Slashdot Mirror


Building Your Own KVM Switch...With Audio Connectors?

Michael B asks: "I recently bought an 8 port KVM to switch between various workstations and servers at home, and I'm realizing what I can't switch is audio! I've seen 4 port audio/video type switches (for things like switching between video console systems) but this doesn't address more than 4 ports and having the adding RCA/S-Video is a waste. I've thought of building one from scratch using Radio Shack parts, but can't find any info, such as a schematic, online. Does anyone have any ideas or sources of info for this one? Belkin seems to make a 4 port KVM with audio, which would be nice, but I need more than 4 ports. Thanks for any help!" After a bit of digging, I found this monster, which does 8-port KVM and audio, but that weighs in at a hefty $500USD, which is rather expensive. Has anyone managed to find schematics to such switchers so that folks, who aren't afraid of soldering irons, can build their own?

80 comments

  1. cheaper solution by rumpledstiltskin · · Score: 5, Informative

    instead of spending $500 or spending all your time building your own switch, just buy a tuner with multiple inputs. you get to have your switch (at the cost of having to push one more button, although if you use the remote it shouldn't be all that strenuous) and you could hook up some advanced (dolby, dts, whatever) audio to it if you'd like.

    1. Re:cheaper solution by TimeTrip · · Score: 5, Informative

      It also allows you to separate the audio from the video/keyboard/mouse. Often times at work, i switch between machines on my KVM switch, but keep my headphones connected to just one machine because its playing my mp3's :). If the audio was run throught the KVM switch i would probably go insane.

      --

      You crazy man? You piss off supahfly!
    2. Re:cheaper solution by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "(at the cost of having to push one more button..."

      The added benefit here is that you can keep the audio going on one machine while switching to the other. If you're listening to MP3s this is nice. Or, if you're waiting for a really long process to finish and it has a sound queue, then you can leave that audio channel open.

      I agree with parent poster, this'd likely be a better option for ya.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:cheaper solution by grammar+nazi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A tuner is a nice idea. I was thinking that one of those $30 radio shack sound mixers would also be nice. You can run all the audio through it and adjust levels depending upon what you choose to concentrate on.

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    4. Re:cheaper solution by oolon · · Score: 1

      Personally I use a mixer, that way I can keep playing mp3s on one computer and listen to the sound effects from another, and still use one set of speakers. Ok it does not auto switch like a kvm would dpo from one computer to another, but there again I don;t want it to because I want to hear the sounds from more than one machine.

      James

      PS for really cheap people with 2 computers use that input on your sound card ;-)

    5. Re:cheaper solution by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      It also allows you to separate the audio from the video/keyboard/mouse. Often times at work, i switch between machines on my KVM switch, but keep my headphones connected to just one machine because its playing my mp3's :). If the audio was run throught the KVM switch i would probably go insane.
      heh - that's why I have a box running a shoutcast server on my lan ;)
      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    6. Re:cheaper solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...depending upon what you choose to concentrate on.

      I believe you meant "...depending upon what you choose to concentrate".

  2. how necessary and what quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless you don't need more than 640x480 video with lots of ghosting, don't build your own. (besides, won't you need a DVI KVM switch soon after your crt dies?).

    make your own separate audio only switch.

  3. the easy way by jjshoe · · Score: 1

    buy a manual select printer switch and put in audio jacks. vwala. how tough could that be? not being an electronical switch though i imagine you could get some nasty "pops" when changing between devices.

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    1. Re:the easy way by quinto2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      voila. Jeez, your spelling is even more creative than the idiotic viola.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    2. Re:the easy way by Mononoke · · Score: 5, Funny
      your spelling is even more creative than the idiotic viola.
      You think that's bad, you should hear some of the grammar used by the cellos.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  4. Re:the easy way - true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to radio shack one day looking for capacitors. when I asked the dull eyed sales associate where they were in the oddly arranged store, she said "umm.....I think the capacitators are over there [points] with the rest of that electronical stuff"

  5. Mix instead? by Piquan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about just building an audio mixer? IIRC, Forrest Mims's "Engineers Notebook" (the one on op-amps, I think) has a multi-channel mixer that allows for an arbitrary number of inputs. This way, your MP3s don't stop when you go to work on your laptop, etc.

