Slashdot Mirror


Sperm Sorting Chip

Makarand writes "Microscopically narrow fluid streams running side by side barely mix - a phenomenon put to use in a new stamp size silicon chip for purifying sperm. This technique could find use in infertility clinics where centrifugal technqiues, which can damage fragile sperm, are currently used to purify sperm. Semen and salt water are dripped into etched lanes less than half a millimeter wide from opposite ends of the chip. When the lanes merge, the healthy and wriggly sperm swim into the salt water stream and leave the dead and the disabled sperm behind."

55 comments

  1. I am an avid Slashdot reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now I know that sperm is good for something. Before that it bothered me, since so far I have found no practical application to it.

  2. Special request by Kelerain · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would like to request at this point, for the good of the community, that no one post any jokes on this thread.

    1. Re:Special request by infornogr · · Score: 1

      Such irony that your post will undoubtedly be moderated as funny.

    2. Re:Special request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Won't someone think of the children?

    3. Re:Special request by figleaf · · Score: 1

      OK. Lets do some Microsoft bashing then.

    4. Re:Special request by Kizzle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok, two sperm chips walk into a bar...

    5. Re:Special request by Dachannien · · Score: 1, Funny

      Okay, then I won't mention sperm racing....

    6. Re:Special request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they weren't drinking blowjobs. Judging from the crowd on this website, it's more likely that they were drinking fuzzy navals or hairy assholes.

  3. Obligatory Monty Python lyrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Every sperm is sacred Every sperm is great And if a sperm gets
    wasted God gets quite irate'"

  4. sperm sorting? by joFFeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    better a sperm dipping chip.

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  5. Chip? by elliotj · · Score: 0

    When used in this context, isn't it really a cracker?

  6. Is it a cracker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When used in this context, isn't it really a cracker?"

    From
    hostingworks:

    "An individual who attempts to gain unauthorised
    access to a computer system. These individuals are often
    malicious and have many means at their disposal for breaking
    into a system. The term was coined ca. 1985 by hackers in
    defence against journalistic misuse of "hacker". "

    1. Re:Is it a cracker? by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      only the sperm of rapists can be considered thus.

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    2. Re:Is it a cracker? by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is probable that the above poster was making a tangential reference to the old homoerotic game of Soggy Cracker or Soggy Biscuit, wherein a group of males (usu. used in initiation rites and the like) will masturbate in a circle upon a cracker and the last one to "finish" is made to eat said cracker. Aren't you glad that now you know!?

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  7. Liquid Cooling by themo0c0w · · Score: 0

    So I guess this chip has its own liquid cooling system.

    --
    ph34r teh p0w3r 0f th3 c0w
    1. Re:Liquid Cooling by leviramsey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two words:

      THERMAL. PASTE.

  8. Okay well.. by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to troll here, but let's think about this.

    It really doesn't matter what value you place on human life, nor if you are a believer in "God's Grand Design" or a steadfast evolutionist or anything in between... Nature is nature.

    If you can't have children because you are naturally unable to, then maybe you're not supposed to have kids at all.

    There are lots of babies born that aren't wanted by their parents. If you want a kid and are unable to have one "the natural way", why not consider adoption?
    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Okay well.. by justinburt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or if you are dying from cancer because you inherited a genetic defect predisposing you to it - don't try to save yourself. If you're "naturally" unable to destroy the tumor, maybe you're not supposed to live at all!

      I don't mean to troll either. We should consider the issues, and your point about adoption is well-taken.

      But your comment is a disturbing muddle. You say that "nature is nature" - what do you mean by this? You seem to imply, particularly with your use of "supposed to," that there is some entity "nature" prescribing rules for human beings to follow. And you further imply that it is our obligation to follow these "rules" (whatever those may be and whoever determines them).

      But this is a strange type of nihilism/fatalism. If we didn't do what we were "naturally unable" to do, we would still be living in caves. There isn't anything "natural" about cars or corrective lenses, or supermarkets or even a reliable supply of food. Do you advocate abandoning these?

