Slashdot Mirror


Building ATA RAID and SMP Support into Slackware 9

TheMadPenguin writes "This HOWTO will describe the steps necessary to build support into Slackware Linux 9.0 for Symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) and a Promise Ultra ATA RAID redundant drive array. By default, there is no support for these configurations unless specified through a kernel recompilation after the initial install."

171 comments

  1. Uhm... by ciryon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you choose to run Slackware, wouldn't you know how to do this?

    There are so many people that wanna run Linux and heard that slack is the coolest and most "pro" way to do it. Sickens me. :-P

    Ciryon

    1. Re:Uhm... by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, seriously. Some mildly experienced folks might find this useful, but how is this news?

      Its just a HOWTO.

      Oh well..

    2. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Distros like gentoo/linux from scratch are the new l337. Slackware is no longer the king of hard.

    3. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, gentoo is for newbs, real hackers type ./configure, make, make install themselves, none of this emerge crap.

    4. Re:Uhm... by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

      If you choose to run Slackware, wouldn't you know how to do this?

      Not necessarily. I'm running Slackware 9 right now and I love it, but I've only been using Linux for a few months. I've never compiled anything besides my CS class projects, especially a kernel. I have never made any hardware changes after installing Linux, since I wouldn't know where to begin configuring it. Yeah, I could RTFM, but I have about a thousand other things to do for school and work, and I just want to be able to use my computer. I can do that without knowing much about the internal workings of Linux. Basically, don't assume that anyone using Linux is an expert - that's the kind of response that turns newbies away faster than Linux itself.

    5. Re:Uhm... by Dogun · · Score: 2, Informative

      yeah... slack is a bit too hardcore for the masses. Going with an entry level distro is probably the way to go. Then, if you find that Redhat and Mandrake are your mortal enemies, give slack a try. That's the story of my life. :) Never been happier... though I hear Gentoo is tight...

    6. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you 'just want to use' your computer, you probably chose the wrong distribution...

    7. Re:Uhm... by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      gentoo > slackware, IMO

      If you are a Slackware fan and haven't tried Gentoo, you owe it to yourself to check it out. I like Gentoo a lot, I also like Mandrake a lot. They are both excellent at what they do, that being a source-based distro and a package-based distro, respectively.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    8. Re:Uhm... by AntEater · · Score: 1

      a CS major?
      'just want to use your computer' ??

      Sounds like he chose the wrong distribution AND the wrong major.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    9. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the wrong site.

    10. Re:Uhm... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Gentoo is the Mandrake of Slashdot... You don't learn how to do anything besides run emerge. May as well run apt or urmpi, IMO.

      LFS is pretty cool but time-consuming. Slackware seems to strike a very happy medium. Using CheckInstall to make Slackware packages for anything I compile by hand, I get every benefit of Debian or pretty much all the RPM based distros without all the overhead and central control.

      A happy Slackware user since '95.

    11. Re:Uhm... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Gentoo is the Mandrake of Slashdot...

      Proofread, dammit... Gentoo is the Mandrake of Slackware, not Slashdot...

    12. Re:Uhm... by Shulai · · Score: 1

      The fact is, Slackware is a very barebones distro,
      The Slackware way is the DIY way, there are no config tools and *unstandard* config files to keep care of.
      I guess only Rock Linux goes beyond Slack in this matter.
      Then, usually it is easier than other distros to make it fit for your needs, of course, if you know what are you doing.

    13. Re:Uhm... by Xpilot · · Score: 1

      Great, now we have some dude complaining about too much documentation. Sheesh, if I had mod points I'd mod the parent up as a troll.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    14. Re:Uhm... by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      No way, dude! With Gentoo I can compile everything with the -supadupafast flag! It doesn't actually result in any performance improvement but the placebo effects are awesome!

      Seriously, when you hear people talk about comiling with optimizations under Gentoo, doesn't it remind you of a Mac user claiming his machine "feels a lot snappier" after a minor OS update?

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    15. Re:Uhm... by incripshin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they should have made a few tweaks to it and called it a RedHat/Mandrake guide. And wouldn't a simple kernel recompile be the same in every distro anyway? How is SW9.0 any different? BTW, I finally got Samba set up in SW9.0 so I could access the filesystem from within VMWare ... what a bitch :) Not bad for only having used Linux for six months now if I do say so myself. incripshin

    16. Re:Uhm... by incripshin · · Score: 1
      Sorry about the other message ... forgot about HTML formatting. Should have previewed!

      Yeah, they should have made a few tweaks to it and called it a RedHat/Mandrake guide. And wouldn't a simple kernel recompile be the same in every distro anyway? How is SW9.0 any different?

      BTW, I finally got Samba set up in SW9.0 so I could access the filesystem from within VMWare ... what a bitch :) Not bad for only having used Linux for six months now, if I do say so myself.

      incripshin

    17. Re:Uhm... by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I saw a major improvement with -O6 -march=athlonxp...

      Granted, it took nearly 4 days to install the system, but it was pretty neat. :)

      Gentoo has other advantages that have less to do wtih the "fast" part of the distro. Like the equivalent to BSD ports, for instance, and the runlevel system is pretty damned neat. I have it on smaller machines, unoptimized for sanity's sake. Having pretty much every package be a source compile has a huge amount of advantages.

      That said, I'd never consider it on a server.

    18. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try -06.9 for march=athlonxp-expiremental for a real performance boost.

    19. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, right here we have damning proof that Linux is easy to learn. It only took this gentleman six months of dedicated studying, reading, installing, configuring, reinstalling, testing, cursing, reading, ahh! it works, to get the equivalent of double clicking on Network Neighborhood. Linux is definitely ready for the desktop now!