    1. Re:Mix instead? by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did just this. I have two machines connected on a LCD display, one uses the DVI input, the other the analog input. I bought a simple USB switch and built a simple mixer using four resistors. It works perfectly.

    2. Re:Mix instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you don't want to build, the shack sells a cheapo $25 mixer (or used to) -- it's how I solved this problem.

  6. Stupid Idea by roseblood · · Score: 1

    Take Switch #1 - Plug in 4 computers. Take Switch #2, plug in 3 computers and the output from switch#1. Now you have a 7 Computer Switch with all the features of your 4 port switch, at twice the cost of course.

    --
    There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    1. Re:Stupid Idea by wang33 · · Score: 1

      I tried this before with a 4 port kvm and 2 port kvm with horrible results...

      Although it looks like some of the higher end kvm's can be daisy chained through a special connector i don't think even the highest end ones will work as suggested in parent.

      --
      PAGERANK++ Robsell.com
    2. Re:Stupid Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use 3 cheap 4-way KVMs (in series! the last four computers have some ghosts, but not bad- 10 computers total - they're networked but though VNC works well, the switches seem better to me.) with acceptable results. For the audio I use Radio Shack tape control centers (but not as many computers need to have audio output).

  7. Here's an idea by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 5, Informative
    If your 8-port switch has led select lights for the port that is active, bring out a wire from each of the signals that drives the leds and wire each of them to a simple buffer transistor and relay.

    Each of the relays would gate the respective sound signals onto a common bus. Use a double pole relay for stereo. 2N2222 (npn) and 2N2907 (pnp) are available from Fairchild through Digikey in TO-92 packages and would be a good choice for a relay driver.

    Likewise, an Omron TX2-5V is a reasonably priced DPDT telecom relay with a 5v coil, also available from Digikey.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Here's an idea by Kz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead of mechanical relays, use electroinc analog switches, like the easily found 4066. cleaner, less power, no need of buffer transistors. maybe you'd have to use a transistor to match the LED output to the CMOS logic, but that's easier than driving a relay.

      --
      -Kz-
  8. sometimes simpler is better by Tesseract · · Score: 1

    If you're just trying to get sound (alerts, alarms , whatnot...) why not just buy some cheap speakers? You can pick up something that'll put out sound for under $10 per set.
    If you're looking for higher end sound (music, et all) then you're probably better off dropping the $5C.

    --
    Show me what you want, and I'll show you how to get along without it...
  9. I am waitng for the telepathic models to come out. by infonography · · Score: 0, Troll

    Forget about what I just typed, Do what I am thinking about damn it!

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  10. USB KVM by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe if you used a USB audio output device and a USB KVM?

    I haven't tried this myself, but it seems like it should work.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:USB KVM by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Haven't actually tried it either, but I doubt you can do that. KVMs have to have smarts so as to fake out each PC to think it always has the keyboard/mouse. Some are even bright enough to hold the state of the keyboard LEDS and restore the correct pattern when you switch machines. Unless you got one that was also smart enough to handle audio in a similar way (at which point it would probably BE the audio device) you would run into trouble. You see, if the KVM isn't faking things for a device each time you switched you would generate a disconnect on the machine you just switched away from and a connect event on the one you just punched up. I doubt Linux could handle that many disconnect/connect events and I'd bet money Windows wouldn't last a day under that sort of abuse.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:USB KVM by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think Linux would be just fine. I have 2 USB mice, an Intellimouse Explorer and a little IBM optical travel mouse (for my 3 year old, the MS mouse is huge and the side buttons are positioned so that she can't grip it and reach buttons 1 and 2 without hitting the side buttons, the other one is the perfect size for her hand). I hotplug them all the time with no problems, on SuSE 8.1 Pro with the default kernel, if you care.