      Further, the "natural way" of having children involves risk of death to the mother, almost guaranteed malnourishment for both mother and child, and the probability that the child will not live past the age of 5 (as figures from many third-world countries, and pre-Industrial Europe will attest). Should we all return to this state because it is how we're "naturally supposed to" live?

      Justin

    2. Re:Okay well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe those parentless babies are supposed to be orphans and die at a young age.

      Isn't that nature's will, like you said?

    3. Re:Okay well.. by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1, Funny

      U R A NATURALISTIC FALLACY SUX0R UR BRANE IS 0WN3D BY DAVID HUME

    4. Re:Okay well.. by Quill_28 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because you will adopt a kid and then the father who could card less gets talked into filing for custody(by his mother), when the child is 2 years old. You lose the court case and the child is taken away from you.

      There are big problems with adoption policies in the us. Why do you so many people look overseas to adopt?

    5. Re:Okay well.. by qqtortqq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are naturally unable to fly, does that mean one should never take an airplane anywhere?

      Adoption is a good thing, I was adopted myself, but thats a personal decision, adoption isn't for everyone. My dad had an accident, and his brain swelled, crushing a part of his brain responsible for regulating hormones, therefore rendering him unable to father children- does that mean he shouldn't have kids? You say that if nature doesn't want you to have kids, you should adopt a kid? Makes no sense...

    6. Re:Okay well.. by Copid · · Score: 3, Funny
      U R A NATURALISTIC FALLACY SUX0R UR BRANE IS 0WN3D BY DAVID HUME

      I'm sorry, but it's too bad about the moderation on this one. Something about a reference to being "0WN3D" by an 18th century philosopher is just classic. My kingdom for some mod points.

      "PH33R MY L337 PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY!"

      --John Stuart Mill

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    7. Re:Okay well.. by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It really doesn't matter what value you place on human life, nor if you are a believer in "God's Grand Design" or a steadfast evolutionist or anything in between... Nature is nature.
      If you can't have children because you are naturally unable to, then maybe you're not supposed to have kids at all.


      There you go, the fatal flaw in this reasonning is when you used the word "supposed". As if there was an intention behind someone's low sperm count, as if a concious choice was made at some point by an intellectual entity with power over your sperm count.

      This is not how natural selection works. Natural selection works thusly: If you have descendents, you suceeded. And the word "natural" doesn't mean "if you have children that you would also have had had you been stranded without any technology on a remote desert island".

      Using a device to filter out your lil' swimmers is no different, in the grand scheme of things, from using a spear to kill an antilope. Its using your naturally selected brain to come up with a plan to make sure you live another day and have kids that'll do the same, day after day.

      Remeber, its not how you reproduce, its if you reproduce.

      If you want a kid and are unable to have one "the natural way", why not consider adoption?


      Selfishness. They don't want "a" kid, they want "their" kid. They want a version 2.0 of themselves.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:Okay well.. by capnjack41 · · Score: 1
      There isn't anything "natural" about cars or corrective lenses, or supermarkets or even a reliable supply of food.

      I've thought about this myself, about the corrective lenses part. In the year 2560, when machines take over the Earth, and we don't have access to contact lenses and glasses, then what? All the people that were "supposed" to be "filtered out" have passed on their bad-vision genetic code, and everyone in the world has bad eyesight. Now everyone's bumping into each other, unable to find food, etc. By this point people also probably lost all their hunting instincts.

      Technology, which for now is compensating for our bodily imperfections, is a crutch that might not always be there. And the time it won't be there...

    9. Re:Okay well.. by quantaman · · Score: 1

      You seem to have missed the point. I share the same view as the original poster and it has nothing to do with letting yourself die of cancer. Rather you do have a severe genetic predisposition towards cancer. Should you have children knowing that they will most likely die a horrible death from cancer?

