Slashdot Mirror
XP Service Pack Slows Programs
AEton writes "Vnunet and others are reporting that Windows XP's Service Pack 1 has introduced a flaw into the operating system. Changes to memory handling code result in programs which often allocate memory (which is many of them) can take up to ten times longer than normal to start. Microsoft has acknowledged the problem in Q815411, and while a patch is available by request from Microsoft Product Services, it will not be widely released until Service Pack 2."
...In the meantime, Microsoft suggests you refrain from running programs which use memory. Thank you for your patience.
In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
It looks like the pirates who weren't allowed to upgrade to SP1 have gotten the last laugh. Piracy does pay! Thanks MS, for pointing this out.
This is really just more anti-Microsoft Slashdot FUD. After all, this only affects programs that allocate memory.
Programmers can easily work around this bug by returning right after printf("Hello World") finishes.
Now I know why they call them service packs rather than upgrades. Apparently Microsoft doesn't even trust themselves.
More good work from MS's 'does it compile?' quality assurance program
I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
It definitely is a conspiracy theory.
you use XP. Serves you right for piracy.
Windows XP's Service Pack 1 has introduced a flaw into the operating system.
Drat, just when we all thought windows had achieved perfection. Back to the Visio board...
(actually, it's because I'm using XP with that pirated serial number that SP1 kindly "de-activates" for you)
:P
Now honestly... do you not think that admitting to piracy (even on Slashdot) is not a rather stupid thing to do?
No wait... actually what I meant to say was, don't you think admitting to using Windows on Slashdot is a stupid thing to do?
---
Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
Each component in Windows is so intertwined together that when one thing needs to be fixed, the a few other pieces breaks, which must be fixed, therefore more pieces break and it will get to a point when all pieces break and it is better off to run NT4, as Microsoft stopped breaking it.
Please direct all bug reports to
This patch, along with the fact that MS won't be releasing a patch for that recent gaping hole in NT4, reminds me of a scene...
(Read along in a mock British-imitating-French accent, ala the castle scene in Monty Python's Holy Grail)
Microsoft Engineer: We've got a problem here, chaps!
MS Users (All, Amongst Selves): Well, how about a patch then?
Microsoft Engineer: Uh, we've already got one, you see.
MS User 1: Are you sure he's got one?
MS User 2: He says they've already got one!
Microsoft Engineer: Oh, yes. It's very nice-a.
MS Engineers: [chuckling]
MS Users: Well, u-- um, can we come up and have a look?
MS Engineer: Of course not! You are clueless types-a!
MS Users: If you will not show us the patch, we shall switch all our systems to Linux!
MS Engineer: You don't frighten us, clueless pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottom, sons of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Linux King, you and all your silly open source k-nnnnniggets. Thpppppt! Thppt! Thppt!
MS User 1: What a strange person.
MS User 2: Now look here, my good man--
MS Engineer: I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
MS Users: Is there someone else up there we could talk to?
MS Engineer: No. Now, go away, or I shall taunt you a second time-a! [sniff]
(With aplogies to Monty Python)
Script here.
What the hell did they have to go and touch that for? Was is broken?
Yeah, so the new Microsoft standard malloc() and takes 10 times as long to load as the old version. But with this increase in time, the customer can be sure that the memory allocations are being done more securly, and in a way that's good for them.
Also as a bonus, no more pesky free()'s. When that memory gets allocated, it STAYS allocated untill you (have to) reboot your system.
Huh?
Is it possible to tell if Mozilla runs slower? That's like determining the exact second the paint started to peel ;)
SecureCRT takes forever to start up.
So I suppose SP1 is to XP as beer is to me: a tool to slow your reaction time. Too bad it doesn't make XP more attractive...
if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll);
Historically speaking this makes it an upgrade
You know it's serious when it causes w2k
Sure, it has some side effects, but don't all fixes?
Probably job security. They have to have people that patch the patches to the those other patches that were ment to fix the O/S.