      I know how KVMs work, or at least how they are supposed to work ;-) but I don't think that would be an issue, unless the sound stream dies every time every time you unplug the audio device. I suspect that could largely be solved with scripts, though, at least on Linux.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:USB KVM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In theory, you should be able to arbitrarily disconnect and reconnect USB devices, with none of that crazy 'fake out' logic needed for PS/2.

      (I say "in theory" because I just had to reboot windows to see a new mouse.)

    4. Re:USB KVM by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they aren't."

      Not much you could expect the system to do if the sound device disappears while sound is playing other than to abort. So much for flipping to another machine for a moment and expecting the MP3 to still be playing when you flip back.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  11. Alternative by cei · · Score: 1

    Another option might be just getting a 16 point patch bay... You could either do it with 1/4" mono or stereo jacks and you'd only need one or two patch cables.

    --
    This sig intentionally left justified.
  12. KVM by Naikrovek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Keyboard, Video, Mouse. are you surprised that there is no audio?

    get a mixer. there is probably little reason you'd want to play music on more than one computer at a time, so just get a mixer and put them all into the mixer and out the speakers right in front of you.

    1. Re:KVM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > there is probably little reason you'd want to play music on more than one computer at a time

      Gaming on one machine, turn off the game's craptacular music, pipe mp3s through from the laptop.

      The specific game I had in mind here was NFS6, which had one decent song and one tolerable song and the rest crap.

  13. Don't switch audio -- mix it. by -dsr- · · Score: 2, Informative

    Buy a cheap audio mixer and control all your sound inputs individually.

    1. Re:Don't switch audio -- mix it. by belroth · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at this for a while and can't find anything that does what I want at a reasonable price.
      I want to be able to have stereo inputs 1 to 6 and mix those into either of stereo outputs A or B, output C might be useful too. If anyone has any suggestions.....?
      I'm quite happy to build my own, I just don't have the knowledge to design it or the time to acquire that knwledge, but I can probably build it.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  14. Consolodate by _iris · · Score: 0

    Skip the KVM switch. If you have 8 machines at home (assuming you aren't running a business from your home), just start consolodating machines. In the end, you'll probably save on your energy bill.

    1. Re:Consolodate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize this is Slashdot don't you? Eight computers in one's bedroom is a minimum let alone the entire home.

  15. Get thee ass to a radio shaK by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

    They sell A/B audio switchers and A/B/C/D audio switchers... use the A/B to select which one of the two ABCD switch to use, then select one of those. Total cost: about 70 dollars max. I think they come in RCA only, so YMMV. Good luck.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  16. Seperate switch by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I built a 2X2 for switching two computers to either earphones or speakers. Two DPDT switches, one controls input, one controls output. i1 i1 i2 i2 1 2 1 2 o1 o1 o2 o2 1 and 2 are connected together, i and o are inputs and outputs, left and right. Tie all grounds together, switch L+R. I guess doing that could cause a ground loop hum, but it hasn't caused a problem for me. There isn't really a pop or anything when you switch mine, even with the speakers on. You need reasonably good quality switches though, if the switch feels loose or wiggly, it will probably cause a lot of static when you switch it. I found a lot of my surplus switches were not up to audio use. I eventually settled on push-on push-off switches I scavenged from an old set of speakers, they were power and bass boost switches. This concept is the same way one would build a switch with many more inputs or outputs, you just need rotary switches, DP#T where # is the number of things to switch. Here are some switches The 2 pole 5 position and 2 pole 6 position from there is probably what you want. You can cascade a DPDT and two 5 position rotary switches for 10 outputs with one input or vice versa. Scavaging from manual computer switch boxes is probably not a good idea, since most of those are low numbers of positions, with high number of poles.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  17. Re:Seperate switch (Formatted right) by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note to self, PREVIEW! (Slashdot doesn't seem to do the TT tag the way one would expect!)

