Slashdot Mirror


Apple Releases Mac OS X 10.2.6

Numeric writes "Apple has released 10.2.6 update, which you can read in detail. Here's a partial list: Addresses an issue for Mac OS X 10.2.5 in which a kernel panic message may appear if certain USB hubs or devices are connected. Addresses an issue for Mac OS X 10.2.5 in which English is the default language and Asian language scripts are not be available in the International preference pane, if a script's font is not available. Address Book now supports the Sony Ericsson T610 phone."

37 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Repair Permissions by mgaiman · · Score: 3, Informative

    As always, it is a good idea to repair your permissions after an OS update (though this update isn't huge). It always seems to speed things up a little for me.

    Applications/Utilities/Disk Utility

    1. Re:Repair Permissions by foniksonik · · Score: 5, Informative

      It also does a fsck -y to the system... and runs the rest of the standard UNIX maintenance jobs, like log rotation, etc. There is a slim chance you would see a noticeable difference.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Repair Permissions by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two questions:

      - Why are the permisions not installed correctly in the first place?

      - Why is it called 'repair permissions', when it actually runs a slew of other tests like fsck?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:Repair Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      fsck -y is run every time the system is started up- it happens during the grey apple sprocket screen, unless of course, you have enabled file journalling on your system:

      sudo diskutil enableJournal /

    4. Re:Repair Permissions by switcha · · Score: 3, Funny
      Why is it called 'repair permissions', when it actually runs a slew of other tests like fsck?

      Because, due to the nature of the marketing of this product, it's made to be "Grandma Friendly".

      Doesn't "Repair Permissions" sound better than "I'm gonna do a whole bunch of shit to your hard drive right about now buddy. You sure you want to do this?"?

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    5. Re:Repair Permissions by Matty_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      What do you mean? There are two sets of options: Verify/Repair Permissions and Verify/Repair Disk.

    6. Re:Repair Permissions by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Informative
      - Why are the permisions not installed correctly in the first place?
      - Why is it called 'repair permissions', when it actually runs a slew of other tests like fsck?
      Right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing. The permissions/privs get mucked up when an installer or coder doesn't set them up correctly. "Repairing" them checks the existing permissions of your MacOS X install against a canonical listing of "the way permissions should be" that Disk Utility has.

      It's worth noting that that listing has changed, and if you repair permissions while booted from a MacOS X 10.2 CD it will make "fixes" that a later version of Disk Utility will fix back. Permissions war! Also, don't run the standalone "Repair Priviledges" program in MacOS X 10.2; that software was for 10.1.5 only.

      "Repair permissions" is one task that Disk Utility does, separate from verify/repair disk volumes (aka fsck) or formatting/partitioning. It also runs on the command line (type 'diskutil' for a list of options; it has no 'man' page).

      Lastly, IMO this is something of a "voodoo" fix. I have run many Software Updates and not seen broken permissions after the installation. Sometimes I do see them. It's never caused me much concern but I still do it. Better go run it now, bye!

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    7. Re:Repair Permissions by sharkman67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I installed the update and after restart picked up an additional 250MB of disk space. I know this because I didn't have enough drive space (500MB) required for the system update as well as QT 6.2. I made just enough space to install the upadates and upon reboot had almost 800MB available.

      The only permissions out of whack were: ./System/Library/Filesystems/hfs.fs/hfs.uti, ./private/var/db/locate.database and ./private/var/run/utmp

    8. Re:Repair Permissions by Tannhauser · · Score: 2, Informative
      What happened was that your swap files were removed when you rebooted. The system starts with one swap file (size 80 MB) and creates additional ones (also sized 80 MB) when needed. Unfortunately, the system doesn't remove any of these when the memory load is lower. The only (?) way to get rid of them is to reboot (a more permanent solution would be to buy more RAM :-). You can find the swap files in the /var/vm directory.

      --
      Stop the continental drift NOW!

      --

      --
      Stop the continental drift NOW!

  2. Re:Kind of a small list by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're probably spending most of their time getting 10.3 (Panther) ready for release. It's gonna be interesting seeing if Panther really _will_ be available in a 64-bit variant for use on the PPC970 machines.

