Slashdot Mirror


Unreal Tournament 2003 Mac Demo Unleashed

An anonymous reader writes "The Unreal Tournament 2003 demo for Mac has been released - see the story at Insidemacgames.com." The demo has 5 maps, requires OS X, and download mirrors, as always, are hard to come by - try 3D Gamers and Fileshack, also here's unofficial BitTorrent link-age [verified, correct file -Jamie]. It's good to see the Mac community being supported with high-profile titles like this - but what other games would you like to see ported to the Apple-icious platform?

38 comments

  1. droool by redwood2 · · Score: 1

    FINALLY...
    I've got another FPS to play besides tenebrae quake on X. bout time too..

    now only if maxis'll get their act together and port me simcity 4000... then I'll be happy.

    poo.

    1. Re:droool by DansnBear · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about Metal of Honor: Allied Asault I've been playing this one on the mac for a while. . . Quite a stable port, too. I have to give credit to Aspyr for all the games that they are trying to give to the mac platform.

      --

      -= Who are The Headlocks? =-
  2. yay! by y0bhgu0d · · Score: 1

    i just got my 900MHz iBook yesterday... *clicks torrent link*

    1. Re:yay! by vandel405 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, how's it run? I have 500mhz iBook, and cannot play heroes 4 and dumb as that sounds.

      It is SO choppy.

      Anyway, just curious.

    2. Re:yay! by Isbiten · · Score: 0

      Might be because the port is a peice of shit. It runs very bad on my 800mhz iMac too. So don't worry about your computer to much.

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    3. Re:yay! by y0bhgu0d · · Score: 1

      900MHz G3 iBook
      640mb ram
      ati radeon 7500/32mb

      runs suprisingly well... smooth and all. just kinda hard to play w/ a touchpad... ;)

  3. For the morbidly curious by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Informative

    first off, i f-ing hate the slashdot games section color scheme.

    secondly, bit torrent does work on a 550 mhz G4 powerbook w/16 MB agp vid card, 512 MB ram. so does UT2003. on OS X 10.2.5 no less.

    if you're up for UT2003 slideshow.

    Granted, with a minimum system requirement of a 700mhz processor, and a 32 meg video card, the fact that it ran on my system at all is impressive. I get about 0.5FPS by my guess, durring "the action", while I got a decent(?!) 10 or so fps when walking through low poly areas, with everything turned to low, very low, or off.

    what does this mean? basically that if you bought your computer in the last 8-12 months, it should meet the minimum sys requirements (mine is closer to 18-20 months old). good luck with this, I guess I'll just have to stick with Quake 1,2,3 and the original UT for now.

    p.s. i managed to kill one of the bots on novice skill with the flak cannon! amazing!

    p.p.s. shouldn't this be in the apple section, not the games section?

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:For the morbidly curious by curious.corn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      first off, i f-ing hate the slashdot games section color scheme.
      So do I. Slashdot editors, get rid of it! Please!!!

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    2. Re:For the morbidly curious by dotgod · · Score: 1
      if you bought your computer in the last 8-12 months, it should meet the minimum sys requirements

      hmm....Mac users always claim that even though the specs appear lower, they are actually a lot faster than PC's. Funny thing is that you have to have an almost new Mac to run this game that I can run just fine on my 1.2 ghz machine that i built 2 years ago for under $700.

    3. Re:For the morbidly curious by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most mac users don't play that many games. Secondly, that claim only holds true for OS 9, OS X has alot of "eye candy" that slows office & non game applications way the hell down, even with a $400 video card.

      As for apples older than 12 months old, apple released their 733mhz desktop system in February of 2001... it just took a while for Apple's laptops to break the 700mhz barrier (for marketing reasons). Granted, that model came with a 16 meg video card, but also a 4x AGP bus, so you can pick up a 32 meg card on the cheap these days... which would make the age:performance ratio of the apple about as good as your computer, although you obviously win out on price.

