Slashdot Mirror
New debian-mentors Public .deb Repository Available
JohnKFisher writes "For anyone who has ever put together a .deb package, but didn't want to bother with the hassle of setting up their own repository, or trying to get your package added to the official one, the Public Package Repository is up and running. I wonder if this means someone can finally add a version of KDE not dating from late in the Carter administration."
If you use unstable KDE 3.1.1 is there by default. If you use stable, kde.org has a debian server up for 3.1.1 that you can use.
Photos.
This is a nice way of hosting packages when someone doesn't have the space to put up their own apt-repository. If it's searchable, that's a bonus.
It remains to be seen exactly what kinds of packages will end up here. At least it still requires a DD sponsor, so hopefully poorly-packaged/broken packages will not end up here...
Taral
WARN_(accel)("msg null; should hang here to be win compatible\n");
-- WINE source code
A few days ago, David Wright posted a message to the Debian-user list, questioning the wisdom of Debian's decision to target 11 architectures. He pointed out (with supporting references) that this decision has contributed to a long delay in releasing Woody; of course, other people have said this before.
The main result was that a small number of Debian insiders posted abusive comments in response to David's perfectly reasonable message. (The thread, in case you missed it, has the subject "This post is not off-topic".)
With hindsight, it's clear that trying to support too many architectures was a mistake.
Of course, everybody makes mistakes. It is truly said that he who never made a mistake, never made anything.
But what separates the doers from the wannabes is the ability to admit a mistake, change direction, and move on.
If the people in effective control of Debian's direction no longer have this ability, then perhaps Debian is no longer useful to most of us.
To save the Debian Attack Team the effort of a search, I'll admit immediately that (like most Debian users) I've contributed nothing to Debian except good intentions and trivial amounts of money. Debian does not need me. And I need a stable release with the 2.4 kernel.
debian users are deluded. i should i know. i am/was one. (i run gentoo on my main boxes; with debian still on my public server)
debian's great leap over redhat that is the largest cause for criticism is a good packaging system with proper dependancies and *the ability to resolve dependancies automatically*. gentoo fixes debian's problems by not being license nazis and by offering the latest software soon after release optimized for your system.
Redhat lacks a central package repository and the ability to work out what things depend on what so that you can actually install something without manually hunting for more rpms or just saying screw it and installing everything.
that said, why does such a packaging system matter for most people? it doesn't. redhat can be managed site wide by simply deploying security/bugfix rpms and nothing else new beyond what your site has defined as the base install. when it comes time to upgrade a full distro/machine upgrade is done to a much later redhat release. for the other lusers out there that happily reinstall their system with each redhat release it also doesn't matter.
That's great news. Now it seems that I don't have to move to Gentoo to get some very recent packages.
FYI: This is also a good please to find your deb-packages.
This is RiverTonic's sig.
What we really need is a decent tested 'backports of new things to Woody' archive, for people who need a new feature, but also need mission critical stability.
i run unstable and i don't really understand why anybody would want anymore bleeding-edge than that (unless they're going through "frequent-reboot" withdrawls after leaving windows...). i suppose you could add a bunch of cvs lines to sources.list and roll the dice, but gnome2.2, gcc 3.3, and galeon 1.3.4 are plenty up to date for me.
well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
for those without a sense of humour, or knowledge of the last ten years, Al Gore once claimed to have invented the Internet. Which is why the comment was funny. Christ...
For those who might propogate the urban legend presented in the parent post, I suggest reading this first.
Actually, if you're not just rolling out cookie cutter desktops fro everyone, solid package management (in particular dependancy resolution) is very important. Web server? base+apache+perl (depending on need, add mysql or postgres), no worries, it WILL just work. periodicly, do apt-get update; apt-get upgrade (to be fair, RedHat is catching up there with up2date, but Debian's had that for many years). New version comes out? apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade, it will just work.
While home users won't find that so compelling, they will like it when they download a packaged binary from elsewhere and just wants to get it installed.
At the same time, for the packages themselves, I actually find RPM easier to maintain (as a developer). Thus, what I'm really waiting for is a mature apt4rpm