    I built a 2X2 for switching two computers to either earphones or speakers.

    Two DPDT switches, one controls input, one controls output.

    (ASCII art deleted because Slashdot can't deal with it.)

    1 and 2 are connected together, i and o are inputs and outputs, left and right. Tie all grounds together, switch L+R. I guess doing that could cause a ground loop hum, but it hasn't caused a problem for me. There isn't really a pop or anything when you switch mine, even with the speakers on. You need reasonably good quality switches though, if the switch feels loose or wiggly, it will probably cause a lot of static when you switch it. I found a lot of my surplus switches were not up to audio use. I eventually settled on push-on push-off switches I scavenged from an old set of speakers, they were power and bass boost switches.

    This concept is the same way one would build a switch with many more inputs or outputs, you just need rotary switches, DP#T where # is the number of things to switch.

    Here are some switches

    The 2 pole 5 position and 2 pole 6 position from there is probably what you want. You can cascade a DPDT and two 5 position rotary switches for 10 outputs with one input or vice versa. Scavaging from manual computer switch boxes is probably not a good idea, since most of those are low numbers of positions, with high number of poles.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  18. Probably you don't want that. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    You don't want to change the audio every time you switch to a new computer. It interrupts the program.

  19. Any recomendations for mixers? by Fallon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've seen several recomendations for just using standard audio gear to mix the inputs (and was looking for something like that lastnight). Any recomendations for a nice low end mixer with 4-8 inputs and 2+ outputs, bonuses for rack mountable.

    1. Re:Any recomendations for mixers? by John+Meacham · · Score: 5, Informative

      the Samson PL1602 is a real nice cheap rack-mount mixer. I use it to mix all my audio inputs, plus it has its own headphone port of the mix, and I can send arbitrary channels back to the computer (independent of what i am listening to) for recording audio from other devices.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    2. Re:Any recomendations for mixers? by Aczlan · · Score: 2, Informative

      on the low end:
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIte m&item =2528831537&category=23785
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws /eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =3023072453&category=3319

      on the high end: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =2529625961&category=41473

      DJ Aaron Z

      --
      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote
    3. Re:Any recomendations for mixers? by DoomGerbil · · Score: 1

      Hey Fal, I haven't seen you around in a while. Where've you been lately? (And no, you can never really escape us....)

      DG

  20. Not too hard... by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is pretty trivial to build; you shouldn't need schematics. Audio signals are pure analog, so all you really need to do is get a switch with multiple throws (3 for stereo) and wire it up to jacks and mount it in some kind of box. If you get a rotary switch you could have a pretty much arbitrary number of computers hooked up to it.

    If you care about sound quality or having the device look nice, just get a desktop mixer. That's perfect for having multiple computers driving a single stereo.

    1. Re:Not too hard... by barzok · · Score: 1

      I think the idea was to have on switch to do it all, not have to switch two boxes each time he changes computers.

  21. Here's an idea ... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1
    Run your audio through an amp. You can then switch the inputs using the remote control, or the big knob on the front. I don't know how many computers you are going to connect, but there's a chance you don't need a KVM switch at all. Most non-cheap monitors come with at least two inputs. I bought two TFTs over the last four months, and both of them had two inputs, one analog, one digital, switchable with an extra button on the front. The Sony X72 even has three inputs: one digital, two analog, and it's a good monitor, too. So if you have only two or three computers to connect, and you consider the cost of a decent KVM switch, you might want to buy just a new monitor. In this case you could then get one of the cheap mouse/keyboard switches.

