "just build a PC". It's hard to explain, but a device like the audiotron works really well. Streaming and MP3s really get nicely integrated into your current setup in a way no homebuilt mp3/streaming-pc-player can to. It's easy to use with the remote or front panel. no fans humming, it just "feels" like another stereo component, which I think is cool.

      --
      my sig
    2. Re:getting there...but where's the digital out? by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Wait... Let me see if I got this right:

      You want this snazzy MP3/WMA/(insert other compressed audio format here) player. But you wouldn't buy it because it doesn't have digital audio out so you can get that 'CD' quality sound?

      I can think of some technical reasons why they don't do this. Maybe they change the clock rate of the DACs to match the sample rate of the MP3 being played. Then an additional (costly) sample-rate converter would need to be added to maintain a constant SP/DIF clock. But even still, unless you encode your music at break-even compression ratios, the audio's bound to sound just as good being piped out in analog as in digital form.

      Believe what you want about compressed audio. If you ever do buy such a receiver, I'd be glad to sell you some gold-plated Monster Cable TOSLINK cables to go with that.

    3. Re:getting there...but where's the digital out? by schvenk · · Score: 1
      Cool. Looks promising. How do you (or anyone else with one) like it? Is the sound quality, feature set, etc., good and mature enough at this point?

      Also, what technologies does it use for connecting to your computer? Is it something that would work with a Mac (bearing in mind that Macs support SMB networking)?

    4. Re:getting there...but where's the digital out? by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      The sound is great, someone had some complaints about the analog output being to weak and a small hum. I don't know if that is a general problem since I only have used the digital output.
      It should work with Mac too, I have seen a few Mac users on the mailing list. I connects just fine to my Linux box using Samba. They release new firmware a couple of times each year, and more often beta versions are also available for one to play with. I use it a lot for shoutcast/icecast and Windows media stations and of course to play my ripped CDs.
      One of the things that really makes a great music expirence, is that you can select songs by many different ways, not only by album but also by fx. artist and category/type. I can only recomend it, but look at their message board and mailing list and judge by yourself.(but also remember that most of them are problemsolving forums). Also many people are writing their own frontend to the player such as Windows/php/java/whatever programs using the API.
      On of my personal favorites is the party jukebox (ATaParty) when you turn a pc into a control interface where people can select songs add to the queue and you avoid having 10 people standing and changing CDs every minute. :D. Anyway more links are to be found here: http://www.tasman.nl/AT/

      --
      my sig
    5. Re:getting there...but where's the digital out? by schvenk · · Score: 1
      My knowledge of stereo equipment isn't as complete as I'd like it to be, so if you'll set aside the sarcasm for a minute I'd like to know what you mean.

      Obviously I'm interested in good sound, and I bought a fairly nice receiver for that reason. My understanding is that a digital connection (from a digital device, anyway) to a receiver is going to deliver better quality sound than an analog one, and I had presumed it's because that method virtually guarantees no loss of quality: The information that hits the receiver is the exact same information that left the component, which in turn is the exact information in whatever media you're reading from. Obviously if the source is of low quality it wouldn't be worth it. But with a CD -- and, presumably, with a high-quality mp3 -- the preservation of signal would mean higher-quality sound in the end.

      Anyway, that's my understanding, and if it's wrong, or if there are other aspects of it I'm missing, I'd love it if someone would set me straight.

    6. Re:getting there...but where's the digital out? by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to be TOO sarcastic, but fair enough...

      Analog signals, like those that come from the RCA outputs on your CD player, can be affected by every stage along the way from the CD player to the speakers. In that signal path, noise (static, resistor noise, AC hum) and distortion ('clipping', not-quite-linear amplifiers) can creep into the signal. You may notice that most stereo equipment documentation mentions a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This is a measurement (though standards DO vary and you can easily make it misrepresent reality) of the decibels between the noise floor (the average of non-signal) and the maximum signal that an audio network can pass (often a 1kHz sine wave). However, the smallest signal that can be represented with a 16-bit digital source (CD audio, your MP3 player, etc) occurs at -96dB (20*log10(2^16))

      Let's say that your stereo receiver claims a -100dB SNR (which is pretty average for most midrange consumer receivers) for the analog inputs. Assuming you have a good, solid connection in between the input device (let's assume it's your CD player again, and that its output can represent all 16 bits, aka -96dB) and the receiver, there will be 4dB of headroom that your receiver will provide. This is more than adequate for CD audio, but for >16 bit digital sources (DVD, HDCD, etc) this may not even be enough.

