I realised that commercial astrology was just a money making machine when Jonathon Cainer was interviewed by Jools Holland at the new year hotteny-wotsit, and said something like "it will be interesting to see how much influence the newly discovered sedna has on our lives". What, you mean, now you know it's there? Surely it would always have had an affect?
I agree. The policies towards trivia are a little harsh; if I'm bothering to go to wikipedia to look something up, then it's probably the trivial I want to know. Take the Simpsons or South Park; being British, I often don't get the "in" jokes, and I want to know why they're funny....
I've always thought that wikipedia should record everything possible about a subject, and if that causes long articles, so be it. Splitting articles into numerous pages is even more annoying. Still using a modem, if I download a page, disconnect, read it, then find that the info I want is actually in a sub-article really irritates me....
But that's not the issue here - there is nothing wrong with criticising others in public, but if you actually read the article (it's a lot to ask, i know), there's a lot more at stake than make factual claims about an individuals shortcomings.
Not under English Law at the very least: one should not defame an individual in a manner which causes them loss in their trade or profession, or causes a reasonable person to think worse of them.
That really is the most god awful website i've seen in years, and putting aside the fact that the presentation is horrendous, I'm concerned that this is what passes for my fellow law students.....
It was withheld last in 1708 by Anne. The 1999 action was not withholding assent, she refused to allow it to be heard. And as a ten minute bill, it was not a significant piece of legislation, more the personal plans of a single MP.
I addressed this in my other post in this thread, but the House of Commons can pass law without the House of Lords (see the recent hunting act), and Royal Assent is pretty much a given. While I agree that it still has to be passed by the House of Commons, it is possible to bypass it altogether. In times of "national emergency", the Civil Contingencies Act allows Parliament to use the Privy Council to enact legislation.
We don't need the House of Lords. The House of Commons can pass a bill for a second time to become law, even if the HoL rejects it. Also, Royal Assent has not been withheld since the 1700's.
of course, those of us with children and bottle sterlisers know that placing water and objects in a microwave leads to the steam cleaning them... "well duh" was my reaction when i saw this "news" item yesterday....
Actually, that was the one part of the film that continually bothered me. The Agent Smith character is so strong in my mind, I kept expecting him to say "Good Morning Mr Baggins" or something.
erm... you could always carry the credit card sized portion in your wallet, couldn't you?? I got pulled over once for having "intermittent brakelights", and they were quite happy only seeing one half of my license. They were quite happy with it when my wife got pulled over on New Years Eve for "driving overly cautiously" too.
Network Admin here. To the vast majority of the 1200 people I deal with, the servers are the network. I do the lot, LAN, WAN, Servers, clients, software. I suppose technically I should be a 'Systems' admin.....
Slashdot Mirror
best tell the japanese....
yes. thought it was me.
ALERT! Difference of opinion expressed! For god sake, what's with mods these days?
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=vnc6rm&s=5
me neither...
I realised that commercial astrology was just a money making machine when Jonathon Cainer was interviewed by Jools Holland at the new year hotteny-wotsit, and said something like "it will be interesting to see how much influence the newly discovered sedna has on our lives". What, you mean, now you know it's there? Surely it would always have had an affect?
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/US-ruling-makes-server-RAM-a-document-/0,130061733,339278641,00.htm
I agree. The policies towards trivia are a little harsh; if I'm bothering to go to wikipedia to look something up, then it's probably the trivial I want to know. Take the Simpsons or South Park; being British, I often don't get the "in" jokes, and I want to know why they're funny.... I've always thought that wikipedia should record everything possible about a subject, and if that causes long articles, so be it. Splitting articles into numerous pages is even more annoying. Still using a modem, if I download a page, disconnect, read it, then find that the info I want is actually in a sub-article really irritates me....
It's GoLive code, I believe.
The last lot of Lenovo desktops we brought were made in Hungary. Get one of them instead...
But that's not the issue here - there is nothing wrong with criticising others in public, but if you actually read the article (it's a lot to ask, i know), there's a lot more at stake than make factual claims about an individuals shortcomings.
Not under English Law at the very least: one should not defame an individual in a manner which causes them loss in their trade or profession, or causes a reasonable person to think worse of them.
Actually, it's libel in this context.
That really is the most god awful website i've seen in years, and putting aside the fact that the presentation is horrendous, I'm concerned that this is what passes for my fellow law students.....
Wow, common sense for once! You must be new here :D
None. Wiretap evidence is inadmissable in court.
It was withheld last in 1708 by Anne. The 1999 action was not withholding assent, she refused to allow it to be heard. And as a ten minute bill, it was not a significant piece of legislation, more the personal plans of a single MP.
I addressed this in my other post in this thread, but the House of Commons can pass law without the House of Lords (see the recent hunting act), and Royal Assent is pretty much a given. While I agree that it still has to be passed by the House of Commons, it is possible to bypass it altogether. In times of "national emergency", the Civil Contingencies Act allows Parliament to use the Privy Council to enact legislation.
We don't need the House of Lords. The House of Commons can pass a bill for a second time to become law, even if the HoL rejects it. Also, Royal Assent has not been withheld since the 1700's.
of course, those of us with children and bottle sterlisers know that placing water and objects in a microwave leads to the steam cleaning them... "well duh" was my reaction when i saw this "news" item yesterday....
Actually, that was the one part of the film that continually bothered me. The Agent Smith character is so strong in my mind, I kept expecting him to say "Good Morning Mr Baggins" or something.
erm... you could always carry the credit card sized portion in your wallet, couldn't you?? I got pulled over once for having "intermittent brakelights", and they were quite happy only seeing one half of my license. They were quite happy with it when my wife got pulled over on New Years Eve for "driving overly cautiously" too.
This is the only book on Assembly you need, and it covers linux at the back.
Denied!
Network Admin here. To the vast majority of the 1200 people I deal with, the servers are the network. I do the lot, LAN, WAN, Servers, clients, software. I suppose technically I should be a 'Systems' admin.....