Slashdot Mirror


Building a Better 'Mobile $HOME'?

numbski asks: "As a systems administrator, I find myself moving from machine to machine to machine on a daily basis. I happen to be a FreeBSD/MacOS X nut, so on a given day I move from my 17" iMac at home, to my 12" Powerbook at work, to any one of my 16 FreeBSD Servers. That's not to mention any of the Win2k Servers that have Cygwin loaded. All of that said, there is a longing in me to have a simple $HOME that all of my systems use and understand. I've considered the Knoppix way of dealing with this problem using a USB key device from this previous Slashdot article, however I don't know how many systems I could get away with consistently having my USB device picked up and used correctly without scripting changes to fstab, not to mention the issue of choosing a filesystem that just about every OS will recognize: FAT32. Windows is going to be unhappy no matter what I'm afraid, as it doesn't understand symlinking. c:\Documents and Settings\$USER can't just be moved off to another volume. The one glimmer of hope I have is this article on ftpfs and webdavfs. Using these one should be able to set up a single, persistent home that follows you from machine to machine over the internet. I guess I would like to know how others have gone about setting up a mobile $HOME. I look forward to having all of my preferences, dotfiles, and bookmarks follow me around."

12 of 41 comments (clear)

  1. No good answer by Phexro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, you have two issues to deal with. First and foremost is simply getting access to your data, and the second (and harder) is making that data usable to whatever os/apps you may be using.

    For example, I use Konqueror on my Linux box(en), but use Mozilla on Mac OS X. How do you get bookmarks from one browser to work on the other?

    As for the first problem, NFS works enough for LANs, but I sure wouldn't want to use it over the public 'net.

    Coda seems promising, but I've never found a distro that actually supports it, and there's a fair amount of manual stuff you have to do to use it. I've never managed to get it working properly, but from what I understand, it's somewhat similar to CVS in that you have to update/commit. This has the advantage of working when disconnected.

    InterMezzo also has some promise, but I haven't played with it as of yet.

    USB keys seem like a better idea, until you realize that if you lose the little sucker, you're SOL. So, keep backups. Also, I keep a ridiculous amount of stuff in my home directory - multiple GBs - so being able to move a few hundred MB at a time just doesn't work for me.

    1. Re:No good answer by martinde · · Score: 3, Interesting

      An alternative to a true distributed filesystem is Unison , a user-space daemon that keeps filesystems automagically synced using rsync. I have not used it myself, but I saw reference to it nested somewhere in here and thought it looked interesting.

  2. Have a macro create it on each system. by WGR · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why should $HOME be the same on each system. Why not have a expression in .login or Windows login.bat create a value that points to the Home location on each machine?
    For example on a Windows XP machine your login profile script would do
    set HOME="%HOMEDRIVE%\%HOMEPATH%"

    in Cygwin it would be
    export HOME="$HOMEDRIVE/$HOMEPATH"

    etc. depending on the OS.
    So you would use $HOME (or %HOME% in Windows) whenever you wanted the home location.

  3. My incarnation by Jahf · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm about to implement a mobile $HOME at my home ... my plan is to use a main server to store the data. I'm plannint to use the Intermezzo fs for my laptops so that they can run connected to the network or not (Intermezzo caches data, so I can take my laptop on the road, continue to work on documents, and when I plug back into my home network it will populate my edits back to the server). For these machines and my linux desktop I'm planning to roam everything in $HOME so that I have a single install of custom fonts, Star Office, mozilla settings, etc.

    However, I'm giving up on having a roaming desktop between Windows boxes and my wife's iMac. For those I'm just using Samba / Netatalk to link to the documents and bookmark files but not roaming anything else. It's just not worth the hassle for me to try and make those systems any more portable.

    I did consider using the Unison service to do synchronization between Windows and Linux, but I think I'm happier with Intermezzo since I can afford the dedicated partition space on the Linux machines. I really do wish that Intermezzo could support the sharing of individual files, but then it would just be a synchronizer, not a filesystem.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  4. Here's what I do - not very elegant by leehwtsohg · · Score: 2, Informative

    As was pointed out already, there are two problems here - one is having a universally readable piece of hardware, and the other is how to keep configuration across different systems.
    I solve the 2nd problem by having 2 directories, called .laptop and .desktop
    and a directory called .cur_dot that is linked on my laptop to .laptop, and on the desktop - .desktop (!) .kde is linked to .cur_dot/.kde
    dot files that need to be the same on both systems sit in .common_dot, and are linked correctly. So .tcshrc is linked to .common_dot/.tcshrc
    If I really wanted, I could trace down the various bookmark and cache files in .kde and place some of them in .common_dot.
    I can thus rsync my home directory easily, just taking care not to overwrite .cur_dot
    This can easily be extended to cover several systems. I wrote a couple of things to make life easier, but overall it is quite a pain to keep track of every new dot file that a program generates....