      So why do some CD players sound better over a digital link? For CD audio, the reason lies in the CD mechanism itself. The data stream coming off a CD is regulated, or 'clocked', at 44.1kHz. That means that one bit of audio data gets cranked out every 1/44100th of second. This clock is regenerated from the bitstream on the CD itself, much like an RS232 receiver regenerates the baud clock from the incoming data. The digital signal being cranked out of most CD players, as well as the DAC inside the player, are themselves clocked from this regenerated signal. Problem is, the mechanical nature of the CD system can induce jitter, which is an timewise inconsistency in that clocked data. Jitter comes from everything from thermal noise to a crappily mastered CD. If you graphed the clock coming from the CD player's chipset (often called the 'servo chipset') on an oscilloscope, you would see the signal jiggle left and right randomly (hence the term jitter). The way this jitter affects you is that it misrepresents the digitally-encoded data to the DAC in the time domain, causing all sorts of distortion artifacts. This kind of distortion is often seen on an FFT as harmonics of the actual audio.

      If you use the digital-out on your CD player to attach to your receiver, then you shift the responsibility of the digital-to-analog conversion to the receiver. Fortunately, your receiver has a DSP (of which my employer makes many of) that can not just regenerate the digital audio clock, but make corrections to it so that it is consistent when it gets converted to the analog domain.

      But with MP3 audio, especially with a component MP3 'receiver', this digital clock is generated by the device's CPU, which is in turn being created from a stable source like a crystal oscillator. Inherently the analog audio coming out of such a device is more true to its digital representation than a CD. This comes at a price, though. All compressed, lossy audio formats make assumptions about the listener and cut out not-so-critical parts of the audio to save bandwidth. This results in some harmonic distortion being added in when the music is regenerated. For that reason cymbals don't sound so sharp and voices lose their presence when you listen to them in MP3 format. Audiowise, you're back to the same place you were when you were listening to your CD player's analog output, even if you use a SP/DIF cable to connect the MP3 deck to your receiver.

      IANAA (not an Audiophile), but this is what I know from working with portable MP3 devices on the job.

  29. Re:More Phillips hybrid tech... I wouldnt buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This 'experiment' has started over a year ago and they have given several updates already to the current customer base. They've even added new services already. This is already the second product in the line and I've heard they have several more coming.

  30. I've got... by vjmurphy · · Score: 2, Informative

    And Audiotron hooked up via Linksys ethernet bridge; plan on getting a Slimp3 eventually, as well. I don't see a reason to lock myself into wireless as a method to hook up any of these devices, though: the audiotron works with phoneline networks and plain wired ethernet, which works for me.

    I do have a Motorola wireless SimpleFi, though, which uses RF. Cute hardware, but the software
    is horrible: it would take me too long to set up (plus, there doesn't appear to be a way randomly play songs). It sits unused these days.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  31. Re:As a concerned American patriot, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You actually lifted my spirits tonight. Hell, you made my friends list for that comment. I love /. for the news it provides, and most of the comments are interesting if not informative. however I loath the anti-US sentiment so prevelant on this site. it is though it has become cool to hate the US. I admire that you used facts to back up your statements, unlike the numerous people that sourcelessly slander the US over every decision it makes. I do not support everything the US has done, i fear the patriot act, and i am not too fond of the DMCA. However all these posts stating that the US is not a democracy for whatever reason make my blood boil. Not getting into the technicalities of our voting system, GW bush WAS elected as the presedent, and when we elected him we gave him the authority to act in our name. People say that iraq has no WMD, however, how do they know this? because sadaam says so? I have faith in the US intelligence services, and I do not expect to know everything that iraq does or possess. When you give up intell that you know, you put lives at risks. Once the enemy knows your sources, it is terminated. It is that simple. This is somewhat to rant, ive had a bit too much to drink tonight. then again, i've been serving my country overseas for the last 3 years in the Marine Corps. I missed my high school graduation, prom, and college, and I haven't seen my family or friends for 3 long years. I do not regret this. But please don't forget that there are many young men and women who have sworn away so many personal freedoms and opportunities in order to protect your freedom to slander the very thing that we have sworn to protect and defend to the death.

