Turn Your Monitor Into an HDTV
orangerobot writes "ViewSonic has released an interesting new box that turns any VGA monitor into an HDTV video display with support for standards up to 1080i. At $399 it's a little on the pricey side, but according to the review from EnvyNews, the unit performs pretty well." Like the review, I can't figure out what the target market for this is, but it's still a cool device.
Could you potentially use this device with a projector? Might make a great (much cheaper) alternative to a giant HDTV.
...
Yeah that's exactly what I want...a 19" HDTV. If I'm spending $400 on a TV (not including tuner) then it damn well isn't going to be 19". Take that $400, and the cost of the tuner, and you're well on your way to a real HDTV that would actually provide some quality entertainment. That said, it is cool of course that this can be done. Synopsis - cool, yes; worthwile, hell no!
Consider that the best purpose-built HDTV's can only display 720 lines of video non-interlaced and 1080 lines interlaced, and even then only at a refresh rate of 60Hz.
What's on your desktop is a far better display device, it's just smaller, and mostly what you're paying for with HDTV's is size.
There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
TV/Video input compatibility
480i, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080i
RGB output capability
640x480, 800x600, 852x480, 1024x768, 1280x720, 1280s768, 1280x1024
Clearly, This takes up to a 1080i HD input and displays up to 1280x1024.
Obviously this product isn't intending to supplant living room HDTV sets, but rather is a niche product for a niche purpose. Your contention that a 19" monitor is "too small" to show the differences between HDTV and NTSC seems flawed: You seem to presume that someone would put their 19" monitor in the middle of their living room and sit 12 feet away, rather than the more likely "guy sitting at his home office/computer desk watching HDTV". At close proximity there most certainly would be a difference between the two.
Of course I don't see why this product is getting attention, given that Hauppauge has had something similar for a while now.
These will be great when they cost $50 or so. Until then, it is more of a novelty, I can't really see anyone wanting to cough up the money for one of these. Use with a projector seems like a decent idea, but even then, most projectors don't support the same aspect ratios. You can by a hdtv that is bigger than your monitor (unless you have a huge monitor) for less than you can by this converter.
I had the same thought - I really want to get a projector that works well with computers and A/V input like HDTV.
First of all, I was thinking that since it had a tuner built in it could process over the air HDTV signals. Nope! The article claimed it was silly to think so, but the that would have been a great feature.
But that's not even that bad, you can still buy a tuner... no, thing thing that did it for me was darkening of scenes, and much much worse a "slight blue think on all output that could not be removed". If the colors are off, what's the point of putting this in a home theater?
Also, it seemed to have problems using higher HDTV resolutions when running Dragon's Lair 3-D on the XBox.
To be fair, the unit was not meant for home theater - it was meant to provide a very simple solution for letting you see TV and video signals on you desktop computer. It does that OK (though even then the blue tint would annoy me).
Better to waitfor HDTV projectors to come down in price... sigh.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
When filmed content is broadcast in HD, does the MPEG stream actually take advantage of the "repeat field" flags to encode only 24 frames per second, like DVDs do? Or are the extra fields simply "burned in" to a regular 60 field per second MPEG stream?
One complication with these "inverse telecine" systems is that the field ordering might not be consistent between cuts. It will be consistent for a movie that is edited at 24fps and then telecine'd all at once, but lots of things are now shot on film, telecine'd shot-by-shot (with 3:2 pulldown), and THEN edited in a 60 field environment. So any cut is liable to break the 3:2 field ordering. (the video editors I have spoken to about this problem seem not to care, if they even understand the issue at all...)
They both suck ass in terms of app and driver support.
Get the MyHD card instead.
The website for the device mentions watching TV and DVD on your monitor with this device. That seems illogical for 2 reasons. First, DVD only has 480 lines of resolution, not 1080 so you are really not getting anything more out of your DVD with this device. Second, you still need a HDTV decoder for the HDTV signal. These boxes run about $1000 right now. I don't think anyone is willing to pay that much money just to watch HDTV on their monitor. Chances are, if they are going to spend that kind of money on TV, they must be serious about things and will most likely go for a HDTV ready projection screen and the HDTV decoder box.
SIGFAULT
Maybe I'm the guy that's missing something, but the cheapest HDTVs I saw at best buy are above $1300 US. Meanwhile, I bought a used 19" monitor a month ago for $55. If I must have HDTV, $455 seems cheap.
I've got an InFocus LP330 XGA DLP projector that does VGA up to 1024x768 and S-Video, composite (NTSC and PAL).
I've been looking for something that will support higher resolutions in the future. But for now, the image quality from a panasonic DVD audio/video player is good enough for me. I live in a 2bd apartment, and project my image onto a bare wall. At night, with dolby digital surround, it's just like being in a theater. With a good pair of headphones on, it's a private screening room.
It's rated at only 650 ANSI lumens (newer projectors have up to 2000!!) so at night it's perfect but during the day it's not terribly bright. Getting a projection screen will help immensely, I don't have one because of my living situation right now.
Getting a high-res converter box (with HDTV, progressive, whatever) to transfer converted XGA signals to this projector would be awesome.
The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
i'm totally confused by this product.
if you already have a monitor...you probably have a pc hooked up to it as well.
buy a $150 WinTV-D pci card)...hook up a $15 antennae and you are now watching HDTV on your monitor.
This old review at Dan's Data talks about a similar tuner/decoder that outputs VGA signals, but you'll need a monitor that can handle the output. None of this namby-pamby downscaling, but full-fat 1080i HDTV. When someone's transmitting something worth watching, that is. And right about now, it's not looking very interesting.
Anyway, the review's fun, with plenty of acronyms, pics of back-panel ports, and serial port update instructions. Enjoy.
it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
With the advent of HDTV, with truly decent resolution, everything that needs a screen will go to one box.
Think about it. The Dreamcast had the ability, with a simple box, to output VGA. TV tuners make cable/antenna TV on your PC viable. On the other hand, WebTV and Tivo have interfaces that would benefit from HDTV resolution.
What we really need is a ETHERNET-STYLE Video bus. Choose a device (no matter what room), choose a screen, and go.
Most multi-sync monitors will already sync to HDTV. My 5 year old, 15", $99 KDS monitor will sync to 720p just fine. It takes a bit of fiddling to get the aspect ratio correct (vertical size against the lower stop), but I get a 16:9 picture and it looks pretty darned good. It just requires a cable to feed the component signal to the rgb lines of the HD15 input connector.
The advantage to this box is that it will transcode component to RGBHV, as well as tune NTSC and allow source switching via remote. Not something I'd pay $400 for. Of course, I did turn my "free" 15" Dell LCD into a TV with their less expensive NTSC unit (~$80) so I could have a TV in my bookcase.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
I accidently bought the prior version (NV5) because I thought it would was an HD tuner. This is not the case, it only tunes NTSC signals which means it is simply upconverting the low res standard definition signal to whatever the output resolution is. I really can't think of any reason to buy this thing.