    20. Re:Uhm... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      You will see performance enhancements with Gentoo if you set up your compiler flags properly. I believe that the standard compiler flags for most distros these days is -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -- produce code that'll run on anything Linux'll run on, but order them and optimize them for execution on P6 class machines.

      By specifying the proper -mcpu you can see some significant enhancements, especially (I'm speaking from history here, I haven't kept up with instruction ordering optimization since P5) since some of the instructions used on i486 would crawl on i586 and again be significantly different on i686.

      The downside, of course, is that people will use -march=mpentium4 or something and then wonder why nothing works when their system dies and they have to plug their hard drives into an old P2 or P3 sitting around.... (not that I've learned that the hard way, noooooooo...

    21. Re:Uhm... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slackware is no longer the king of hard.It doesn't pretend to be. It just works; it's one of the simplest distros, ideal for tweakers. The init scripts make sense to "real" unix heads, and if you want to recompile anything (or everything) from scratch, it won't stand in your way like rpm or perhaps even deb based systems will. Basically, it just gives you a world to stand on while you do it.

    22. Re:Uhm... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I saw a major improvement with -O6 Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that gcc, while it recognises optimisation flags up to 10, it doesn't actually do anything past -O3. Is that not hthe case?

    23. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask the average windows user what the Network Neighborhood icon is for, and you'll probably get some pretty silly answers. Windows users are clueless too.

    24. Re:Uhm... by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      That is a good question. The last time I really spent a lot of time following compiler development, it was with the egcs branch, which had distinct optimizations up to 06. (pgcc, another branch, had 9 of them.) It's very possible that this is not the case after egcs and gcc merged. Another person that I know has mentioned this to me, but when I pointed out the egcs optimizations, he wasn't sure if what you were describing was still the case. One of these days I'll look into it, but really, you can put anything you want after the -O flag and it'll just lower than number to the highest optimization... Of course, you already know that.

      Regardless, I have seen a huge improvement over my old debian system. O3 certainly would help over debian's compiles, but debian also compiles for (around 8 months ago) an i586 "standard" CPU target, so the -march isn't hurting things, either. That, and binary packages rely heavily on the package maintainers optimizations. Gentoo gives me the opportunity to change that pretty easily (packages which have known problems with optimizations are forced to do otherwise).

      I must admit at first that the notion of speed was the reason I tried gentoo, but really that's not the reason I enjoy it anymore. I listed those in the parent.

    25. Re:Uhm... by staed · · Score: 1

      slackware was the first linux distribution i ever used (exept from 15 min of redhat installation) and i'm still sticking to it. slackware is imho a perfect n00b distribution, as long as the n00b _wants_ to learn. it's not cool, it's functional. i never expected it to work out of the box, still don't ;)

      but, a howto like this one should definitely not be slackware specific. doesn't take much writing to include others as well.

      (If you choose to run Linux, wouldn't you know how to do this?) ;)

  2. Why Slackware by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative
    Why is this Slackware specific. These instructions would work on most distros (with one or two small changes of where the boot kernel is kept). A better title would have been:

    Building ATA RAID and SMP Support into Your Kernel

    Those complaints asside, the guy knows what he's doing, so if you want to run RAID or SMP on your kernel, give it a read.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Why Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about

      Building ATA RAID and SMP Support Into Your Linux Kernel

      ? There are other kernels that can be rebuilt, you know...

    2. Re:Why Slackware by baywulf · · Score: 1

      "Why is this Slackware specific. These instructions would work on most distros (with one or two small changes of where the boot kernel is kept)."

      That's because most other distributions already have a precompiled version of the SMP kernel.

    3. Re:Why Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when???

      I've compiled custom kernels on SuSE and Redhat distros for years.. Its not like they have a "NON-DISTRO KERNEL DETECTOR" that will cause them to break on bootup

    4. Re:Why Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time I've EVER had a custom kernel compile cause problems was with Mandrake and their "supermount" option that wasn't part of the regular kernel.

      I don't know where you get "a lot" from... Probably just making shit up.

    5. Re:Why Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I don't know where you get "a lot" from... Probably just making shit up.

      No, AC, you are making shit up.

      Fuck I hate ACs. Don't even know why I bother replying consider they don't even read my fucking comments. Let me quote for you, dumbass (with emphasis on what you didn't read, shit for brains):

      Because, quite simply, a lot (not all) of other distros quit working well ( as in automated ) if you use a handbuilt kernel. Since (unlike these distros) slackware works very well with a handbuilt kernel, it's become slackware specific (which sucks, IMHO).

      Oh, and BTW: FYAD.

    6. Re:Why Slackware by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Its not like they have a "NON-DISTRO KERNEL DETECTOR" that will cause them to break on bootup

      I didn't say they would break whatsoever. I did say that you would have problems with what's supposed to make these other distros so great (namely the autoconfig). Has redhat (et al) fixed their autoconfig to support monolithic kernels yet? I very, very, highly doubt it. If you plan to configure your box by hand, what makes RedHat (et al) so choice?

      Please read more closely before you put words in people's mouths, most especially when others can see the comment. It can make you look quite silly.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Why Slackware by msoltysiak · · Score: 1

      well, slackware is seen by most professional users - that is, engineers, mathematicians, phyicists, chemists, etc -- as the best linux distribution of all time!!

  3. This just in... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the office of Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf (aka Baghdad Bob):

    "Symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) and a Promise Ultra ATA RAID redundant drive arrays in Linux do not exist! It is a trick by the coalition forces!"

    More at 11.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:This just in... by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      I think we have a replacement for 'In Soviet Russia....'!!!!!

      -Colin

      PS: In Soviet Russia Symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) and Promise Ultra ATA RAID redundant drive arrays build YOU into Slackware 9!

    2. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude that guys the greatest stand up comedian to come along in years.

      "There are no American mercenaries in Baghdad!"