    when was the last time all the slashdotters stayed up 84 hours straight patrolling a combat zone in the pouring rain in full combat gear, wondering if the fucking supply truck would actually arrive that day to bring you some 3 year old MREs? When was the last time you were issued 120 rounds of 5.56mm roundes and 4 HE-DP 40mm grenades and told "your on post for the next 48 hours. No one will enter this area." Never ever take your freedoms for granted. You never know how many freedoms you have untill you lose most of them. Ever had to request permission to make a head call? call home?

    Posting anonymously for fear of anti-US mods, tracerJPN_USMC

  32. Re:gracenote CDDB - bleh by pherris · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If it can be changed to use FreeDB instead of CDDB I'd be pretty happy.
    Don't bet on it. To use CDDB one must agree not to support any other similar systems like FreeDB.

    From "Why freedb.org" at freedb.org:

    As Escient has changed the terms of licence for accessing CDDB, some programmers complained that the new licence includes certain terms that threatens them in a way they cannot accept: If you want to access CDDB, you are not allowed to access any other CDDB-like database (this one, for example) ...
    Besides from what I've read in the past Philip's net radios require some hacking to get them to work with personal streaming servers. Changing anything past the volume seems to be controlled by Philips. It's too bad since I suspect they could sell a lot more if people could modify the onboard software.
    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  33. Yeah I tried to get in on this..... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I tried to get in on this a while back (on the beta). The way it was setup is if you got selected (totally at random), they'd send you the device and it was yours and you had to tell them what was wrong with it. After the beta period, you'd fill a form out and tell them what you thought. As payment, you'd get to keep the beta device (I think). I think that this is a excellent idea. I bought a Toshiba e740 and I am still semi putting up with little problems. Every once in a while, you'd fire up the WiFi and it would immediately shutoff. Then, you'd have to do a soft reset to get it to work. Sometimes, it will do a hard reset when you just bump it lightly (although that problem seemed to have disappeared on my unit). Every once in a while, the fonts in the start menu will turn white. Then go back to normal (real bitch if you have a light colored background and you usually do since the text is normally black!). I feel that the e740 was very much a beta for the new e755 (I may even try to talk Compusa for letting me use my TAP to get it due to the problems I have been having). The e755 has a new version of the Xscale, a faster system bus plus 64 MB ram and 32 MB of non volitile ram to use for storage (similar to safe store on iPaq). It also has the wifi built in and a transreflective screen. In any case, I think that this thing is needed. If more hardware was beta tested in this manner, then maybe the bugs will be fixed before it's widely available. I would gladly fill out surveys and lend my opinion on new devices. I would even send them back if they wanted them, although I feel it's fair to let the beta testers keep it as payment. I think that they might actually sell more if they were less bug ridden.

    Now on to the streamium! It sounds very cool. Would have loved to test it for them! :) I would like to have this so I can use it to play my music when I am washing the car. That way the hard disk is nice and safe inside! :) For now, I'll just be happy using my Zen Nomad plugged in to the car stereo...

    --

    Gorkman

  34. sure it is by g4dget · · Score: 1
    You mean like a handheld with a WiFi card? Or a small, low-end laptop? Or a Mini-ITX board in small case?

    PCs come in more form factors than stereos. One of them fits your need, at a reasonable price.

  35. Nope by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    If I want a portable boom-box style wifi device then I want just that. A handheld or a laptop won't pump out 10w or so of sound, and is a hell of a lot more expensive than a standard boom box. A mini ITX box doesn't run off batteries either, and non of them are ruggedised, have a radio, cd and maybe a tape deck in it either. I really think a wifi enabled boombox fills a gap in the market.