      Since you're using my laptop, usually viewed as a lesser peforming computer compared to a traditional desktop at the same speeds, how well would a laptop in the PC world from circa October 2001 fare next to mine? This would be a better comparison.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:For the morbidly curious by gmuir · · Score: 1

      I just have to say one thing to that. I have a 400mhz g4 with a radeon 8500 and 448 megs of sd-ram and I have to say that while the fps is low on my computer it stays at around 20 through out the whole game. I would love to see a PC with a 400mhz processor power this game.

      --
      -gmuir

      "Some people are wise and some are otherwise"
      --Unknown
    5. Re:For the morbidly curious by Lewisham · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree. I'm a gamer at heart. I'm also now a hardcore Mac user, since switching to a Powerbook last year. I decided to move could finally use UNIX in a nice environment (very useful for my CS degree!), and not having to use an absolute brick of a laptop.

      I've played Warcraft 3 and Medal of Honor and such. It's not that Mac users aren't gamers, they actually just can't play any games. The 3D isn't fast enough, no-ones making the games that we all want (*coughcoughcough*Star Wars: Galaxies) without having to wait months after the PC release, or there is no conversion at all.

      I wish I could play games on this thing. I love Mac OS X. the next desktop I buy will be a Mac. I've given up on PC gaming for Mac. That is something I never thought I'd do. But there are so many times I wished I could play Counterstrike! If Apple get their act together when it comes to game speed and development, maybe we'll see the final switching barrier removed.

      I've bought a Gamecube instead, now. I still love games, and I always will. But I will love them more in Aqua :)

    6. Re:For the morbidly curious by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I'm a gamer at heart too. I did download and play the game 5 hours before you even posted this, didn't I? :) I suppose i wasn't clear when implying that most mac people don't play games on their mac simply because the games aren't there, causing a catch-22, no market for games on macs because the market doesn't exist (for the most part, aspyr would disagree).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    7. Re:For the morbidly curious by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Hmm, there is definately somthing to be said for the 8500 then. On a powerbook I have the neutered version of a Radeon 7000, as near as I can tell. It is probably the major downfall for my portable gaming experience. How does one achieve 448 megs of ram, instead of the traditional 512?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  4. What others by Lars+T. · · Score: 0
    "- but what other games would you like to see ported to the Apple-icious platform?"

    Maybe this.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    1. Re:What others by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Oops. Galactic Civilizations. I swear it was in the preview ;-)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  5. Port this: by Paddyish · · Score: 2, Funny

    Minesweeper.

    1. Re:Port this: by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

      This minesweeper game works great for me...

      NSMine

  6. HL2 by rastachops · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be great to have Half-Life 2 on OS X... HL is the one major game that I wish was on OS X, but thats old now, so it'd be better to plan ahead and make HL 2 available within say 6 months of HL2's release.

    1. Re:HL2 by TwistedKestrel · · Score: 1

      Yes, goddamnit! I still don't understand why the first Half-Life never made it on to the Mac, it doesn't make any sense. If *any* game, anywhere, would turn a profit on the Mac, it would probably be Half-Life. I mean, the Sims would probably be the first choice of suits everywhere to port to the Mac, but I think Apple users are a fairly different audience. Please, PLEASE port HL2 to the Mac!

    2. Re:HL2 by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      There was an attempt to port it to the mac, some third party did the port, but it didn't pass Valve's quality controls, and they wern't able to get the network code (highly optimized on the PC end) to work properly. Thus it was nixed. Considering how quiet Valve has been about HL2, it wouldn't suprise me in the least if they announced a simotanious release for PC and mac, just to capture that much more of the market.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  7. Splinter Cell by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

    My old games Win98 based machine is now an 800 MHZ paperweight according to most "minimum games requirements" these days - while my newer Powermac has been working fine. (Heck, my Powerbook runs Jedi Knight II great.)

    So since there are plenty of Tom Clancey games ported to the Mac (Ghost Recon, etc), there's no reason why Splinter Cell shouldn't be either.