      Said as M1A2 tanks can be plainly seen rolling past in the distance.

    3. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, you're funny. Not.

      And you lot wonder why everybody else despises Americans...

    4. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know!!11!!!

      we peeople of france reconize that the iraqi information minister presents the real deal on whats happeneing in iraq, not the americans

    5. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retard. You really have no sense of shame, do you? You probably think everybody loves your country for being a symbol of freedom and prosperity or whatever. CLUE: WE HATE YOU ARROGANT SHITHEADS.

    6. Re:This just in... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Well, there aren't.

      There are US troops in Baghdad, but the Mercenaries never showed up (They're too busy fighting France's Chocolate War in Cote d'Ivoire)

      Ain't it wonderful when spin contradicts itself?

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    7. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's okay, we own you buttpuppet. Now get a-suckin'.

  4. Generic HOWTO would have sufficed? by Lefty2446 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I see it there is nothing drastically different with Slack to require a Slack specific HOWTO.

    This only complicates things more.
    http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Kernel-HOWTO.html

    Would have sufficed,

    Adrian

  5. Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by farrellj · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Most of us Slackware Users already can do this, in our sleep...if you haven't compiled a Kernel a couple of hundred times, you probably aren'ta Slackware user!

    Just this past week, I compiled kernels for use on IBM X series e-server SMP systems and ServeRaid (ips) or MTP Fusion Chipsets...plus sound card support...A little tricky, and but no biggie.

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow j00 are a 733t g0d
      can I w0r5h1p j00?

    2. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by Dogun · · Score: 1

      Hey, can I be a god too?

    3. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is true, even if it used to be. I'm still pretty new to linux, and I use Slack. I use slack because it respects standards. For instance, I was using Red Hat, and whenever I would ask my linux friends how to do something, they would reply with something along the lines of "just add such and such a line to such and such a file." Using Red Hat, this didn't work, because Red Hat put a lot of its configuration stuff in weird places. Now I'm using Slackware (installed with the help of a friend) and I'm learning linux faster than ever - and loving it.

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    4. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by BJH · · Score: 1

      No. You can be a badly-abused servant of the gods if you like, though.

    5. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real cool admins don't need to compile all that stupid shit. It's already compiled into modules on your Mandrake distro and you just load the ones you need. In fact, kudzu should set that shit up for you. Compiling kernels is hard.

    6. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many distros do thing there "own way". Just because Red Hat does the same doesn't mean its some nonstandard mess. Red Hat like it or not is in fact the "standard" for linux.

      So really if you can't figure out the Red Hat way then your out of touch with what the majority think of as the one true linux. Also its a lot more likely that most people would know how to configure Red Hat than a minority OS like Slackware.

      I'm not playing favorites here, that's just how it is and only someone in total denial would argue against Red Hat's popularity.

      If it makes you feel better you may now say some stuff about how Red Hat is bloated or something.

    7. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by cyberkreiger · · Score: 1

      Many operating systems do thing there "own way". Just because Windows does the same doesn't mean its some nonstandard mess. Windows like it or not is in fact the "standard" for operating systems.

      So really if you can't figure out the Windows way then your out of touch with what the majority think of as the one true operating system. Also its a lot more likely that most people would know how to configure Windows than a minority OS like Linux.

      I'm not playing favorites here, that's just how it is and only someone in total denial would argue against Windows popularity.

      If it makes you feel better you may now say some stuff about how Windows is bloated or something.

      --
      Stumbling in the dark
      I hear slavering of jaws
      Eaten by a grue.
    8. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      I realise this is probably flamebait, but I'll bite.

      Calling Windows the 'standard' for Operating Systems is similar to calling McDonalds the 'standard' for food.

      Sure, it's the 'standard' for fast food, whatever that may be, in much the same way that windows is the standard for desktop systems, but Windows has far less server market share than everything else out there put together.

      I'm not saying it doesn't have the single largest percentage of installed machines, merely that it's not the 'standard' and doesn't even have a clear majority on the back end.

    9. Re:Who needed the HOWTO?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your patron God Aybabty intones: "Thou needst a new form, mortal". -more- You feel a change come over you! You turned into Santa Claus.

      "Ehy, where's my presents, damn you Santa!"

  6. Party like its 1996 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god, open source software has aught up to where MS was when they released WinNT! A small step for a distro, a major step for free as in speeh and free as in beer!

    1. Re:Party like its 1996 by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I haven't laughed that hard in years. BTW, you are an idoit.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  7. Re:Place your bets! by damien_kane · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's 7:08 PM.
    9 minues
    It is easier/better/more difficut BUT more rewarding in Gentoo.

  8. Now then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about buidling proper file dialog support into gtk.

  9. Why was this posted again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gotta agree, why was this posted? Lets all compile our kernels. I think I followed these instructions a few times this past week on RedHat... (fyi not by choice. Had it been my choice it would have been Slackware :) ).

  10. it's news. by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's news because it is new (Posted on Saturday, April 12 @ 18:31:18 EDT ).

    that said, like the original poster, if you're running slack you should know how to add stuff like this without reading a howto.

    though maybe it saves few minutes for some people.. and gives distribution ranters some online time.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:it's news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how did you gain this magical knowledge? Were you born with it? Can you comprehend the idea that someone might actually be grateful that there was an existing "M" to go with your "RTFM" comments?

    2. Re:it's news. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *And how did you gain this magical knowledge? Were you born with it? Can you comprehend the idea that someone might actually be grateful that there was an existing "M" to go with your "RTFM" comments?*

      there is _already_, if you just read the kernel comments while configuration, or read kernel howto, smp howto and raid howto. or get experience on some other distro before jumping head on (though, how useful such tainting 'experience' is that some distros offer is debatable).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  11. RAID !=OS's job by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    all you need is to have the OS recognize and support the RAID controller. Actual RAID array building and configuring is a manual hardware task...