  36. integration would be better... by CBravo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not integrate the wifi stuff into the loudspeakers? Just put your 110/220 in the speaker and voila, done. If you really want a user interface, put it on the remote.

    I guess it wouldn't work if you want a CDR/MP3 player, but the same can be done there too.

    There should only be one sort of wire: power wires (because I haven't thought of a better solution for that).

    --
    nosig today
  37. Re:gracenote CDDB - bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it can be changed to use FreeDB instead of CDDB I'd be pretty happy.

    Umm, yeah. That would be, umm, great... Pay for an expensive boombox with CDDB support, and hack it to use Freedb with its shitty data quality and hopelessly broken protocol. Yah, that'll show 'em!

  38. Review of the Streamium MC-i200 by MaineGuy · · Score: 1

    I have a Streamium MC-i200 in my garage (yeah, I spend a lot of time there). Here's the environment: Connected to the Ethernet port is a D-Link DWL-810 Ethernet-to-wireless bridge, which talks to a Netgear MR314 in my upstairs office. Also in the office is a media server, which is simply an old PC with a big hard drive. Finally, I have an old notebook that sits on my A/V tower downstairs, with a Y-cable from the stereo minijack out to an unused set of audio ins (MiniDisc, I believe). The notebook is perfect for playing Rhapsody through my main receiver.

    With that out of the way, here's a quick review of the Streamium:
    Good
    - Ability to play MP3s from media server anywhere on your network.
    - Limited Internet streaming capability. Rhapsody or something similar is needed.
    - Really good sound, with decent bass thump.
    - Remote control is handy when I'm working underneath the car and want to change tracks.

    Bad
    - Requires a special version of MusicMatch Jukebox on the "server" PC, even though I had already paid (yes, I paid) for the full version of MusicMatch. Now I have two versions on my music server. This server app must be running for the Streamium to find it and play music from the hard drive.
    - Horrid navigation. My music is stored in folders, with an artist at the top level, and album folders underneath. It's a chore to page down through the alphabetized list of artists. So I play more Geoff Achison than I would like, and less of the Zombies.

    Bottom Line
    - While this is a good first step, $500 is far too much to pay (I evaluate this gear for my job). For that jack I'd buy a two-year-old notebook, PC speakers, and slap in a wireless card.
    - Keep an eye out for a Digital Media Adapter from Linksys, which should be released soon. It, too, sits on your A/V tower, hooks into your receiver, and should have an out to the TV, so you can navigate playlists and such on the big screen.

    BTW, the Wall Street Journal reviewed the Streamium last month. Yup, you gotta have a subscription.

    Hope this helps.

    -Ray

  39. Re:As a concerned American patriot, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    you've got some facts horribly wrong.

    Venezuelan oil accounted for more than 17% of total U.S. oil imports, compared to just 12% during the first nine months of 2002.

    look here

    Iraq has more proven oil than Venezuela, and about 90% of the country is unexplored. It's second to Saudi Arabia, and many people believe it's first. However, if it is 'for the oil' chances are it's also for the natural gas as well. Iraq is also loaded with that.

  40. I'll pass by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    Besides a high price, limited music content, and OS restrictions, my.phillips.com even blocks my browser - Opera, and I'm on a PC.

    Miraculously, the site works when I tell Opera to identify as IE.

  41. Apple?? by Ballresin · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this is the first incarnation of Apple and Philips' little venture with iTunes and zeroconf wi-fi stereos??

    --
    I got nothin'.
  42. that's what /etc/hosts is for by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    or any other mechanism for fooling the DNS

    remember - real geeks route around such things

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  43. Oh the irony.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The same was said about Linux, we are rolling out 100 servers this week.

    Laugh now, it is just a matter of time before the format is supported.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  44. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    The rights and interests of the laboring man will be protected and cared
    for not by our labor agitators, but by the Christian men to whom God in his
    infinite wisdom has given control of property interests of the country, and
    upon the successful management of which so much remains.
    -- George F. Baer, railroad industrialist

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...