      I know a man who has diabetes and he has said that he will not have anymore children because he feels that it's irresponsible to pass on this defect to his children. That being said he got diabetes from not taking care of himself but that was his decision nevertheless. The fact is that if medicine continues along its current path where more and more people sucessfully reproduce when they could not of in the past and we continue our current practices we quickly find that the quality of the human race starts to decline at a startling rate. This means not only various disorders such as cancer, diabetes, or even bad eyesight become more frequent but that people won't be as intelligent and healthy in general. We have two options, one is genetic engineering which certainly isn't a possibility yet, and the other is some sort of natural selection which could mean that if you can't reproduce naturally maybe there is a good reason. Of course there are situations where it's a problem not really related to genetics or you could count on genetic engineering to become available in the future and fix up all those bad genes. This isn't an opinion I'm trying to present here, it's a fact, if we ignore evolution now it may just catch with us later with a vengance.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    10. Re:Okay well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

      I haven't seen a funner post on slashdot. Ever.

    11. Re:Okay well.. by JJahn · · Score: 1

      In that case when technolgy goes away I guess I'm fucked. Oh well, better start stocking up on spare contacts or glasses now.

  9. yea but... by schnits0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    does it run on linux?

  10. try thinking a little more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    think a little longer there, buddy.

    phrases like supposed to give me the willies.

  11. Centrifugal techniques by Pall+Agamemnides · · Score: 5, Funny

    This technique could find use in infertility clinics where centrifugal technqiues, which can damage fragile sperm...

    If centrifugal techniques can damage sperm cells, just imagine what a centrifuge will do to the rest of the guy undergoing the treatment! You'll never get me into one of those deathtraps!

  12. Sperm Sort? by one9nine · · Score: 4, Funny

    How does it perform against Mergesort or Quicksort?

    1. Re:Sperm Sort? by Izanagi · · Score: 1

      ROFL++

      --
      SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
    2. Re:Sperm Sort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably finishes way too quickly.

      Ba-dum-bum.

    3. Re:Sperm Sort? by keli · · Score: 1

      Obviously it is either Bubble Sort or Select And Insert Sort.

  13. Wondering... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would it be fair to say that this is "seminal research"?

    --
    Ron Paul 2012
    1. Re:Wondering... by CTalkobt · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of the Dr Demonto's song:


      Upstream, Going against the gulf stream


      Aagh, Can't remember the rest but now my image for the song is ruined by pictures of little tiny magnified sperm swimming up the gulf stream.


      Gah! I wish it would stop.... Must watch something mindless to get it out of my head.

      --
      There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
    2. Re:Wondering... by Doctor+Hu · · Score: 1
      ... 2 foes already ...
      Make it 3, for a pun as old as that one....
  14. Do puns count? by infonography · · Score: 1
    If there is a joke article posted on today's slashdot, then this is it.

    If not puns do Sperm count?

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  15. So if this sorts sperm by infonography · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would it not be better to use a maze that they would have to traverse. Might be able to breed a better human if the sperm had to find it's way to the egg. Maybe with little ghosts that flash colors when you find a powerup.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  16. Science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Shouldn't this be on apple.slashdot.org ?

    ;)

  17. From the FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Superefficient sperm chip processing
    The sperm chip processor has been designed for unparalleled efficiency and performance. It can accomplish more tasks than Pentium processors in the same amount of time because of its short pipeline and the vector processing strengths of the Sperm Engine.

    Short sperm pipeline
    All processors complete their tasks in a series of steps or stages, referred to as the processor pipeline. These steps include fetching, decoding and storing sperm and executing instructions. And here's where the sperm chip processor demonstrates its overriding advantage over Pentium 4 a.k.a. "John Holmes" systems: The sperm chip was designed with a short "geeky-dick" pipeline, while the Pentium 4 processor has to cycle instructions through 20 inches. Because of its shorter geeky pipeline, the superefficient sperm chip accomplishes a task in 19,9 fewer inches than the Pentium 4.