  3. Good... by jnetsurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Hopefully this will fix my problems using my Rio and my Nikon. I had about a 50% chance I'd get a kernel panic when I tried to use either of them...

  4. Update Size by rsmith-mac · · Score: 2

    If anything, I have to give kudos to Apple for the size of the update. While this update doesn't have as much in it as previous updates, it's also far smaller, at under 7MB. For those of us less-fortunate in terms of broadband, this is much better than swallowing the "horse-pill" that previous updates have been.

  5. Re:Kind of a small list by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is a small list of fixes. 10.2.5 was released less then 3 weeks ago, if memory serves.

    Apple just needed to get the 10.2.6 patch out quickly, because it was a pretty signifigant bug for some people.

    Since the fix is probably at the kernel level, the fix warrants it's own patch version.

    This was my first real experience with an OS X problem. Took me 3 hours to figure out that my Godmother's G4 was crashing because of the USB hub. Pro bono, but at least I got some homecooked meals and some education out of the exchange :)

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  6. Oh no! by Daleks · · Score: 2, Funny

    This update erased my HD! It messed up everything! Damn you Apple! I'm going to buy a PC tomorrow!

    I just thought I'd get that out of the way. Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Oh no! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because there was a space character in your Hard drive's name. This is a known problem, and will be fixed shortly.

  7. Re:Kind of a small list by JGski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    :-) Yes, but if you are the one the kernel panic happens to... My Epson 1640U scanner started causing panics seemingly out of the blue about two weeks ago. I had update to 10.2.5 a while back but had brought the scanner out of the garage for a quick project two days before. The timing of both events obscured the cause pretty well. Since my Mac is my primary Let me forgot I know anything about computers and just get the work done machine, this gave me a fright. Did I install something evil? Did I run out of disk? Worst it would kernel panic again within 5-10 minutes of rebooting from a kernel panic. Fortunately I tracked it down to the USB from the logs and presumptively to the scanner. Shutting it off did the trick. I'm actually excited about this patch! :-)

  8. Re:Perhaps not so 'minor' as first appears by Sahib! · · Score: 4, Informative

    The text you pasted is from the description of the "Combined" 10.2.6 update, which includes all minor version updates and security patches since 10.2.0.

    Here are the relevant KnowledgeBase articles:

    --

    I prayed about it, and God said, "Don't do it!" But I thought, "I know better."

  9. 10.2.6 totally screwed my system! I hate Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, not really, but I figured I'd get it out of the way now because somebody is going to say it...happens every time with every point release.

    Anyway, 10.2.6 update went fine on my Ti Ghz. All systems go and everything normal. Of course, everything was fine before the update too. I notice no difference in casual use.

  10. Slightly Off Topic... by macmurph · · Score: 3, Interesting

    10.2.5 really fixed my v.92 powerbook modem 'modem on hold' feature.

    In 10.2.3, when someone would call while Im online, I would get a message saying "an unknown caller is calling, answer, ignore". I would click answer, and I couldnt hear anyone half the time.

    In 10.2.4, if someone called while I was online, I would get a kernel panic and lose all of my work... ouch.

    In 10.2.5, when someone calls, I can actually click the answer button and talk to them every single time. Im really happy someone is working on this over at Apple.

    Im downloading 10.2.6 right now. We'll see what changes that brings. I hope it allows you to resume your connection from the modem menuling. Im tired of digging around for the resume dialog behind all of my windows. I also would love if it put downloads on hold... when Im downloading something, it usually just kicks me offline when someone calls.

    And no resumable downloads in Camino... whats up with that?

  11. Re:perhaps not that small, actually by JJSpreij · · Score: 5, Informative

    The above list is not correct for the 10.2.6 update. Software Update just says:

    The 10.2.6 Update delivers enhanced functionality and improved reliability for the following applications, services and technologies: Address Book, Graphics, Printing, OpenGL, and PC Card and USB hub device compatibility.

    For detailed information on this Update, please visit this website: http://www.info.apple.com/kbnum/n25448

    The too-long list in the parent is probably the full list of changes from 10.2 to 10.2.6

    --
    "These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." --Groucho Marx
  12. Re:but what about my battery by trouser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did 10.2.5 or 10.2.6 fix the battery problem ?