    1. Re:Splinter Cell by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

      you might see it too... I *believe* that splinter cell uses the UT2003 engine...

    2. Re:Splinter Cell by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      I had a 450MHZ Celeron system and it ran Jedi Knight just fine - at least with the detail and resolution turned down.

  8. Battlefield 1942 by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    If they ported BF 1942 I could get rid of my PC once and for all...

    Oh and maybe Halo with tools (yeah, right!)

    What the Mac gaming community really needs is another break out title that is Mac first or a concurrent release. Another Marathon would be good.

    I'll shut up and get to work.

    1. Re:Battlefield 1942 by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

      Amen to that... BF1942 for OSX just might push me over the edge and make me buy a new G4 (or G9 by the time EA finds someone to port it).. We all know how much EA likes us Mac people...

  9. Re:Port this: Here ya go by pcmills · · Score: 1
    --
    Ask Slashdot - google for stupid people.
  10. My $.02 by Pheersome · · Score: 1

    Neverwinter Nights. When they say that there is a Mac port on the way, I think they're lying ;)

    Oh, and on a completely unrelated note, why is every single newspost I see about this convinced that there are only 4 maps? There are actually 5: 2 DM (one outdoors (shiiiiny), one indoors), 2 CTF (CTF-Citadel and CTF-Orbital2 or something like that, space-station-esque), and one BR.

    --
    Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
  11. OH GOD IT BURNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll quit bitching about the colors when Slashsucks finally gets around to changing them.

  12. Minimum specs... by Visigothe · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems that the minimum spec is a bit high, as I am able to play the game at quite a high FPS [well over 30+] on a G4 450DP with all the goodies turned onto full. Granted, the sound is probably offloaded to the second processor.

    One catch to this though.... I have a "non standard" video card for my machine. It's the OEM GeForce 3 card that I stuck in a few months ago to play WarCraft III. As long as you've got a good GPU, you should be golden. It is a fun game once you configure the settings [for some reason the mouse is set to *amazingly* slow and useless by default. Once I changed it to somewhere in the 16+ range, I 0wn3z]

  13. Macs by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

    It seems there's something of a vicious cycle going on, I (and pretty much every one of my gamer friends I've asked) would gladly switch to macs if there were more games and software in general that was supported, as they're superior for so many applications (especially multimedia). However, I don't think software companies will start giving macs the treatment they deserve until they're widely used outside schools and the graphic arts industry.

    --
    It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
  14. MAC by First_In_Hell · · Score: 1
    Why not just get a PC if you need to play these games so badly? Obviously there is no support for gaming on the Mac platform and there never will be.

    You can build/buy a pretty decent PC setup for $1000 or so that will run most/all current games and you do not have to wait 6 months to play a slower version of the same title. There is no reasonable complaint that MAC users can give as to the crappy game support. It was never there in the past, so why would it be there now? It is a dead issue. I think we need to move on.

    1. Re:MAC by wezelboy · · Score: 1

      That's the sig of a troll if there ever was one.

  15. The way... by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    The way to get more games to come to Macs is to buy every one that you can, like I do.

    I'm also Lectrick, the guy who originally put up the torrent file, so I like to contribute in general =)

  16. Another quality icculus port by jensend · · Score: 1

    For news on this and a bunch of other ports to Linux and OS X, go directly to the source: the .plan of Ryan Gordon (AKA icculus). Former Loki employee, personally responsible for over half of the Linux ports of commercial games which have come out since Loki's demise. How the guy manages to do it all, I'll never know.

  17. On the other hand.. by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

    I've got an Athlon 1800+, with a ti4200. Paid about $500 for the whole box.

    I get 60+ fps with everything cranked up. And if I only want to run 600x800 (why would I?) I get 90-100 frames.

    But on the other hand...I've been playing the game for months now, and I've got so many to choose from...

    --
    No reason to lie.