  5. I'm working on something like that by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 3, Informative

    but it's not a total solution.
    What I want to do is base it around Mozilla.
    The Plan is to keep the profile directory on a website, and use Mozilla Roaming profiles to log in from different machines.(doesn't work yet) If there's files I need I'll keep them in the profile directory. If all your machines are connected, and all your tools are browser based, then that's all you'd need.
    Here's to hoping that I can get ZillaVilla.com up and running sometime this century. if anyone has any feedback, contributions, Ideas, insight, whatever, don't hesitate to send them my way via ZillaVilla.com/forum

  6. CVS by DrewFish · · Score: 2, Informative

    I keep the inportant bits of my system in a CVS repository. It's not the most elegant, as it requires some work to "stitch" the checked out directory into all the places programs look for configuration info.

    Plusses: tolerant of transient network trouble; can keep per-machine mods (just don't check them in); one universal distributed set of vim tweaks, yeah!

    Minuses: each ~/.config file symlinked into the directory (ugg); per-machine mods requires a bit of a CVS dance sometimes; most probably unix-only

    A big caveat with this is that I've only used it with two systems, both running the same version of the same distro. So, umm..., there are most likely complications abound.

  7. Re:Symlinking not needed by stubear · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only that but you can change the user's home folder through the User Properties in the MMC. You can set a local path or a path on a connected network drive.

  8. An idea... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) In Win2K...
    Change the Logon path for yourself... run
    mmc.exe %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\lusrmgr.msc
    And find yourself, go to properties, then profile, then set the Logon path to the drive letter (and perhaps a safety-subfolder) that contains your user profile when the USB key is attached. AFAIK it supports UDF filesystems on zip-like things as well (you may need UDF tools like DirectCD if it doesn't work)

    2) In Unix...
    In FreeBSD and Linux, you should be able to create and write to UDF filesystems on anything that looks like a SCSI device (IE a USB flash disk). And OSX 10.1 is UDF-ready for reading and writing on arbitrary devices (incl. usb hard disks/flash disks). Set up your /etc/fstab file to recognize but not automagically mount /mnt/dongle (noauto), then configure your automounter to mount it when you access it. Make sure you add support for umass under FreeBSD, and usb-storage in Linux. Then, set up an auto.home NIS map and again use your favorite automounter to map /home/yourname to /mnt/dongle.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  9. Used an online service instead by kriston · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even at home, not just at work, I use several computers. I tried having a "mobile home" various ways, like the pathetic Netscape Roaming Profiles. I ended up settled on just using Yahoo to handle all my mail ("mail plus" product), address book, notepad, and file storage ("briefcase" product). I determined that all I really needed everywhere was the administrative office-keeping stuff (mail) and some files to download (briefcase). All the software development and systems administration stuff that had to be kept locally on a machine turned out to be very few things: a few dot-files (.emacs, .kermrc, .profile) and copy of Emacs 19.34b built to work from $HOME directory. I keep those files in Yahoo Briefcase.

    Another alternative is to use a hosting provider and access your files remotely from there--same results as using Yahoo but doesn't require a web browser

    Kris

    --

    Kriston

  10. CVS works for me by kuhneng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm doing exactly what you're talking about using CVS.

    Everything I care about lives in huge CVS project, currently hosted on a laptop. In my case, this comes to 7GB, mostly in my photo gallery.

    For servers (Solaris) at work, everything shares one NFS mounted home directory, which has a checkout of everything but my photos (due to quota limits). My personal work machine (Win2k, yuck) has its own complete checkout, with a few partial checkouts to put configuration files where different programs want them. My home machine (OS X) has a complete checkout.

    This setup works for everything except bookmarks, where I find myself using IE on Windows, Netscape in Unix, and Safari on OS X. For bookmarks, I've moved to the "My Yahoo" service, which keeps everything online and accessable with one click from my home page.

    By the way, I'd strongly recommend configuring CVS to default to binaries unless told otherwise for this kind of config. It's a nasty surprise to realize that CVS just mangled all of your .xyz binary files trying to do linefeed conversion, just because you forgot to tell it otherwise.

  11. VNC? by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I know of many people (including myself) who set their "real" working environment on one system running a VNC server, then connect to that from home, the road, etc. via SSH. Not the fastest solution, but it works.

    Then if you're really ambitious, build a VNC client for all of the OS's you'll be working on and put them on a CD for portability.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.