Slashdot Mirror


Caldera vs. Microsoft Court Documents To Be Shredded

Geste writes "As now being reported in this brief story and on my local (Seattle) NPR affiliate, 3 million court documents from Caldera's unfair competition suit against Microsoft are to be shredded in Utah. The timing relative to Microsoft's recent licensing of SCO Unix IP is undoubtedly a complete coincidence. "

9 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Who's doing the shredding? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If $1500 per month is killing SCO, they're in worse shape than I thought.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  2. Re:Why... by Purple+Library+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Paper documents can be altered too. They call them "forgeries", like the one about Iraq buying uranium from Africa. Arguably, the legal system hasn't caught up to centuruies-old technology . . .

  3. SCO lifting code from Linux? by bstadil · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Only marginally on topic but earlier today there was a Wifi story referencing Kernel Traffic. As I read it I saw the comment below:

    If someone have a copy of the SCO source code maybe make a Torrent file, so we can start analysing if they indeed stole something. A few nuggets will go a long way to quash the FUD from SCO. Anyone know where old SCO bug reports can be gooten?

    Quote:

    6. Possible License Violations Within The Kernel Source

    Elsewhere, Christoph Hellwig replied to the original post as well, saying:

    As somone who walked for SCO (or rather Caldera how it was called at that time) I can tell you this is utter crap. There were very people actually doing Linux kernel work then (and when the German office was closed down all those left the company) and we really had better things to do then trying to retrofit UnixWare code into the linux kenrel. Especially given that the kernel internals are so different that you'd need a big glue layer to actually make it work and you can guess how that would be ripped apart in a usual lkml review :)

    It might be more interesting to look for stolen Linux code in Unixware, I'd suggest with the support for a very well known Linux fileystem in the Linux compat addon product for UnixWare..

    Jim Nance said, "Wouldnt it be halirous if whatever code SCO is talking about when they say there is Unix code in Linux turns out to be code some SCO employee ripped out of some GPL program and stuck it into Unixware. That is actually far more likely than what they alledge."

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  4. Re:Where's the Dupe? --- Right here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Tis here, my friend I bet if you search hard enough, you WILL find a duplicate of every taco post.... Its the new urban ledgend everyone keeps talking about..

  5. OSI's rebuttal to SCO's claim by defile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...says that there may be some useful information in the sealed documents in the court battle between Caledera/SCO and Microsoft.

    It's interesting that this airs today.

  6. Re:Toilet paper... by sdamberger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like wiping your ass with silk...

  7. Before you get out of sorts... by rdean400 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The documents have been imaged for permanent storage, so the destruction of the paper records is not a big thing.

  8. Andrew is a shill. by twitter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Qouth the nonsense you linked too:

    I've often had to publicly defend Microsoft against what I felt were acts of scapegoating from whining competitors (including Novell, Borland, Lotus, and Wordperfect), complaints which remind me of the way some Americans like to blame Japan for what are ultimately our own domestic problems.

    Funny how the US Government later decided that M$ did indeed engage is such practices. Andy and DDJ should be ashamed of that article.

    Let's see how the US government saw things. The jucky bits about DRDOS have been dug up by others. Have a look at M$ email for yourself. It was orchestrated from the start to crush an admitedly superior technology, included abouse of Microsoft's own custormers and malicious PR. Anyone who says differently has been proven a fool.

    The destruction of court records is evil because it burries evidence of wrongdoing by a convicted monopolist that has yet to be punished and is proceeding as if nothing at all had happened. These letters may be published elsewhere, but they need to be preserved in context if an objective history is to be written. There's no telling what goodies the Caldera folks dug up before they became M$'s next shill. Evidence of Microsoft's concerted effort to eliminate free software is going to be lost.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  9. So are they in it together? by johannesg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    People here thought it was a bit farfetched when I theorized that Microsoft could be behind SCO's lawsuit against IBM. What do you think now, guys? Are they in bed together? So far we have:

    - SCO attacks Linux.

    - Microsoft supports SCO by paying them a lot of money for their patents, at the same time validating SCO's lawsuit.

    - SCO destroys evidence that Microsoft is a monopolist.