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:RAID !=OS's job by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Come on, this is Slashdot. People here don't use hardware RAID; they use software IDE RAID.

    2. Re:RAID !=OS's job by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1

      *sigh* lol, when Promise ATA raid cards go for like 50 bucks...software raid sucks CPU cycles...

      --
      ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    3. Re:RAID !=OS's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but promise ata raid card ARE software they just do a bit of bios translation for the boot sector then its up to the drivers to do the rest in software.

    4. Re:RAID !=OS's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah the better raid cards don't have cellys in them for nothing..

    5. Re:RAID !=OS's job by BJH · · Score: 1

      'Cellys'? I presume you mean Celerons, but I've never seen a RAID card with a Celeron - all mine have i860s.

    6. Re:RAID !=OS's job by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      but promise ata raid card ARE software they just do a bit of bios translation for the boot sector then its up to the drivers to do the rest in software.

      Which is why I ended up paying extra and getting a nice 3Ware ATA RAID controller. GPL'd drivers, looks like a SCSI device to the system, hardware RAID performance, etc. So far I've only tried their 2 disk controller for RAID-1 mirroring but I hope to pick up an 8 disk controller for my multimedia server project in a few weeks. ;-)

    7. Re:RAID !=OS's job by bogie · · Score: 1

      Like someone else already said Promise raid and low end raid cards are software raid.

      When I've had to use software raid on servers I always feel a lot better having the OS manage it as opposed to some cheap wanna-be "raid" card. Those cards are just one more piece of hardware that you have to worry about not only finding drivers for, but failing as well.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  12. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Measure you words, not everyone that uses linux knows how to modify and recompile the kernal. That doesn't make them dumb, does it?

  13. A (hopefully) good idea by 3141 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, how about this for an idea. With Linux, support for most devices is already built in, and either "just works" or needs a recompile. How about, then, a set of diffs for different devices that you can apply to your /boot/config file to enable support? This way, people won't have to look up the HOWTOs and edit the file manually, but either get the diff direct from the Linux-savvy manufacturer or go to an unoffical webpage (like this one) and get it from there?

    So first you look up your device, then you apply the diff to your config file, then you recompile, then your device works.

    Am I missing out on anything? This would be very handy, and significantly reduce possibilities for manual-editing-screwups.

    1. Re:A (hopefully) good idea by Jameth · · Score: 1

      I'm not really an expert on this stuff (in fact, I'm pretty damn far from it) but I think the issue would be needing a different diff for every possible configuration, not just every device.

      So, ATAraid would be one diff, SMP would be another diff. However, applying both wouldn't work, so you'd need a third diff for ATAraid and SMP. At that point, it just gets confusing, especially since these diffs would only every apply to any single given kernel config.

      Seeing as the kernel itself is rather small, it's much easier to have pre-compiled kernels of just about every reasonable combination.

    2. Re:A (hopefully) good idea by 3141 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I don't see why it would need a different diff for every possible combination. Just a minimal "turn this on, turn this on, turn this on". If the thing was already turned on, it wouldn't matter. Perhaps diff would be the wrong program to use, but the idea would remain the same.

    3. Re:A (hopefully) good idea by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Just make the make [menu|x]config smarter by adding some metacategories that automatically turn a set of things on, and you are set. I think they are working on rewriting the config stuff for 2.6 anyway, so it may already be this smart.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  14. yes! by gladbach · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes, I would like to be the 40th person to post a big phat

    "who gives a fuck?"

    --
    "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  15. Its not a joke by Mohammed+Al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Funny

    They really do not exist! Our valiant troops destroyed SMP support along with hundreds of the American criminals. Today alone we destroyed over 500 American tanks and over 40 of the evil zionist kernel modules.

    --
    Former Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf
    1. Re:Its not a joke by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Damit! I should have register that name.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  16. For further reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a list of links from a recent search I did for "slackware SMP Linux" on altavista.

  17. Knows what he is doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOLY CRAP!!!

    Any newbie kernel-rebuild HOWTO should explain how to deal with multiple kernels so you can get back to the old one, if the new one fails, without having to resort to a recovery disk.

  18. Are you shitting me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next, how to enable ethernet support?

    I mean, I know slashdot has some lame articles.. but this is really lame.

    1. Re:Are you shitting me? by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      No, how to configure a FTP and Telnet server is next, then we tackle the ethernet issue.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  19. RTFM by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    When someone waltzes into #slackware and demands that someone help him get it working, they can all yell back, with perfectly synconized timestamps, "RTFM or switch to Mandrake!"

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  20. HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by Fritz+Benwalla · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . if my Mom has to recompile the kernel just to get symmetric multiprocessing support and a working ATA raid array for chrissake??!!!

    -----

    --

    Believe me, I'm as surprised by my comment as you are.
    1. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Most "consumer OSs" don't support SMP,
      and your mom dosn't have an ATA raid array (which almost always requires drivers)..

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    2. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't get invited to parties much do you krypt?

    3. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there were a -1: Missing the Joke modifier, you'd get it.

    4. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh.

    5. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooossssssshhh!

    6. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by gmby · · Score: 1


      Is your Mom such a power user that she needs SMP and an ARRAY?

      If she is then she wont have any problem using and compiling linux.

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    7. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by Charm · · Score: 1
      Funny Not!

      You must of missed the Slackware reference in the article or maybe you haven't a clue what that might mean.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    8. Re:HOW WILL LINUX EVER BE A CONSUMER OS. . . by donutz · · Score: 1

      . . . if my Mom has to recompile the kernel just to get symmetric multiprocessing support and a working ATA raid array for chrissake??!!!

      Well, fortunately your Mom probably isn't interested in a RAID, but you know, if you could run Slackware on your new dual G4 Mac...well then you might actually have a point. But then, Slack's (mostly) just an x86 product.