    As to building your own ... a bunch of analog multiplexers (or relays if you want it to be fancy), flipflops, pushbuttons and LEDs, and you should be done. Well OK, it might also be a good idea to use a microcontroller and program it to switch the signals in the proper sequence. Something like an AT89C2051 and a bunch of 'HC164s to control the multiplexers. You could then also add a serial port for configuration.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  22. Re:the easy way - true story by lewp · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's because she's a girl. Girls just don't understand technology.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  23. Belkin SOHO by Sleepyguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    buy a belkin soho .. they are cheap and they support audio and usb.

    _

    --
    b
    1. Re:Belkin SOHO by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Belkin soho's may sell at a lower price than other kvms, but that does not make them cheap. ~$120 USD according to pricewatch.com. Their kvm cables are ridiculously overpriced. (And you'll need at least two sets of cables to be minimally useful.)

      Worse, they are riddled with mouse control bugs, and its noticably annoying when using Linux. You need to use the mouse while switching, or you'll lose mouse scroll or any mouse control, or freak out the xwindows session. (In which case, you need to do an ctrl-alt-1, ctrl-alt-7 key sequence to reset the GUI.) I have a USB kvm connectors to my laptop, but I have to set my laptop bios to turn off legacy USB support. This means I still have to use the laptop keyboard to make boot selections until there is a login prompt. If I turn on legacy USB support, I have no console keyboard when the laptop boots up linux. (This is a problem when you're away & disconnected from the kvm.)

      The Soho sucks.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    2. Re:Belkin SOHO by HBI · · Score: 1

      I have found the effects you describe to be highly individual to motherboards. I have a single ALI chipset P3 board that reacts badly to the Belkin switch, but the other three boards hooked to it are ok.

      USB/PS/2 power levels perhaps? Do you use an external power adapter on your box?

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Belkin SOHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use the plain vanilla MS Mouse driver on Linux, you will not have the problem. I only got the problem when I used the wheel mouse driver.

    4. Re:Belkin SOHO by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      Its not the motherboard or the power supply. It has to do with the fact that the SOHO is overpriced but cheap assed in quality. Instead of storing and maintaining every mouse setting before hopping to the next machine, it feeds a mouse reset code when it hops back to the old machine. This freaks out any Xwindows version besides the latest, and as one AC said, its no good for wheel mice. I'll sooner chuck the SOHO than my wheelmouse.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  24. 2 KVMs by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

    Buy 2 KVMs and use one for the keyboard-video-monitor. Open up the second one and buy some panel mount 1/8" audio jacks or whatever will match your cables. Cut off the mini-DIN and DB-15 jacks, LABEL THE WIRES, then solder in the new jacks.

  25. Re:the easy way - true story by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

    It's because she's a girl. Girls just don't understand technology.

    No, it's because they're a retail outlet and most of their business is appliances. They employ people based on retail experience only and it's a lucky coincidence if any of their staff can even recognise a capacitor.

    --
    455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  26. mixer by g4dget · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why do you want to switch? Why not put the audio into an analog mixer and have all of them active simultaneously?

  27. Re:the easy way - true story by Cecil · · Score: 2, Informative

    For anyone who is actually considering Radio Shack as anything other than an emergency refuge for "awk, I ran out of solder and I need to finish this!"... Radio Shack does not even sell electronics stuff around here anymore. Maybe a bit of soldering equipment, and some connectors, but for actual electronics? Nah. They are morphing into a half-assed Electronics Boutique but with more annoying salespeople. I am fairly certain from other people's stories that this is a trend that is continuing everywhere in the Radio Shack chain.

    You're better off finding a real electronics store, or going mail-order. DigiKey is a decent mail-order place for USA/Canada/UK. You will find their selection very refreshing.

  28. CCTV by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    try google CCTV.

    seporate audio switch, who knows

    just an idea

  29. Audio, Video, Keyboard and Mouse Switching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What you are trying to switch is the red, green and blue video signals, which are analogue and have several MHz bandwidth; the horizontal and vertical scan timing signals, which are lowish-speed digital (a few kHz and a few Hz respectively); the keyboard and mouse clock and data, which are low-speed digital (c.1200 baud) but two-way; and the left and right hand audio, which are analogue without much bandwidth (20kHz tops).

