Slashdot Mirror


Just In Case 3G Isn't Speedy Enough

Roland Piquepaille writes "Will we soon be able to download music or videos on our cell phones? Yes, with the arrival of the next 3.5G technology, as reports Jennifer L. Schenker in this International Herald Tribune article. "NTT DoCoMo Inc., the Japanese company that introduced the first third-generation digital mobile phone service in the world, is preparing to pioneer wireless services that are at least 40 times as fast." DoCoMo will use "a technology called HSDPA, for high-speed downlink packet access, also known as 3.5G, [which] is expected to deliver data at as much as 14.4 megabits a second." This new technology will not arrive in Europe before 2006 at least. Check this column for a summary."

34 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. 14.4 by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yea, so my 14.4 modem isn't useless after all! What's that you say .. megabits? What's that?

  2. All this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I still can't make a cell call from home....

    1. Re:All this... by geggibus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Home sweet home.. i don't need a cell phone... i never leave this room.. 12 fans for all the fresh air i need.. Enough keyboards to make a comfortable bed and some old pizza boxes for growing "vegetables" in .. the healthy slashdot lifestyle...

  3. eh? by RobertTaylor · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Will we soon be able to download music or videos on our cell phones?"

    Us Brits (ok I am welsh really!) have been able to do this already. Three a mobile company here in the UK has been selling handsets and access for a while that provides music/maps/video downloads and calls.

    "In Europe, we are now using GPRS, or general packet radio service, also known as 2.5G. And we are limited to 30 kilobits a second."

    Note this bloke is from france which is in europe, but a backwater in most things! ;)

    Note that the testbed for the DoComo handsets is in Cambridge...UK.

    All together now... God save our gracious queen....

    1. Re:eh? by BenjyD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Three a mobile company here in the UK has been selling handsets and access for a while that provides music/maps/video downloads and calls.

      And nobody is buying them. The salespeople standing outside the Three shops in London look more desperate everytime I walk past. The introductory special offers have been extended in an attempt to boost flagging sales.

      Mobile phones and SMS meet a basic need for communication, 3G and video phones don't really add anything to this. Look at the desperate advertising campaigns from Three etc trying to convince us that it's cool to be able to see someone while talking. Nobody is advertising 3G as 'useful' or talking about features - it's all image.

    2. Re:eh? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note this bloke is from france which is in europe, but a backwater in most things! ;)

      That's right! We in the UK have an increadible insight into France and the rest of Europe, due to the unbiased, honest reporting of our wonderful press. Those Europeans are trying to take away 1,000 years of British sovereignty, because, erm, they're jealous of us. Or something. No, I've got it! They're backwards and so need to reign the UK in with silly straight banana rules to be able to compete with us. After all, the UK has the largest economy in Europe, because we don't have silly European laws. Probably.

      God bless the Queen. And Bush.

  4. 2006 eh? by RajivSLK · · Score: 5, Funny

    This new technology will not arrive in Europe before 2006 at least.

    Japan now and in europe in 2006 -- early extrapolations of this trend indicate that this technology will splash into the north american market as early as 2032.

    Lets keep our fingers crossed.

    1. Re:2006 eh? by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Funny

      And a few years later (around 2040 when the rest of the world long forgot this whole thingy) an American company will start the PR machine for something called SUPER-DUPER-CDMA-MADE-IN-USA which will give comparable results (slightly better than a defacto standard from years ago), is incompatible with anything ever made.....
      Then ten years after that George Bush the third will invade some third world countries because they still don't use SUPER-DUPER-CDMA-MADE-IN-USA... eh... no,no make that making weapons of mass destruction and being a saveheaven for some 12-year old cyber-TERORIST who defaced the whitehouse website.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  5. In Europe? No way.. by fille · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "All European operators are eventually expected to move to 3G networks to ensure that there is enough capacity to handle voice and increased data traffic."

    I don't think it will be introduced in Europe in the near future. Even WAP is a total disaster here. When will these people learn that we don't need 14.4 Mbits on our cellphone? We just want to make a call and send SMS. Japanese people may like the newest gadgets but in Europe, people do not get excited by this technology..

    1. Re:In Europe? No way.. by fleabag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to think the way you do - but now I think 3G will be different. A lot of these 3G contracts have no monthly charge, and no contract - you pay for the data. The device costs about £200.

      So what?

      1) I agree that photo/video messaging is pointless, and people won't buy it.

      2) How much is a 2Mbit "always on" PCMCIA card worth in your laptop? Granted, the costs at the moment per Gb are pretty ugly - but they won't be for long.