  21. Use Slackware's kernel source package. by volkerdi · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's better to use Slackware's kernel-source-2.4.20-noarch-5.tgz package, since it already contains patches for some ext3 bugs as well as the recent ptrace exploit.

    If you do use the original 2.4.20 tarball in the source/k directory, you will need to apply the linux-2.4.20.ptrace.diff.gz that you'll find in the same directory, and if you use ext3, you'll also want to apply the patches from the ext3-patches directory.

  22. Re:Switch to FreeBSD 4.8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all you have to do is wait for SMPng to come out and that whole "SMP is easier to setup under FreeBSD" will actually be something worth mentioning.

  23. Linux not ready for the desktop . LINK by zymano · · Score: 0
    Day old article from newsforge.

    not ready

  24. Re:En Fran�ais by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all this is is the "cartman's mom is a big fat bitch" song in French, with the words "cartman's mom" replaced with "Jesus". Weird.

  25. Re:En Fran�ais by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aucun Christ? Pas la maman des kyle? Déposez le CRACKPIPE

  26. Honestly... by HeavensTrash · · Score: 1

    What's the point of this how-to again? All you need to do is recompile your kernel with those options built in. If you don't know how to recompile your kernel I think you have some more general linux reading to do.

  27. Bah. BAH I say! by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

    "I compiled kernels for use on IBM X series e-server SMP systems and ServeRaid (ips) or MTP Fusion Chipsets...plus sound card support"

    Bah. Bigass systems, big disk arrays, whatever.

    it's cool that you got the sound working though...

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    1. Re:Bah. BAH I say! by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1
      "I compiled kernels for use on IBM X series e-server SMP systems and ServeRaid (ips) or MTP Fusion Chipsets...plus sound card support" Bah. Bigass systems, big disk arrays, whatever. it's cool that you got the sound working though...
      I really can't add to this. I guess I will just applaud. *applause*
      --
      Why not fork?
  28. howto get workin by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

    how to get this slackware 9 raid smp to work on my MAndrake?

    Inspired by actual questions in #linux...

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    1. Re:howto get workin by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      For christs sake, read the man page, the HOWTO, or go back to point-and-click windows if you want your hand held.

      Inspired by actual answers in #linux...

    2. Re:howto get workin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #linux stopped being useful like 3 years ago. It got taken over by arrogant shitheads who avoid answering ANY question regardless of its difficulty.

      Easy question: "RTFM n00b!"
      Average difficulty question: no answer whatsoever.
      Tough question: "You shouldn't be doing that anyways"

      For every 1 helpful op there was on there, there was at least a dozen assholes who were probably 12 year olds that just installed Linux last week, but were friends with some other "l337" op on there and gained status.

      Fuck channel #linux and all the pissants who think they know what they're talking about in there.

  29. Re:Err... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mind you, Linux is a fairly complicated OS to manage and maintain. Trying to use and maintain Linux simply requires quite a bit of understanding on how it works as nearly everyone knows. Trying to use Linux without reading up on basic things (like kernel recompiles) and understandin them is like driving a car without experience or a license.

    The "Everyone should be able to do everything" idea is what's wrong with computers in general these days. No, John Doe does NOT need to set up an IIS webserver that came with his pirated Windows XP Pro CD. Keep things simple for users instead. Easier for them to understand and easier for professionals to maintain. (Even though I know "professionals" who should be banned from using computers, ugh.)

  30. Back in my day, sonny... by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slackware was the easy distribution!

    Lol, how far things have come.

    1. Re:Back in my day, sonny... by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Slackware was pretty much point-and-drool (well, maybe type-and-drool) compared to SLS or TAMU. The hard part back then was stealing 40 floppies from your school/employer to put all of the install disks on. These kids today, I tell ya... :-)

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    2. Re:Back in my day, sonny... by pyite · · Score: 1

      Oh don't remind me. I remember trying to hold a stack of like twenty or more floppies between my index and middle fingers and my thumb and then suddenly feel it "let go" and have disks fly out like a deck of cards. The horror.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  31. smp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hasnot smp been already integrated in slack kernel in the older versions? it seems to me that there is a kind of mild confusion here...

  32. mistake, imho by doodleboy · · Score: 5, Informative
    article says: #> mv /lib/modules/2.4.20 /lib/modules/orig
    Bad bad bad. Now the original config is unbootable, a bad thing when you're monkeying around with the kernel. What you do is edit the kernel Makefile and add something to the extraversion parameter, i.e.:

    EXTRAVERSION = -smp_raid

    Then you'll have two entries under /lib/modules, 2.4.20 and 2.4.20-smp_raid. Make the appropriate entries in /etc/lilo.conf and you can boot either one. Disabling a stock, working kernel config is lunacy. Using extraversion is obviously the safer method, that's what it's for. This is all mentioned in the kernel HOWTO, iirc.
  33. I'm not impressed with Slack 9 by Nikkos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used Linux for about 6 years, and although I'm no guru, I've gone through many installs of every major distro on quite a few different machines. This time, upgrading from Slack 8.1, I got bad vibes from the start. The installer flaked out on me during partition setup, having to get the kernel sources separately is annoying (particularly since I have to have them to install Nvidia drivers) and overall I got the feeling that the whole thing was just slapped together. This is disapointing since the creator of Slackware went to the same college I did. (Go Dragons)

    So I downloaded Mandrake 9.1, installed it, and I haven't had a problem.

    Since I'm ranting about ease of use anyway, and maybe using my Imac is starting to jade me, but I'm getting tired of running ./configure, chasing down libraries, fixing compiler errors, and such in order to setup programs. I like being able to download a program and just click the bastard to run. I do seriously hope that along with the 2.6 kernel and a more desktop-friendly outlook, more developers will make thier programs more friendly to install for the average joe.

