Which Shell Do You Prefer?
Pascal de Bruijn asks: "I recently started to use NetBSD, the first thing I noticed was that it didn't have a command-line history. So I immediately wanted to switch my shell, being on BSD my first instinct was to change to tcsh, but many people told me it wasn't any good. Others recommended zsh. I would really like to hear your opinions about shells." The submitter is particularly interested in shell memory usage, and the features you like...and dislike...from the current options that are available, today.
nuff said
Blarf.
Conch shells.
If your plane crashes on a deserted island, and you get the conch shell, you 0\/\/n3rs the island.
Opinions on the Twiddler2 hand-held keyboard?
Personally, I prefer Emacs, because VI doesn't have enough features.
Actually, wait, I prefer Gnome, because I dislike KDE's philosophy in duplicating technologoies that already exist, but in the "KDE" style...
Enterprise vs. the Battlestar Galactica? Enterprise, baby! Battlestars always catch on fire, as if they were made of rice-paper.
No wait, wait... this is about shells. Gosh, I've never used a shell. What is it?
"Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
Hands down the most powerful shell there is.
-- ;-)
Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end.
Shells
Royal Dutch?
Real men have a perl script to search through all .h's and .so's on the system, and make up an executable including and linking them all, and just printing "hello, world.".
Then they run that in GDB and break. Instead of rm they use "p unlink("file");" Occasionally they might break down and use "system("shell command\n"); but only if no one is looking.
I prefer the adventure shells.
The core cannot defend itself. It dies.
"It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
I'll be modded down for this but:
root shells.