    Just how much bandwidth is in a video signal? Well, if you have a screen of 1024x768 and it refreshes at 70Hz, that means the electron beam has to draw 1024*768*70 = 55050240 dots a second, each dot being either a crest or a trough leaving a frequency of 27.525120 MHz in the worst case, when rendering alternate dim and bright pixels. Bear in mind also that the device has to work into a low impedance of 75 ohms, so the on resistance - and the switching time - are as critical as the propagation delay.

    The bidirectional digital signals are not a problem. Analogue switches will handle them. Think: switch off = different voltages both sides, switch on = same voltage both sides.

    You will need some really high bandwidth analogue switches for the video, but you'll get away with 4066-type for the audio and data and maybe the timing. Take a look at http://www.maxim-ic.com for parts and schematics. The basic principle, though, is to connect all the switch ICs to switch one device at a time onto a set of common rails for R, G, B, HS, VS, KC, KD, MC, MD, LA, RA.

    Another option would be to mod an existing unit with some 4066-type analogue switches. You'll need a +-5V supply from somewhere. Drive the switch gates from the switching signals in the first unit. A really impressive feat if you can manage it would be to construct a simple audio mixer (use a 2904 op amp) and rig it so the unselected channels are still fed into the mix, but at a lower volume. Then you can still hear death screams :-)

    Don't even *think* about using any kind of mechanical switch or relay. Moving parts suck bigtime and will distort any analogue signal you try to pass through them.

    1. Re:Audio, Video, Keyboard and Mouse Switching by homemademissiles · · Score: 1

      Don't even *think* about using any kind of mechanical switch or relay. Moving parts suck bigtime and will distort any analogue signal you try to pass through them.

      With regards to relays, this statement is simply wrong. A good quality relay is infinitely superior to any electronic switch. For instance, reed relays are available which will switch from DC up to microwave frequencys at useable power levels and have 'on' resistance values which are magnitudes better than an elctronic switch. Bear in mind that a set of relay contacts is essentially just a piece of wire. Very few methods of transmitting analog signals distort less than bits of wire.

      Dont believe me? Check this site out and look at some of the specifications:

      http://www.pickeringrelay.com

  30. Re:the easy way - true story by spongman · · Score: 1

    jameco is pretty good, too. Their selection is much smaller than DigiKey's but it's oriented slightly more towards the hobbyist. They both have good online and free paper catalogs.

  31. 1600*1200*75 = 144 MegaHertz. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    1600 x 1200 resolution at 75 Hertz refresh rate is: 1600*1200*75 = 144 MegaHertz. The video system bandwidth must be much greater than that to avoid ruining the video quality. That's why even the $30 nVidia video adapters have a 300 MegaHertz RAMDAC (digital to analog converter).

    19 inch CRT monitors with a 1600 x 1200 resolution cost as little as $225, so that resolution is becoming a standard.

    It is a big technical achievement to switch 1600 x 1200 resolution without video degradation. IO Gear does it by having special video processing amplifiers inside the KVM switch. Building a KVM switch is not something most people would want to attempt, because it would cost so much in time.

    As was mentioned above, #5923272, a tuner is a good cheap solution. They can be had at garage sales for considerably less than $50 sometimes. Mostly you don't want to switch the audio when you switch computers. It interrupts whatever you are listening. For example, presumably you want only one computer signaling if you have email.

    IO Gear is a little bit flaky at times. Notice that their GCS1714 KVM switch is listed with a "case weight" of 27.25 pounds, but the weight of an entire package is listed as 4.7 pounds. Presumably they mean the weight of a case of KVM switches, but the quantity is not specified.