    Did the battery problem really exist ? There's no official word from Apple, just a lot of speculation from disgruntled customers. Batteries do wear out.

    My iBook battery died very quickly soon after installing 10.2.4, but I use the machine daily both on and off mains and regularly have uptimes of > 30 days because I sleep the machine instead of turning it off. I suppose that's probably a little hard on the battery.

    That said, since I bought my new battery (AU$275) I've been running Linux and I'm wary of reinstalling OSX.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  13. List is correct by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not everyone is sitting at 10.2.5.

    New computers on the shelf, as an example, are at 10.2.3. This means that 10.2.6 is small over 10.2.5 only...but if you buy a new computer today, or you haven't yet moved to 10.2.5, and you proceed to install 10.2.6, you will see a much longer list.

    What part of 'perhaps' in the parent caused you confusion?

  14. Re:Kind of a small list by Duck_Taffy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had it a bit worse than this - my Wacom tablet caused a kernel panic on every other boot, about 20 seconds after pressing the power button, while it was still on the grey screen. All fixed now!

    --
    Karma: Ran over your dogma.
  15. Slightly off topic, but it should be an update. by General+Sherman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, so disc burning from the finder is nice, right? It's easy to do, and it doesn't take over your computer while you do it, and it's just nice not to have to use another program. Same with iTunes, great to be able to burn in your playlist order and all that.

    The only problem is that to do this, you need to have a supported drive. Huge bummer. They hardly ever add more compatible drives to the list.

    My only question is, why don't they go the normal route and allow companies to make drivers for the finder/iTunes so they can use their drives? This would make it easier for Apple for one, and I'll bet a lot more drives would become supported. It just seems like they're doing this wayy too closed.

    Just a rant from someone with an unsupported drive (gotta use Toast...)

    --
    - Sherman
    1. Re:Slightly off topic, but it should be an update. by Andre+Breton · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The only problem is that to do this, you need to have a supported drive."

      Take a look at /System/Library/Frameworks/DiscRecording.framework /Versions/A/Resources/DevicePlugIns/

      I have an unsupported Samsung CD-RW. I just opened the SamsungCDR.device-plugin with an hex editor and changed the model description I found there to my model. Use the model description that Toast shows or use any UNIX tool you like.

      Make a backup of the changed file, bcz with some system updates it got reset.

  16. Re:but what about my battery by trouser · · Score: 2

    Hmmm...I've been thinking of going the same way but, other than the battery problem, the iBook is a really nice machine.

    Also, it runs Linux really well. X is fast. And an interesting thing is that most of the hardware in the iBook is well supported in Linux now. Apple are pretty good with publishing fairly detailed hardware specs and there are far fewer hardware configuration variations with Macs so Linux driver developers don't have to deal with the constantly moving target that confronts Wintel guys.

    I bought the iBook so I'd have a portable *nix box. I'm seriously starting to think that I chose the right hardware but the wrong OS. Linux is great on this hardware.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  17. Unsupported CD Burners by Paladeen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, have you taken a look at xlr8yourmac.com?

    They happen to have a huge drive compatibility database which lists tons of drives people have managed to get to work with Finder disk burning and iTunes by modifying configuration files. I have an *officially unsupported* Samsung 32x CD-R/DVD which now works fine with both, thanks to some minor tweaking.

    I prefer Toast for these functions, but I didn't like the *Unsupported* label I saw by my drive in the System Profiler.

  18. Re:List is misleading by JJSpreij · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not everyone is sitting at 10.2.5. New computers on the shelf, as an example, are at 10.2.3.

    Like I said: The too-long list in the parent is probably the full list of changes from 10.2 to 10.2.6. What part of 'probably' in the parent caused you confusion ;-?

    But seriously, in the context of this specific update that's just come out it's not very interesting (not to say misleading) to list all changes of earlier updates, attributing them all to 10.2.6.

    For the specific changes from 10.2.1 to 10.2.5, if that's what you're interested in, just check these Apple knowledgebase articles: 107036, 107140, 107263, 107362, 25405 (for instance 107036)

    I could make you a list of changes since 10.0, or even Mac OS 7.5.... that would look even more impressive. But it wouldn't help anybody much.