      3) How about any device where security and resilience are not paramount, and data throughput is not too high? Think embedded sensors, because the 3G chipsets will be given away before long. Vehicle tracking for example?

      4) What about the areas of the world that cannot get broadband? (pretty much anywhere that is > 3 miles from a phone exchange). Satellite broadband is an option in the UK - 3 G is already as cheap as this for light use.

      If you think outside the "mobile phone" model, the possibilities are limitless once there is sufficient volume to get the price down.

    2. Re:In Europe? No way.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2
      A lot of these 3G contracts have no monthly charge, and no contract - you pay for the data.

      Which is exactly why I wouldn't buy such a system. In the bad old days of dial-up connections to the Internet, this was more or less the case (okay, so you payed for time online not data, but in principle it's the same). The main freedom I enjoy from broadband is not the high data rate (although that's nice) but rather freedom from the feeling that it is costing me money all the time I'm using it. I can't enjoy using the Internet, or use it productively if I'm thinking about the cost rather than what I'm reading.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Where are the applications? by nnnneedles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be nice to have an mp3 player that you could travel with and continuosly download music to without having to dock it to a stationary PC.

    other than that and multiplayer gaming, what cell phone applications possibly need this bandwidth?

    They are having a hard time coming up with useful applications for current cell phones with gprs as it is.

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:Where are the applications? by chiasmus1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The students I teach here in Japan have cell phones that can do all sorts of things. Many of my students have been downloading music for a while. Almost all cell phones come with a built-in camera. They do email, web browsing and more.
      In Japan it is common to have a box attached to your door bell so that you can answer a phone inside the house and talk to the person. The cell phones have also been hooked up to the doors so that if someone rings your doorbell and you are on a trip in Tyoko you can answer and tell them to go away or something like that. It is good for tricking robbers into thinking you are home.
      Bandwidth is not something you need to build up when you need it. You want to have it there so that you do not need it. It is always better to be safe than sorry, right?

  7. i hate to be a buzzkill by gTsiros · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but we'd prefer broadband in our home for less than a kidney/month and have it *now* instead of 14Mb in our cellphones in 3 years.

    How come greece sucks so much that we're the only goddamn country in europe that still hasn't got dialup.

    i pay fucking E100/month for sucky dialup.

    you really think this 3g shit is going to make us happy?

    get lost.

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do you know why Greece does not have broadband? Because Greece does not have a cable TV network. The only network capable of high-speed internet belongs to the phone company that, after decades of despotic state rule finds itself in a free economy. IIRC the proposed ADSL prices go something like 150EUR for a 256/64 connection. While ok for most people (I guess you wouldn't mind paying that much, for example), it is WAY overpriced for everyone else. And I won't even start speaking of Greek connectivity, it is hilarious. When I was visiting Greece last year I was told that the main connection to the Internet was a 10Mbit line!

      Just for comparison purposes, here in Portugal I have a choice between cable Internet for about 50eur (768/128) or ADSL (various speeds, up to 1024/256). The 1024/256 option costs about 200eur, including modem and fixed ip. And you are connected to the European backbone (my isp is Via.networks, they OWN their own backbone).

      Anyway, and to the point, wireless broadband is the only way that Greece will get true broadband...

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by isorox · · Score: 2

      Where do you live?

  8. 3G is a gimmiky flop by jocks · · Score: 5, Informative

    We have had 3G introduced here in the UK and so far it is awful. The handsets are expensive, the service is expensive, the battery life is very poor, the phones don't play mp3/ogg, the reception is extremely bad and you cannot get "The Internet" on the system either (they don't like you talking about that).

    Call it what you like and make it as fast as you like but no-one is biting. It is an expensive technology conceived and financed at the height of the .COM boom which will never make its money back.

    Our biggest telecoms company wrote off the £9-billion license cost last week to try and stimulate the market. Guess what...no change.

    The first commercial vendor of 3G (a company called "3") has already resorted to pron to try to raise interest.

    Save your money, buy more memory or a bigger screen, or send your money to Ethiopia, but don't waste your cash on this junk it will only disappoint.

    1. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by RobertTaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The point the article makes is that the technology is yet to be with us - which is wrong.

      Its just the government crippled the mobile sector by making huge windfall taxes on the 3G licences. The billions must be made back somewhere, and currently even normal GSM services are expericaning a price hike.

      Technology is here, pricing is wrong. Bloody men in suits stopping things. Again.

    2. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by jocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree with you. I think the technology is poorly conceived. Don't get me wrong, it is brilliantly done and very, very clever but it still does not "work". There is no way that I would make a call to my missus in a public place, shouting at a handset held two feet from my face. There is no way I would take out my expensive phone and make a video call in the pouring rain. There is no way I would make a video call whilst walking because I would end up bumping into people, standing on dog turds or falling down stairs. I cannot use the phone in bright light because of the ill-conceived TFT screen.