  32. Note that IO Gear plays games with cables. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Note that IO Gear (at least sometimes) plays games with the supplied cables. A four port KVM will be supplied with 2 ten foot cables and 2 six foot cables. The shorter ones are too short to use in some installations. That isn't mentioned on their web site, that I can see, or in the manual, available online.

    Also, the keyboard controls for switching may not be well considered.

    IO Gear does seem to be the best for video quality.

  33. Cheap Mixing with Daisy chain by FatTux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You could daisy-chain the soundcards - i.e., the LINE-OUT from one to the LINE IN of the next one. The last PC will have its speakers playing all signals mixed and the cost will be very low (just stereo cables).

    1. Re:Cheap Mixing with Daisy chain by satterth · · Score: 1

      What happens if one of the Computers is off in the middle of the chain?

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  34. Re:the easy way - true story by CharterTerminal · · Score: 0

    But how much technology does a girl need to understand? All we really need is a good, sharp knife. (Or, worst-case scenario, a carefully-wielded student ID card.)

  35. Haken, shut your mouth. Just shut it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is a jack of all trades, master of none. Take his advice with a wary eye as he is a know nothing person who seems to have something baseless to say about everything. If anything, his convict uncle works for Jameco and he is getting a penance for doing this.

  36. Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from an architecture so lame it never originally featured audio...so why bother switching it? These things are designed for PC's, Sparcs and Macs et al. always have used custom keyboards / vid connectors...

    this could be forgiven by the simple fact that you're average home user isn't going to need one, and no-one listens to music @ work do they (or at least the boss doesn't think so *grin*)

  37. Found a 2-port KVM switch with audio!! by shdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found this at newegg.com

    It's 2 ports, supports audio & is only about 90$.

    --
    "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
  38. Do it in software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    How about that:

    Machine you work on:
    cat /dev/audio | nc 192.168.100.1 48050

    Machine you plug your speakers in:
    nc -l -p 48050 > /dev/audio

  39. You don't need 8 port audio switching by donutz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, you said you have a mix of servers and workstations at home. Do you really need to hear the Windows bell or chime sounds on your servers (or if you're running linux servers...why do you have them configured to make sounds?)?

    It just doesn't seem worth the effort to try to find a solution to this "problem" when it doesn't even seem to be much of a problem. But you're certainly free to spend your free time doing whatever you want, including trying to hack together your own KVM switch.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:You don't need 8 port audio switching by klaricmn · · Score: 1

      I mean, you said you have a mix of servers and workstations at home. Do you really need to hear the Windows bell or chime sounds on your servers (or if you're running linux servers...why do you have them configured to make sounds?)?

      Did you read the question? He said that he wanted the audio to run through the KVM switch too. This would imply that the only sounds that he'd be hearing would be coming from the one machine that he's switched to currently--just like the only video that he sees is the video from the current machine.

  40. Just get more speakers by mistermocha · · Score: 1

    PC Speakers are reasonably inexpensive. Just get a second set for the second comp for $9.97 at Radio Shack.

  41. Belkin makes one by Steven+Reddie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://www.practicallynetworked.com/review.asp?pid =468

  42. Read Piquan's post above by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    To summarize:

    You can build mixers pretty easily using op-amps, and Forrest Mims' "Engineer's Notebook" has quite a few useful designs.

    Where to get it? Rat Shack, although these days it's often not stocked (just like their 150-2160 UHF-only TV antennna grumble grumble)... RS is going downhill.

    RS is definately not the optimum place to get electronic components, but when you need something fast and you aren't buying that much, it's quick. Digi-Key is far better, but keep in mind that DK sucks for small orders. ($5 surcharge for orders under $25, in addition to the $5+ shipping costs.)