    --
    "These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." --Groucho Marx
  19. Re:Talk to Apple by JJSpreij · · Score: 2, Informative

    To answer own question, the very long list is indeed here 70174, but it's for the Combo Updater which lists all changes since 10.2

    --
    "These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." --Groucho Marx
  20. Re:iPod and iTunes4 by stego · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had this problem right after I installed iT4. I had to delete the installed iPod drived (? kext ??) and use the iT4 installer to re-install the driver. Easy enough once I figured it out, but it took a few hours to get there -- I'm not used to having to think about these things... The message boards in the Apple support section had a number of people experienceing thhis and were a pretty good help.

  21. Appears to re-introduce the DNS bug by Alrescha · · Score: 3, Informative

    A previous Apple update fixed a DNS bug where large DNS reponses (typically from Akamai-based sites) would get dropped. The most notable victim was Apple itself.

    10.2.6 appears to re-introduce this bug, making Safari pretty much useless for me.

    Did anyone else notice this un-fix?

    A.

    --
    ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    1. Re:Appears to re-introduce the DNS bug by Alrescha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I generally don't reply to AC postings (as I don't usually see them), but between the mis-information and the request, an exception seems called for.

      In spite of the AC claiming that this is not a OS bug, I beg to differ. In:

      http://docs.info.apple.comarticle.html?artnum=1202 10

      Apple says:

      "Addresses an issue in which domain name lookups could fail if the DNS server responded with a very large reply packet."

      Since Akamai's servers appear to work fine for just about everyone else, and Apple did choose to issue a fix, the implication is that they had a bug. I haven't read anything that points to Akamai - and I did a *lot* of googling trying to sort this out.

      Yes, it's possible that Akamai changed their servers at the same moment that I upgraded to 10.2.6, but I don't think that is as likely as Apple dropping a fix on the floor by accident.

      What I do know is that last night I upgraded to .6, and today browsing is near impossible, just like it was before .5

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
  22. Re:Let's draw straws by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2, Informative

    To quote a Mountain Dew commercial:

    We got hosed, Tommy. We got hosed.

    Anything that uses Keychain access is frigged up for me. Safari wouldn't load without freezing until I denied access to the Auto-Fill list. Mail won't quit. Internet Connect freezed trying to load the password for my VPN session.

    So far that's all I've seen.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  23. Unsanity's SafariNoTimeout by Xenex · · Score: 3, Informative

    SafariNoTimeout is a little utility that removes the 60 second connection timeout from Safari.

    Without it on my dial-up connection, Safari is virtually useless while downloading and/or with a few tabs loading at once.

    It should make Safari useful again for you. It sure did for me.

    1. Re:Unsanity's SafariNoTimeout by RestiffBard · · Score: 2, Funny

      hear hear. notimeout is to my mind essential for dialup folk. course, Cox should be out sometime today to turn on my cable connection and I'll be able to get on with life again.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  24. Bluetooth Modem improvements by gsfprez · · Score: 2, Informative

    in 10.2.4, i could connect to the internet via GPRS on my TMobile t68i without incident.

    for the last 3 weeks with 10.2.5, i couldn't connect often evne after 3-5 attempts. When i did connect, it would often not hold for more than a minute. I'm way behind on my data allowence for the month on my account. :-)

    10.2.6, i'm back to 10.2.4 days.. i can keep the connection up as long as I like... and should pummel my 10 megs in a day or two now.

    i'm using my AlBook 12" on my work desk with my t68i on my desk in the desk stand charger in the exact same position for all 3 software revs. I'm sure its the software, and not the phone or computer.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  25. correct URL is... by bblackfrog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=254 05

    I agree with Alrescha: it looks like this 10.2.5 bug fix was somehow dropped on the floor with 10.2.6.

    To see this ugly bug again is very frustrating. I've been wrestling with this problem since the 10.2 release, when it was apparently introduced with Rendezvous. Rendezvous uses multi-cast DNS, and required significant changes to the DNS code.

    btw, why does the Slashdot server insist on inserting a space between the "254" and the "05" in the first line of my submission...???