    Nikkos

    And in other news: Today, April 12th, is cosmonauts day, Yuri Gagarin was the first man in space in 1961.

    1. Re:I'm not impressed with Slack 9 by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Since I'm ranting about ease of use anyway, and maybe using my Imac is starting to jade me, but I'm getting tired of running ./configure, chasing down libraries, fixing compiler errors, and such in order to setup programs.

      Honestly that's not an issue on practically any distro. Personally I don't like the fact that I can almost never get the package I want, even with Debian and it's 10k packages. GNU-Radiusd, PostgreSQL with SSL support, qmail with the patches and options I think are relevant, (same with courier-imapd), vpopmail... it's tiring to look only to find that it's not there and you need to build anyway, and then realize that if you're out to make it fit in with your system properly you have to do a lot more work with the Mandrakes and Debians out there.

      Slackware's cool because it's package manager is tight enough to keep track of what's where, and it stays the fuck out of the way for everything else. That is a package manager for someone like me. I find I have LESS hassle managing packages on Slack than I have ever with RedHat, Mandrake or Debian, even when it comes to security updates like the recent Samba update or the SSH fiasco of way back.

      The simple truth of the matter is that for most updates, the libraries do not have to be updated unless the problem is in the library or there's been some major update. And for production systems, you're almost never going to run across that.

    2. Re:I'm not impressed with Slack 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try swaret.. very cool

    3. Re:I'm not impressed with Slack 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...This time, upgrading from Slack 8.1, I got bad vibes from the start. The installer flaked out on me during partition setup..."

      RTFM! You have to make your partitions before running setup, duuh. Didn't you read the manual? I guess not!

    4. Re:I'm not impressed with Slack 9 by Charm · · Score: 1
      upgrading from Slack 8.1, I got bad vibes from the start. The installer flaked out on me during partition setup,

      Why are you fiddling with the partitions if you are upgrading Slackware or do you mean you are upgradeing by reinstalling?

      Which part of the installer setup? fdisk, formatting partitions, choosing the partition to install to, LILO setup?

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    5. Re:I'm not impressed with Slack 9 by Nikkos · · Score: 1

      I upgrade by reinstalling, then putting backed up files back on. I've learned I usually have less problems that way.

      It flaked out while setting partition mountpoints . After formatting and setting /, I had two other partitions I wanted to set, a /root and /boot. Setting the last one (either /root or /boot, didn't matter) would trigger something, and the installer would exit with a message about not being able to access some file. (obviously I don't have the exact message in front of me :)

  34. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er... yes, yes it does. Dumbass.

  35. Re:En Fran�ais by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like that phrase... 'Déposez le crackpipe, moderator!'

  36. such bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advantage slackware has is its simplicity.

    You really want a newb to have to deal with nonessential, nonstandard unix bullshit like kudzu, anaconda, rpm, shit like that?

    Slackware is THE distro for newbies.

    1. Re:such bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, heaven forbid you make your life easier with newer software that becomes available...

      If we lived according to your gospel, we'd still be using kernel 0.99 and spending a week getting all the software installed because a distro is "nonessential nonstandard unix bullshit".

      Knob.

    2. Re:such bullshit. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Don't be too hard on the misguided ubergeek; doing things the hard way is a badge of honor (and job security) for 'em. It's like some kind of perverted mental work ethic.

      It's also kind of like how when I was a kid, my grandpa would be proud to have us all dig a ditch with shovels rather than use the Caterpiller backhoe that was sitting on the property.

      If you've invested lots of time in 'Hard', then 'Easy' earns contempt from bitter people.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:such bullshit. by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      While that crap may make your life easier if your idea of a Linux Manual is 'Linux for Dummies', Slack's bare-bones BSD-ish layout is absolutely wonderful for those of us who work on systems running numerous Unix's and admin from the shell/SSH. All I need is vi and a working compiler and I can admin my box.

      Kudzu, Anaconda and Drak are more trouble than they're worth for a sysadmin. They are pretty nice for Joe user though, who wants a desktop system that doesn't require large amounts of knowledge.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
  37. and the traditional /usr/src/linux symlink mistake by mister_jpeg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Again, for the billionth time, folks, /usr/src/linux IS NOT supposed to be a symlink to the current kernel sources.
    /usr/src/linux SHOULD link to the kernel headers in place when glibc was compiled.

    Therefore you may safely have

    uname -r

    Linux 2.5.25

    /usr/src/linux-2.5.25
    /usr/src/linux-2.2.19
    /usr/src/linux->linux-2.2.19

    --
    -jpeg
  38. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess things change with time. At one time, slackware users used to know how to compile kernels and do shit like this, but I guess now they are just users.. this is sad, what's left out there that's not just users? Gentoo or Debian?

  39. from the department of redundancy department by Erpo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This HOWTO will describe the steps necessary to build support into Slackware Linux 9.0 for [...] RAID redundant drive array.

    ...or even a RAID redundant independent drive array, or a RAID redundant array of independent (or inexpensive) drives (or disks). Hey, that's getting a little long...maybe an acronym would be useful here. How about: RAID RAID!

    Tune in next week when the poster describes how to set up NIC Cards on your PC Computer using only OSS Software from the FSF Foundation.

    1. Re:from the department of redundancy department by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Tune in next week when the poster describes how to set up NIC Cards on your PC Computer using only OSS Software from the FSF Foundation.

      Will I need to upgrade my RAM memory? I'll have to stop at an ATM machine on my way to Fry's...

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:from the department of redundancy department by Erpo · · Score: 1

      Tune in next week when the poster describes how to set up NIC Cards on your PC Computer using only OSS Software from the FSF Foundation.