      Basically I can only fully use the phone inside, in privacy. I'm sorry, I have a life.

  9. Wi-Fi? by apetime · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm not that familiar with the new technology that DoCoMo is testing, but the impression I've gotten from the press lately is that most wireless companies are working Wi-Fi coupled with Voice over IP into their current and future plans.

    I've even seen some documents out of DoCoMo themselves that suggest they're thinking of moving toward a system that allows smooth roaming between high-bandwidth (1 Gbps) hotspots and a wide-area cellular system for a future 4G network.

    Can anyone familiar with this standard enlighten me as to how Wi-Fi and related technologies figure in it?

  10. Too bad DoCoMo is so expensive... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This sounds really freakin' sweet! Granted I don't need this for my phone, it would be great for my mobile internet connection. Currently, I am using DDI Pocket's Air H" system (warning that is a Japanese page) and This little number from Fujitsu plugged into my iBook to get 128kbps access from anywhere in the Yokohama/Tokyo/Chiba area. It is nice, and the speed is decent enough considering I can use it anywhere.

    But, 14.4Mbps?!?!?! AWESOME! That is faster than my AirPort card! Unfortunately, if DoCoMo follows the same pricing methods as it did for FOMA (their 3G service), then this is something I will never be able to afford. They don't have a flat rate unlimited connection plan, but rather charge based on the amount of data you download (I pay DDI Pocket 10,000 yen per month for unlimited access and I probably abuse it...expensive but worth it for the mobility IMO).

    PLEASE, DoCoMo, give us a decently priced flat rate unlimited connection plan. I would seriously consider paying around 15,000 yen per month for something like that at this speed.

    BTW, I am currently a DoCoMo customer for my phone service. It isn't too expensive and my only complaints are the 500 character mail limit and the slow connection for iMode (my phone is 2 years old and only connects at 9600bps). But the coverage is AWESOME...and good thing for me since I will be spending a few months travelling around Japan by bicycle and I don't want to be caught without a signal in an emergency situation (speaking of which, any /.ers in Japan want to give a poor American traveler a place to crash for a night? email me).

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  11. Please, place your bets... by asciimonster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, when is this going to be introduced in Europe? Let's make it a bet. I bet 100 slashdollars (the virtual currency used here at slashdot) that it will not be introduced before 2015.

    The reason I'm saying this is that most introduction dates for new communication technologies are far too optimistic.

    For instance, UMTS was supposed to be introduced by now. Haven't seen it yet. That miscalculation nearly bankrupted KPN Telecom (the Dutch telephone co.). Every home a (A)DSL connection? It's coming but not quite. Every youth an i-Mode? Nope.

    Problem is: introducing a new communication protocol usually requires a new infrastructure and that requires a lot of money. And when it is all about investing people (and especially europeans) like too wait for the competitor to make that investment.

    Hence my skeptisism.

  12. I'll be impressed ... by TheGrayArea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When we can get less dropped calls and actually get decent cell phone coverage away from the interstates. Check out the cell maps of the major carriers, they all hug the lines created by interstates. You go to a rural area like I'm from and the coverage is crap. IMHO the feature set of cell phones is starting to creep into the "that's cool, but I don't think I'll ever need it" category. The camera phones have got to the be worst.

    --

    This space for rent.
  13. Absolutely nothing new here ... by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the investor relations PDF here (in Japanese!), HSPDA was released in March 2002 as part of the FOMA initiative.

    It also says the maximum data transfer rate is 14Mbps. Which is not the same as throughput.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  14. So where did it all go then? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sure, these handsets are 14.4 odleplexes of bandwidths per second, on paper.

    I have had a chance to play with a next gen DocoMo handset, and the video - while strictly geek appeal only and something I would deliberatly turn off for every day use so I don't have to shave - was watchable only until you started moving, then it just breaks up. The faster you go the worse the picture - by the time you get up to car+ speeds you are restricted to voice only calls.

    They also seem to have a massive latency, far worse than my 14.4k/sec CSD dial up mobile connection, and that's only 1p/min. 3.5G might be good for the odd small file or even some streaming formats, but for SSH it blows.

    It would be interesting to find out what compression they use for it - probably something that is as light on the CPU as possible, but that really shows in the transmission quality.

    The telecomms industry could do with starting from the ground up (rather than building off the technologically suspect CDMA or GSM systems) with a new, open standard 100% packet based network with IP6 support - then and maybe then the internet (and related services) on a mobile level could become a killer app. Until then they would be best off sticking to voice calls and massivly overcharging for SMS.