Whoa, whoa whoa. Hold it right there. Alpha patches? For WinXP?
.44 magnum shells and dry cleaning. I refuse to pay one red cent towards dragging you into the street by the hair, shooting you and then pissing in the 6 craters I will have just created in your body.
You , sir, are one of two things:
1.- You are an evil cracker who is tempting people into downloading your latest Trojan Badger^WHorse code so you can r007 them and be a 1337 h4x0r. Except they'd actually have to be for NT4 to run at all, you fucking lamer.
2. - You are a Microsoft engineer who has XP running on the Alpha processor. Which means Microsoft still supports the Alpha internaly, and Compaq needn't of killed it. I could have had an EV8!!!
In either case, you can expect your next of kin to recieve a very large bill for beer,
HAND.
Soko
(Still mourning the Alpha)
"Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
But due to the Service Pack update, IE took ten times longer to launch! ;-D
-/-
Mikey-San
Mikey-San
Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
Memory leaks are often caused when using streaming applications because they tend to use a lot of bandwidth, causing your internet "pipe" to have what's known to us programmers as an "overflow condition". This problem is often exacerbated by having too many open ports. On Linux and BSD you can generally fix memory leaks by applying a tarball with the "patch" utility to the affected server.
Memory leaks were very common in older systems that used 'bubble memory' and lots of pointers.
Other things you can try are entering the BIOS and turning off the "memory hole". This is unnecessary for everything but OS/2 anyway. If you do need to keep the memory hole, you can try using the "finger" utility to plug the hole. This method is popular with Netherlands programmers.
HTH.
I knew it!! Where else is that money going? I never see any...
I never did quite trust printf(), a little on the seedy side it always seemed to me. How can it just keep taking arguments? That's just not natural.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
For too long have tail-recursive supporters been laughed at and ignored while people used fancy stacks that grew without bounds!
No longer! Now, arise my tail-recursive brethren and let a new day of shallow-stack programming commence!!
Wait - stack growth is not the same as memory allocation? My bad. Back, I say, supporters of the One Recursion! The time is not yet right.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Well, Bill said 640K of memory is enough for most people, so I guess M$ it taking that as a design goal and ooptimizing their OS for things that don't need more RAM than that
"The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
(This is rhetorical and not meant as a troll.)
Mein Gott!
The poster criticized a Microsoft competitor and didn't get modded into oblivion? The poster deigned to utter a discouraging word on /. about an open-source product and got away with it? What is this world COMING TO?!? C'mon, libc is perfect in every way and when a fully-functioning HURD kernel is released in 2060 or so, it's gunna be awesome!
WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
That means apps will be loading 10ms instead
of 1ms on my brand new p4 with stripe raid ?
*going to shoot myself in the head*
- Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
- Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
IN5T4-LLM3T-0CR4P-UPURW-1ND0Z
Works as per SP1 specifications.
Huh? I thought that's what alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.ms-beta was for. Isn't it official?!?
<looks shocked>
This means me and my friend will be able to play Descent 1 without the originally gentle bobbing of the ship sped up to a nauseating earthquake speed! Dust off that copy of Descent and try it for yourself. I dare you to try and play for 15 minutes without getting a nauseating headache!
:-D
moox. for a new generation.
... folks with Macs are yawning and getting on with their lives. Macintosh: more than a computer, it's a way of life.
be an ultimate recycler - buy an old used car every year
Hrm, worked fine here with Safari on OSX and Mozilla on Solaris.... dunno what your problem is...
Oh wait, yes I do. The OS.
Yeah yeah, I gots me one of them thar Itanic workstations at work .... I bought it to run HP-UX, and well, it bites.
...
:)
Ready for prime-time my ass.
I'll stick with my SunBlade & PA-RISC workstation, thanks
Now off to get a nice shiny AlphaStation
Yeah... I often find myself typing "porn" instead of "port"... Gets annoying ;).
Where do you want to go eventually?