Slashdot Mirror


Sperm Sorting Chip

Makarand writes "Microscopically narrow fluid streams running side by side barely mix - a phenomenon put to use in a new stamp size silicon chip for purifying sperm. This technique could find use in infertility clinics where centrifugal technqiues, which can damage fragile sperm, are currently used to purify sperm. Semen and salt water are dripped into etched lanes less than half a millimeter wide from opposite ends of the chip. When the lanes merge, the healthy and wriggly sperm swim into the salt water stream and leave the dead and the disabled sperm behind."

18 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. Special request by Kelerain · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would like to request at this point, for the good of the community, that no one post any jokes on this thread.

    1. Re:Special request by Kizzle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok, two sperm chips walk into a bar...

  2. sperm sorting? by joFFeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    better a sperm dipping chip.

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  3. Okay well.. by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to troll here, but let's think about this.

    It really doesn't matter what value you place on human life, nor if you are a believer in "God's Grand Design" or a steadfast evolutionist or anything in between... Nature is nature.

    If you can't have children because you are naturally unable to, then maybe you're not supposed to have kids at all.

    There are lots of babies born that aren't wanted by their parents. If you want a kid and are unable to have one "the natural way", why not consider adoption?
    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Okay well.. by justinburt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or if you are dying from cancer because you inherited a genetic defect predisposing you to it - don't try to save yourself. If you're "naturally" unable to destroy the tumor, maybe you're not supposed to live at all!

      I don't mean to troll either. We should consider the issues, and your point about adoption is well-taken.

      But your comment is a disturbing muddle. You say that "nature is nature" - what do you mean by this? You seem to imply, particularly with your use of "supposed to," that there is some entity "nature" prescribing rules for human beings to follow. And you further imply that it is our obligation to follow these "rules" (whatever those may be and whoever determines them).

      But this is a strange type of nihilism/fatalism. If we didn't do what we were "naturally unable" to do, we would still be living in caves. There isn't anything "natural" about cars or corrective lenses, or supermarkets or even a reliable supply of food. Do you advocate abandoning these?

      Further, the "natural way" of having children involves risk of death to the mother, almost guaranteed malnourishment for both mother and child, and the probability that the child will not live past the age of 5 (as figures from many third-world countries, and pre-Industrial Europe will attest). Should we all return to this state because it is how we're "naturally supposed to" live?

      Justin

    2. Re:Okay well.. by Quill_28 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because you will adopt a kid and then the father who could card less gets talked into filing for custody(by his mother), when the child is 2 years old. You lose the court case and the child is taken away from you.

      There are big problems with adoption policies in the us. Why do you so many people look overseas to adopt?

    3. Re:Okay well.. by qqtortqq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are naturally unable to fly, does that mean one should never take an airplane anywhere?

      Adoption is a good thing, I was adopted myself, but thats a personal decision, adoption isn't for everyone. My dad had an accident, and his brain swelled, crushing a part of his brain responsible for regulating hormones, therefore rendering him unable to father children- does that mean he shouldn't have kids? You say that if nature doesn't want you to have kids, you should adopt a kid? Makes no sense...

    4. Re:Okay well.. by Copid · · Score: 3, Funny
      U R A NATURALISTIC FALLACY SUX0R UR BRANE IS 0WN3D BY DAVID HUME

      I'm sorry, but it's too bad about the moderation on this one. Something about a reference to being "0WN3D" by an 18th century philosopher is just classic. My kingdom for some mod points.

      "PH33R MY L337 PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY!"

      --John Stuart Mill

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    5. Re:Okay well.. by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It really doesn't matter what value you place on human life, nor if you are a believer in "God's Grand Design" or a steadfast evolutionist or anything in between... Nature is nature.
      If you can't have children because you are naturally unable to, then maybe you're not supposed to have kids at all.


      There you go, the fatal flaw in this reasonning is when you used the word "supposed". As if there was an intention behind someone's low sperm count, as if a concious choice was made at some point by an intellectual entity with power over your sperm count.

      This is not how natural selection works. Natural selection works thusly: If you have descendents, you suceeded. And the word "natural" doesn't mean "if you have children that you would also have had had you been stranded without any technology on a remote desert island".

      Using a device to filter out your lil' swimmers is no different, in the grand scheme of things, from using a spear to kill an antilope. Its using your naturally selected brain to come up with a plan to make sure you live another day and have kids that'll do the same, day after day.

      Remeber, its not how you reproduce, its if you reproduce.

      If you want a kid and are unable to have one "the natural way", why not consider adoption?


      Selfishness. They don't want "a" kid, they want "their" kid. They want a version 2.0 of themselves.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  4. yea but... by schnits0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    does it run on linux?

  5. Centrifugal techniques by Pall+Agamemnides · · Score: 5, Funny

    This technique could find use in infertility clinics where centrifugal technqiues, which can damage fragile sperm...

    If centrifugal techniques can damage sperm cells, just imagine what a centrifuge will do to the rest of the guy undergoing the treatment! You'll never get me into one of those deathtraps!

  6. Sperm Sort? by one9nine · · Score: 4, Funny

    How does it perform against Mergesort or Quicksort?

    1. Re:Sperm Sort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably finishes way too quickly.

      Ba-dum-bum.

  7. Wondering... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would it be fair to say that this is "seminal research"?

    --
    Ron Paul 2012
  8. Re:Liquid Cooling by leviramsey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two words:

    THERMAL. PASTE.

  9. So if this sorts sperm by infonography · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would it not be better to use a maze that they would have to traverse. Might be able to breed a better human if the sperm had to find it's way to the egg. Maybe with little ghosts that flash colors when you find a powerup.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  10. Re:Is it a cracker? by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is probable that the above poster was making a tangential reference to the old homoerotic game of Soggy Cracker or Soggy Biscuit, wherein a group of males (usu. used in initiation rites and the like) will masturbate in a circle upon a cracker and the last one to "finish" is made to eat said cracker. Aren't you glad that now you know!?

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  11. Sperm Sorters: The Lineup by Jonny+290 · · Score: 2, Funny

    AMD:

    Sorts sperm fast and cheap. Has tendency to overheat and make little sperm omelets.

    Intel:

    Overpriced for the performance, but every American trusts Intel to sort their sperm. Only sorts one at a time, but does it really frequently; i believe the term is "HyperJizzing"

    Amiga:

    Sorts them slowly, the most incompatible, but goddamn if it doesn't do it with style.

    Atari:

    Ancient sperm-sorting technology. People use this when they want to relive the 80's while they sort their sperm.

    Apple:

    Only sorts gay sperm.

    --
    Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...