    --
    Beep beep.
  15. Prices by baaa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uau, just think of this: my current operator charges 0,02 per 1024 bytes with GPRS connections. (Portugal, Optimus)
    That's right, you read it correctly, it's 0,02 per 1024 bytes!

    At these prices 14.4Mbps is almost 2000 /sec.

    --
    Jesus Christ, I hate those christians!!
    1. Re:Prices by toriver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At these prices 14.4Mbps is almost 2000 /sec.

      UMTS (3G) and later aren't volume-priced as GPRS is, but are "always-on" that you pay blood per month (probably 200 or so) to use, plus charges from service operators.

      Still, I have no idea who will buy UMTS or 3.5G devices, though - I spend 90% of my time in the vicinity of an internet-connected computer, I am not interested in paying a fortune just to be able to use a small set of services when I'm not.

  16. Bulletproof argumentation there by corgi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nicely argumented view. I especially like your references to numerous studies on the subject. And thanks for making it clear to me that I don't want mobile wideband-applications.
    Phew, I think I'd better go crawling back to the local landline monopoly and beg them to re-install a landline connection.

  17. When capitolism works.. by Loco3KGT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You get this. Companies advancing technology to offer better services to stay ahaead of their competition.

    It's a damn shame not a lot of this happens in the U.S. anymore. :-(

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  18. We have this already by Bruha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Verizon Wireless is testing EVDO (Evolution Data Only) in the beltline area of Washington State.

    While it does not promise 14 megabit speeds (What you gonna run slashdot off it?) it will do 600Kbit while moving and 2.4 megabit stationary.

    I think also there's an expansion out in San Diego also.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=EVDO&sourceid=moz il la-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf- 8

    Edumacate yourself :)

    1. Re:We have this already by necrogram · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The word from the Big V is they are also testing in the Baltimore area. Since Big V is in the process of getting a migration from CDPD to Rx1TT going, i dont see EVDO become wide spread untill 2008 or so.

  19. At 14.4 Mb/s... by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 5, Funny
    The battery life for these things will be about three minutes.

    Assuming that by the time the networks get built we can use fuel-cell batteries, then the problem will be heat build-up. Can you imagine a phone with a fan? Heat pumps are little help, because they can only move heat from inside to the case, and you can't have the phone getting too hot to hold. "Are you happy to see me, or is that a 4G phone in your pocket?" I suppose ice fisherman could use them to keep their hands warm.

    Before these things could become practical we would need asynchronous-logic chips or spin-coupled logic, both over a decade off.

    The days of defrauding investors are far from over.

  20. I just love the Greek phone company. by arcanumas · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Please don't be a liar ;). We DO have dialup. It's just that when your line is on PCM (if you don't know what it is , consider yourself lucky) and you complain about not being able to connect to the Internet, you are told that:
    "all you 'rich' assholes want Internet. You are LUCKY to have a phone! Now get out!"
    Nice? And then the chief technician (of a 200.000 people area in Athens) comes and tries to be a 'techie' , only to make you understand that his knowledge of modems is stuck to the ones seen in 'Wargames' (seriously).
    But we have ISDN you might say... well.. when the 2 technicians came to my house to do the installation, i was told that the 'idiot' electrical engineer had made it impossible for the line to work. I told them to leave the Network Terminal device and get out, then i installed it myself. (And i am not a techie).

    But they are not just ignorant idiots, they are also cheating bastards. When the phone company (OTE) started selling special low rate numbers for Internet connectivity (EPAK) they only sold to their subsidiary (OTENET) and not to other ISPs. All they paid was a 150000 Euro's fine (small money to what they gained. Customers of OTENET paid less money on they phone accounts than other ISP's).

    The stories i can tell you about the phone company in Greece would make most slashdoters cry in agony with the prospect of ever coming to the banana country.. err.. Greece.

    But! to be fair, the Mobile phone infrastructure is actually quite good!. 3G is coming, and GPRS (2,5G) has been here for years.

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
  21. Is this really the way forward? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Japan might have a market for it, but I have difficulty believing anywhere else does.

    Simple question:
    If I can't use my cell phone in the basement, on the elevator, wherever... how can I continue to put more and more important data on its network?

    The phone companies will never have an incentive to serve my basement (at work)... so what I really need is some kind of inexpensive repeater... 802.11x or whatever.

    Since the idea of active repeaters (as opposed to remote antennas in a high-rise to improve reception) is so contrary to the way the telephone industry works, how are we ever going to get "cooperating networks," where the data flows on the best possible path?