Slashdot Mirror


Resume Spamming Creates Storage, Legal Snags

selan writes "Did you know that federal law requires companies to store a copy of every single resume they receive? This applies to emailed resumes too, regardless of whether the applicant got the company's name wrong or is applying for a job that doesn't exist at the company. Employers not in compliance risk being fined and could lose government contracts. The resulting storage problems are creating massive headaches at companies who are overwhelmed with bulk-emailed resumes. The Baltimore Sun has the story."

4 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Found this out last week by Rorgg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When HR came to me about someone mass-sending his own resume over and over again, they wanted to know if they could avoid receiving it again. I wonder if setting up a rule on the box to automatically delete the message on arrival would have been sufficient, or if it needs to be blocked before it gets there?

  2. Does Uncle Sam play too? by Pilo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if the government has to keep all the resumes that are sent to them from people wanting municipal jobs and the like

  3. My company refuses to take unsolicited resumes... by jot445 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All mail is pre-screened. No applications or resumes are accepted without a corresponding and valid job number. Personnel accepts no unsolicted phone calls Postings always close within two weeks. It's really tough to get a job with the company because of these Federal regulations. Compliance is not an option.

    --
    The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
  4. What about resume _viruses_ by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A number of viruses disguise themselves as resumes. Does this law also force companies to keep those? Do companies still have the right to disinfect these mails?