    Bubble economy
    Additionally, this short processor pipeline enables the sperm chip to adapt quickly to changing conditions. Using a process called speculative operation, all advanced processors try to increase performance by anticipating what you'll require them to do next. A processor doesn't always guess correctly, of course and when it's wrong, it has to clear the pipeline and start over. These periods of time when no sperm is available for processing are called bubbles. Because the sperm chip pipeline is so short -- about one third the pipeline length of the Pentium 4 -- the chip recovers from bubbles and resumes processing sperm very quickly.

    High Sperm
    The sperm chip further improves its operating efficiency with a 128-bit vector processing unit aptly named the Sperm Engine. The Sperm Engine uses SIMS (single instruction multiple sperm) technology, which allows the application of a single instruction to multiple chunks of sperm at the same time to accelerate sperm processing. Geeks that use sperm processing -- and there are hundreds of them -- typically transform large sets of sperm as they watch nude pictures or play a porn video.

    Attention clock-watchers
    Thanks to the advantages of its short pipeline and Sperm Engine, the sperm chip can go head to head with a Pentium 4 that has a nominally faster clock speed and often accomplish ejaculation in the same amount of time. In fact, on some tasks of special interest to geeks, the sperm chip is significantly faster.

    The cache advance
    An efficient masturbation alone can't guarantee results with real-world woman. To achieve optimum goal - to get laid - the system architecture needs to provide fast access to the excuses -- and that's exactly how the sperm chip's unique cache memory architecture gives the sperm chip processor a significant advantage - even if the host is drunk.

  18. Sperm Lane-Merging by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    When the lanes merge, the healthy and wriggly sperm swim into the salt water stream and leave the dead and the disabled sperm behind.

    Yabbut what happens if you get one hat-wearing sperm that gets onto the ramp early and blocks all the others, left-turn signal blinking all the while?

    I wonder if the scientists have noticed Homer sperm behavior under the microscope.

  19. Implants by rasteri · · Score: 1

    What would be cool is if this could be implanted inside the infertile man... then there would be no need for invertility clinics, just a relatively simple operation (unless it could be injected, in which case not even that would be needed).

    I also wonder if the chip could be reversed... i.e, stops "able" sperm in it's tracks. This could be an interesting contraception method (and could be inserted in either a man or a woman, presumably)

  20. Sperm Sorters: The Lineup by Jonny+290 · · Score: 2, Funny

    AMD:

    Sorts sperm fast and cheap. Has tendency to overheat and make little sperm omelets.

    Intel:

    Overpriced for the performance, but every American trusts Intel to sort their sperm. Only sorts one at a time, but does it really frequently; i believe the term is "HyperJizzing"

    Amiga:

    Sorts them slowly, the most incompatible, but goddamn if it doesn't do it with style.

    Atari:

    Ancient sperm-sorting technology. People use this when they want to relive the 80's while they sort their sperm.

    Apple:

    Only sorts gay sperm.

    --
    Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  21. Bah by grub · · Score: 1


    My ex-wife could have sorted them..

    "ptooey.. that one's bitter.. hack.. that one's defective.. Mmmmmmmm... salty..."

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She swallows and you let her go?! Man...

  22. You know you've spent too much time on /., when by Doctor+Hu · · Score: 1
    you misread that headline as "SPAM-sorting chip".

    Memo to self: get outside more often.

  23. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf cluster of.....

    Oh fuck, look what you've gone and made me say.

  24. Oh yeah, but did they indicate first? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    When the lanes merge, the healthy and wriggly sperm swim into the salt water stream and leave the dead and the disabled sperm behind.

    Does road rage occur at the cellular level?

  25. If you're into the group thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine a beowulf cluster of these . . .

  26. I need a larger font... by RealErmine · · Score: 1

    I seriously thought it said "Sperm sorting chimp".

    Is there anything they can't train those monkeys to do?

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
  27. Sperm Filtering Fist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is definately an improvement over the time tested method of sperm filtration used by many young (and old) male scientist:

    The Sperm Filtering Fist.