    You should be able to find some mixer designs on the 'net as well. www.headwize.com has lots of audio designs, although most of these are amplifiers and I'm not sure if they have any mixers.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  43. I built my own passive selector using .... by Abm0raz · · Score: 2, Informative

    3x female 1/8" stereo jacks

    4x female RCA mono jacks

    4x SP/DT slide switches (3/16" x 1/2")

    2' jumper wire

    1x plastic electrical junction box

    1x clear plastic picture cover from picture frame. (3"X5")

    First 4 parts are available from RadioShack for a total less than $10. The junction box is available at Lowe's for $1.66. The picture cover you can get with any cheap picture frame.

    step 1: lay the junction box upside down on a piece of paper and trace. Cut out the outline.

    step 2: lay out the jacks and switches on the paper. the 4 jacks go with the 4 outputs (or inputs as you see fit) and the odd jack out is your static out/in.

    step 3: glue the paper to the plastic

    step 4: drill and dremel the plastic according to the paper pattern.

    step 5: screw/glue all audio parts in.

    step 6: flip over and solder all left channel and right channel negatives together.

    step 6: solder wires from your static jack right channel to the middle-left side of each switch and the left channel to the top left of each switch.

    step 7: solder the middle right of each switch to the CORRESPONDING input/output jack's right channel and the top right to the jacks left channel.

    step 8: place the plastic on the junction box and seal with glue or screws

    To use as a multi-out: place the output from your computer into the static jack. Run lines from the other jacks to your computer speakers, stereo, tv, headphones ... When a switch is in the on position, that jack will get signal. When it is off, it won't.

    To use as a multi input, connect your speakers to the static jack. Connect all inputs to the other 4 jacks. When the switch for a jack is on, it's signal will goto the speakers. When it is off, it wont.

    I built this cause I was sick of switching my sound cables everytime I wanted to switch from my computer speakers (when playing games) to my TV (when watching DVDs on my DVD out) to my headphones (when listening to music while coding and my roommate was sleeping).

    CAUTION: this is a PASSIVE system. IF you are using it as a multi-out, there isn't much danger. You will just get decreased volume as you turn on more outputs because the signal will be split. If you are using it as a multi-INPUT system and try to input several signals to the speakers at once, you can run the risk of blowing them.

    If you have any questions, reply. I'll give you my ICQ and write up some clearer diagrams.

    -Ab

    --
    Nothing fails quite like prayer.
  44. Isn't Radio Shack a proper noun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it is, should it not be capitalized?

    Of your three (non-sig) sentences, "A tuner is a nice idea." Seems closest to error free. It does beg the question though, "Is a tuner really an idea?" It seems more like an object to me. Would it more accurately capture your meaning to say, "To solve this problem with a tuner would be a nice idea?"

    The AC's watch the watchers.

  45. Don't build a switch, build a passive mixer by BrynM · · Score: 1
    A passive mixer is easy to make, requires no power and can be less redundant. You already have mixers built into each machine (software), so don't waste cash on a mixer. You won't have to throw two switches. Unless you're trying to monitor live feeds, mixing the audio might be a good end result - play MP3s on one machine, while playing a game on another. You can find plans and more by searching.

    I actually just daisy chain the inputs of my PCs. Take the line out of one. Plug it into the line in of the next. Rinse. Repeat. The only drawback is trying to keep track of two channels (in and out) on each software mixer instead of just the line outs. The advantage is that the final PC in the chain acts as a master volume.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  46. Mixer is the way to go. by AutomatonD · · Score: 1

    I have a set up were I like to watch movies on one machine, have my mp3 database on another, and e-mail on another. Yes i do like to here my mail application make a faint beep so I know i have new mail. So i used a 5 channel mixer, obviously for your purposes an 8 channel would be a better solution. One of these can be easily found at a pawn shop for less than 100$. But to be elegent one day I plan to convert my KVM to having 1/8" heaphone jacks for each machine and wire them altogether to one master. That would include only drilling holes in the back and srewing in the jacks. the soldering to connect them all is very light duty soldering. This system would of course not switch the sound from machine to machine but pass it thru from all machines. But it is on the super cheap and relativly easy. Provided you have room in your KVM.