      Will I need to upgrade my RAM memory? I'll have to stop at an ATM machine on my way to Fry's...


      I suspect so -- be sure to get "Random Access" RAM. That's the kind GNU's GCC Collection tends to suck down when it's building ATA Attachment drivers into the kernel, which you'll probably need if you want to get the extra source off of your distro's CD Disc and store it on your HDD Drive if your devices aren't connected through a SCSI Interface. On the other hand, you could try to find an RPM Package of the driver on the internet. Make sure you read all the FAQ Questions you can get your hands on, though, as messing around with the OS System kernel can make the LILO Loader very unhappy. You could end up with errors all over your CRT Tube.

  40. Recompile the kernel? HOWTOs? by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    And people wonder why Linux isn't ready for primetime. Here's a "HOWTO" for installing Promise RAID drivers during a Windows XP install:

    Press F6.

  41. Re:Place your bets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APT-GET a clue, install Gentoo

  42. Re:This just in...- MOD PARENT BACK UP- qwertyuiop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To whomever moderated this off-topic, I have moderated you unfair. This reduces the chance that you will get to moderate in the future.

    This joke is entirely on-topic to the point of virtually quoting the topic in the joke. If you don't find it funny, deal. It is not, however, off-topic.

    If/when you get to moderate again, please learn to read the moderation guidelines.

    Anonymous MetaMod

  43. Re:This just in...- MOD PARENT BACK UP- qwertyuiop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks man

    ZC

  44. Re:and the traditional /usr/src/linux symlink mist by BJH · · Score: 1

    Well, I dunno... IIRC Linus has mentioned that multiple times, but I've been symlinking my latest source directory to /usr/src/linux for several years now (from 2.0.32 or so), and I've never once struck a problem.

    But, if you're paranoid, I suppose it's good advice.

  45. Re:and the traditional /usr/src/linux symlink mist by mister_jpeg · · Score: 1

    You won't have a problem until you upgrade glibc.
    Actually, you probably won't have a problem until you upgrade glibc and THEN run something you've compiled afterwards. Then shit should get interesting.

    Believe me, it's not something you want to try to track down, cause once you find out all that trouble could've been solved if you hadn't done something Linus himself told you not to do, you'll feel stupider than a win95 user.

    --
    -jpeg
  46. About Promise RAID controllers: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    About Promise RAID controllers: When running a mirror, or a spanned mirror, what is the sychronization software for? The controller should be writing the same data to both hard drives. Promise tech support has never been able to answer this.

    The readme file says this:

    "- SYNCHRONIZATION
    This is a maintenance operation for Mirrored (RAID1) arrays. It will compare data on drives for differences. If there are differences it will automatically copy data from the first disk to the second disk in the array. This needs to be performed periodically to maintain data integrity."


    Also, have you ever had problems with the array falling apart when there is no hardware failure?

  47. Anything for 203xx controllers? by melted · · Score: 1

    I have ASUS P4S8X mobo and RH9 doesn't support not only RAID (which is based on PDC20368 if I'm not mistaken) but network adapter and sound, too. This is a very popular board, so it would be great for a lot of folks to know how to make Linux work on it.

  48. What about Promise 20276 support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article won't work for the Promise 20276 RAID chip, will it? Thanks!

  49. Promise Fasttrak SX4000 by Pornosonic · · Score: 1
    Speaking of RAID, has anyone been able to get the Promise Fasttrak SX4000 to work under FreeBSD and/or Gentoo Linux?

    "The first low-cost, high-performance RAID 5 host adapter with all the RAID features you want, at a price you won't believe [about $150]" was touted to work under RedHat Linux, however I have been unable to coax it to work under Gentoo or FreeBSD.

    (gnashes teeth)

  50. Re:Recompile the kernel? HOWTOs? by Charm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh no another Desktop OS Moron. Slackware is normally used in things like servers. Therefore your comment is redundant.

    --
    -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
  51. Re:and the traditional /usr/src/linux symlink mist by BJH · · Score: 1

    Funny thing is, I *have* actually upgraded my glibc while doing that, and not struck any problems (then again, I may just have been lucky).

  52. Okay people. . . by Sialagogue · · Score: 1

    I want each of you who responded to the parent post to focus on me as best you can. Looking right at me? Okay, here we go:

    That was a joke. But I'm glad you all spoke up in defense of Slackware and Moms everywhere, because you have illustrated a very important point that might be useful to the Slashdot community as a whole, which is:

    IF YOU'RE HIGH, DON'T GO TO PUBLIC PLACES AND TRY TO MAKE A POINT.

    Weed is meant for simpler things. But if you really want to post high, make it something we can all enjoy, like:

    "Don't you get it? What we call 'humans' are just quantum clouds floating in open space!"
    -- or --
    "No seriously - if we all just grew one fucking tree and sent the fruit to somebody, there would be no hunger! None!"

    Better yet, just kick back with your Kazaa rip of 'Freddie Got Fingered' and your beef jerky and have a cool night at home.

    --
    The only acceptable defense of scientific results is to say that they were the product of the Scientific Method.
    1. Re:Okay people. . . by Charm · · Score: 1
      That was a joke

      Yes but note that I said it was not funny. Just call it a seperation of humours or mabye I'm just so sick of the Desktop crowd that I see no humour in that subject. So in my opinion it wasn't funny, others have the right to differ

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
  53. Re:and the traditional /usr/src/linux symlink mist by adolf · · Score: 1

    While I am perfectly willing to accept your prose as gospel, I'm interested in knowing some background information about why doing what you say is a Good Thing.

    I've been running Slackware for eight years, with /usr/src/linux symlinked to whatever kernel I happen to be running this week. Nary a problem.

    So, please educate - even if it is for the billionth+1 time.

  54. Re:and the traditional /usr/src/linux symlink mist by batkiwi · · Score: 1

    This is ONLY true if your system boneheadedly sets up the /usr/lib kernel header classes as symlinks into /usr/src/linux rather than copying them. Gentoo and LFS aren't like that, I'm not sure which linux distro's still do this.

  55. /usr/src/linux symlink by mister_jpeg · · Score: 1

    There's plenty of info available googling - check the lkml archives for Linus' position on the subject.

    basically, /usr/src is a system directory. When you compile libs, /usr/src/linux is where your system is going to look for symbol/function definitions. These must be the same headers that glibc was compiled with.

    otherwise, look at my reply to the other reply. My experience was upgrading glibc, upgrading the kernel (changing the symlink), and proceeding to compile perl, openssl, apache, et al. IIRC, openssl was what bombed. It's been a while, and this was on an alpha, which has had its own issues.

    --
    -jpeg
  56. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah! Enough of those damn users!

    Leave computers to us experts!

  57. Thanks for the info. by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info, MadPenguin. I've been using my ATA RAID controller as just another IDE controller. I've been too lazy to fiddle with it since Slack 8.1, and haven't needed the extra speed or redundancy (Slack with ReiserFS is really fast). I recently installed Slack 9, but I will keep this FAQ in mind when I upgrade to an Opteron machine with a new ATA RAID controller.

    1. Re:Thanks for the info. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDE raid will slow down your system in most cases without expensive raid controller cards. when they advertise "this mobo supports raid" they lie sometimes. it's all done using software raid.

  58. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... the obvious answer would be to use Red Hat.

    Spare me your evangelistic garbage; if it works under Red Hat, use Red Hat.

  59. Promise under linux? Why? by nshank · · Score: 1

    First off, this is by no means ment to be a flame of any type.
    That said, why would someone who wanted use a promise controller (RAID) under any O.S.? If you want mirroring, there is the 3ware 2 chan cards, and if you want more, there are the 4+ chan cards. And, the last time I looked, you had to run the mknod command about a dozen times to get things to maybe work. *searches for major/minor #'s*
    And as far as SMP? Anyone running SMP should know how to RTFM, at a very min.
    One other thing, if your sysadmin is considering deploying *nix for the users, there is a better then fair chance she/he knows how to K.I.S.S it for the users...
    OK, rant compleated, we now return you to your regurlar scheduled insomnia...


    --
    I have no need for a .sig
  60. Why the Howto? by rf0 · · Score: 1

    This ins't a troll but why does this howto exist? Doesn't the Linux Raid and SMP HOWTO cover this. TLDP.org is all you need

    Rus

  61. I'm not impressed with your cognitive skills by espilce · · Score: 1

    maybe you should have looked at UPGRADE.TXT located in the root directory of the Slackware CD-ROM, it is as informative as it is useful. Can you guess why? Because Patrick Volkerding wrote it, and he hopes that you read it before trying to upgrade by running the Slackware installer, which, by the way, has nothing to do with upgrading.

    overall I got the feeling that the whole thing was just slapped together.

    Strangely enough, I got the feeling that Slackware 9.0 is an extremely well integrated and refined operating system, one which undoubtedly took many hours of hard labor to assemble.

    By the way, the system I am currently running is running Slackware 9.0, upgraded from 8.0, which was upgraded from 7.1 by following the instructions in UPGRADE.TXT (here's a little trivia, how many people upgraded from Slack 4 to 7? that's right, none. I was initially very afraid of upgraded because of the strict warning in 7.0's UPGRADE.TXT, but it has worked fine ever since). Everything works perfectly. But as they say, different strokes for different folks. Some prefer the simplicity of Microsoft Windows. On the other end of the spectrum, some prefer the simplicity of Slackware Linux. What 'sucks' to you probably 'rocks' to someone else. I think Windows is shit, but for some reason, millions of other people seem do disagree. Oh what a tragedy.

    --
    :q!
  62. Gee, sounds really complicated... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    Well, I suppose you'd start by compiling the support into the kernel and then, uh, run it?

  63. Kernel supported RAID since RH7.1 by floydman · · Score: 1

    I recall installaing a RAID on RedHat 7.1, it was a bit trickier though, but it did the job.....

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  64. Re:Recompile the kernel? HOWTOs? by Orig · · Score: 1

    Here's a "HOWTO" for installing Promise RAID drivers during a Windows 2000 Server install:

    Press F6.

    Better?

  65. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and what then when John Doe siis Jack Doe running his webserver and wants to do it too?

  66. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well i guess you can get in here and configure my computer do all the funny stuff i want it to do? for free, of course.

  67. Re:and the traditional /usr/src/linux symlink mist by Xpilot · · Score: 1

    I don't think any modern and popular Linux distro does this. I know Slack doesn't.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  68. Re:Recompile the kernel? HOWTOs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot step 2. Watch windows bluescreen and kernel dump all your memory to various parts of your harddrive randomly.

  69. Re:Recompile the kernel? HOWTOs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL!!!1111111 ITZ FUNNAY CAUZ M$ IS THE SUX0RZ! YOU IZ SO FUNNAY!!!!111

  70. Re:Recompile the kernel? HOWTOs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, step 2 is install everything and be up and running in 30 minutes to an hour instead of spending nine days trying to figure out whether you have to pass -foo --bar to recompile the kernel instead of --foo -bar.

    Some of us like Windows for a reason.

  71. Well... by espilce · · Score: 1

    She might be using Slackintosh. But I think there's about an ice cube's chance in hell that anyone's mom is using Slackware, let alone Slackintosh on a new G4 power Mac...

    --
    :q!
  72. Of course! For goodness sake! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    How can I have missed something so obvious.

    It sucks to be me.

    I'll throw my sorry self in a cage full of hungry penguins. DO not blame anybody for my untimely but just demise.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.